sefus Posted September 16, 2021 Share Posted September 16, 2021 I mean as in tone setting, the lack of 69 and Adult humor, amped up violence, and darker story, would you consider it a more "Mature" and "Dark" game kinda like GTA 4? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lock n' Stock Posted September 16, 2021 Share Posted September 16, 2021 Without a doubt. Still some of that trademark Rockstar humour but it's more restrained. I think the one place where the edgy style of humour is present (at least in RDR 1) is during the in-game silent movies. NightmanCometh96, tonko, billiejoearmstrong8 and 2 others 5 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lemoyne outlaw Posted September 17, 2021 Share Posted September 17, 2021 i think for the most part it is. i feel like less kids would play red dead. but since gta has all the fun toys. more kids play it. i do feel like gta 4 is pretty dark. similar to the red dead games. but gta 5 vc sa are more lighthearted silly games. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KGBeast Posted September 17, 2021 Share Posted September 17, 2021 Yes. Both deal with many of the same themes but RDR is more grounded and dramatic whereas GTA is heightened and satirical. Cutter De Blanc, Lock n' Stock, SneakyDeaky and 2 others 5 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Badman_ Posted September 17, 2021 Share Posted September 17, 2021 Yes. RDR wants the player to think deeper on the repercussions of his/her violent actions. The Downes family plot is the best example of this. You won't find anything like it in a GTA title. IV kind of scratched this concept, but not with same effectiveness IMO. Drimes, SneakyDeaky and billiejoearmstrong8 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
billiejoearmstrong8 Posted September 17, 2021 Share Posted September 17, 2021 (edited) In general it is but there really is quite a lot of silly humour in RDR, especially in RDR1. Like, it's not stupid humour but literally half the characters you do main missions for in RDR1 are silly "comedy characters" (Nigel West Dickens, Seth, Irish, Reyes, Harold McDougal, Uncle) along with pretty much every side mission character. RDR2 has a lot of silliness with side missions as well. I guess it was to balance the overall serious tone and emotional storylines/events, but I kind of wish they went with less of that and made it even more serious. I suppose GTA IV has a lot of humour alongside the seriousness as well, but it seems more in keeping with the tone of the game (dark humour and the usual over the top GTA satire). But yeah, RDR's stories go beyond anything in GTA for being emotionally affecting, and the setting and gameplay is more involved and grounded and mature. Edited September 17, 2021 by billiejoearmstrong8 Algonquin Assassin and SneakyDeaky 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SneakyDeaky Posted October 1, 2021 Share Posted October 1, 2021 No, I think almost everyone in the game are immature idiots! sefus 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AzelfandQuilava Posted October 2, 2021 Share Posted October 2, 2021 Red Dead 1's Stranger Missions and NPC interactions outside of the main story are GTA 3D Universe levels of goofy a lot of the time. The story has some quirky elements to it early on but it grows the f*ck up by the halfway point. Red Dead 2 has a much more consistent tone in that sense. Everything is played straight, even the fantasy elements that it introduced regardless of how goofy said elements might've been. Thankfully neither game has "haha look the business name has 69 in the title" levels of humour. For that we should be thankful. Jeansowaty 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
billiejoearmstrong8 Posted October 2, 2021 Share Posted October 2, 2021 2 hours ago, AzelfandQuilava said: Red Dead 1's Stranger Missions and NPC interactions outside of the main story are GTA 3D Universe levels of goofy a lot of the time. The story has some quirky elements to it early on but it grows the f*ck up by the halfway point. Red Dead 2 has a much more consistent tone in that sense. Everything is played straight, even the fantasy elements that it introduced regardless of how goofy said elements might've been. Thankfully neither game has "haha look the business name has 69 in the title" levels of humour. For that we should be thankful. I think RDR2's stranger/side missions can be pretty goofy too. And in RDR1 although they're goofy they do have a theme that makes them more interesting in the end - almost every one of them is about people deluding themselves. They all believe they can achieve their unrealistic dreams but fail. When it comes to the end of the game we see that John wasn't much different (deluding himself that if he did what Ross said he could live happily ever after with his family), and this makes them more meaningful. I agree that RDR2 gets the tone more consistent and plays it straighter, but they're pretty close I think. Algonquin Assassin and Jeansowaty 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
illicitstreet Posted October 8, 2021 Share Posted October 8, 2021 Definitely Even when RDR is humorous, it's just a very different kind of humor compared to GTA humor, it feels like a higher quality humor, GTA sometimes goes for some very easy and unfunny jokes, GTA V does this on most of its cutscenes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WXSTER Posted October 8, 2021 Share Posted October 8, 2021 Yes the endings are alot less "WE DID IT" Im not including gta 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now