Next DLC Speculation Topic Mk XI

[Spider-Vice]

14 minutes ago, Quinn_flower said:

I’m a video game

[VitoCorleone1992]

5 hours ago, Crateman said:

we clearly need more dlcs per year, 3/4 like the good old days or at least 3 a good filler in march/April with decent drip feed, this 6 months gaps are terrible, Iam really curious to see if the infamous GTA V expanded and enhanced Will gives us this, because if they keep doing only 2 dlcs per years the Game Will slowly start to die imo.

 

If R* would noticed that this formula that they are using didn't work, they surely would do more minor dlc's. But i agree with you that we don't have a new Valentines Day update without it being resused stuff since 2016, is very lackluster.
But good luck with the "maybe now with E&E they will start doing 3/4 dlc's per year" they are being like this for the past what, 4, 5 years? And taking into account how "enhanced" the Trilogy got, despite being GTA Online i wouldn't get my hopes that high. I will be happy with 2 dlc's per year if they are good - and yes, i expect a new map expansion like LC to the free mode.

Edited November 27, 2021 by VitoCorleone1992

[arisfelbonilla]

23 minutes ago, VitoCorleone1992 said:

 

Si R * se da cuenta de que esta fórmula que están usando no funciona, seguramente harán más dlc menores. Pero estoy de acuerdo contigo en que no tenemos una nueva actualización del Día de San Valentín sin que se haya vuelto a utilizar desde 2016, es muy mediocre.
Pero buena suerte con el "tal vez ahora con E&E comenzarán a hacer 3/4 dlc por año". Están siendo así durante los últimos cuatro o cinco años. Y teniendo en cuenta lo "mejorada" que se volvió la Trilogía, a pesar de ser GTA Online, no tendría tantas esperanzas. Estaré contento con 2 dlc por año si son buenos, y sí, espero una nueva expansión de mapas como LC al modo gratuito.

is a liberty city complete with npcs and all details possible? for me it is impossible even if it is the one in the next gen ps5 and and series

although I bet you will tell me that some modders did it but that is exclusive to pc and it is not the same mods as the official rockstar games

[VitoCorleone1992]

12 minutes ago, arisfelbonilla said:

is a liberty city complete with npcs and all details possible? for me it is impossible even if it is the one in the next gen ps5 and and series

although I bet you will tell me that some modders did it but that is exclusive to pc and it is not the same mods as the official rockstar games

I mean...i don't understadn nothing about programming, etc. I'm just here in the consumer's side. I ask for something in the game and i hope i can get it.

[éX-Driver]

36 minutes ago, VitoCorleone1992 said:

 

If R* would noticed that this formula that they are using didn't work, they surely would do more minor dlc's. But i agree with you that we don't have a new Valentines Day update without it being resused stuff since 2016, is very lackluster.
But good luck with the "maybe now with E&E they will start doing 3/4 dlc's per year" they are being like this for the past what, 4, 5 years? And taking into account how "enhanced" the Trilogy got, despite being GTA Online i wouldn't get my hopes that high. I will be happy with 2 dlc's per year if they are good - and yes, i expect a new map expansion like LC to the free mode.

Their current model works very well. two big bang updates creates massive hype and skyrockets the playerbase, they’ve reported record sales and player numbers every year for the last three years. 
 

I’d personally prefer they do 4-5 small Beach Bum-style themed updates that just include a handful of vehicles, clothes, and weapons. And then every December launch a big new heist or something similar. This way there’s content spread more evenly throughout the year, whilst allowing them to devote real effort and time to a single big update. 

[VitoCorleone1992]

50 minutes ago, éX-Driver said:

Their current model works very well. two big bang updates creates massive hype and skyrockets the playerbase, they’ve reported record sales and player numbers every year for the last three years. 
 

I’d personally prefer they do 4-5 small Beach Bum-style themed updates that just include a handful of vehicles, clothes, and weapons. And then every December launch a big new heist or something similar. This way there’s content spread more evenly throughout the year, whilst allowing them to devote real effort and time to a single big update. 

Tbh, this summer dlc wasn't "BIG", it was only "medium large". What we in fact got? 6 mini-heists, an auto-shop and a car meet area. Excluding the normal stuff, clothes and vehicles, which the latter was in normal numbers, 16 or 17.

