Quantcast
Jump to content
Search In
  • More options...
Find results that contain...
Find results in...
    1. Welcome to GTAForums!

    1. GTANet.com

    1. GTA Online

      1. Los Santos Summer Special
      2. The Diamond Casino Heist
      3. Find Lobbies & Players
      4. Guides & Strategies
      5. Vehicles
      6. Content Creator
      7. Help & Support
    2. Red Dead Online

      1. Frontier Pursuits
      2. Find Lobbies & Outlaws
      3. Help & Support
    3. Crews

    1. Red Dead Redemption 2

      1. PC
      2. Help & Support
    2. Red Dead Redemption

    1. Grand Theft Auto Series

    2. GTA VI

      1. St. Andrews Cathedral
    3. GTA V

      1. Guides & Strategies
      2. Help & Support
    4. GTA IV

      1. The Lost and Damned
      2. The Ballad of Gay Tony
      3. Guides & Strategies
      4. Help & Support
    5. GTA San Andreas

      1. Guides & Strategies
      2. Help & Support
    6. GTA Vice City

      1. Guides & Strategies
      2. Help & Support
    7. GTA III

      1. Guides & Strategies
      2. Help & Support
    8. Portable Games

      1. GTA Chinatown Wars
      2. GTA Vice City Stories
      3. GTA Liberty City Stories
    9. Top-Down Games

      1. GTA Advance
      2. GTA 2
      3. GTA
    1. GTA Mods

      1. GTA V
      2. GTA IV
      3. GTA III, VC & SA
      4. Tutorials
    2. Red Dead Mods

      1. Documentation
    3. Mod Showroom

      1. Scripts & Plugins
      2. Maps
      3. Total Conversions
      4. Vehicles
      5. Textures
      6. Characters
      7. Tools
      8. Other
      9. Workshop
    4. Featured Mods

      1. Design Your Own Mission
      2. OpenIV
      3. GTA: Underground
      4. GTA: Liberty City
      5. GTA: State of Liberty
    1. Rockstar Games

    2. Rockstar Collectors

    1. Off-Topic

      1. General Chat
      2. Gaming
      3. Technology
      4. Movies & TV
      5. Music
      6. Sports
      7. Vehicles
    2. Expression

      1. Graphics / Visual Arts
      2. GFX Requests & Tutorials
      3. Writers' Discussion
      4. Debates & Discussion
    3. Gangs

    1. Announcements

    2. Support

    3. Suggestions

Sign in to follow this  
Mister Pink

Is the news bad for you?

Recommended Posts

Mister Pink

I grew up in a household where the news was watched religiously by one of my parents. I hated it as a child. As an adult, I found myself becoming more prone to consuming a lot of news. We would also have The Sunday Times in the house, complete with magazine supplements and culture section, which I believe was very enriching - I learned about new music, films, and seen some of the best published photography ever. I do appreciate that, growing up. But, with the advent of Google News and having a smartphone nearby at all time, and being able to tailor Google News to certain topics and sources, I found myself easily going to browse news topics, oftentimes, multiple times a day. 

 

More and more, I started to think it's mostly a waste of time. Most news doesn't affect me. And most news topics I consume fall out of my circle of influence. So why was I consuming it? Was to be in the know? Was it to keep up with conversations in the workplace? Was it understand what's going on in the world? Probably a little bit of all. But is it really that helpful? I mean, a lot of the news I would end up consuming due to headlines in related articles was really stuff that doesn't effect me at all. A car crash here. A murder there. I would get a thrill from reading about something. I'm of the opinion, it's mostly a waste of time. It's a form entertainment. It's think it's mostly a terrible way to be informed of a topic too.

 

To quote the author and businessman Rolf Dobelli for The Guardian

Quote

Out of the approximately 10,000 news stories you have read in the last 12 months, name one that – because you consumed it – allowed you to make a better decision about a serious matter affecting your life, your career or your business. The point is: the consumption of news is irrelevant to you. But people find it very difficult to recognise what's relevant. It's much easier to recognise what's new. The relevant versus the new is the fundamental battle of the current age. Media organisations want you to believe that news offers you some sort of a competitive advantage. Many fall for that. We get anxious when we're cut off from the flow of news. In reality, news consumption is a competitive disadvantage. The less news you consume, the bigger the advantage you have.

