Anyone in here love GTA 4 and 5 better than SA?

[StrafeFTW]

 

Imo, the gameplay in SA was incredible 

*BUT*

The storyline was utter garbage just because it was all over the place and the missions were so boring.. why would I want to spray a wall in a mission.. and GTA IV IMO improved the storyline, missions, characters, presentation, physics, details and multiple options in missions.. and GTA V, while the storyline was not a big improvement to GTA IV but it was a big improvement over SA story because the story is not about your protagonist being a gangbanger, owns a garage, casino and then being a gangbanger once again.. and the missions in V was a big improvement over SA and IV and they brought back rampages that were Vice City feature, and they came up with a lot of new features such as strangers and freaks missions, random event and etc..

So imo

V>IV>SA 

[Excalibur Voltaire]

Once again, we already have a thread for this

 

[DOUGL4S1]

For me it's IV>SA>V

 

I do respect San Andreas because it had some... let's say creative, missions. But I do feel like the game's story gets absolutelly lost after The Green Sabre, if it wasn't for Sweet's occasional phone call, you could start the game from the middle and not lose that much (I mean, you go from a gangbanger, then you're helping a redneck lunatick to rob everything, then you're working for the mafia, and suddenly you're robbing casinos and raiding miliraty bases, like wtf). It also had a LOT of stuff to do: schools, vehicle challenges, trucking, gambling, etc (even tho people seem to have a love-hate relationship for that).

 

IV's story was great, but I do feel like the mission variety suffered a bit from that (not complaining, tho.) and V seems to be trying to copy San Andreas with some sprinklings of IV in there.

[Uncle Sikee Atric]

5 minutes ago, Legion of Hell said:

Once again, we already have a thread for this

 

 

That's all there is to say.