GTA 6 Speculation & Discussion

[Dark Alessa]

Nobody thinks that if it was set in the 50s it would be very similar to games like Mafia II?

 

[HOW'S ANNIE?]

9 hours ago, Jon Dohnson said:

Yeah, people are always dumb and desperate, but not you, right?

You are always well informed and you know exactly what´s coming next.

Maybe you are the one who is the exact opposite?

 

Granted it's nothing more than a reference to San Andreas, but doesn't it seen strange how similar these shots look to the ending of GTA V Trailer 1?

Edited January 6, 2020 by HOW'S ANNIE?

[Kris194]

17 minutes ago, HOW'S ANNIE? said:

Granted it's probably nothing more than a reference, but doesn't it seen strange how similar these shots look to the ending of GTA V Trailer 1?

GTA V didn't even exist back in 2008.

3 hours ago, Ronald Reagan said:

You know, we could have one protagonist in 1980's (or 1970's, whatever) and one in 2020's and change through them just like in Grand Theft Auto V, but with a short loading screen.

 

Or even better... chapters. 

 

Chapter 1. 1950's

Chapter 2. 1980's

 

Chapter 3. 2010's (or 2020's).

 

Yeah...

 

I don't know, man.

 

---

I believe we'll have chapters, similar to RDR 2.

Edited January 6, 2020 by Kris194

[Zello]

 

 

If we're going by pictures and easter eggs in games I want this to be Venturas soo bad.

[Kris194]

5 hours ago, Black_Jesus said:

I for one think we will get Venturas and Vice connected or Vice and Liberty connected just based on my theory.

Venturas is out of question, it deserves its own GTA.

Edited January 6, 2020 by Kris194

[HOW'S ANNIE?]

6 minutes ago, Kris194 said:

GTA V didn't even exist back in 2008.

Edited my post to make it a bit clearer, but I wasn't trying to imply so. The imagery just happens to be similar enough to notice is all I'm saying

[REVENGE777]

22 minutes ago, HOW'S ANNIE? said:

Edited my post to make it a bit clearer, but I wasn't trying to imply so. The imagery just happens to be similar enough to notice is all I'm saying

I see what you’re saying. They both look so similar that it almost looks like it was take straight from the trailer 

[C-h-a-r-l-y]

3 hours ago, HOW'S ANNIE? said:

Granted it's nothing more than a reference to San Andreas, but doesn't it seen strange how similar these shots look to the ending of GTA V Trailer 1?

It´s the skyline of Los Santos. Possibly updated later. There must be a lots of Easter Eggs in V pointing to GTA 6. The makers of GTA 6 are Occultists.lol

 

We should all play V again searching for possible new hints. We will see this game with other eyes.:)

3 hours ago, Zello said:

 

 

If we're going by pictures and easter eggs in games I want this to be Venturas soo bad.

It´s maybe one part of "Project Americas".:) Who knows?

 

https://asapland.com/gta-6-does-gta-5s-new-easter-egg-reveal-clues-on-the-project-americas-map/11068/

 

This would be so sick.:)

Edited January 6, 2020 by Jon Dohnson

[C-h-a-r-l-y]

https://gta.fandom.com/wiki/Vice_City_(HD_Universe)

 

I´m sure there is meaning to all of this, besides the fact that Vice City is a nonphysical part of the HD Universe.

 

It makes sence to hint at it as the next GTA Game appearing physically in the HD Universe.

 

Man, i´am a genius.:D

Edited January 6, 2020 by Jon Dohnson

[Zello]

 

To all the fake leakers out there

 

 

E3 Announcement? Nope

 

Gamescom announcement? Nope

 

October Announcement? Nope

 

The Game Awards announcement? Nope

 

Bully II announcement instead? Nope

 

CES? Nope

 

Fake leakers are fake? Yup

 

Edited January 6, 2020 by Zello

[Kris194]

37 minutes ago, Jon Dohnson said:

It´s maybe one part of "Project Americas".:) Who knows?

 

https://asapland.com/gta-6-does-gta-5s-new-easter-egg-reveal-clues-on-the-project-americas-map/11068/

 

This would be so sick.:)

It's just "employment agency" looking for mule to smuggle cocaine from South America to Central America. That's how it works basically.

 

I have a small theory, that we should be rather looking at some GTA Online DLCs because those could be natural part of GTA Online and they could be testing waters for GTA VI at the same time. Is it fun? Is it gonna work?