 

I'm not saying there is no purpose for news. I'm not saying there isn't value in news reporting. Some publications will do a nice long-form piece that you can dig your teeth in and learn more about a topic. But again, most of it doesn't really affect your daily decision making.  What I am saying is daily news consumption is probably as useful as watching Love Island. I'm generalising of course. 

 

Author Dobrelli makes some compelling arguments that news is bad for you. He does so in the article I linked. I understand, a lot of it is opinion, subjective, personal and it's not always based on data from studies but I still think his arguments are compelling. If you don't feel like reading the article linked above you can watch a short TED he did here. 

 

There's also some research conducted that suggest that news consumption and lead to change in mood (anxiety and sadness) and lead to catastrophizing personal worries.  The psychological impact of negative TV news bulletins: The catastrophizing of personal worries - here is an free PDF scan of the study: http://www.envisionkindness.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/Johnston-and-Davey-1997-Psychological-Impact-of-Negative-TV-News.pdf

 

 

 

I'm inclined to agree with him. As a very creative person, I'm interested in how better to opimise my time. I'm studying and I'm try to develop a number of creative projects simultaneously. And news consumption is one of those things I would rather cut out and read a book instead. And that is a challenge as other ways to consume media usually take preference; I'm an avid consumer of podcasts, TV series, and tutorials for my hobbies. But news was this guilty pleasure and consumes my time. Thankfully, I've weened myself off social media, for the most part. The next part is to ween myself off news consumption. 

 

I would like to ask people here, their thoughts. More a discussion than a debate, perhaps? Do you consume a lot of news? Have you thought about your news consumption and if so, what did you think? Can you imagine your life without news? What would that look like? 

 

After watching the video or reading the article and/or study

Do you think news is bad for you? 

 

 

Edited by Mister Pink
  • Like 4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Raavi

Interesting topic, and something I have thought about a bit in the past as well. I consume a lot of news, from big international topics of the day to national news to local news to specialised business and legal news. To that end I also have multiple subscriptions to a variety of outlets. The reasoning as to why is really two-fold: on one hand it kind of is a necessary element of my field of expertise to keep track off the goings on around the country and the world. On the other hand I also quite simply enjoy it on a personal level, both reading what is going on and then doing deeper research myself as well as later on discussing my findings and views with others - which you could definitely call a form of entertainment.

 

As for if it is bad for me.. depends on how you look at it, it sure can be a form of procrastination but it at the same is one I feel less bad about because unlike playing wordfeud or some such on my phone I can actually use being informed to my advantage at least on some level at a later point. Even if it is for something as banal as talking with colleagues about the dismal state of the DOJ when standing around the coffee machine. So could I imagine a life without news for me personally? That's gonna be a no. Though I could reasonably read less of it whilst not compromising my being informed too much. 

 

That being said, whilst I think everyone should be as informed as possible I can also see the argument of ignorance being bliss. Though I feel like that will inevitably come with a whole host of side-effects of its own.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
ilovebender.com

I watch the news around the clock.

I've also been known to google it the news randomly throughout the day.

I hear the Labour Debate I was watching in the other room on in the background now. (when I started typing)

I didn't personally set out to watch it; the TV was already on the news and I happen to catch the Victoria Derbyshire show daily (Should probably touch that dial) I have three TVs, two medium sized sets, one hooked up to a first generation Tivo box from Virgin Media I should call for the free upgrade, and a secondary regular Virgin Box that I really should upgrade to Tivo for free as well since it started prompting me late last year with  message, and a big one hanging up high on the wall in the bedroom in a spot where it makes great for entertaining if you lift the oak table out (I like wide floor spaces if I can help it) and it turns into what I've seen in nightclubs only I've got a 60" TV doing it that's also great to laying back in bed) - connected to my Xbox One which I've been known to stream live news from YouTube and BBC iPlayer on too.

Is news bad for you? I don't think news is bad, I think politics is bad for you.

Politics is decisive , ugly, and often leads to disagreements when it'll be great if everybody just got along; I'm all for arts and poetry, music and movie making and any form of expressive art there is; I think that's good for people, not 'politics', but politics though avoidable, still matters if you believe you can, but I envy those who don't like politics have a hold on them, I imagine they're happier people.

