What will be the average FPS that I get in GTA V with this build I'm planning to buy?

[komet163]

I've been wanting to play most of the newer games smoothly, but my laptop just won't keep up. Getting 30FPS avg at GTA 4. I need to know what will be the average FPS when I play GTA V with:

(Vanilla) Low settings,

(Vanilla) Ultra settings,

(With Redux Graphics) Low settings,

(With Redux Graphics) Ultra settings.

 

Here are the specs:
CPU: Intel Core i7-8086K @4GHz

GPU: Gigabyte Aorus GeForce GTX 1080 Ti Extreme Edition 11G GDDR5X

RAM: G.Skill Trident Z 16GB @3200MHz (2 sticks)

 

Thank you.

[sivispacem]

What resolution? That will make a huge difference. As a yardstick, I get ~70fps minimum on a GTX 1080 at 1440p at Ultra settings (and with some of the additional draw distance settings turned up).

[komet163]

2 minutes ago, sivispacem said:

What resolution? That will make a huge difference. As a yardstick, I get ~70fps minimum on a GTX 1080 at 1440p at Ultra settings (and with some of the additional draw distance settings turned up).

Well, I only need 1080p.

[yoječ]

Why 8086 instead of the 8700?

[HaRdSTyLe_83]

More important, what monitor? Seems a bit overkill for 1080p if you only have  60hz.

 

 

[komet163]

2 hours ago, yoječ said:

Why 8086 instead of the 8700?

Nothing, just want to get the anniversary edition thing. They said it has the same performance as the 8700K, and I don't really know the difference between the two. userbenchmark shows that the 8086K is better as well. I can change that if the 8700K is better. I also see that it has higher clock speed.

 

56 minutes ago, HaRdSTyLe_83 said:

More important, what monitor? Seems a bit overkill for 1080p if you only have  60hz.

The ROG Swift PG258Q, @1080p and 240Hz.

[sivispacem]

I would think you'd be consistently and comfortably over 120FPS at 1080P Ultra in the vanilla game.

[komet163]

1 hour ago, sivispacem said:

I would think you'd be consistently and comfortably over 120FPS at 1080P Ultra in the vanilla game.

Thanks for the info.

Guess I will have no more struggles at gaming with that custom build.

[Andreaz1]

The 8086K is a waste of money, buy the normal 8700K instead.

Edited September 7, 2018 by Andreaz1

[komet163]

25 minutes ago, Andreaz1 said:

The 8086K is a waste of money, buy the normal 8700K instead.

Let me know the difference.

[Andreaz1]

1 hour ago, a bad day said:

Let me know the difference.

The 8086K will turbo to 5GHz on a single core, the 8700K I believe does 4.7GHz. All other turbo steps and literally everything else is exactly the same between them. Except you'll pay a lot more.

[komet163]

5 hours ago, Andreaz1 said:

The 8086K will turbo to 5GHz on a single core, the 8700K I believe does 4.7GHz. All other turbo steps and literally everything else is exactly the same between them. Except you'll pay a lot more.

Oh, okay. I'm not gonna buy that anymore.

[SilverRST]

On 9/7/2018 at 1:45 PM, HaRdSTyLe_83 said:

More important, what monitor? Seems a bit overkill for 1080p if you only have  60hz.

 

 

Not really. If there are nice monitors, they are mostly 1080p and if he got nVidia GPU, he can use DSR which can renders games up to 2160p.

He can still turn the resolution higher than 1080p like I do with GTA4 to 1440p or 2160p.

[HaRdSTyLe_83]

2 hours ago, SilverRST said:

Not really. If there are nice monitors, they are mostly 1080p and if he got nVidia GPU, he can use DSR which can renders games up to 2160p.

He can still turn the resolution higher than 1080p like I do with GTA4 to 1440p or 2160p.

 

You can turn the resolution to 8K if you desire, you wont see more pixels then the monitor has to offer. Super sampling only shows the images less jaggy, far far away from looking even like 1440p

 

Also when i made that comment it was about being overkill for 1080p @60 hz, and OP already said he got a 240hz.

Edited September 8, 2018 by HaRdSTyLe_83