Edited January 6, 2020 by Kris194

[C-h-a-r-l-y]

16 minutes ago, Zello said:

 

To all the fake leakers out there

 

 

E3 Announcement? Nope

 

Gamescom announcement? Nope

 

October Announcement? Nope

 

The Game Awards announcement? Nope

 

Bully II announcement instead? Nope

 

CES? Nope

 

Fake leakers are fake? Yup

 

There are no fake leaks. A leak is backed up by evidence and confirmation.

 

A "fake leak" is an oxymoron. Impossible.

18 minutes ago, Kris194 said:

It's just "employment agency" looking for mule to smuggle cocaine from South America to Central America. That's how it works basically.

 

I have a small theory, that we should be rather looking at some GTA Online DLCs because those could be natural part of GTA Online and they could be testing waters for GTA VI at the same time. Is it fun? Is it gonna work?

They´ve tested the volumetric sky of GTA 6 possibly in RDR 2. Yeah it makes sense.:)

[iPeluche]

 

[Kris194]

1 hour ago, Jon Dohnson said:

 

We're talking about it now. Six figure in terms of six zeros, you know, millions.

Edited January 6, 2020 by Kris194

[Len Lfc]

20 minutes ago, Kris194 said:

We're talking about it now. Six figure in terms of six zeros, you know, millions.

Six figures is less than a million. At most it's $999,999. Six figures, not zeroes  

[C-h-a-r-l-y]

21 minutes ago, Kris194 said:

We're talking about it now. Six figure in terms of six zeros, you know, millions.

Maybe a hint that there are 6 Mio cubic meter of Water in GTA 6.rofl

8 minutes ago, Len Lfc said:

Six figures is less than a million. At most it's $999,999. Six figures, not zeroes  

smarta$$!

[Len Lfc]

  

10 hours ago, Jon Dohnson said:

Nobody treat them as facts, this is simple impossible

 

1 hour ago, Jon Dohnson said:

There must be a lots of Easter Eggs in V pointing to GTA 6.

Yet you seem to contradict yourself. Also, why must there be easter eggs to GTA VI, in GTA V. Also, you can't put easter eggs in ahead of time, about future games 6 - 10 years in advance, that's not what an easter egg is. At best, it'd be a hint. And Rockstar don't know for a fact where they're going next. 

 

10 hours ago, Jon Dohnson said:

Just let the people think and believe whatever they want, unless there is a confirmation from Rockstar. Try to be a part of the community who want to believe and to dream until the announcement. Don´t try to destroy their "illusion", even if you knew more than they do

I'm not stopping anyone believing what they want to believe. Evidenced by the very discussions on these forums. But I'm not going to go along with all the obvious fake BS, or 'discoveries' that some people think they've found when they're just 6+ year old in game websites that are about something completely different. I've been digging up more concrete evidence and speculation based of facts and legitimate information, than many here. Along with other users who are doing some great work. Trust me, I've been there, when I was young and just wanted to get excited at anything. But it gets you nowhere. Why should I let people believe for the sake of believing? They're not kids believing in santa claus. I'd rather help educate them, and help people understand how to look at things, and how to understand things. Some people are so desperate, they think anything that has the number 6 in it is 'obviously' a tease. or if there's a map with south america visible it's 'obviously' a tease. I don't know more than anyone. We all have access to the same information. I'd just rather more people were sensible about things, rather than getting over excited and helping spread misinformation. Because guess what... people believe that sh*t, and then get upset when it doesn't happen. I don't know how many people were adamant that GTA VI would be announced in 2019, apparently it was 'obvious' yet again. "With all these teases, it's obvious something is coming soon" Okay... based on what? Teases that aren't actually teases, that people are just imagining, and convincing themselves about. People don't use any logic or reasoning. They just wish and hope and feel. I don't want to be a part of that.

 

[YNNEL]

Len Lfc, what do you make of Rockstar adding GTAV to game pass? No doubt it’s nothing, but it seemed a bit weird to me considering GTAV is still a best seller and there’s not really any reason for them to put it on there. Maybe they want to get more people playing it before they announce VI.

[Kris194]

Not really, they make more many on GTA Online's shark cards than on game sales. By the way, CES 2020 could be more exciting than I thought. It seems, that Xbox is heading to Las Vegas

 

Sony so far is whisper quiet, they only posted this few days ago

 

 

Do not expect anything big, that will come in February but they may want to reveal something ahead of PS Meeting.

Edited January 6, 2020 by Kris194

[Len Lfc]

49 minutes ago, YNNEL said:

Len Lfc, what do you make of Rockstar adding GTAV to game pass? No doubt it’s nothing, but it seemed a bit weird to me considering GTAV is still a best seller and there’s not really any reason for them to put it on there. Maybe they want to get more people playing it before they announce VI.