I don't like getting political with my art if I can help it because I feel it can very quickly date the piece, and even though I've written about current events, I've done so with a heavy heart knowing it's probably going to end up looking very dated very shortly - so I don't like to mix politics and art if I can help it.

Edited by ilovebender.com
  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
jpm1

@ilovebender: you don't like politics, but how do you plan to govern a country. because even if you take out the scythes, and the forks soon or later you"ll have to get into politics 😉. only a far rightist didn't understood that. i'm not talking for you. just pointing out how dumb far right is

 

regarding the news. only the global far right pushes got me hooked to the news channels recently. generally i don't give a f.. of what others do. but right now it seems the world is entering a dumb period which seems to have no bottom. thus this interests me, as a French who got his country into a bloody, unfair, stupid, and totally out of justice revolution once. for me the French revolution is not only something that generated rivers of blood, but also make the French become c..t, thinking violence is a good way to go. you can see it with the recent gilets jaunes, or blockades. they want to destroy the world, they don't even know what for. typical French, go violent, then dominate, then discuss, or cry (c**ts!). and i thank God to have created the British who calmed us down when we did go too far sometimes. i'm not going to make myself some friends on that one, but i don't care

so to finally answer, i watch news but not to educate, just to witness (the world s..)

Edited by jpm1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
ilovebender.com
6 hours ago, jpm1 said:

@ilovebender: you don't like politics, but how do you plan to govern a country.

I don't.

I plan to return to my life of electric guitar and substance abuse.

I love Denmark St. It's the centre of my universe; I plan to return to having dalliances too! - but it's mostly about the guitar with me.

 

Quote

because even if you take out the scythes, and the forks soon or later you"ll have to get into politics 😉. only a far rightist didn't understood that. i'm not talking for you. just pointing out how dumb far right is

Define far right? I define far right as the BNP or the former NF... I also think UKIP became more far right given their candidates they paraded in the last European Parliament elections. I guess if you're unaware, these are UK's answer to Jean-Marie Le Pen or his daughter; I don't know a lot about French politics though I so won't take offense if you've not heard of the old NF or the BNP - but it is they who I'd deem 'far right'; not The ERG faction of the Tory Party or Donald Trump's administration.

Quote

 

regarding the news. only the global far right pushes got me hooked to the news channels recently.

You mean quote unquote "populism"?

 

Quote

generally i don't give a f..

That's a good way to be; I don't where you in France you are; Paris looks particularly political with the yellow vest movement and the strike action by refuse workers. Because of being in London, because of Brexit and Jeremy Corbyn, I've had politics dumped onto me blocking my way, so I more or less got dragged into politics lest we get ruled by the EU or Labour.

 

Quote

of what others do.

Amen.

Quote

but right now it seems the world is entering a dumb period which seems to have no bottom.

Define dumb.

 

Quote

thus this interests me, as a French who got his country into a bloody, unfair, stupid, and totally out of justice revolution once. for me the French revolution is not only something that generated rivers of blood,

River's of blood was said by the Founder of the NF party Enoch Powell in the UK back when all the Caribbean people came and he invited them over even but then they didn't go home so then he made an infamous speech called his 'Rivers of Blood Speech' and then started the NF (A laymen's understanding of history). But I believe it was him who started the NF thing with his Rivers of Blood Speech.

 

 

Quote

but also make the French become c..t,

 

Quote

 

thinking violence is a good way to go. you can see it with the recent gilets jaunes, or blockades. they want to destroy the world, they don't even know what for. typical French, go violent, then dominate, then discuss, or cry (c**ts!). and i thank God to have created the British who calmed us down when we did go too far sometimes. i'm not going to make myself some friends on that one, but i don't care

so to finally answer, i watch news but not to educate, just to witness (the world s..)

See, Napoleon and Hitler had somethings in common;

Napoleon wanted to conquer the world, Adolf Hitler wanted to conquer the world, Napoleon followed Nostradamus and thought himself an Antichrist, Adolf Hitler followed Nostradamus and thought himself an Antichrist; Napoleon gassed slaves and butchered them in Haiti, Adolf Hitler gassed more Jews in Poland and the whole Holocaust...

