Next DLC Speculation Thread (Part 5)

[ALifeOfMisery]

https://www.rockstargames.com/newswire/article/60387/New-from-the-Southern-San-Andreas-Super-Sport-Series-Target-Assault-Ra

Target Assault has its own trailer lol. I'm getting Tiny Racers flashbacks.

[BlarKing]

 

https://www.rockstargames.com/newswire/article/60387/New-from-the-Southern-San-Andreas-Super-Sport-Series-Target-Assault-Ra

Target Assault has its own trailer lol. I'm getting Tiny Racers flashbacks.

 

 

I think this is the reason they allowed themselves to release just one car this week..

Somewhere in the mastermind head, the monkey with the cymbals told them

this mode is a big enough deal and that players will be happy with it enough to

swallow a single drip-feed vehicle.

Edited April 3, 2018 by BlarKing

[Non Funkable Token]

Good thing is this event seems to last only one week.

[ALifeOfMisery]

Good thing is this event seems to last only one week.

I'd be extremely surprised if the Target Assault bonus isn't extended by a week. Hopefully we get a good bonus alongside it next week. Because I think we'll be skipping vehicle releases next week.

[Tez2]

 

 

Just imagine how much worse the negative feedback on the updates would be, if they actually cost $.

It can always be worse, so make the best out of what you get for free....or play something else.

Let's ignore all the factors that will change upon doing this and claim it will be much worse.

 

 

Let's ignore all other examples and pretend it would be better.

Just because they charge for it, doesn't mean it will be quality. The multitude of sh*tty DLC out there is clear evidence of this.

But hypothetical circular arguments are hypothetical circular arguments.

 

What about this example ?

 

 

 

That's the first idea they had for GTA Online and it looks great without even playing it.

That was separated from freemode, you could choose to play that or freemode.

The developers can make content like that if you let them have the opportunity to not think about money.

R* isn't giving them that opportunity just like how SP DLC was scrapped due to GTAO success.

[AUScowboy]

Hopefully next week will bring bonus cash on something lucrative once again as well as the release of the Sparrow, Flash, and Issi Classic.

[Tez2]

 

https://www.rockstargames.com/newswire/article/60387/New-from-the-Southern-San-Andreas-Super-Sport-Series-Target-Assault-Ra

Target Assault has its own trailer lol. I'm getting Tiny Racers flashbacks.

 

Kinda makes sense since the codename of the DLC is mpassault

[thesentient]

Wonder if Rockstar will introduce some sort of mass battle-royal DLC.

[BullseyeSBT]

 

 

https://www.rockstargames.com/newswire/article/60387/New-from-the-Southern-San-Andreas-Super-Sport-Series-Target-Assault-Ra

Target Assault has its own trailer lol. I'm getting Tiny Racers flashbacks.

 

Kinda makes sense since the codename of the DLC is mpassault

 

Am I to understand we will be able to crate our own Target Assault races?

[Duckdude001]

Dont understand the reason they added this vehicle as a addition to the weaponized class. Could have just made the target assault races come with technicals and other weaponized vehicles as options instead of ruining a good pickup truck and overpricing it by adding a gun on it. 1.7mil, really?! My technical does almost everything this thing does and in many aspects better, not even counting the other 2 military machines known as the insurgent and the barrage.

Wonder if Rockstar will introduce some sort of mass battle-royal DLC.

just give motor wars 3x rp/$ and allow an option to remove weaponized vehicles from the maps and replace them with civilian vehicles. And theres ur battle royale. Edited April 3, 2018 by Duckdude001

[carnerd3000]

Hey Fun, is there any Targeted Sales at all?

[lll-H-I-M-lll]

Hopefully next week will bring bonus cash on something lucrative once again as well as the release of the Sparrow, Flash, and Issi Classic.

Flash and issi im well looking forward too i got some vehicles ''stored'' in my clubhouse so the spaces i have left are reserved

[Killer Whale]

Wow... they really want people to throw money away with the Avenger.

 

And I guess many fell for the "2x$ every week on business" schtick they made last year.

[carnerd3000]

I'll try to give the races a shot, but I think I'll be taking a break from GTA this week. Although I do want the Barrage, but maybe not now.

