BennyGod Posted July 30 Share Posted July 30 What GTA location is most accurate compared to its real life version? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
XNOR Posted August 11 Share Posted August 11 I'd say GTA IV's Liberty City followed by 3D-era San Andreas state. gta111 and Jakub1904 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BennyGod Posted August 13 Author Share Posted August 13 On 8/11/2024 at 12:32 PM, XNOR said: I'd say GTA IV's Liberty City followed by 3D-era San Andreas state. Really? I'd say GTA V's San Andreas state is way more accurate to the IRL location. Pashaforever 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pashaforever Posted August 13 Share Posted August 13 1. GTA VI Vice City 2. GTA IV Liberty City 3. GTA V Los Santos Agent Edward 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bethmurphy Posted August 16 Share Posted August 16 The most faithful GTA location to its real-life counterpart is Los Santos, inspired by Los Angeles. Its detailed depiction of LA’s landmarks, neighborhoods, and urban layout captures the essence of the real city remarkably well. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
universetwisters Posted August 18 Share Posted August 18 (edited) On 8/16/2024 at 9:00 AM, bethmurphy said: The most faithful GTA location to its real-life counterpart is Los Santos, inspired by Los Angeles. Its detailed depiction of LA’s landmarks, neighborhoods, and urban layout captures the essence of the real city remarkably well. I have to contest this. South Central is only a couple of blocks large. Despite being based on the movie capital of the world, there’s only one film studio. For being the city known for its freeway system and subsequent suburban sprawl, there’s only one real suburb (mirror park).  Also this post reeks of AI lol   OT - Star Junction in IV relative to Times Square, at least at the time before they made that one street pedestrian only Edited August 18 by universetwisters BrynnaDaRosa, Airwolf359, gta111 and 1 other 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
almightyvasi Posted August 19 Share Posted August 19 GTA V's Los Santos no doubt, though places such as Venice Beach & Pier and similar landmarks around LS are depicted almost to perfection, some parts of the city feel.. idk unfinished or something. I mean my real life neighborhood is literally bigger than the entire Davis (Compton) area, and it goes the same to the downtown part as well and some more areas not worth mentioning Beer Flood, NightmanCometh96, JE77 and 1 other 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beer Flood Posted August 22 Share Posted August 22 I'll have to agree with IV's Liberty City. They did a great job at scaling down NYC and Jersey City while still representing many of the landmarks and the atmosphere of the cities. Though I wish they did more to make Alderney feel like a separate state  I also have to give a callout to 2D Liberty City too, due to it being shaped more accurately to NYC than HD Liberty City and especially 3D Liberty City Spoiler  HD San Andreas nails the atmosphere of LA and it's surrounding area, but drops the ball on almost everything else propanecocaine71 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Journey Posted September 15 Share Posted September 15 (edited) On 8/18/2024 at 9:55 AM, universetwisters said: I have to contest this. South Central is only a couple of blocks large. Despite being based on the movie capital of the world, there’s only one film studio. For being the city known for its freeway system and subsequent suburban sprawl, there’s only one real suburb (mirror park).  Also this post reeks of AI lol   OT - Star Junction in IV relative to Times Square, at least at the time before they made that one street pedestrian only GTA IV is kind of the same with Broker, Dukes and Bohan. If you look at a size comparison of the V and IV maps, each of them are the same size as South Los Santos (excluding the airport for Dukes).  in GTA IV, Algonquin is like 3x the size of Broker. In real life it’s the other way around. I think it’s just for the map to be more interesting vs copy/pasting the same identical looking residential blocks.  But yea South LS would’ve been better if it was like double the size + Long Beach but I’m more pressed over how dirty they did the countryside in V. Edited September 15 by The Journey JE77 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mp412rex Posted September 15 Share Posted September 15 GTA 4 bc it didn't have pesky mountains that hogged up space (looking at u V) Â Â If V had less mountains and more city it would've been perfect. Im not asking for LA noire kinds of city building but should've been bigger propanecocaine71, universetwisters, Role-Play Walkthrough and 1 other 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