Hard to say. It was in PlayStation Now for 3 months, so now it's Xbox's turn. https://blog.eu.playstation.com/2019/10/01/playstation-now-update-brings-new-subscription-pricing-adds-gta-v-god-of-war-uncharted-4-and-more/

You could see it as Rockstar having one last push at new players before moving on. Or it could just be another new way to gain more players in general. Too many unknown factors to really judge. GTA V isn't exactly a game that needs a boost. Personally, I think: When Rockstar are about to announce GTA VI, they know GTA V will spike. So why have it on a free service? Maybe it doesn't matter to them, as it's a free gateway to people being more willing to buy shark cards. But GTA V is fairly cheap now anyway. I don't suspect it's any indication of GTA VI news, tbh. But... I do not know. 

[Kris194]

2 hours ago, Jon Dohnson said:

They´ve tested the volumetric sky of GTA 6 possibly in RDR 2. Yeah it makes sense.:)

Not really, that's not what I meant. If rumors are true then both PS5 and XSX will be 10x as powerful as PS4 in terms of GPU. What worked in RDR 2 in terms of graphics is unlikely to work in GTA VI.

[Len Lfc]

8 minutes ago, Kris194 said:

Not really, that's not what I meant. If rumors are true then both PS5 and XSX will be 10x as powerful as PS4 in terms of GPU. What worked in RDR 2 in terms of graphics is unlikely to work in GTA VI.

I don't like that logic to begin with. If that were true, then every game would just be a test for their next game. GTA V had a snowy prologue: test for RDR2. RDR2 had guarma: Test for GTA VI. Will whatever is in GTA VI be a test for RDR3 or whatever is next after that? Surely time spent working on something to test in the current game would be better suited to developing the actual game, and the time saved can be used on the actual next project.

 

Basically, North Yankton and Guarma probably exist for their own reasons. Not as 'tests' for the next game.

[Kris194]

I don't like and I don't get that logic too. Rockstar is always trying to figure out what is good for their current game, not if it will work in next game. What I exactly meant is, that with some GTA Online DLCs such as Smugglers Run,  Rockstar could be ALSO(it's not reason why they exist) testing waters (intentionally or not) for GTA VI since they already knew, what will be main theme of GTA VI.

Edited January 6, 2020 by Kris194

[Dark Alessa]

2 hours ago, YNNEL said:

Len Lfc, what do you make of Rockstar adding GTAV to game pass? No doubt it’s nothing, but it seemed a bit weird to me considering GTAV is still a best seller and there’s not really any reason for them to put it on there. Maybe they want to get more people playing it before they announce VI.

 

1 hour ago, Len Lfc said:

Hard to say. It was in PlayStation Now for 3 months, so now it's Xbox's turn. https://blog.eu.playstation.com/2019/10/01/playstation-now-update-brings-new-subscription-pricing-adds-gta-v-god-of-war-uncharted-4-and-more/

You could see it as Rockstar having one last push at new players before moving on. Or it could just be another new way to gain more players in general. Too many unknown factors to really judge. GTA V isn't exactly a game that needs a boost. Personally, I think: When Rockstar are about to announce GTA VI, they know GTA V will spike. So why have it on a free service? Maybe it doesn't matter to them, as it's a free gateway to people being more willing to buy shark cards. But GTA V is fairly cheap now anyway. I don't suspect it's any indication of GTA VI news, tbh. But... I do not know. 

It could mean something. Lately it has been common for Sony to add games to PSPlus while promoting a new game from that franchise. For example they gave us Nioh a month ago, just when Nioh 2 is coming, they have also done the same with Quantic Dream games before Detroit came out, and I'm sure there are several more examples in that sense. But of course, it can also be just a coincidence and we're obsessed with making sense of it all.

 

[DOUGL4S1]

4 hours ago, iPeluche said:

Reminds me when people tought the Gruppe Sechs logo was an indication to GTA 6, even tho that logo was around since GTA IV.

 

GTA 6 is almost like Half Life 3.

Edited January 6, 2020 by DOUGL4S1

[Len Lfc]

8 minutes ago, Dark Alessa said:

 

It could mean something. Lately it has been common for Sony to add games to PSPlus while promoting a new game from that franchise. For example they gave us Nioh a month ago, just when Nioh 2 is coming, they have also done the same with Quantic Dream games before Detroit came out, and I'm sure there are several more examples in that sense. But of course, it can also be just a coincidence and we're obsessed with making sense of it all.

 

Considering it's now left PS Now, and is now entering Game Pass, presumably for the same amount of time, although I'm not sure. And GTA VI has still not been announced... I'd say it means nothing. 

