Kicked from session for no reason

[Lonely-Martin]

2 minutes ago, Verbal Soze said:

I've been there too man, these guys are the spoiled rats imo, why the feck did they kick you out? I mean if they don't want to mingle with other players why not use the MTU or the NAT test in Xone, so they can grind peacefully right? Why in the feck did they have to kick other players, I just don't get it...

What's not to get?

 

A group of friends can be in different CEO's or crews even, lol.

 

Clear many want to just enjoy GTA with their friends and not risk playing another's game of it.

[Verbal Soze]

2 minutes ago, KWF1981 said:

What's not to get?

 

A group of friends can be in different CEO's or crews even, lol.

 

Clear many want to just enjoy GTA with their friends and not risk playing another's game of it.

Nah look at voodoo's post they are using mtu and lag instead of kicking players which is better, kicking players out? Not a good start, better start fully loaded i guess

[Lonely-Martin]

8 hours ago, hugh750 said:

i know it's a dirty thing to do.

Gotta enjoy this one though hugh. Just read you elsewhere proud to passive pop out there, lol.

 

Too many bitching over this that equally are using weak dick moves themselves. Quite entertaining to Me, lol.

8 hours ago, Verbal Soze said:

Nah look at voodoo's post they are using mtu and lag instead of kicking players which is better, kicking players out? Not a good start, better start fully loaded i guess

Eh, you didn't quote Voodoo, you were saying you didn't understand why a group of CEO's booted another, lol.

 

Pretty obvious is all. They do want to mingle with others, but only those they know and trust.

 

But of course, saying they're whatever for doing so and instead of letting it go, you gotta punish them, lol. Go nuts, only vindicates their assumptions of you, lol.

 

A griefer that deserved kicking. Only here to waste others time. That's how it looks to them.

 

Don't disagree there are better ways. But acting up is only adding to their paranoia is how I see that crap.

Edited August 12, 2018 by KWF1981
Spelling was terrible, lol.

[Verbal Soze]

7 minutes ago, KWF1981 said:

Gotta enjoy this one though hugh. Just read you elsewhere proud to passive pop out there, lol.

 

Too many bitching over this that equally are using weak dick moves themselves. Quite entertaining to Me, lol.

Eh, you didn't quote Voodoo, you were saying you didn't understand why a group of CEO's booted another, lol.

 

Pretty obvious is all. They do want to mingle with others, but inly thise they know and trust.

 

But of course, saying they're whatever for doing so and instead of letting it go, you gotta punish them, lol. Go nuts, only vindicates their assumptions of you, lol.

 

A griefer that deserved kicking. Only here to waste others time. That's how it looks to them.

What if i'm not a griefer? What if i sent them an offer to help? Still getting kicked while i'm driving my gt500? That is clearly looking for a trouble, they asked for it, i'm just delivering it to them

[Lonely-Martin]

1 minute ago, Verbal Soze said:

What if i'm not a griefer? What if i sent them an offer to help? Still getting kicked while i'm driving my gt500? That is clearly looking for a trouble, they asked for it, i'm just delivering it to them

They don't want to game with or around you. Their game too, and unfortunately, you alone in that scenario lose out.

 

All R* for enabling grief and giving people an option to force people out. The whole system is f*cked. But to see folk wanting peace as 'they started it' is very school playground like, lol. After all, why would you want to stay among players you dislike, lol. Just wasting your time too because it really isn't teaching anyone anything they don't know about this game.

[Guest Member2756931]

57 minutes ago, Black-Dragon96 said:

Except they wont, because they feel confirmed.

They feared that you are hostile and in their eyes you turned out to be hostile.

They can feel confirmed and still regret it. Are you suggesting that poking a bear wouldn't be regrettable because if it attacks at least you confirmed poking a bear is a bad idea?

 

Oh it's ok to just walk in to a police station waving a gun around, you might get shot but if you do at least you can rest easy knowing it's been confirmed they will shoot you - despite the fact that they probably wouldnt have if you hadnt waved the gun around.

 

I'm sure in a lot of cases those who try to kick regret doing so, especially when there are many ways to avoid getting kicked right away.

 

We can all be dicks. I could, if I wanted, start a vip job to buy 10 mintes, invite my friends in who could start in their facility and constantly spam the orbital cannon for free.

[Verbal Soze]

10 minutes ago, KWF1981 said:

They don't want to game with or around you. Their game too, and unfortunately, you alone in that scenario lose out.

 

All R* for enabling grief and giving people an option to force people out. The whole system is f*cked. But to see folk wanting peace as 'they started it' is very school playground like, lol. After all, why would you want to stay among players you dislike, lol. Just wasting your time too because it really isn't teaching anyone anything they don't know about this game.

No, if they are reasonable persons, they will find their own space, without kicking other players, those are the spoiled ones, being in a group and shoving everyone else, when all they have to do is MTU, NAT test or message the other first if they are a threat then they can take the action by kicking other players

[Lonely-Martin]

9 minutes ago, Verbal Soze said:

No, if they are reasonable persons, they will find their own space, without kicking other players, those are the spoiled ones, being in a group and shoving everyone else, when all they have to do is MTU, NAT test or message the other first if they are a threat then they can take the action by kicking other players

Yeah, we'll go around in circles here. A group of friends ain't choosing to keep doing that every time someone pops in, lol. But alas, it's better to ask/try other ways of course.

