Next DLC Speculation Thread (Part 2)

[Irish45455]

Asking for proof isn't that far-fetched of an idea. The absence of evidence is not the evidence of absence. If I told you that Rockstar was going to give everyone a shirt that makes you bulletproof you'd do one of two things: call me a nutter or say you want proof. You wouldn't take that as be-all end-all proof that it is for sure gonna happen.

Edited November 17, 2016 by Irish45455

[RedDagger]

-heavily implies that it's actually leaks and not just speculation

-makes a point of implying they know stuff we don't

-people talk about it for months as if it's a legitimate leak

-people start to think that, surprise surprise, it doesn't have any legitimacy

-still talking about it

 

"actually it's just speculation I didn't actually believe it...but hey what if it was real not that I actually believe it"

 

Good sh*t, folks. Good sh*t.

[Hunter]

Why does it matter who does or doesn't believe the soft guy? We have news of something (SP DLC possibly returning), and it's pretty solid, a lot more than him anyway.

 

As for soft, meh, maybe he's real maybe he's not. Doesn't really matter either way. Nothing's lost by believing or not believing or considering it or whatever.

Edited November 17, 2016 by Hunter

[SOFTSECRETS]

This post is going to long but here goes...

Just remember 2013 pre GTAV, and the wild theories this forum and many others had, on how GTAOnline would work, and compare it to the SOFTSECRETS speculation post!

 

Show me a past SPECULATION post, closer to the GTA online model we have today then what SOFTSECRETS speculated back in 2013! Pre GTA data miners and GTA youtubers!

 

To some the 2013 post may seem vague! (Not vague at all if you have the ability to comprehend and compare without any pre conceived judgements) and understand the games shift into micro transaction territory!

 

I asked before if anyone knows,

Where Heists even known to be available ONLINE back in MAY 2013? I think the Online trailer dropped in AUGUST 2013?

 

Purchase Clubhouse to activate biker free roam missions! NOT businesses! NOT biker work! NOT biker challenges! But CLUBHOUSE BIKER FREEMODE MISSIONS!! Just as the Speculation speculated! (Clubhouse BIKER freemode missions were not leaked by data miners)

 

Nothing like CEO/VIP scripts, the Clubhouse missions resemble heist board set up!

 

Another obvious, lucky guess! (Certainly doesn't prove speculation) but also doesn't disprove it!

 

Even the name of the update (again probably obvious) BIKERS! But again doesn't disprove speculation!

 

Bull-s***, Guess-work, Lucky, Vague, Coincidental, Obvious, Law Of Average, Process of elimination? OR (just maybe) the SPECULATION has some substance, bearing in mind the 2013!

 

And if/WHEN Law And Dis-Order(actual translation)

Update drops, and VEHICLES are needed to ACTIVATE missions, will it be said to be obvious, Lucky, vague..?

 

The high risk vehicles was supposed to be included in the last bikers update! (According to genuine leakers)

 

So nothing from that speculation post has been disproved yet!!

 

I see GTAIV and EFLC were worked on/updated recently..again probably just a another COINCIDENCE?

 

English my 2nd language (some here may say 3rd if you included bull****) so forgive grammar !!

 

Personal opinion (not worth much)THINK the speculation has substance and that's why I originally posted, although If genuine I thought post would have been removed for legal reasons, But it hasn't, so.......maybe.... IDK.....?? !!

 

As mentioned before I know nothing about data mining or codes

 

But police vehicles are already in the game files, all the mechanics are in place, I can't see why powers that be, wouldn't want to (maximise revenue) and make use of all the developers work! (Also probably why police vehicles can't be stored yet? $$$??)

 

As for animals online, I think the interaction menu (VIP style) way of rendering objects such as a crashed plane in the middle of LS,

Make this, to me, seem plausible!

 

(Start job, spawn animal, hunters hunt, other free mode players defend animal?? maybe? IDK!)

 

I Don't think animals will be overtaking LS lol, probably just spawn via mission launch interactive menu!

 

Mansions and Pets, I know (SMH)

But a LOT of work went into animals to be wasted offline!

I remember reading a article detailing the massive job the developers done on furs, textures, individual hair strands etc, some one here could properly find the article!

 

I don't think it would be to hard to spawn a dog or cat in one of those mansions around Rockford hills, would raise a few shark card sales from CONTENT ALREADY COMPLETE and at the developers disposal!

 

pets as useful as money safe in office!!