[drizztle]

6 hours ago, awesomefoot said:

 

How about a Christmas mission where Sess messages us that someone brought their car into the shop for repairs. IT'S SANTA'S SLEIGH! We learn he was shot down by Merryweather trying to bring gifts to the good boys and girls in Los Santos. We rebuild the sleigh with help from Lester, Martin, Gerald, Agatha, Paige, etc. calling us with tips on parts locations. At the end Santa takes off and blasts some Merryweather out of the sky with missiles as it's revealed some upgrades may have been made.

 

We then unlock Santa's Sleigh to buy for $10 million which is basically a 2-seater beefed up Oppressor Mk II. Also it drops presents out the back which work like flares.

 

And dun forget to bring these Saints row 4 vehicle to the new dlc

 

 

Making that list and checking it twice, got to have enough guns and knife

Santa Claus bombing tonight~

 

[Big Molio]

I just wish that they would add the karts to the sport class for racing with. 

[Niii]

15 hours ago, arisfelbonilla said:

is a liberty city complete with npcs and all details possible? for me it is impossible even if it is the one in the next gen ps5 and and series

although I bet you will tell me that some modders did it but that is exclusive to pc and it is not the same mods as the official rockstar games

Yes, its possible, the submerged tunnels are not a problem contrary to what people said, we are talking about a map created by Rockstar, on the same engine, they will find solutions, they know their engine. They can even use it for a story; there was an attack and they were destroyed. The rumors of a GTA IV remaster gave me hope, because it would mean that the map would have been reworked and therefore possibly portable to GTA Online. Apparently it's bullsh*t for GTA IV remaster, which is sad, this game deserves to run in 60fps/4k on console. I mentioned the water problem because it is apparently the only "major problem". Traffic and pathfinding are also to be considered in my opinion (vegetation need a rework too). There are helipads, houses, apartment, stores and plenty of garage space for the player. It's really a huge job to adapt this city to GTA Online. It's possible, but it has a cost: time, money and a lot of ambition. It remains to be seen in which direction Rockstar Games wants to go for the end of GTA Online.

Edited November 28, 2021 by Niii

[MekhiSkyline]

1 hour ago, Niii said:

Yes, its possible, the submerged tunnels are not a problem contrary to what people said, we are talking about a map created by Rockstar, on the same engine, they will find solutions, they know their engine. They can even use it for a story; there was an attack and they were destroyed. The rumors of a GTA IV remaster gave me hope, because it would mean that the map would have been reworked and therefore possibly portable to GTA Online. Apparently it's bullsh*t for GTA IV remaster, which is sad, this game deserves to run in 60fps/4k on console. I mentioned the water problem because it is apparently the only "major problem". Traffic and pathfinding are also to be considered in my opinion (vegetation need a rework too). There are helipads, houses, apartment, stores and plenty of garage space for the player. It's really a huge job to adapt this city to GTA Online. It's possible, but it has a cost: time, money and a lot of ambition. It remains to be seen in which direction Rockstar Games wants to go for the end of GTA Online.

Liberty City would be a good map expansion for GTA Online. However if R* makes a GTA IV Remaster, I just hope that R* doesn't f*ck it up.

Edited November 28, 2021 by MekhiSkyline

[fryday]

18 minutes ago, MekhiSkyline said:

Liberty City would be a good map expansion for GTA Online. However if R* makes a GTA IV Remaster, I just hope that R* doesn't f*ck it up.

 

We dream and hope for it, but since we saw the E&E / trilogy output, they will add nothing new or do any changes.

they will bring minimum effort for another 60 bucks game. better textures, beter lighting, same old multiplayer...

[Cyoctane]

If you could only get one of them added in Expanded and Enhanced, would you rather have San Fierro or Las Venturas? Whichever you pick will be seamless built on to either the NE or NW portion of the map with reworked roads, bridges, and land mass to make them feel more naturally part of San Andreas

[Short Dawg]

1 hour ago, Cyoctane said:

If you could only get one of them added in Expanded and Enhanced, would you rather have San Fierro or Las Venturas? Whichever you pick will be seamless built on to either the NE or NW portion of the map with reworked roads, bridges, and land mass to make them feel more naturally part of San Andreas

Las Venturas all the way 

[Thomas The Dank Engine]

Let's all hope for a portable music player this time so we can listen to music on foot. 

[Yannerrins]

1 hour ago, Cyoctane said:

If you could only get one of them added in Expanded and Enhanced, would you rather have San Fierro or Las Venturas? Whichever you pick will be seamless built on to either the NE or NW portion of the map with reworked roads, bridges, and land mass to make them feel more naturally part of San Andreas

San Fierro + probably other cities such as Santa Barbara or Bakersfield parodies.

