Next DLC Speculation Topic Mk X

[Kernel]

1 minute ago, ivarblaauw said:

The main thing I hope they'll fix in the E&E is the goddamn controls in on foot combat, both shooting as melee. Give us either the controls of Mafia 3

OH GOD YES. I would kill for this to happen. The Mafia 3 controls and gameplay pacing would work so, so well in GTA V, or at least GTA Online. I loved playing Mafia 3 purely because of the controls, ngl.

[Geisterfaust]

33 minutes ago, seth297 said:

totally disagree  gta 4 holds up play it on series x looks beautiful not rdr 2 quality but its a 13 year old game . 

Of course the game holds up great. I was playing it at release and still consider it masterpiece, but from a technical standpoint it is a mess. Just as RDR is a masterpiece for consumers, but absolute hell for developers. I've only once played it on console, that was 360 and it was horrendous, at that time I was PC exclusive player and seeing how bad thing looks (not to mention runs) on 360 was painful.

 

Last PC patch is limiting framerate to 45 or so, 60 fps breaks the physics in the game and not recommended. And framerates are never smooth even on 1080 Ti, the GPU that is approx. 3 to 5 times faster than 5970 that was cosidered high-end in 2009, and I'm talking syntethical tests, not real life usage.

11 minutes ago, MaddenedGhost said:

I tried to run it this morning on my PC, I couldn't LOL

Should be playable, available on Steam now. Earlier there was an issue with GFWL, but hey, it's gone now just as the multiplayer because F* U that's why. They took some songs with them too, why not rob the poor guy while he's off, right? Anyway, thing should be operational, just watch for the patches.

 

Thing about IV, my experience of playing it in 2010 on 6670 with 1GB VRAM is not really fundamentally different in comparison with playing it in 2019 on 1080 Ti, lol. The game is great, worth making it work. If you have issues, check the forum sections or we can work something out together, PM me if you like.

[Zapper]

IV ran fine on my 5600X and second hand RX 570 just fine. I'll stay with it until I get a 3070 Ti/Super.

 

 

[ivarblaauw]

8 minutes ago, MaddenedGhost said:

I hope they make it an option, I don't think the controls of this game needs fixing, but an option for whoever thinks so is good, and please, RDR2's controls are one of its flaws, it's the one thing I dislike about it.

I know seriously no one who actually likes the gta V controls. It is so outdated, very slow and is actually one of the reasons I barely play the game at this point. 

 

Especially after playing Mafia 3, which is fundementally better than GTA V's controls. 

[MaddenedGhost]

7 minutes ago, ivarblaauw said:

I know seriously no one who actually likes the gta V controls. It is so outdated, very slow and is actually one of the reasons I barely play the game at this point. 

 

Especially after playing Mafia 3, which is fundementally better than GTA V's controls. 

I find them fine, what I don't know though is someone who seriously prefers RDR2's controls over GTAV's, RDR2 is a masterpiece but the controls are sluggish.

Edited February 9, 2021 by MaddenedGhost

[philipg193]

1 hour ago, seth297 said:

if a remaster is this quality then you all can get excited 

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uAMHdegG0uA

Here's the original video, that the person stole it from: 

 

[DazC123]

55 minutes ago, philipg193 said:

Here's the original video, that the person stole it from: 

 

I want it! Now! 
even on switch! That looks insane

if only that was real

[Yannerrins]

8 hours ago, iPeluche said:

Fun fact : Last time GTAF staff teased something after a T2 call, nothing happened.

They also teased Island and Go-karts in last summer. And as we know, it turned out to be true.

[lowriderlife63]

1 hour ago, philipg193 said:

Here's the original video, that the person stole it from: 

 

Don’t forget about this 1 as well, looks so good. 

 

[Standard Deluxe 59]

As nice as it would be to see VC and SA touched up similarly to that, I'll be surprised if they do much other than increase the resolution and do something with the saturation. 