But France has a tomb in Paris for Napoleon and Germany try to distance themselves from Hitler.

I don't get that about France, but that's because I'm British and are of the people who put one down and helped to bring down another.

I mean, Britain's okay, I guess, I mean, it's history is pretty sh*tty in the calculated brilliance it took to annoy people the world over once upon a time, but, it's still home - it's okay, I guess, my country and all of that... but I thank God for the Americans, especially since I'm British and learned in the actual room in Philadelphia that America was born in that the American Revolution taught the British a much needed lesson in freedom when they broke away from the British Empire - if it wasn't for that to keep the British in check, the world would probably have to pay a TV license for the BBC.

 

I look at Nelson like, one of my own in that, if they had Quickfit or the AA back then, that'll be his go to; love my countrymen, but only because I too would have to use the AA or Quickfit etc. It's a pretty stupid way to identify with history I admit, but, they should advertise Quickfit by having Nelson pull the HMS Victory in for a service lol.

Edited by ilovebender.com

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Eutyphro
20 hours ago, ilovebender.com said:

See, Napoleon and Hitler had somethings in common;
Napoleon wanted to conquer the world, Adolf Hitler wanted to conquer the world, ... But France has a tomb in Paris for Napoleon and Germany try to distance themselves from Hitler.

Britain actually did conquer the world. Was the British empire like Hitler as well?
 

Quote

Napoleon followed Nostradamus and thought himself an Antichrist, Adolf Hitler followed Nostradamus and thought himself an Antichrist;

What sh*tty conspiracy website are you getting this tripe from?

As for OT reponses go, the news is a very negative influence. Because the masses are mediocre and slightly aimless they are most stimulated by negativity, and negativity is what the news provides. Often it's a massively meaningless disaster highlight reel. I plan on distancing myself from the news as much as possible and only read about current evens in weekly in depth articles. I'm sure that the reason many people are on antidepressants and suicidal is due to the way our society is hedonistic, nihilistic, and feeds people negativity round the clock. I noticed that when I lived with my parents again a few years ago, with them watching tv news around the clock, I've become much more mellow with most of the news out of my life.

Edited by Eutyphro
  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
ilovebender.com
8 minutes ago, Eutyphro said:

Britain actually did conquer the world. Was the British empire like Hitler as well?

Well the British Empire never thought itself to be Nostradamus' Antichrist.

Also, I don't think the Brits gassed people in confined spaces like slave ships or "showers" - That's some next level b/s. I think if we ever gassed anyone, it was some open field somewhere in France or Belgium before the international community deemed chemical warfare too bad to use and outlawed its use even for warfare; so much so the Brits' aversion to gassing people, Brits in WWII were issued their own gas masks, even children had children's gas masks; they never were gassed in the end, but you see somebody in England in WWII, they've probably got a gas mask.

Edited by ilovebender.com

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Eutyphro

What's your source for the Nostradamus nonsense? The British were at fault for many mass slaughters of occupied peoples. Gassing or not, doesn't matter. Murder is murder. The Holocaust isn't horrible because it involved gassing, but because it involved the murder of millions.

Edited by Eutyphro

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Rhoda

Please let's not turn this into UK Politics Discussion V2.

 

My view - compulsive viewing of the news can be damaging, but in a different way. I don't often watch the news in the traditional sense, but I do occasionally open news sources on my phone, maybe every other day. I believe I'm better off, because negative news almost always outweighs the good. For every wholesome story about a boy being pulled out of a well by frantic villagers, there's five dedicated to political instability, climate change, poverty, war and general misery. I'm not saying that these things aren't important, of course they are. To shut yourself off from new developments completely would be ignorant, and might contribute towards a narrow world view. Much like everything, there's a balance to strike, and it's all subjective. Some people feel altogether happier keeping their finger on the trigger, knowing everything and anything about the day. It helps them stay informed. However, people can be impressionable and might feel deflated from exposure to some of the more turbulent and violent stories. The news has always been manufactured as informative, but the more cynical might believe that outlets use the more depressing developments to distract the general public from what's "really going on". That's probably true, but this is by the by. We're talking about the news contributing towards unhappiness and eventually poor mental health. I would probably say it does, but it would depend entirely on your outlook to begin with. Don't get me wrong, it would drive anybody nuts, but only in the same way reading the newspaper would if you're not particularly well read. For my own wellbeing I tend to limit my news intake. I have a fair enough idea of what's going on, and I treat everything I see with what I'd consider to be a healthy amount of suspicion and skepticism. I'm not going around bleating "conspiracy" at everything, but I take things with a pinch of salt.

