The B*tch & Moan Thread (Part 3)

[CommanderBlack]

People in the Gta VI topic are going crazy about some mountains and people here are going crazy about @Tez2 twitter post, i love this Community here

[Pol The Agent]

1 hour ago, Black-Dragon96 said:

"something new for a change" eh?

F*ck it ima call cops and crooks.

Same here
.

[VitoCorleone1992]

9 hours ago, ST0b said:

Hey @VitoCorleone1992,maybe you're looking at the wrong game for the Pretty Babes DLC.Saints Row is the game you're looking for.The previous ones had..a few...elements and this new reboot might contain some new Business Ventures that you may like.I mean,alot of stuff(I feel like 60% stuff) in GTA online is inspired by saints row,so I say look at the source/root of imagination instead of the derived products.Forexample,The infamous Oppressor MK2 that everyone loves and adores in GTAO was copied from the Flying Bike in SR 3 or 4.It made sense in a game where you run faster than cars and you would need a flying bike or heli for airborne enemies but putting it in a Crime Simulator with Online environment,we know how that turned out.I am hopeful,it won't be as glitchy and buggy as Glitch Simulator Online(GTAO)

The forumers' catchphrase "hey, vito, - something about - YOUR pimp DLC is this or that", is the comparison for the common: "it's a friend who's asking"?

But...trying to once and for all if we get this right, i will try explain myself a bit better, so, spoiler tab, if you're not interested, but if you do, click and you're welcome, bcz i hope this is the last time i have to explain it:
 

Spoiler

When it's not me touching the pimp dlc, are you guys pushing for it, using the "vito, the only guy who wants a pimp dlc in the entire forum, in the entire gta world" card.

 

I can understand when it's just for meme reasons and makes everyone laugh and it's ok. The problem is that sometimes i get confused about if it's some troll or some rant/"personal attack" disguised as a troll/joke. And i can only think about something: i think i got the fame for talking about a pimp dlc, not bcz i was hte only one that would be ok with a dlc of that kind, but maybe bcz i kinda got labeled - and probably a lot from my own fault - as the spokesperson of the "pimp dlc syndicate", but only because i was the one that discussed more the subject due the fact that it caused me some bad feeling of some kind of cancelation vibe only bcz some people would be more pron to a, idk how to say, women's cause? feminist cause? "white-knightism" cause?, that maybe shouldn't even be a thing, mainly because 1) it's a criminal simulator game , 2) prostitution has been a consistency in the gta franchise and we owned bussinesses of that type in some gta titles and 3) even if was to become a thing, i doubt that they would go darker routes like Watch Dogs, which they never went too dark in any gta title about prostitution, anyway...it's not even like it's not even a legal bussiness in some countries...

So that's why i never understood the feeling of some sort of differenciation based in what looks like some moral judgement - never forgetting that we are talking about...a game, so we shouldn't not even given so much of a trouble, we are looking like those lawyers who persecuted Rockstar in the early 2000's from some BS conclusions about "crime in a game and it's correlation to real life crime, you do in the game, you will do in the real life"... - that would separate the concepts of "killing indiscriminately, selling drugs, theft, corruption, general violence, etc.," --» OK; "prostitution" --» NOT OK.

And even when the "NOT OK" means "free will prostitution (like a lot in real life, and if it's something that i agree or i'm happy about, no, i'm not, but again...a game...and again (x2) in the basis of what would be a DLC based on a free will of going to the prostitution lifestyle from the prostitutes themselves + no human trafficking = not a dark route, like it was never even a case in the entire gta history; no violence towards women (even the contrary, if you had that bussiness as a pimp or working for a pimp, your role would be to protect those girls from violent clients), etc., --» it's still a "NOT OK". And i can't understand why...who makes this separation of "right and wrong" in a game that is basically all about criminality? Sure, everyone have the freedom to not like the concept of a certain DLC or even some aspects of the game and the socio-political approaches that could have, but still, it's just a game...a game. Not to mention that a lot of the prostitution problem, at least in the 1st world countries is due to poverty but for the kind of lifestyle that we have, is more a problem of drugs (and 3rd world countries is due to poverty, most), so when we are the drug tycoons, we haven't exactly the hands clean about the side-effects of our lifestyle of a criminal in the (virtual) society and the argument "but we don't have to deal directly with that aspect, well, sure, but we are part of the problem...if we woudl send someone to be killed, we couldn't say that it was not our fault and responsability just because we didn't pulled the trigger directly...but, to be honest, after reading this last part, it doesn't look surreal that we are so serious and philosofical about a game? a simulation? something that hardly would affect the reality?

So, all the memes i'm ok with it, i just don't want to feel like some folks want to crucify me just bcz i say "i would be ok with a pimp dlc in gta and i don't see the problem with it". And if you really want to know, i most be one of the most anti-prostitution guys out there in real life, even against the legalization of it, because i indeed think that would not solve the problem. It's not because it's regulated by a State that means that the issue turns to be something "ok" and "good". But as i'm against prostitution, i'm also against drugs, violence, criminality, but i play a criminal simulator game and that's all about it.

Ok, so it's all i think. Hope i get this straight at least. Peace, forum comrades!

In other news... @rollschuh2282, @WildBrick142...you guys have some uncles working at R* don't you? You "guessed", the bonus week again. I hope you can spill some beans of the next dlc at least by the end of May. (jk).

[VitoCorleone1992]

I've been far from here all day...so, all this fuss is because of Tez twitter?
 

