GTA 6 Speculation & Discussion [Part 8] - The Rabbit Hole

[malik ndiaye]

Le 30/01/2023 à 00:22, Tez2 a déclaré :

Je ne sais pas si mentionné précédemment, mais la vérification de l'étiquette de chaque vidéo divulguée révèle le CPU/GPU et le nom de l'exe en cours d'exécution.

 

La vidéo "Americas_1 2022-09-13 16-32-43" était en cours d'exécution sur "Intel(R) Core(TM) i9-10980XE CPU @ 3.00GHz", "NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER" et "game_win64_bankrelease.exe".

 

Alors que "Americas_1 2022-09-12 16-42-30" fonctionnait sur "AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX 32-Cores", "NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER" et "game_win64_bankrelease.exe".

 

Il y a des vidéos en cours d'exécution sur "game_win64_beta.exe" et une vidéo en cours d'exécution sur "game_win64_debug.exe".

 

D'après ce que j'ai compris, la "version bancaire" est une construction de débogage avec des fonctionnalités visant à atteindre la "fonctionnalité complète". C'est ou pourrait être la principale construction de débogage. Alors que la version "bêta" est en quelque sorte la même, mais avec des fonctionnalités supplémentaires visant à atteindre le "contenu complet".

Merci pour les infos 

[Edward RDRIII]

51 minutes ago, Crateman said:

GTA 7 Will be in Liberty City, You are a taxi driver with a million dollar license debt and You start working for the mafia to repay your debt 

 

About GTA 6 they Will tell in the upcoming community update that the next entry of the series is in full develpoment and they Will share more info soon 

To be honest Iam more interested at the moment if they mention anything regarding E&E for PC 

I also want them to put Expanded and Enhanced for PC out of the way, so announce and release this f*cker and then bury GTA 5 and its infinite versions already.

 

33 minutes ago, guslax3 said:

You're skipping Liberty. Remember that IV was originally supposed to include the whole state of NY and not just the city. 

I already knew about this, but what this has to do with my question anyway?

 

32 minutes ago, VercettiGuy said:

 

Good question actually. I think they'd probably create a new state for it. Or they'll just dump the state thing. 

I've never actually thought about LV returning. Although I'd love it, I don't think it could get it's own standalone game. The map would just be lots of sand and that doesn't sound very interesting and I think they know that. To be honest I can't imagine them going back to LS/SF/LV in the next game. I think the next game will be something new, for the first time since 2004.

 

Speaking of Las Venturas:

Although very unlikely, what if instead of Las Vegas we get an Atlantic City clone? And have the next game be Liberty/Atlantic/Carcer? I'd love that so much. I'd also love LC in VI and think it would fit, but that ship has probably sailed.

I think it's easier for Liberty City to return on GTA 6 than Los Santos, it just happens to be muuuch closer.

Edited January 31 by Edward RDRIII

[OOI]

Boy, someone really wants to bank on that "portgellhorn.com" domain.

 

https://who.is/whois/portgellhorn.com

 

Quote

Expires On
2023-09-18

 

Registered On
2022-09-18

 

Updated On
2022-09-18

 

[Lukas2580]

3 minutes ago, OOI said:

Boy, someone really wants to bank on that "portgellhorn.com" domain.

 

https://who.is/whois/portgellhorn.com

 

 

ok, It's not me this time 

[Spider-Vice]

That was registered the day of the leaks by someone random, someone really wants an email from T2 eventually (if they care to grab it once the game is officially revealed)  

[Tez2]

It's gonna play like that land dispute scene from Better Call Saul. Rockstar sending their best lawyers after the "portgellhorn.com" domain owner.

 

Actually since he's one of us. Take-Two won't be needing to spend a single penny. Giving him early access is all it takes to win him over

Edited January 31 by Tez2

[VercettiGuy]

23 minutes ago, Edward RDRIII said:

I think it's easier for Liberty City to return on GTA 6 than Los Santos, it just happens to be muuuch closer.

 

To be fair ... does anybody really want Los Santos to return?

But I'm one of the most vocal "Enough-Of-V" people on here, so ... what do I know?

[AztecaEh]

1 minute ago, VercettiGuy said:

 

To be fair ... does anybody really want Los Santos to return?

But I'm one of the most vocal "Enough-Of-V" people on here, so ... what do I know?

I think LS had enough time in the spotlight, It would be nice to see the map in VI as a "proof of concept", maybe for the rumored map expansion plans, but nothing more than that. 

[Tez2]

Nevermind. Take-Two doesn't have to approach whoever owns that domain. The UDRP allows Take-Two to simply snatch that domain from whoever own it.

 

Spoiler

Quote

Under the UDRP, you (the Complainant) will be required to prove all of the following:
(i) The domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which you have rights.
(ii) The Registrant has no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the domain name.
(iii) The domain name has been registered and is being used in bad faith.