[Zapper]

Bit of a wild theory here, what if Rockstar remakes San Andreas from scratch and puts Las Venturas and San Fierro in GTA Online Next Gen. That would be killing two birds in one stone. Maybe players will get to access new cities in free roam only if you buy the SA remake. You'll still get to play whatever content they add in those cities like heists, adversary modes, I mean anything that isn't free mode only with invites from other players (Just like you can do heists even if you don't own the required properties). 

Obvious complication would be the GTAO map has to be modern era and SA is set in 1992. Also you have to download the map and content updates even if you don't have SA remake, but that's a minor problem imo.

[The Jungz]

3 hours ago, MaddenedGhost said:

I find them fine, what I don't know though is someone who seriously prefers RDR2's controls over GTAV's, RDR2 is a masterpiece but the controls are sluggish.

RDR2's controls are arguably worse but the pace of the gameplay is much slower than V's so its a bit less of a hard slap in the face.

 

GTA V and Online have you trying to navigate so many tighter and tighter interiors with plummeting FPS that the problem is magnified.

[MaddenedGhost]

2 minutes ago, The Jungz said:

RDR2's controls are arguably worse but the pace of the gameplay is much slower than V's so its a bit less of a hard slap in the face.

 

GTA V and Online have you trying to navigate so many tighter and tighter interiors with plummeting FPS that the problem is magnified.

Okay after thinking about it, you're right, GTAV and Online aren't "fine" but they are okay-ish I guess, I just thought of RDR2's controls and I said GTAV's controls are good, they are good compared to that, so yeah I take that back, they need some adjusting for sure.

[Yannerrins]

25 minutes ago, Zapper said:

Obvious complication would be the GTAO map has to be modern era and SA is set in 1992. Also you have to download the map and content updates even if you don't have SA remake, but that's a minor problem imo.

 

Talking about map - i agree with you. I think the "GTA SA Remake" will be a expanded GTA V map, with added SF and LV + changes that make the LS more 1992-ish.

You know, R* even can re-use some GTA V locations as thier GTA SA counterparts. Like Paleto Bay = Angel Pine, Grapeseed = Blueberry (not take the big part of SA storyline, but), etc.

 

Same with GTA III Remake map - just take the GTA IV LC, improve the graphics and done! R* don't even need to change anything in the city, GTA IV LC it's already a post-9/11 NYC in the mid 2000's.

Edited February 10, 2021 by Yannerrins

[Zapper]

10 minutes ago, The Jungz said:

GTA V and Online have you trying to navigate so many tighter and tighter interiors with plummeting FPS that the problem is magnified.

In both games I most of the time use first person to navigate tight spaces but even in third person it's fine if you're playing on PC with 60+fps.

4 minutes ago, Yannerrins said:

Talking about map - i agree with you. I think the "GTA SA Remake" will be a expanded GTA V map, with added SF and LV + changes that make the LS more 1992-ish.

You know, R* even can re-use some GTA V locations as thier GTA SA counterparts. Like Paleto Bay = Angel Pine, Grapeseed = Blueberry (not take the big part of SA storyline, but), etc.

Very much possible if they really want to keep GTAO alive for a long time which if you ask me, is very likely. 

And regarding the new locations in GTAV that weren't present in SA, they could just add few collectables, random events and sh*t, maybe a few side missions if they want.

Edited February 10, 2021 by Zapper

[philipg193]

1 hour ago, lowriderlife63 said:

Don’t forget about this 1 as well, looks so good. 

 

I was hoping people checking them out for some solid gems like that. They do some awesome work

[seth297]

52 minutes ago, Zapper said:

Bit of a wild theory here, what if Rockstar remakes San Andreas from scratch and puts Las Venturas and San Fierro in GTA Online Next Gen. That would be killing two birds in one stone. Maybe players will get to access new cities in free roam only if you buy the SA remake. You'll still get to play whatever content they add in those cities like heists, adversary modes, I mean anything that isn't free mode only with invites from other players (Just like you can do heists even if you don't own the required properties). 