[AStiffBreeze]

Looking forward to everyone losing their sh*t at GTAVI's female protagonist.

I'm curious to see who they'd model her after. Rockstar always take a heap of influences from movies, and their characters often tend to mirror specific movie characters. I haven't seen many female protagonists in the sorts of crime movies that would inspire a GTA game. Any suggestions on that front?

 

Wow... they really want people to throw money away with the Avenger.

The Avenger is awesome. It's a VTOL enabled, orbital cannon proof, vehicle air dropping, lobby carrying, instaspawning, armoured flying bus of death

[Rented]

If already existing businesses will really be the main focus of the next DLC I hope they add new resupply missions as well.

 

Really hoping for Special Cargo pickups inside the building of Rogers Scrap yard and on the yacht like for gun running.

 

Not including a mission where you have to use a towtruck to steal a car for the Vehicle Warehouse was a missed opportunity as well, would have added some nice variety and some purpose to the currently unused towtrucks.

 

Speaking of unused vehicles the Forklift and Dockhandler could have also been used in Special Create ressuplies to move obstacles out the way. But oh well that's just my take on a fun(time waster/variety) mission.

[MaddenedGhost]

Wonder if Rockstar will introduce some sort of mass battle-royal DLC.

Motor Wars was the closest BR style gamemode that we will ever get in GTAOnline

RDR2 may or may not have its own battle royal mode according to that leak from few months ago.

 

Now how about something new instead of every developer jumping on this BR as if it's the only thing that works in gaming now, just because PUBG and Fortnite are famous doesn't mean that BR is the only thing that works now.

[Sanches]

Wonder if Rockstar will introduce some sort of mass battle-royal DLC.

Are you sure that you'll handle broken PvP but with higher bets?

[thesentient]

I'm not saying I want a BR mode, I just wouldn't be surprised if Rockstar jumped on the bandwagon with GTA DLC.

[Mach1bud]

I'm not saying I want a BR mode, I just wouldn't be surprised if Rockstar jumped on the bandwagon with GTA DLC.

They already did. Motor Wars is literally BR mode with a minimap and Weaponized vehicles.

[Yellow Dog with Cone]

Aside from the broken mess that is PvP in this game, there's also the issue that GTA Online doesn't have enough accesible interiors for such a mode to work.

 

But let's put that away for a sec, what if there was a Battle Royale mode (probably an Adversary Mode) in which you start only with a Pistol and you have to find more weapons, gear like bulletproof vests and helmets, some low end sedans for transport (the upcoming Cheburek would be perfect for this), all of this while the playing area gets smaller eventually?

 

Maybe that could work, even when it's a blatant ripoff.

[carnerd3000]

Just tried one of the races... and then I actually left in the middle of the race because somehow my teammate and I got separated and put into our own Insurgents, so we weren't able to shoot any of the targets anymore. And of course, my teammate was also a random who was trying to shoot everybody else and not the damn targets.

[Mrnrfan182]

Aside from the broken mess that is PvP in this game, there's also the issue that GTA Online doesn't have enough accesible interiors for such a mode to work.

 

But let's put that away for a sec, what if there was a Battle Royale mode (probably an Adversary Mode) in which you start only with a Pistol and you have to find more weapons, gear like bulletproof vests and helmets, some low end sedans for transport (the upcoming Cheburek would be perfect for this), all of this while the playing area gets smaller eventually?

 

Maybe that could work, even when it's a blatant ripoff.

You realize this exists right? Its an adversary mode called motor wars or something like that. You jump from a plane, collect weapons and vehicles and the theres a boundary that shrinks...how has anyone misses that? Theyve x2 that damn mode like 3 times. Its a blatant rip off, it was talked about in excess when it dropped. Edited April 3, 2018 by Mrnrfan182

[trainerdave]

 

 

 

Just imagine how much worse the negative feedback on the updates would be, if they actually cost $.

It can always be worse, so make the best out of what you get for free....or play something else.

Let's ignore all the factors that will change upon doing this and claim it will be much worse.

 

 

Let's ignore all other examples and pretend it would be better.