We need to complete the rest of SA state tbh.

[Enigma M]

1 hour ago, Cyoctane said:

If you could only get one of them added in Expanded and Enhanced, would you rather have San Fierro or Las Venturas? Whichever you pick will be seamless built on to either the NE or NW portion of the map with reworked roads, bridges, and land mass to make them feel more naturally part of San Andreas

 

I'd say LV. Mostly because I believe it would be a little more suitable for Online than SF. 

[Black-Dragon96]

2 hours ago, Cyoctane said:

If you could only get one of them added in Expanded and Enhanced, would you rather have San Fierro or Las Venturas? Whichever you pick will be seamless built on to either the NE or NW portion of the map with reworked roads, bridges, and land mass to make them feel more naturally part of San Andreas

Neither.

I want Cayo Perico as a private Island.

 

Both Las Venturas and San Fiero simply wouldnt fit with our current map.

[concolt]

41 minutes ago, Thomas The Dank Engine said:

Let's all hope for a portable music player this time so we can listen to music on foot. 

We really need AirPods and more headphone options at the least but functioning ones would be great. 

[Kernel]

2 hours ago, Cyoctane said:

If you could only get one of them added in Expanded and Enhanced, would you rather have San Fierro or Las Venturas? Whichever you pick will be seamless built on to either the NE or NW portion of the map with reworked roads, bridges, and land mass to make them feel more naturally part of San Andreas

Las Venturas. I want a casino chain-heist, rob the entire f*cking Strip

[Valiant ENT CEO]

Quinn_flower the video game just released on all platforms and is receiving mostly positive reviews. It has a meta score of 7.7 out of 10. Definitely check it out yall

[Edward85]

9 minutes ago, Valiant ENT CEO said:

Quinn_flower the video game just released on all platforms and is receiving mostly positive reviews. It has a meta score of 7.7 out of 10. Definitely check it out yall

your tag didn't work, might want to quote them next time. since I can't seem to find the comment you are referencing I, and probably others, have zero clue what game you are talking about without any context, and I am curious, what game are you talking about?

[drizztle]

21 hours ago, Cyoctane said:

If you could only get one of them added in Expanded and Enhanced, would you rather have San Fierro or Las Venturas? Whichever you pick will be seamless built on to either the NE or NW portion of the map with reworked roads, bridges, and land mass to make them feel more naturally part of San Andreas

Las Ventures is a Casino and resort based city. Limited potential. The road is simple as well.....

San Fierro....commercial city with gangs from different regions, can do some drive by in the tram. However, some old cars and muscle car won't able to run in the city well since there is a lot of slope....

I think San Fierro maybe a better choice.

Edited November 29, 2021 by drizztle

[Shadowfennekin]

2 hours ago, Cyoctane said:

If you could only get one of them added in Expanded and Enhanced, would you rather have San Fierro or Las Venturas? Whichever you pick will be seamless built on to either the NE or NW portion of the map with reworked roads, bridges, and land mass to make them feel more naturally part of San Andreas

Las Venturas all the way! Casinos, awesome designed buildings and structures....

 

San Fierro is BORING! Like seriously, just play Watch Dogs 2. That is miles better than the San Fierro we had in San Andreas!

[Standard Deluxe 59]

4 hours ago, Cyoctane said:

If you could only get one of them added in Expanded and Enhanced, would you rather have San Fierro or Las Venturas? Whichever you pick will be seamless built on to either the NE or NW portion of the map with reworked roads, bridges, and land mass to make them feel more naturally part of San Andreas

I'd rather see Las Venturas again because they could make a storyline branch about getting involved with the local mobs or bringing down one of them. It would also open up the opportunity to add a bunch of flashy cars from high dollar classics, luxury sedans and coupes to more super and sports cars. They could also add dealerships of sorts inside the shopping promenades like some of the real ones in Las Vegas have, allowing you to see a greater number of available colors for the cars and getting them right away rather than waiting for it to be delivered.  

[Valiant ENT CEO]

2 hours ago, Edward85 said:

your tag didn't work, might want to quote them next time. since I can't seem to find the comment you are referencing I, and probably others, have zero clue what game you are talking about without any context, and I am curious, what game are you talking about?