universetwisters Posted September 15 Share Posted September 15 5 hours ago, The Journey said: GTA IV is kind of the same with Broker, Dukes and Bohan. If you look at a size comparison of the V and IV maps, each of them are the same size as South Los Santos (excluding the airport for Dukes).  in GTA IV, Algonquin is like 3x the size of Broker. In real life it’s the other way around. I think it’s just for the map to be more interesting vs copy/pasting the same identical looking residential blocks. This is true, but at least with Broker/Dukes/Bohan, you can pretend that there’s more to whatever borough further afield that just aren’t depicted within the game. However, in V’s case, it’s harder to suspend your disbelief like that because there’s no bodies of water or barriers to pretend that there’s more outside, you just drive like three blocks in one direction and you’re already through the ghetto.   Ogivaldelta and JE77 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cant remember Posted September 15 Share Posted September 15 What about which location they tried to have a reallife location and completely missed the mark ? IMO the "average" nondescript areas of Broker/Dukes, barely really feel like you're dropped in random street in Brooklyn, the aesthetic/road texture is completely off the roads are much too wide, washed out and windy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Journey Posted September 16 Share Posted September 16 (edited) 14 hours ago, cant remember said: What about which location they tried to have a reallife location and completely missed the mark ? IMO the "average" nondescript areas of Broker/Dukes, barely really feel like you're dropped in random street in Brooklyn, the aesthetic/road texture is completely off the roads are much too wide, washed out and windy. No Italian neighborhood in Broker either, I get that they wanted to focus the mafia story in Alderney but no Italian district in GTA’s Brooklyn is just not it. Edited September 16 by The Journey Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DragonpokeZ Posted September 16 Share Posted September 16 I haven't been to NY to check how faithful the 3D/HD Universe renditions of Liberty City are, but HD Los Santos is very similar to the actual city of LA. Of course there's lots of neighborhoods missing but R* is now going to map out every little house and tree, even if they didn't have technical limitations that prevented them from doing so Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Role-Play Walkthrough Posted September 16 Share Posted September 16 On 9/14/2024 at 11:23 PM, mp412rex said: GTA 4 bc it didn't have pesky mountains that hogged up space (looking at u V) Â Â If V had less mountains and more city it would've been perfect. Im not asking for LA noire kinds of city building but should've been bigger Yeah I would have so much rather had a smaller map that was just urban city LS, if it would have meant keeping the advanced AI behavior and physics and everything from IV mp412rex and propanecocaine71 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BennyGod Posted September 17 Author Share Posted September 17 On 9/15/2024 at 3:23 AM, universetwisters said: This is true, but at least with Broker/Dukes/Bohan, you can pretend that there’s more to whatever borough further afield that just aren’t depicted within the game. However, in V’s case, it’s harder to suspend your disbelief like that because there’s no bodies of water or barriers to pretend that there’s more outside, you just drive like three blocks in one direction and you’re already through the ghetto.   To be fair, real life ghettos can be right next to decent parts of cities. Often, the division is very sudden and apparent. The size though is unimpressive. universetwisters, JE77 and propanecocaine71 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
universetwisters Posted September 17 Share Posted September 17 (edited) 1 hour ago, BennyGod said: To be fair, real life ghettos can be right next to decent parts of cities. Often, the division is very sudden and apparent. The size though is unimpressive. Yeah I don’t doubt that since I live in cities like that. One neighborhood north of the main road is very nice and middle class while the neighborhood south of the main road is just a ghetto slum.  