 

Properties in Blaine county and paleto? Could be hunting cabins or something?? Purchase cabin, then purchase hunting license, then purchase hunting clothes etc $$$$

 

Alongside pets, Luxury living sound like a good time to open up Bahama Mammas, comedy clubs, plastic surgery??

 

There's definitely a method to this madness lol!

 

As for MAP Expansions, if the above comes to pass, I think it's safe to say LIBERTY CITY will be revisited!!

[Classique]

Eeey, look who came out of his cave! ^

[Initial.Dinka]

Eeey, look who came out of his cave! ^

 

someone obviously alerted him lol

[Classique]

 

Eeey, look who came out of his cave! ^

 

someone obviously alerted him lol

 

Or triggered him.

[woteva]

Thought about the post op van as high-risk-vehicle, wasn't funny

[futureproof]

Thought about the post op van as high-risk-vehicle, wasn't funny

Give it a gold paint job and announce the lobby that you're driving one. Now it's a high risk vehicle.

[Hunter]

-snip-

You never replied to the ultimate question I PM'd you back in August.

[Wurmy]

 

SP DLC confirmed?

Not with the announcement of RDR2.

 

I'm not so sure: http://gtaforums.com/topic/860017-next-dlc-speculation-thread/page-1221?do=findComment&comment=1069215618

 

Probably not before RDR2. That's what I mean.

[MGgames100]

-snipping maniacal ramblings-

 

Can someone TLDR for me? I can't be arsed, to read through that wall of text. If he says "It was speculation and you all interpreted it in the wrong way" - then I'm good. If it says "MUH LEAKE IZ TREU BELVIE MEH CUZ I LAEKED UNLINE" tho, then please give me two gallons of bleach so I don't have to look at him ever again.

[The Gator]

 

-snipping maniacal ramblings-

 

Can someone TLDR for me? I can't be arsed, to read through that wall of text. If he says "It was speculation and you all interpreted it in the wrong way" - then I'm good. If it says "MUH LEAKE IZ TREU BELVIE MEH CUZ I LAEKED UNLINE" tho, then please give me two gallons of bleach so I don't have to look at him ever again.

You're not interested either way, so why would anyone bother summarizing it for you?

 

#stopbeinglazy

[jdv95]

 

-snipping maniacal ramblings-

Can someone TLDR for me? I can't be arsed, to read through that wall of text. If he says "It was speculation and you all interpreted it in the wrong way" - then I'm good. If it says "MUH LEAKE IZ TREU BELVIE MEH CUZ I LAEKED UNLINE" tho, then please give me two gallons of bleach so I don't have to look at him ever again.

 

it's just a repeat of his first outing but in the style of what it should have been in the first place.

meaning that he now said everything again but puts the words i think before every update he again thinks might come out.

his only reasoning behind his wishlist is because "it's all in the game/has pottential so therefore it might come out" stuff.

 

still a weirdo for being so obsessed with all this sh*t though.

[HKM87]

SOFTSECRETS alleged leak is so descriptive, it went in detail for part of it, if it's real then he better show some pics.

[pie4july]

all these people asking for proof

 

lol

 

don't ANY of you have any faith in what you cannot see?

Not without facts no. As a scientist I use critical thinking. Claims must have facts to support them. For example Yan and Fun look through code, when they find something, they show us the code. As for mach, he is a known leaker. Therefore we can trust what he says without much proof.

 

SS is unknown. He has no proof and has not gotten anything right yet. The only biker stuff we heard from him was thinks already leaked / speculated.

 

Rockstar has hinted the next dlc. It is that import/export high end sh*t. That is not on SS's list. If Rockstar had every single dlc planned from now to the completion of GTA online, then why would they randomly start this one? It wasn't not their list.

 

So we can draw conclusions that SS's list is very likely not real.

Edited November 17, 2016 by pie4july

[Gnocchi Flip Flops]

don't ANY of you have any faith in what you cannot see?

 

No.

 

tbh to believe any of that crap is pretty ignorant tbh without proof tbh it's nothing of value tbh

[pie4july]

This post is going to long but here goes...

 

I completely understand English is not your first language, however your argument is not convincing at all to me. You are rambling and you sound like you're covering for yourself. If you either had proof or possibly could explain how you "heard" these things without naming names, we'd be more inclined to believe you.

GTA 5 trailer AD on youtube

 

I don't understand your point. What does this have to do with anything? (Not trying to be rude, just confused)

Edited November 17, 2016 by ~Tiger~
cut image quote

[EVOLUT7ON]

- text was here -

Yo hoe hoe!