 

Quinn_flower made a comment like 15 replies back with a simple typo and said "I am a video game" or something to that effect. Then Spider-Vice made a blank faced reply to her and it was pretty funny. I was just playing off their cute little posts. It wasn't all that funny in the end. My post anyway.

[Zak Ras]

4 hours ago, Cyoctane said:

If you could only get one of them added in Expanded and Enhanced, would you rather have San Fierro or Las Venturas? Whichever you pick will be seamless built on to either the NE or NW portion of the map with reworked roads, bridges, and land mass to make them feel more naturally part of San Andreas

San Fierro would be lacking a Mount Chilliad.

Las Venturas will be lacking a heistable Casino & a military base that's "not even on the map".

 

Naturally I always argue in favour of Liberty CIty, but force me to pick between SF or LV - I pick SF because that island is the island that has had the most aquatic focus outside of a Vice City game. It would be an opportunity to add life to the aquatic side of the sandbox which LS on its own can't provide.

[Edward85]

39 minutes ago, Valiant ENT CEO said:

 

Quinn_flower made a comment like 15 replies back with a simple typo and said "I am a video game" or something to that effect. Then Spider-Vice made a blank faced reply to her and it was pretty funny. I was just playing off their cute little posts. It wasn't all that funny in the end. My post anyway.

oh, lol, that explains it, I saw that post but didn't think that's the one you were referencing, lol

6 minutes ago, Zak Ras said:

San Fierro would be lacking a Mount Chilliad.

Las Venturas will be lacking a heistable Casino & a military base that's "not even on the map".

 

Naturally I always argue in favour of Liberty CIty, but force me to pick between SF or LV - I pick SF because that island is the island that has had the most aquatic focus outside of a Vice City game. It would be an opportunity to add life to the aquatic side of the sandbox which LS on its own can't provide.

Mt Chilead wasn't in San Fierro, why would there not be a heistable casino in Las Venturas? and who's to say they couldn't add Area 69 on the outskirts? but I do agree LC would make the best first map expansion

[AUScowboy]

28 minutes ago, Zak Ras said:

San Fierro would be lacking a Mount Chilliad.

Las Venturas will be lacking a heistable Casino & a military base that's "not even on the map".

 

Naturally I always argue in favour of Liberty CIty, but force me to pick between SF or LV - I pick SF because that island is the island that has had the most aquatic focus outside of a Vice City game. It would be an opportunity to add life to the aquatic side of the sandbox which LS on its own can't provide.

SF wouldn't lack Chiliad if it was Northeast and connected to Paleto Bay.. If Rockstar didn't get sold publicly and was still run by the OGs at their peak they could afford to flesh out HD San Andreas. Add the other two cities and connect them with a large amount of new space in between and pepper in some smaller cities like with the original. Would it be profitable? It could be If they did it right. Obviously these are piping hot dreams  but I would honestly prefer VI be set in what I just described than moving on to VC. The HD iteration of San Andreas is lacking and unimpressive, and playing in it this whole time through GTAO didn't help with getting sick of it and seeing it's flaws. It's an amazing map with unparalleled detail for its time, but it will always feel small and confining compared the the original.

 

Look at what R* is worth... they could afford to do a lavish remaster of IV's LC, add the rest of San Andreas, and add the entirety of it to GTAO, and maybe even do some single player Stories style games set in the remade map and it would sell like crack cocaine in the 80s. 

Edited November 28, 2021 by AUScowboy

[FrugalDangerMan]

5 hours ago, Thomas The Dank Engine said:

Let's all hope for a portable music player this time so we can listen to music on foot. 

I don't think this will work. I don't have ears on my feet.

[IceDree]

6 hours ago, Cyoctane said:

If you could only get one of them added in Expanded and Enhanced, would you rather have San Fierro or Las Venturas? 

 

San Fierro will be easier to implement and integrate into the existing HD San Andreas map. They'll have to modify Procopio Beach and parts of the ocean floor, maybe relocate some of the collectables too. But its a lot easier than modifying the eastern side of the map.

 

San Fierro alone won't cut it though. They have to add a bunch of smaller towns along the way from LS to SF, maybe towns inspired by Monterey & Santa Barbara or something. And a small town north of San Fierro. Can't have a San Francisco inspired city without the Golden Gate bridge.

 

Maybe have the organization crime aspect of it inspired by Rogue assassin & Romeo must die. Yakuza, Triad and street gangs.

Edited November 28, 2021 by IceDree
sPeLlInG