Obvious complication would be the GTAO map has to be modern era and SA is set in 1992. Also you have to download the map and content updates even if you don't have SA remake, but that's a minor problem imo.

that aint happening if this remaster thing is true it will  be a bit of a touch up and a quick cash grab for rockstar anything else is delusional . 

nothing announed by sunday this rumour is finished . 

i not saying anything is false but we remember gonnae last year who did not get banned.

[Zapper]

5 minutes ago, seth297 said:

that aint happening if this remaster thing is true it will  be a bit of a touch up and a quick cash grab for rockstar anything else is delusional . 

nothing announed by sunday this rumour is finished . 

i not saying anything is false but we remember gonnae last year who did not get banned.

I'm not even talking about any rumor. I'm just saying if they really want to extend GTAO's life they can add other 2 cities and in the meantime if they're feeling generous can also remake SA. I for one don't believe whole 3D trilogy would be remade properly but if they're gonna make one it's probably SA due to the fact GTAV/O already has Los Santos. It's pure speculation.

[Darth_Cruiser]

2 hours ago, Zapper said:

Bit of a wild theory here, what if Rockstar remakes San Andreas from scratch and puts Las Venturas and San Fierro in GTA Online Next Gen. That would be killing two birds in one stone. Maybe players will get to access new cities in free roam only if you buy the SA remake. You'll still get to play whatever content they add in those cities like heists, adversary modes, I mean anything that isn't free mode only with invites from other players (Just like you can do heists even if you don't own the required properties). 

Obvious complication would be the GTAO map has to be modern era and SA is set in 1992. Also you have to download the map and content updates even if you don't have SA remake, but that's a minor problem imo.

That isn't possible though. They will have to remake the entire map by scouting Las Vegas and San Franciso to bring them to HD standards which will take years. They can't just update the graphics and add them because the cities are too small compared to gta 5 los santos.

 

There have been no leaks about rockstar scouting in las vegas or san franciso.

 

Adding Liberty City makes way more sense because they just have to upgrade the graphics and modify it a bit. Not remake the whole map.

[Crateman]

If Rockstar Open the mall in the next dlc maybe we can help our Boi Vincent with some kind of "job", so we can profit and he can quite that awful mall cop job, it's a win/win situation 

Edited February 10, 2021 by Crateman
And Also we might visit Didier Sachs possible newly Open store -_- coming soon

[ivarblaauw]

1 hour ago, StuntMaster100 said:

That isn't possible though. They will have to remake the entire map by scouting Las Vegas and San Franciso to bring them to HD standards which will take years. They can't just update the graphics and add them because the cities are too small compared to gta 5 los santos.

 

There have been no leaks about rockstar scouting in las vegas or san franciso.

 

Adding Liberty City makes way more sense because they just have to upgrade the graphics and modify it a bit. Not remake the whole map.

That is absolutely bollocks. For all we know they have scouted, just because no gamer saw them, doesn't mean they weren't there. 

 

Plus there is something called google and google maps, plus their previous trips to those locations. 

 

Years? Don't think so, look at how Watch Dogs pumps out cities like they are rabbits. Especially R* with thousands of employees can do this in a heartbeat. 

 

Not saying it is easy, but if they have had 1 studio working on this for a year, I am pretty sure that at least the landscape and city are done. 

 

Implementing missions is more difficult, each need to be added by hand, but I am pretty sure they have a creator for that. Keep in mind that they have all those tools and assets available from the Rage engine. Do they for example need desert? They already have the stuff from New Austin, Mexico and West Elisabeth from rdr2. 

 

It will be quite the work, but it is not as if they have to create / update an engine alongside with it

[rollschuh2282]

2 minutes ago, ivarblaauw said:

Years? Don't think so, look at how Watch Dogs pumps out cities like they are rabbits. Especially R* with thousands of employees can do this in a heartbeat. 

you can´t compare R*s worlds ubisoft with watch dogs and such.

in watch dogs i am sure you can find the same buildings pretty much copy and pasted in a lot of places, while R* every map and part of the map feels unique.

like, it´s hard to explain.

but i played watch dogs 1 and 2, but they somehow didn´t feel as alive as a R* world.

like they seemed like the world is build around the player.

i can´t really explain it.