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
ilovebender.com
1 hour ago, Eutyphro said:

What's your source for the Nostradamus nonsense? ...

The History Channel.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Tyler
On 2/12/2020 at 4:08 PM, Mister Pink said:

Do you consume a lot of news? Have you thought about your news consumption and if so, what did you think? Can you imagine your life without news? What would that look like? 

 

After watching the video or reading the article and/or study

Do you think news is bad for you? 

 

First and foremost, I've been pretty active with news consumption most of my life. As much as it pains me to admit it, I used to spend what little money I made as a child buying newspapers and magazines that were sold at the store next to my grandmother's house. It's how I got into National Geographic, and it's also how I became pretty cynical about major news sources. This sort of avid consumption kept going into my teens and 20s. As of now, I confine myself to a couple of longform subscriptions like Monthly Review and the LA/London Review of books, but I end up reading a lot of current affairs through my affiliated volunteer work. Until recently, it was also a large part of my job to be well-read in foreign affairs, which is a lot less stressful to me, because I can look at most news affecting the world with a more abstract and detached lens.

 

I've thought quite a bit about whether news is worth viewing. For me, understanding and acting within the political sphere is a necessity--my interests are all in on it, so for me it's an easy answer. At the same time, I have cut my intake of most cyclical news and local news almost entirely. Like you said in your post, the constant siren of murders or whatever mysterious disease is plaguing some part of the world this week becomes more of a drain than anything. Yellow journalism has existed since before the modern age, and people will always feel a certain primal draw to those obscene, possibly morbid, probably exaggerated tales. They make the world seem less boring. They also generate and intensify feelings of fear and isolation, which is the main reason I try not to pay much mind to them. I've even stopped listening to true crime podcasts for the same reason.

 

My life without news would have to be much different. Maybe I'd be more focused on art for its own sake. Nonetheless, I don't have a problem with the way I consume media these days. I spend idle time playing piano or writing, but I also spend a lot of time looking at political news in the hopes of understanding and explaining bigger ideas and concepts to friends, families, and the people I reach out to in my work. One day, all things willing, I'll retire to a nice cabin on the coast and chop logs, watch rain fall on the rocks, and enjoy human life for what it is. For now, I'm afraid I have bought into society and politics and invested enough of my own compassion that I can't see any other way of doing it. 

 

Great topic, Pink. This is one of those things we should all examine about ourselves. Whether you are able to handle the constant intake of news is a serious thing to consider. Our media devices seem inclined to shove news into our eyes at all waking ours, and the profitability of 24-hour news makes it that much more likely that you or someone you know will read a shocking headline that you simply must share. Not everyone is at the capacity to take in that grief and misery and ambiguity and speculation without having more serious problems with their conception of the world.

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Caysle

news are programmed to get a reaction out of us, and they usually piss me off. I follow some news accounts on my main twitter, but I do not use that account often. I have an anon account that's designed much better in terms of timeline clarity. I don't watch TV as the one in my apartment is not even plugged in. so yes I don't consume much news. at the end it's about what do you want to see in the world. I feel news are inherently ugly. something off putting and evil about them trying so hard to make things look like in a certain way to people. I don't like ugly things and I'm better of without them in my life

this is the end of me philosophising for now, see you soon for a new one

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
ilovebender.com
On 2/14/2020 at 5:46 PM, Eutyphro said:

What's your source for the Nostradamus nonsense? 

 

This is the History Channel's documentary on Nostradamus called The Nostradamus Effect, the pilot episode, talking about the three Antichrists Nostradamus spoke of and how both Napoleon and Hitler acted and also their belief that Nostradamus spoke about them.

I mean, to the British, Hitler and Napoleon are viewed kind of the same, only France built a monument for Napoleon and Germany try to distance themselves from Hitler! - now that's funny if you get a kick out of that sort of stuff.