The following are examples of registration and use in bad faith – the facts on which UDRP decisions often turn:
(i) Circumstances indicating that the Registrant has registered or has acquired the domain name primarily for the purpose of selling, renting, or otherwise transferring the domain name registration to the Complainant who is the owner of the trademark or service mark or to a competitor of that Complainant, for valuable consideration in excess of documented out-of-pocket costs directly related to the domain name.
(ii) The Registrant has registered the domain name to prevent the owner of the trademark or service mark from reflecting the mark in a corresponding domain name, provided that the Registrant has engaged in a pattern of such conduct.
(iii) The Registrant has registered the domain name primarily for the purpose of disrupting the business of a competitor.
(iv) By using the domain name, the Registrant has intentionally attempted to attract, for commercial gain, Internet users to his web site or other on-line location, by creating a likelihood of confusion with the Complainant’s mark as to the source, sponsorship, affiliation, or endorsement of the web site or location or of a product or service on the web site or location.

 

 

Imagine the guy waiting for an email from Take-Two to discuss his terms

[happygrowls]

guys i did a video interview for rockstar and they asked me what i knew about teapot and tez, i also got a free cookie for leaking tez's location

[Spider-Vice]

There's many examples of domain name disputes out there, you can search for some even on sites like this IIRC:

https://www.wipo.int/amc/en/domains/index.html

[GRANDHEIST]

"The early access" would be just R* sending those leaked dev videos to the domain owner with a middle finger

 

 

But really R* has no use for that domain

 

there is no sandyshores.com etc.

[ionutx02]

27 minutes ago, Tez2 said:

It's gonna play like that land dispute scene from Better Call Saul. Rockstar sending their best lawyers after the "portgellhorn.com" domain owner.

 

Actually since he's one of us. Take-Two won't be needing to spend a single penny. Giving him early access is all it takes to win him over

Here you go! A month early copy of GTA VI. Please don't leak or you will be a cell mate with Teapot!

[michalxm]

33 minutes ago, Tez2 said:

It's gonna play like that land dispute scene from Better Call Saul. Rockstar sending their best lawyers after the "portgellhorn.com" domain owner.

 

Actually since he's one of us. Take-Two won't be needing to spend a single penny. Giving him early access is all it takes to win him over

Early access but you have to sign the NDA from hell and play in an undisclosed location with a gun to your head

[CyroTheAlien]

17 hours ago, MrBreak16 said:

Can't wait to randomly execute people with a gun in the street to watch them ragdoll to the ground and bleed out and laugh at their suffering like the psycopath that I am 

I can't wait to grab a golf club and start "playing a game of golf" on a civilian's head

[MaddenedGhost]

3 hours ago, Edward RDRIII said:

Alright, there's something I want to ask you people, would you be fine with Las Venturas still being part of San Andreas on the next GTA after GTA 6 or you want Rockstar to make a brand new state for it? I ask this because I suspect that Rockstar won't add Los Santos to GTA 6 like many of you are suspecting and instead they'll remake it, alongside San Fierro and Las Venturas, for GTA 7.

I am expecting LC for GTAVII.

 

That's what I am expecting, what I would want is Las Venturas.

 

Edited January 31 by MaddenedGhost

[Retro_Causality]

Is tomorrow the month? Believe?

[SoldierBoy]

32 minutes ago, Retro_Causality said:

Is tomorrow the month? Believe?

[PolandMountain]

8 minutes ago, SoldierBoy said:

Proceeds to kill blind granny

[jacqueks]

5 minutes ago, PolandMountain said:

Proceeds to kill blind granny

YOU need to HAVE some FAITH

[neoslice]

54 minutes ago, Retro_Causality said:

Is tomorrow the month? Believe?

 

Quote

Believe?

 

Quote

Belie

 

Quote

lie

 

Oh well it was nice while it lasted

[mussefar03]

bully 2

[AztecaEh]

5 minutes ago, mussefar03 said:

bully 2

agent 

[lelomew]

8 minutes ago, mussefar03 said:

bully 2

 

2 minutes ago, AztecaEh said:

agent 

Manhunt 3 

Edited January 31 by lelomew

[TheFranchise]

I’d laugh my ass off if Rockstar started to change it’s Facebook, instagram, and twitter profile pictures to a neon color to tease GTA VI, only to turn around and announce a brand new table tennis game. 

[Retro_Causality]

35 minutes ago, lelomew said:

 

Manhunt 3 

Beaterator 2

[etechucacuca]

every damn week for the past 4 years

 

[(Vip)Met]

15 hours ago, Spider-Vice said:

Best to not expect anything and be pleasantly surprised if we do get something  

[Zapper]

2 minutes ago, Retro_Causality said:

Beaterator 2

 

Rapponator!

 

 

[44Orca]

16 hours ago, LastTiger said:

Do you guys think either Jason or Lucia will die at the end?

No I don't think they will repeat this. I like having a single main ending but I don't mind other ones. Other characters might die, or perhaps what I prefer, the endings have to do with other consequences, doesn't have to be death. Killing them off sounds "too easy" to me.

I prefer more unique endings. Consequences, Jason or Lucia end up life in prison as one ending ? it's just one example, stuff like that.  IT'S just one ending it's not the main/canon one..

Edited January 31 by 44Orca