Just because they charge for it, doesn't mean it will be quality. The multitude of sh*tty DLC out there is clear evidence of this.

But hypothetical circular arguments are hypothetical circular arguments.

 

What about this example ?

 

 

 

That's the first idea they had for GTA Online and it looks great without even playing it.

That was separated from freemode, you could choose to play that or freemode.

The developers can make content like that if you let them have the opportunity to not think about money.

R* isn't giving them that opportunity just like how SP DLC was scrapped due to GTAO success.

 

 

I just saw the BETA graphics and thought that looks like fun, wonder what game that is......only be slapped in the face by R* choosing greed over content. I can only imagine what PC modders will "legally" do to improve this game once it no longer becomes relevant to R* pockets.

[elfoam]

 

Aside from the broken mess that is PvP in this game, there's also the issue that GTA Online doesn't have enough accesible interiors for such a mode to work.

 

But let's put that away for a sec, what if there was a Battle Royale mode (probably an Adversary Mode) in which you start only with a Pistol and you have to find more weapons, gear like bulletproof vests and helmets, some low end sedans for transport (the upcoming Cheburek would be perfect for this), all of this while the playing area gets smaller eventually?

 

Maybe that could work, even when it's a blatant ripoff.

You realize this exists right? Its an adversary mode called motor wars or something like that. You jump from a plane, collect weapons and vehicles and the theres a boundary that shrinks...how has anyone misses that? Theyve x2 that damn mode like 3 times. Its a blatant rip off, it was talked about in excess when it dropped.

 

How's anyone missed it?.. I haven't played an adversary mode for years! the I did try one, tiny cars or something.. threw up almost..

[Yellow Dog with Cone]

 

Aside from the broken mess that is PvP in this game, there's also the issue that GTA Online doesn't have enough accesible interiors for such a mode to work.

 

But let's put that away for a sec, what if there was a Battle Royale mode (probably an Adversary Mode) in which you start only with a Pistol and you have to find more weapons, gear like bulletproof vests and helmets, some low end sedans for transport (the upcoming Cheburek would be perfect for this), all of this while the playing area gets smaller eventually?

 

Maybe that could work, even when it's a blatant ripoff.

You realize this exists right? Its an adversary mode called motor wars or something like that. You jump from a plane, collect weapons and vehicles and the theres a boundary that shrinks...how has anyone misses that? Theyve x2 that damn mode like 3 times. Its a blatant rip off, it was talked about in excess when it dropped.

I already know that Motor Wars exists, I should have put that in my post.

 

My post was more of a "what if" we got an Adversary Mode closer in concept to PUBG than we have now with Motor Wars.

 

TBH, I have never played either PUBG or Fortnite, so I'm not an expert on the subject.

[Ehrmantraut]

 

why do you think there were no new titles between 2013 and up-to 2017 when RDR(2?) was announced?

Because they don't pump and dump games like other franchises do. If you follow the trend from the last several titles, it takes as many years to create as the number. So we should be looking at GTA VI next year (pure speculation).

 

From GTA III to SA: ~3 years

From SA to GTA IV: ~4 years

From GTA IV to V: ~5 years

From GTA V to VI: ~6 years????? (2019)

 

But that would be on the heals of RDR2, so maybe 2020.

 

I'm sure that he's not talking about GTA specifically, like, GTA it's not the only R* franchise, you know: Bully, Manhunt, Max Payne, Midnight Club, "Noire" (If that ever becomes a series), Agent, etc...

Or a new IP. It's just not normal for a Giant like R* spend 4, 5 years without release any single new game.

Edited April 3, 2018 by Cookie_Dude

[AUScowboy]

Wasn't there a rumor about them wanting to make a game set in the medieval era?

[Classique]

Wasn't there a rumor about them wanting to make a game set in the medieval era?

 

Imagine a lime green catapult with pink dollar rims and a musical horn. That will definitely strike fear in their enemies.

 

Glorious.

[Sanches]

Imagine a lime green catapult with pink dollar rims and a musical horn. That will definitely strike fear in their enemies.

 

Glorious.

I won't be able to move my catapult to Los-Santos Customs.

Edited April 3, 2018 by Sanches