VLA4Life Posted December 18, 2018 Share Posted December 18, 2018 Customs Fast Tracks was one of the optional missions you could do for Cesar after Driving School & San Fierro races are out of the way. At the start of the mission, CJ mentions his distress for Beverly, Sweet & Smoke. Kendl asked CJ what they were gonna do about Sweet and he couldn’t give a straight forward answer. Rockstar most likely meant for this to take place before Sweet’s released from prison, but the conversation was worded to where it could mean CJ’s trying to get Sweet out of the hood life for good. CJ lost Brian, Smoke, Ryder; he’s lost enough brothers already. Betrayal or not. Cesar mentioned before he wanted to propose to Kendl. After everything that’s happened, I doubt Sweet would be too upset about that. I think Kendl asked about Sweet simply because he wants to stay stubborn in the ghetto. Once you claim every set for the Grove, you don’t have to worry about Ballas & Vagos again until 2013. Do you think CJ got him to leave eventually? Or did he just stay there and die? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Evil empire Posted December 19, 2018 Share Posted December 19, 2018 (edited) CJ and Sweet are fictional characters. When the scenario ends it's like when a theatre play ends, nothing happens, the show is over. Edited December 19, 2018 by Evil empire lil weasel, D9fred95, Hmmm nice bike and 1 other 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VLA4Life Posted December 19, 2018 Author Share Posted December 19, 2018 Wow, you must be very fun to talk to. Lancerator, Lioshenka and Copcaller 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KingD19 Posted January 2, 2019 Share Posted January 2, 2019 On 12/19/2018 at 5:53 AM, Evil empire said: CJ and Sweet are fictional characters. When the scenario ends it's like when a theatre play ends, nothing happens, the show is over. I find it hilarious that when we make our fan made theories one of you guys simplify what actually happen Evil empire and Copcaller 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rhoda Posted January 4, 2019 Share Posted January 4, 2019 The short answer? It's vague enough to be explained away, but it's a little clumsy and is indeed written in a manner where the player plays this strand as soon as it's available. With Zero's missions, it's a little different, because he's involved in the planning of a heist which also happens to be optional. If we play the heist but not Zero's missions, we still know enough about him to involve him. He's useful, and perfect nerd foil for the group. Long (and purely speculative) answer? You could argue that it slots in to almost all stages of the storyline. Even at the end, if you were to come back to it after everything has been wrapped up you might argue CJ is still hesitant about his brother's life in the Grove. Sweet is stubborn to a fault, and almost completely discredits CJ's success the minute they see each other. While the two do reconcile, it isn't like Sweet's packed his belongings and moved by the end of the game. CJ would likely still have reservations about sticking around, living in the house his mother was killed in. You could say at a push that Kendl's question could fit in regarding that, but I don't think R* thought that far ahead. I would argue that most players would play these missions as soon as they were available. Who wouldn't want to play absolutely everything the game had to offer? Even if you miss them completely, you would miss the plot hole entirely anyway so it doesn't matter. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VLA4Life Posted January 6, 2019 Author Share Posted January 6, 2019 On 1/4/2019 at 2:11 PM, Motherstep said: The short answer? It's vague enough to be explained away, but it's a little clumsy and is indeed written in a manner where the player plays this strand as soon as it's available. With Zero's missions, it's a little different, because he's involved in the planning of a heist which also happens to be optional. If we play the heist but not Zero's missions, we still know enough about him to involve him. He's useful, and perfect nerd foil for the group. Long (and purely speculative) answer? You could argue that it slots in to almost all stages of the storyline. Even at the end, if you were to come back to it after everything has been wrapped up you might argue CJ is still hesitant about his brother's life in the Grove. Sweet is stubborn to a fault, and almost completely discredits CJ's success the minute they see each other. While the two do reconcile, it isn't like Sweet's packed his belongings and moved by the end of the game. CJ would likely still have reservations about sticking around, living in the house his mother was killed in. You could say at a push that Kendl's question could fit in regarding that, but I don't think R* thought that far ahead. I would argue that most players would play these missions as soon as they were available. Who wouldn't want to play absolutely everything the game had to offer? Even if you miss them completely, you would miss the plot hole entirely anyway so it doesn't matter. I always thought the Zero missions & the Casino heist were required. Zero’s missions I didn’t care for but the heist would make more sense if CJ got that taken care of before flying back to Los Santos. I believe in GTA 3 if you go through Sal’s missions before finishing Joey’s you’ll f*ck yourself over on getting 100% because of a turning point like with The Green Sabre. I’d say most would finish the games at their own pace but also not worry too much about stuff outside of the story they could finish at any time. It’s not that I didn’t want to play those missions with Cesar ASAP. I just had no idea. I didn’t pay much mind to driving school or races shortly after a new city was unlocked. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lioshenka Posted January 6, 2019 Share Posted January 6, 2019 On 12/19/2018 at 10:53 AM, Evil empire said: CJ and Sweet are fictional characters. When the scenario ends it's like when a theatre play ends, nothing happens, the show is over. That's you, sir. Just because you have no imagination doesn't mean that the others don't. VLA4Life and Copcaller 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VLA4Life Posted January 6, 2019 Author Share Posted January 6, 2019 1 hour ago, Lioshenka said: That's you, sir. Just because you have no imagination doesn't mean that the others don't. Yeah Ken Rosenberg & Kent Paul being with CJ shows how things after the events of Vice City went to sh*t but “lol it fiction lol xddd” like what the f*ck is the point of these forums anyway if you can’t talk about these things. Lioshenka and DK06282000 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Evil empire Posted January 6, 2019 Share Posted January 6, 2019 4 hours ago, Lioshenka said: That's you, sir. Just because you have no imagination doesn't mean that the others don't. I have imagination but it doesn't prevent me from remaining connected with the reality. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lioshenka Posted January 7, 2019 Share Posted January 7, 2019 14 hours ago, Evil empire said: I have imagination but it doesn't prevent me from remaining connected with the reality. GTA SA is fiction though :p Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheSantader25 Posted January 7, 2019 Share Posted January 7, 2019 I M A G I N A T I O N Lioshenka and El Penguin Bobo 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
D9fred95 Posted January 7, 2019 Share Posted January 7, 2019 Yeah, I'm going to be the non-imaginative guy. The Wang Cars missions probably chronologically happen when San Fierro is done since that's the earliest CJ can purchase the showroom. Presumably Toreno would call CJ after the Wang Cars assets are done because it would be weird for CJ to continue building up the garage after his brother has been threatened by a mysterious phone call. Only reason Toreno calls CJ before you do the missions in the game proper is because Wang Cars is optional and forcing the player to do them before the story can continue would no longer make them optional. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Evil empire Posted January 7, 2019 Share Posted January 7, 2019 9 hours ago, Lioshenka said: GTA SA is fiction though This is what I wrote ; I remain connected with the reality of GTA San Andreas featuring fictional characters taking part to a fictional story in a fictional place. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VLA4Life Posted January 7, 2019 Author Share Posted January 7, 2019 45 minutes ago, Evil empire said: This is what I wrote ; I remain connected with the reality of GTA San Andreas featuring fictional characters taking part to a fictional story in a fictional place. Are you this self-absorbed and condescending in real life or is this just your little fictional late 90s album username persona? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DK06282000 Posted January 9, 2019 Share Posted January 9, 2019 On 12/19/2018 at 2:53 AM, Evil empire said: CJ and Sweet are fictional characters. When the scenario ends it's like when a theatre play ends, nothing happens, the show is over. I agree. Because coming up with our own theories and imaginations is rather pointless and a waste of time. In fact, why don't we close this forum down since there's no point in using our own theories or imaginations, because f*ck this site for allowing people to do any of that! Lioshenka and VLA4Life 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VLA4Life Posted January 9, 2019 Author Share Posted January 9, 2019 3 hours ago, DK06282000 said: I agree. Because coming up with our own theories and imaginations is rather pointless and a waste of time. In fact, why don't we close this forum down since there's no point in using our own theories or imaginations, because f*ck this site for allowing people to do any of that! It took me one solid second to click on his profile and the very first thing I noticed was him bitching and moaning over someone making a popular topic. Imaging telling users with actual substance to get a grip on reality while nitpicking posts you don’t like over the most trivial sh*t. On a video game chat form of all places. Lioshenka 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now