[Darth_Cruiser]

13 minutes ago, ivarblaauw said:

That is absolutely bollocks. For all we know they have scouted, just because no gamer saw them, doesn't mean they weren't there. 

 

Plus there is something called google and google maps, plus their previous trips to those locations. 

 

Years? Don't think so, look at how Watch Dogs pumps out cities like they are rabbits. Especially R* with thousands of employees can do this in a heartbeat. 

 

Not saying it is easy, but if they have had 1 studio working on this for a year, I am pretty sure that at least the landscape and city are done. 

 

Implementing missions is more difficult, each need to be added by hand, but I am pretty sure they have a creator for that. Keep in mind that they have all those tools and assets available from the Rage engine. Do they for example need desert? They already have the stuff from New Austin, Mexico and West Elisabeth from rdr2. 

 

It will be quite the work, but it is not as if they have to create / update an engine alongside with it

lol rockstar puts in a lot more detail into their cities than watch dogs. They are not going to just rush the cities quickly. They took 2 years to make map for gta 5. Remaking Las Venturas and San Fierro will take 2 years even at the minimum. google maps? Nah they use on-location scouting for most of the stuff.

Edited February 10, 2021 by StuntMaster100

[CrysisAverted]

As with most games this old, R* should open up to user created content and mods for updates

 

Spoiler

 

and give us the f*cking LC expansion they took from us

 

 

[Darth_Cruiser]

5 minutes ago, rollschuh2282 said:

you can´t compare R*s worlds ubisoft with watch dogs and such.

in watch dogs i am sure you can find the same buildings pretty much copy and pasted in a lot of places, while R* every map and part of the map feels unique.

like, it´s hard to explain.

but i played watch dogs 1 and 2, but they somehow didn´t feel as alive as a R* world.

like they seemed like the world is build around the player.

i can´t really explain it.

rockstar world are far more detailed that's why they take so long to make

[rollschuh2282]

Just now, StuntMaster100 said:

rockstar world are far more detailed that's why they take so long to make

yeah exactly.

i mean even in V they still worked on the map in 2012-mid 2013.

like fixing areas and making adjustments.

they even moved the entire map of north yankton in 2012.

so yeah, they keep working on details of the map the whole development

[Darth_Cruiser]

1 minute ago, rollschuh2282 said:

yeah exactly.

i mean even in V they still worked on the map in 2012-mid 2013.

like fixing areas and making adjustments.

they even moved the entire map of north yankton in 2012.

so yeah, they keep working on details of the map the whole development

There is a possiblity they might rush LV and SF and not bother with making them too detailed since it's for Online. They seem to care about detail only in the singleplayer campaign.

[rollschuh2282]

Just now, StuntMaster100 said:

There is a possiblity they might rush LV and SF and not bother with making them too detailed since it's for Online. They seem to care about detail only in the singleplayer campaign.

oh no.

they care.

i mean...they added eastereggs to cayo perico, like loch ness, the torture cage, the dead whale, grave sites etc.

they didn´t need to, but they did bc R* cares about their maps.

even if they are mission exclusive.

so i can guarrantee that R* will always put efford into their maps.

 

[Darth_Cruiser]

1 minute ago, rollschuh2282 said:

oh no.

they care.

i mean...they added eastereggs to cayo perico, like loch ness, the torture cage, the dead whale, grave sites etc.

they didn´t need to, but they did bc R* cares about their maps.

even if they are mission exclusive.

so i can guarrantee that R* will always put efford into their maps.

 

then it will take more than a year to properly remake las venturas and san fierro and bring them to los santos level

[rollschuh2282]

Just now, StuntMaster100 said:

then it will take more than a year to properly remake las venturas and san fierro and bring them to los santos level

that is likely.

and towns are also harder to do than countryside.

towns need detail variation etc, which they can get away with less in the country side.

i mean, cayo perico was being worked on for probs most of the year or even a few weeks before it still, and it is mostly foliage area, and not much city wise.

so took less.