My issue isn’t you drive three blocks in any direction and you’re out of the ghetto, my issue is you drive three blocks ACROSS the ghetto, front to end. Yeah some smaller cities have ghettos like that which is fair, but this isn’t a smaller city being depicted, it’s south central LA. I’m not at a computer right now but I’m willing to bet money that Rockford hills is significantly larger than the ghetto, which sucks especially because like 1/5 of the game takes place in the ghetto (or is centric to that part) while we don’t do much in Rockford hills other than get a mansion there  E. I’m stupid I don’t mean Rockford hills, I mean whatever the neighborhood Franklin moves into is called Edited September 17 by universetwisters JE77 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bruhology_978 Posted September 17 Share Posted September 17 As someone who actually does live in Los Angeles (Los Santos irl) I personally would say that Los Santos is pretty faithful to the real life L.A. Â But there are some stuff that kinda make me question what Rockstar where thinking like cutting off half of the South Central area from the game. Like yeah we do have Compton in the game, Watts, and Crenshaw but it's literally just pieces of it all mixed up in the game. I know that the game came out on the PS3 and the XBOX 360 way back then (I was 8 at the time) but like they could've at least have more of the city then the country side cause in my personal opinion. The entire desert area is kinda boring and doesn't serve that much purpose. Â Like there could've been more potential for the city to be a lot bigger than it already is, like even Midnight Club L.A. has some good amount of the city that didn't make it in GTA 5. There's a lot more I could get into like the freeways or the Metro System and all that but that's mostly what I got to say plus it would've been cool taking Trevor to a much bigger version of South LS in the game and cause havoc lmao JE77 and universetwisters 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.Ryan. Posted September 22 Share Posted September 22 HD Liberty City and Los Santos are kind of obvious picks since they’re way closer to the real life cities they’re based on than anything from the 3D era.  In saying that I have to give GTA 1’s Liberty City a special mention. It might not seem like it because it’s top down and it’s hard to distinguish well anything, but when you look at the map itself it’s quite accurate to how NYC looks.  Albeit it’s no where near to scale obviously, but for 1997 I can’t think of anything else like it. propanecocaine71, JE77, NightmanCometh96 and 1 other 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HOW'S ANNIE? Posted September 24 Share Posted September 24 HD Liberty City is probably the most faithful, taking into consideration the period in which it's set. 2008 New York is a radically different place to what 2024 New York is. I think Rockstar struck at the last possible moment to paint LC/NY as the grimly hell hole it once was. It is all too clean and sterile now. .Ryan. and LowTierDude 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
universetwisters Posted September 26 Share Posted September 26 On 9/24/2024 at 8:11 AM, HOW'S ANNIE? said: I think Rockstar struck at the last possible moment to paint LC/NY as the grimly hell hole it once was. It is all too clean and sterile now. You say this like the Bronx and Brooklyn aren’t parts of NYC Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BennyGod Posted October 1 Author Share Posted October 1 On 9/26/2024 at 12:46 PM, universetwisters said: You say this like the Bronx and Brooklyn aren’t parts of NYC Brooklyn is really divided between being nice and being terrible. The Bronx is worse overall, and so is Queens. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LowTierDude Posted October 2 Share Posted October 2 On 9/24/2024 at 8:11 PM, HOW'S ANNIE? said: HD Liberty City is probably the most faithful, taking into consideration the period in which it's set. 2008 New York is a radically different place to what 2024 New York is. I think Rockstar struck at the last possible moment to paint LC/NY as the grimly hell hole it once was. It is all too clean and sterile now. Yeah you could def tell this when youre playing spiderman, it's interesting to see the contrast between the 2 new yorks NightmanCometh96 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jazzbone Posted Tuesday at 06:17 AM Share Posted Tuesday at 06:17 AM The Venice beach area in GTAV. From photos and movies R☆ did well with recreating the beach, pier, boardwalk, shops and nearby neighborhood.  Times square in GTAIV, especially with a line of yellow taxi cabs, only lacks needing more npc's walking about. Hailing a cab and telling the driver to hurry is cool. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
notactive Posted Wednesday at 09:19 AM Share Posted Wednesday at 09:19 AM I mean …  The map may not be topographically accurate … but parts of Los Santos are literally inseparable from the real-life Los Angeles, at least at first glance. It’s by far the most realistic. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now