UK also wasn't fond of these people either considering the wars we had and everything to put them down.

 

I wonder if History Channel's bad for you? lol

Edited by ilovebender.com

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Nico

Yeah, the news do affect me. A lot.

 

My parents are both well north of 50 and like everyone of their age, they were raised with TV. During their free time at home, if they are not sleeping, they are watching TV. My mother is particularly into the right wing media and she believes everything they say. The same right wing media that supported our previous goverment, which absolutely destroyed our economy and put us on a massive debt, with the money going to their f*cking pockets and we the normal people have to pay for it now. I used to believe what they said as well, even though I was never into it as much as my mom. I think I have developed critical thinking a bit over time.

 

Back in 2013 I started a career in Journalism, and even back then teachers warned us to not solely trust a single side of the spectrum, they told us to listen to multiple sources and draw a conclusion. I dropped that career and overall I think that chapter of my life was mostly a mistake, but it taught me a few things nontheless.

 

But back to the subject. Yeah, news f*cking suck. I don't want to sound like I support being uninformed, but these days it's hard to notice if what they are telling you is true or not. And like Eutyphro says, it's ALL negativity. And the few "positives" are usually crap information I couldn't care less about. Like the latest trendy cat/dog video on internet. Or the goals of our football players overseas. But outside of that, they just can't stop giving you the impression that this country (and our society as a whole) is going nowhere. These days they are talking about a kid who was killed by some spoiled f*ckwits who were casually rugby players, and now people are attacking everyone who likes or plays rugby. People are extremely ignorant and incredibly willing to express their uninformed and influenced opinions, and obviously they are also willing to defend them by any means. I f*cking hate my country and I want to leave. Nobody is sensible here. Some people believe in the afterlife, I want to believe there are better people somewhere else.

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
-7-

Edited by spectre07

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Mister Pink

Sorry guys, I wasn't online for the last couple of weeks. Wasn't expecting such a huge response and it will take me a long time to respond to everyone.  But I'm glad I posted this thread as it's really interested to hear other people's perspectives

 

On 2/13/2020 at 2:34 AM, Raavi said:

As for if it is bad for me.. depends on how you look at it, it sure can be a form of procrastination but it at the same is one I feel less bad about because unlike playing wordfeud or some such on my phone I can actually use being informed to my advantage at least on some level at a later point. Even if it is for something as banal as talking with colleagues about the dismal state of the DOJ when standing around the coffee machine. So could I imagine a life without news for me personally? That's gonna be a no. Though I could reasonably read less of it whilst not compromising my being informed too much. 

 

That being said, whilst I think everyone should be as informed as possible I can also see the argument of ignorance being bliss. Though I feel like that will inevitably come with a whole host of side-effects of its own.

That's the thing, most news I was consuming really might only be beneficial for just office chat. I find it particularly handy if I've nothing in common with the people I'm chatting with. As for being informed, I find the really important news will get to you, one way or another. 

 

On 2/13/2020 at 11:10 AM, ilovebender.com said:

I don't like getting political with my art if I can help it because I feel it can very quickly date the piece, and even though I've written about current events, I've done so with a heavy heart knowing it's probably going to end up looking very dated very shortly - so I don't like to mix politics and art if I can help it.

This is something I can agree with. I know it's slightly off-topic but I dislike then artists force their politics on their fans. It's off-putting for me. I would be left-leaning centrist but wouldn't care for artists ridiculing people/voters on the right because to me it's just people with different thinking and psychology. And why alienate people when the one thing that's bringing everyone together is the art? And surely if  2 people with different politics can share the same appreciation of art, then that's something. 

 

On 2/14/2020 at 5:49 PM, Rhoda said:

The news has always been manufactured as informative, but the more cynical might believe that outlets use the more depressing developments to distract the general public from what's "really going on".

I agree mostly with your whole post. In fact, I think it's very similar to my thinking. But this line is very true. It's the click-bait. It's the trivial news that is depressing or distracting or just there for to illicit some sort of feeling in the user that's all the fluff. Its the news we don't need.  It's a bit like traffic news on the radio. It's the most pointless thing ever. What percentage of people is using or is about to use a section of road that's blocked and so happens to be tuned in to that radio station that's giving that report at that exact time. I would love to hear from someone that has avoided some traffic because they heard a news radio traffic report. 