I kinda don't want to read like 20 pages... So more hints or it will just be 2 weeks of revitalized activity here on the Forum, based just in this?

My assumption: if it's something new, it will really be something new, like "GTA E&E for PC, 2 weeks from now", that would be new, but not NEW-NEW! But, in one hand, it makes more sense to be something like that, since i don't believe that they will release a new DLC so early. But if it's a new DLC it will be something pretty new, that we never saw before.

Edited May 19, 2022 by VitoCorleone1992

[Crateman]

The fuss is justified...in My book @Tez2 is reliable...but is hard to wonder what we Will get, its the Beauty of this topic , maybe we get some hints here and there going forward...

 

 

Edited May 20, 2022 by Crateman

[VitoCorleone1992]

1 minute ago, Crateman said:

The fuss is justified...in My book @Tez2 is reliable...but is hard to wonder what we Will get, its the Beauty of this topic , maybe get some hints here and there going forward...

 

 

Neither was i saying otherwise...but what is this all about, is probably the fuss...when people saying "MHC confirmed", i would be a bit impressed if so, but at just a bit, bcz if R* will not provide a map expansion, then they must expand the map we have and that maybe we will have to deal with until gta VI.

[Arms Dealer]

I hope it's a mission creator. 

 

Or at least a free mode mission editor lightweight edition. 

 

That would bring a whole lot of new content for a change.

 

Bookmarked jobs were recently broken on PS5 as well as a bunch of intro cutscenes being reset so I'm hoping it's related to changes needed to add some more diverse content.

 

Though if it's Liberty City or a new expansion then that's cool too

 

[Dirty918]

I’m still holding out hope that they fix those terrible handling muscle cars.  

[Pedinhuh]

>"Two weeks or so"

 

Oh God...PTSD kicking in right now

2 hours ago, Dirty918 said:

I’m still holding out hope that they fix those terrible handling muscle cars with advanced handling flags.  

Fixed that, not just the Muscle cars are handling like sh*t because of this nonsense.

 

Unfortunately I'm not counting on them individually going on each flagged vehicle to change those values at all, that would require effort.

8 hours ago, Tez2 said:

Our most-requested feature, Fortnite Dance

 

 

I'd rather not know the cancer that is coming now...

[VitoCorleone1992]

8 hours ago, Spider-Vice said:

Filler before the actual DLC sounds right to me. 

Filler DLC confirmed.

[needforsuv]

10 hours ago, Edward85 said:

looks like they raised bets back to $10k

 

only for this week

Also, technically a new gta+ period is something new, so...

Tez wouldn't be lying if he was referring to gta+

Edited May 20, 2022 by needforsuv

[Devdevi45]

“Something new for a change” I place my money it’s the MKO rebalance 

[gamerMK2]

Game is too old to introduce something really new.

[VCPR]

According for some people, next GTAO update will be awful

Spoiler

Y'know who I am talking about

 

[Insoluble Fiber]

Newswire today?

[VCPR]

8 minutes ago, Insoluble Fiber said:

Newswire today?

Maybe, maybe not

 

I just want something

[GhillieMaster]

I really hope today's the day we get some news. And I really hope the next DLC doesn't have its deadline pushed back either. With what people are saying it doesn't sound very good lmao.

[Insoluble Fiber]

what if something new  for a change is  no summer DLC at all 

[RyuNova]

Battle Royal Mode.

[VCPR]

5 minutes ago, RyuNova said:

Battle Royal Mode.

>2022
>battle royale

[RyuNova]

1 minute ago, VCPR said:

>2022
>battle royale

 

I wouldn't put it past them to be honest. R* seems to just live in their own fantasy world because they have been inhaling their own farts for so long their brain is a pink soup.

[Killerman29]

in two weeks or so? I want to know now!

[Spider-Vice]

1 hour ago, RyuNova said:

Battle Royal Mode.

So, the Motor Wars adversary mode?

[KoolHoven]

>people saying its not very good

>Doesnt explain further or even say what it is

 

This just tells me they dont know 

[RyuNova]

5 minutes ago, Spider-Vice said:

So, the Motor Wars adversary mode?

 

No, like a full map, full lobby PUBG style Battle Royal Mode.

[theguy1998]

5 minutes ago, RyuNova said:

 

No, like a full map, full lobby PUBG style Battle Royal Mode.

Not gonna happen since Motor Wars is basically their way of getting inspiration from PUBG. Besides, Battle Royale is already saturated in my opinion.

[Pedinhuh]

And besides, Battle Royalle is f*cking boring.

[Niii]

GTA Online will become free2play. More people will be tempted to buy GTA+ and/or buy microtransactions if the base product is free.

This also explains the need to re-balance the pvp. Why they announced this so early. Because it's been planned for at least as long as GTA+. (A premium subscription goes hand in hand with a free2play game)

You balance your game to keep your "free" players, because they haven't paid yet if the game is F2P. If they pay for the game, you already have their money, when it's free, you have to seduce them to get their money.

I'm just speculating.

Edited May 20, 2022 by Niii

[Barrtek]

i wouldn't be surprised if they have no plans to release some medium DLC at july/august but instead they will add that next gen content on PC and make very big DLC in december but who knows, im probably wrong

[Spider-Vice]

Again, they have added filler content before a Summer DLC before, we had new maps/modes etc before Tuners and I think it happened before LSSS too so it might be that. Doesn't mean there won't be a Summer update but we'll see, so many wild theories, it's probably just a DLC/content/stuff and nothing to do with like the game going F2P and stuff like that.