[C-h-a-r-l-y]

3 hours ago, Len Lfc said:

  

 

Yet you seem to contradict yourself. Also, why must there be easter eggs to GTA VI, in GTA V. Also, you can't put easter eggs in ahead of time, about future games 6 - 10 years in advance, that's not what an easter egg is. At best, it'd be a hint. And Rockstar don't know for a fact where they're going next. 

 

I'm not stopping anyone believing what they want to believe. Evidenced by the very discussions on these forums. But I'm not going to go along with all the obvious fake BS, or 'discoveries' that some people think they've found when they're just 6+ year old in game websites that are about something completely different. I've been digging up more concrete evidence and speculation based of facts and legitimate information, than many here. Along with other users who are doing some great work. Trust me, I've been there, when I was young and just wanted to get excited at anything. But it gets you nowhere. Why should I let people believe for the sake of believing? They're not kids believing in santa claus. I'd rather help educate them, and help people understand how to look at things, and how to understand things. Some people are so desperate, they think anything that has the number 6 in it is 'obviously' a tease. or if there's a map with south america visible it's 'obviously' a tease. I don't know more than anyone. We all have access to the same information. I'd just rather more people were sensible about things, rather than getting over excited and helping spread misinformation. Because guess what... people believe that sh*t, and then get upset when it doesn't happen. I don't know how many people were adamant that GTA VI would be announced in 2019, apparently it was 'obvious' yet again. "With all these teases, it's obvious something is coming soon" Okay... based on what? Teases that aren't actually teases, that people are just imagining, and convincing themselves about. People don't use any logic or reasoning. They just wish and hope and feel. I don't want to be a part of that.

 

And how do you know that they don´t know where to go for a fact? It´s just speculation on your part. It´s the same thing or even worse.

 

It´s easy not to risk some speculative and maybe far fetched thoughts or even feelings not backed up by so called facts on a game that is not even confirmed yet in it existense.

 

Again, there is no fake bullsh*t or fake leaks(oxymoron) and it can´t be obvious, until Rockstar confirms or refute it. But people can have fun to do so and in this case you would be someone who violates the uplifting atmosphere of all the people dreaming about what could be the next GTA or not, even if it´s based on nothing.

 

You are not better, if you think you´re on the safe site by using evidence of the past, to predict the future or to refute the presence, that´s not even how the world works, in truth. There is more in this world than logic and reasoning. It´s called intuition and the ability to connect the dots, to see the bigger picture. If there is meaning in the hints from Rockstar about a future game, it´s maybe impossible to verify it by facts or evidence, unless Rockstar confirms it.

 

No, nobody gets upset, well maybe kids or idiots, but there is nothing what you could do.lol It´s not your job to educate people on gtaforums. As a normal user or GTA Fan you should rather share the dreams of the community and not trying to be a smartass all the time. As you said, you don´t know more as any other, right?

[Len Lfc]

23 minutes ago, Jon Dohnson said:

Again, there is no fake bullsh*t or fake leaks(oxymoron) and it can´t be obvious.

There are. And they are obvious. That's why mods ban users and lock threads. If someone makes up a lie, and claims it's a leak. Then it's a fake leak. Yes I know technically that means it's not a leak if its made up, therefore fake leaks can't exist. But we're not here to use 100% perfect english grammar all the time. it's easier to just say "fake leaks" or "Bullsh*t".

 

27 minutes ago, Jon Dohnson said:

It´s not your job to educate people on gtaforums. As a normal user or GTA Fan you should rather share the dreams of the community and not trying to be a smartass all the time

If that's not my job, then neither is it yours. So should you stop trying to educate me? Same goes for the rest. You are also a GTAForums member, so you should also share my dreams.

[C-h-a-r-l-y]

The chances are small for a PS5 reveal on CES 2020 and certainly not for a presentation.

 

I think they will showcase some improvements on their headphones or TV´s.

 

The PS5 presentation with some games will be most likely in February.

 

Just my intuition.:)

5 minutes ago, Len Lfc said:

There are. And they are obvious. That's why mods ban users and lock threads. If someone makes up a lie, and claims it's a leak. Then it's a fake leak. Yes I know technically that means it's not a leak if its made up, therefore fake leaks can't exist. But we're not here to use 100% perfect english grammar all the time. it's easier to just say "fake leaks" or "Bullsh*t".

 

If that's not my job, then neither is it yours. So should you stop trying to educate me? Same goes for the rest. You are also a GTAForums member, so you should also share my dreams.

Agreed.

[Eternal Moonshine]

35 minutes ago, Jon Dohnson said:

And how do you know that they don´t know where to go for a fact?

thanks to Ash. despite all the "evidence" i don't really believe that GTA 6 is gonna be set in Vice City