Edited November 17, 2016 by EVOLUT7ON

[Cavot]

Are we seriously still on this Soft Secrets guy? The ONLY way I'll believe any of the sh*t he says is if he pulls a Dragoon and some how gets access to a developer build of an update that's a work in progress and provides proof of doing that with screenshots and videos of the content in game and through OpenIV. Until he is able to provide adiquitte proof, I'll consider all his claims complete and utter bullsh*t.

 

I understand why some of you may want to believe him, and that's because a lot of the things he's saying sound really cool and they're updates we've been wanting for quite some time, but don't let this speculation be a real thing until actual proof is presented to the forum and community. Until that time comes (if it comes), take every piece of info with a grain of salt unless it comes from a reputable source. Those sources being Yan, Fun, and Mach (I think?).

Edited November 17, 2016 by Viper-Venom

[mute!]

R* LIVE stream starting up now if anyone is interested.

[woteva]

Giveaway?

[JesusFR33K]

 

don't ANY of you have any faith in what you cannot see?

 

No.

 

tbh to believe any of that crap is pretty ignorant tbh without proof tbh it's nothing of value tbh

 

Do you believe Yan or Machs leaks since they haven't showed any proof? Not saying SS is right, but until the next 2 dlcs drop anything is possible. Imp/Exp was originally part of bikers (according to fun), but prob grew too big, so it became its own dlc. I cant see you, but somehow im pretty sure you exist. I am a Man of Faith tho, so that could be it.

[mute!]

Giveaway?

i dont know yet.

[futureproof]

Do you believe Yan or Machs leaks since they haven't showed any proof? Not saying SS is right, but until the next 2 dlcs drop anything is possible. Imp/Exp was originally part of bikers (according to fun), but prob grew too big, so it became its own dlc. I cant see you, but somehow im pretty sure you exist. I am a Man of Faith tho, so that could be it.

 

The difference between yan, mach and softsecrets is that they have been right most of the time. Softsecrets 2013 post and his claims now are just to vague. Unless R* releases a DLC where the main focus is any of the things that he mentions, I don't believe him.

 

And gb_vehicle_export was found in Cunning Stunts. Doesn't mean that it was going to be a part of bikers. Just that it has been in development at the same time as bikers.

[Mach1bud]

It is very clear that Softsecrets does not understand what the term "speculation" actually means.

 

Clearly there is a language barrier issue here.

 

Softsecrets, speculation cannot be "proven or disproven" and it cannot have "substance".

 

Speculation is just guessing what will come next. That's it.

 

Just say it so people will understand. Either you are guessing (speculating) or you have real information from a real source, whether that be from someone who works at Rockstar or via the games code. (leaking).

[iSaint9]

don't ANY of you have any faith in what you cannot see?

 

If I told you I'm agnostic, would that answer your question?

 

Both Yan and Fun have been legit sources so far in the whole GTA lifespan. Just because this guy pops up outta nowhere and guesses right one update that's been discussed since two years ago doesn't mean he's a legit source.

 

Also, his updates include mansions, animals in Online and much more ("crazy") stuff that people have been asking for and they're more than likely never going to happen, or at least most of them.

 

I know that people shat on Dragoon because they thought he was bullsh*tting, but hey, at least if he was trolling us, it would've been an elaborate troll because he provided pictures of the upcoming stuff (E&OC).

 

This SOFTSECRETS guy is trying so hard to make people believe me, acting all like "EVERYONE HATES ME BECAUSE THEY KNOW I'M RIGHT".

[Black-Dragon96]

Well i do not belive in softsecrets speculation but to be fair i would not be surprised if everything is true. I mean i called dragoons leaks fake and he had "proof" in fork of pictures.

Even if softsecrets would give us "proof" in form of pictures i still would not belive it, because pictures are really easy fakeable. So the whole proof thing does not matter because as long as it can be faked it does not mean anything.

And everthing (except the liberty city stuff) makes sense to me. These vehicle based bussineses could be vigalanty missions (and there is an empty police computer folder/script in the files).

So in comclusion i would say: I dont belive it but i would not call it fake.

[Hunter]

The SP DLC thing here has me more interested in Soft Secret's thing. I don't have any shame in having thought soft's thing could possibly be real (I mean, worst thing that could happen is me being wrong), but this looks much more realistic than that.

 

What kind of things were going to be in the SP DLC? Any vehicles or anything we know of?

[WildBrick142]

Giveaway?

 

Gonna keep the tab open just in case, but otherwise I'll continue watching another Twitch channel.