 

On 2/14/2020 at 7:34 PM, Tyler said:

I've thought quite a bit about whether news is worth viewing. For me, understanding and acting within the political sphere is a necessity--my interests are all in on it, so for me it's an easy answer. At the same time, I have cut my intake of most cyclical news and local news almost entirely. Like you said in your post, the constant siren of murders or whatever mysterious disease is plaguing some part of the world this week becomes more of a drain than anything. Yellow journalism has existed since before the modern age, and people will always feel a certain primal draw to those obscene, possibly morbid, probably exaggerated tales. They make the world seem less boring. They also generate and intensify feelings of fear and isolation, which is the main reason I try not to pay much mind to them. I've even stopped listening to true crime podcasts for the same reason.

 Interesting that you and Raavi have given it thought about their viewership of the news and if it's worth it. I appreciate that anyone will stop and just question it. I can agree with you about consuming news in the hopes of trying to understand and explain bigger concepts to friends/families etc.

 

I've kind of had issues with just some friends/family, that might have read some story (for example) on how the US is doing some shady deal with X and Y and the outcome is Z. And when you start getting in to world politics, with me, I can't have strong opinions about anything. Firstly because I don't know what it's like to be a politician in power. Secondly, there's probably 80% of the true story hidden away, then this distilled with the reporter's own personal politics and then churned out the the end-user. That's how I'll find it hard to listen to anyone with strong opinions on global politics.   To me there are so many variables in the obtaining of the limited information, mixed with personal biases that to have a strong opinion, especially when not an expert (friends/family members) that it's a futile exercise and it's just people really flexing their own politics. 

 

On 2/14/2020 at 5:41 PM, Eutyphro said:

Often it's a massively meaningless disaster highlight reel. I plan on distancing myself from the news as much as possible and only read about current evens in weekly in depth articles.

This is what I'm kind of concluding from all this. Reading weekly in-depth articles might actually be more researched and informative when the daily crap that's churned out. 

 

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Raavi
On 2/13/2020 at 3:34 AM, Raavi said:

As for if it is bad for me.. depends on how you look at it

I would like to amend this statement in light of the current state of the world. Yes, it Is bad for me and I now consume a fraction of the news I consumed up until a few weeks ago. Every single news broadcast and the vast majority of articles relates in some way to the thing that shall not be named. Which is not at all good for anyone's mental wellbeing.

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awful Waffle

took you guys long enough to realize the news only makes money when you're watching it...

their job is to make things seem as scary as possible. Yellow Journalism is Journalism. there's no distinction in Western media.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Ho Diver

I used to deliberately stray away from any kind of serious news source, but as I grew up I realized that was only making me looks like dumb and ignorant , so I started to go after news about something interesting I heard from someone, something that I read on a comment section, etc. I also tend to click on interesting news that I see on chrome's news feed. But lately, thanks to the quarantine, I started to watch a lot more news on TV, specially during the dawn since I suffer from a chronic insomnia. Even though I like to keep me informed about stuff now, I'm not a "news addicted", I only like to keep me informed about the essential stuff, and also, I gotta say that read/watch/hear about the same f*cking thing 24/7 gets annoying.

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
TheSpectre

I usually get my new from my Twitter feed. I absolutely refuse to watch televised news under any circumstances. I almost find it insulting that these news anchors, these media personalities who are millionaires and incredible influence, feign emotional responses to issues the working class goes through and they themselves never have to deal with.

 

Let me give you an example. There was a story they described as "heartwarming" when in fact the only emotional response it got out of me was disgust. A little boy who was physically impaired and needed a Walker was unable to get one because his insurance company denied him. So his neighbors and people in the community got together and bought pipes from the hardware store and made one for him.

 

Another thing I hate about the news media is the fact that almost all the major news outlets in the US are owned by a handful of very wealthy companies. They have agendas and they have the power to silence voices their CEOs and advertisers dont approve of. They are essentially beholden to the whims of the aristocracy.

 

I much prefer seeing everyday people I can relate to on some level react to and report on news events. I support independent media funded by viewers.

 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Mister Pink
Posted (edited)
On 3/26/2020 at 7:50 PM, Raavi said:

I would like to amend this statement in light of the current state of the world. Yes, it Is bad for me and I now consume a fraction of the news I consumed up until a few weeks ago. Every single news broadcast and the vast majority of articles relates in some way to the thing that shall not be named. Which is not at all good for anyone's mental wellbeing.

I was thinking of this thread during this period, wondering now was it a waste of time because of how valuable reporting has been during this thing. But your right, it's also quite depressing and some in some cases, I've just said to myself "switch it off, this is too depressing."

 

Not even that but I was discussing in my other half, that even if we're tuning in to current trending news, there's a not  a lot you can do with the information. We're all under quarantine anyway, so it doesn't change things. I would actually worry myself about the amount stimulation my brain is getting from all these doom and gloom stories. 

 

Lately, I've noticed I've mostly just been headline scanning for pertinent, local news that I need to know. Often the news is in the headline "Quarantine extended by 3 weeks." That does me. 

 

On 3/31/2020 at 11:49 AM, TheSpectre said:

I much prefer seeing everyday people I can relate to on some level react to and report on news events. I support independent media funded by viewers.

Yeah, that's why I kind of like people like Tim Pool and Jimmy Dore (more on an entertainment level) - it's not news reporting per se, but more commentary on the news which is more discusional and you can get just a little deeper on the topics. I can't stand TV news either. When I see clips of it now and how awkwardly formal it is, it's just bizarre. Why did TV paint themselves in to this weird awkward corner where they have to be painfully formal? You know those American morning news shows where they have this fake, highly sterilized "banter" - it's so cringeworthy. 

 

Edited by Mister Pink

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Eutyphro
6 hours ago, Mister Pink said:

Why did TV paint themselves in to this weird awkward corner where they have to be painfully formal? You know those American morning news shows where they have this fake, highly sterilized "banter" - it's so cringeworthy. 

Because they're manufacturing consent and are sellouts. They're just manipulating the uninformed masses to consent to whatever the mainstream of business wants. It's not malicious per se, because the majority of people are not and do not intend to be free independent thinkers, and willingly live in a bubble of mediocrity and consumerism.

I've also watched the left wing Youtube channels quite a lot recently, such as Jimmy Dore, David Pakman, and Kyle Kulinski. Eventhough they are Bernie groupies, because the mainstream was incredibly deceitful and biased in its effort to undermine Bernie, they provided a lot of interesting angles on events that were not present in the mainstream, and it sometimes made them interesting.

But to get back to my point of the mainstream manufacturing consent and catering to the apathetic uninformed masses, the angle I've already taken on it in this thread is this, it is that people with a lack of purpose and meaning in their life, which most people suffer from, are stimulated most by negativity and sensationalism. This is the reason why mainstream news is a generally meaningless round the clock disaster highlight reel.

I think the most healthy attitude towards news is to limit your intake and read in depth quality journalism.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Mister Pink
Posted (edited)
On 4/14/2020 at 7:12 PM, Eutyphro said:

I think the most healthy attitude towards news is to limit your intake and read in depth quality journalism.

I think you are right. And that's underlying general consensus I'm getting from this thread. 

 

Perhaps I'll elaborate on that some more. Maybe going one step more of limiting the intake and asking myself:

 

  • "Is this news pertinent for my being?"  Does this news hold any value to me and my decision making processes?  If not: 
  • "Why am I consuming this?" is it for entertainment value? The shock? 
  • "Do I have more important things to do, which I have control over?"
Edited by Mister Pink
  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Evil empire
Posted (edited)

To get real news we need the medias to be independent from both the state and the company bosses.

 

What we get watching the "news" is more a mix of propaganda and diversion with a bit of truth here and there.

 

 

For example : everytime a dictator makes a coup d'état or a purge it is helped by the police, the army and it takes control of the medias and of the justice, in other words no dictator never made any coup d'état by crating a welfare-state or nationalizing any company, this is the kind of truth you will never hear in a media controlled by a company boss.

Edited by Evil empire

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Sign in to follow this  

  • 1 User Currently Viewing
    0 members, 0 Anonymous, 1 Guest

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using GTAForums.com, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.