 

To me, it's the game. It's poisonous in places. So I just avoid the lot, lol. Sooner heist and race with randoms, lol.

 

(Luckily though, this nightclub plays right into my natural, lone wolf ways. Happy days, as it means I can now use old businesses again, lol).

 

Folk shouldn't take it so personal.

Edited August 12, 2018 by KWF1981

[Black-Dragon96]

6 hours ago, YouKnowWhoIAm said:

They can feel confirmed and still regret it. Are you suggesting that poking a bear wouldn't be regrettable because if it attacks at least you confirmed poking a bear is a bad idea?

 

Oh it's ok to just walk in to a police station waving a gun around, you might get shot but if you do at least you can rest easy knowing it's been confirmed they will shoot you - despite the fact that they probably wouldnt have if you hadnt waved the gun around.

 

I'm sure in a lot of cases those who try to kick regret doing so, especially when there are many ways to avoid getting kicked right away.

 

We can all be dicks. I could, if I wanted, start a vip job to buy 10 mintes, invite my friends in who could start in their facility and constantly spam the orbital cannon for free.

 

Neither of your examples really works here, Im afraid.

There is nothing for them to regret!

They expected him to be hostile, they expected him to attack right from the start. They decided to take their chances and kick him before he can attack. Why should they regret trying to avoid an attack that, in their eyes, would have happned anyway?

 

They can not imgaine that the other guy will not attack for the simple reason that most gta online players WILL attack at some point. I can't count how often people join the peacefull business lobbys of my crew just to pull out a jet/deluxo/opressor and attacking other players unprovoked. Everytime I see an unknown dude join these lobbys and I got nothing to do, I pull out my akula and head over there, ready to grill his rectum should he make a wrong move.

[Guest Member2756931]

3 hours ago, Black-Dragon96 said:

 

Neither of your examples really works here, Im afraid.

There is nothing for them to regret!

They expected him to be hostile, they expected him to attack right from the start. They decided to take their chances and kick him before he can attack. Why should they regret trying to avoid an attack that, in their eyes, would have happned anyway?

 

They can not imgaine that the other guy will not attack for the simple reason that most gta online players WILL attack at some point. I can't count how often people join the peacefull business lobbys of my crew just to pull out a jet/deluxo/opressor and attacking other players unprovoked. Everytime I see an unknown dude join these lobbys and I got nothing to do, I pull out my akula and head over there, ready to grill his rectum should he make a wrong move.

So you wouldnt regret attempting to kick someone for them to turn around, invite two friends in who constantly orbital cannon using the glitch while the guy you tried to kick is going around in an r2k messing you up too?

 

While conforming they are hostile after being provoked it doesn't stop you regretting it.

 

But whatever man, I've seen enough of your posts to know theres little point in even trying to discuss when you're involved.

 

You're blinkered if you think this is acceptable behaviour. It's as toxic as the rest of the community. At least wait for thr deluxo/stromberg/akula etc to come out before throwing a hissy fit about someone else daring to join a public session.

[BlackMilk]

10 hours ago, Verbal Soze said:

No, if they are reasonable persons, they will find their own space, without kicking other players, those are the spoiled ones, being in a group and shoving everyone else, when all they have to do is MTU, NAT test or message the other first if they are a threat then they can take the action by kicking other players

This has all been explained numerous times already. I don't know who is actually arguing that kicking other players who never made a move on them isn't a dick move. What is being argued is that it is one of the safest ways to conduct business in public sessions that is hard (near impossible) to do alone. Not everything can be solo'd easily.

 

It is the choice of the players to kick others to protect their stock but it was not their decision to put these features into the game that require more safety than public sessions can offer by default. If you are oblivious to the time and money investment people put into these businesses, you'll understand why they kick strangers indiscriminately. If you can ever be bothered to, ask someone on this forum who admits to doing that if they actually feel good about it. I don't think they do in most cases if they weren't being attacked. But often times it seems a necessary evil.

 

With the incompetence of many players accidents are likely to happen even between friends and crewmembers. Anyone you don't personally know that you run into online is a potential and likely threat. Posters like yourself prove this over and over again by saying you'll go after the players trying to kick you. For them, what is and isn't a dick move isn't relevant. The results are. They know that they cannot trust strangers because anyone can attack at any given time with a great number of tools of destruction. And yeah, you can tell them you're friendly. But unless you were literally born yesterday and quickly learned how to speak, you should be well aware that both in real life and online people are capable of this little thing called lying. Or changing their minds. That's not even taking into consideration misunderstandings.

 

This isn't the same as random douchebags on games like Counter-Strike (or in my more recent experience, the first Killing Floor and other zombie games) servers kicking other players because they get off on the control. This is people trying to make sure they don't lose their massive investments to a random jerk in a public session. Kicking you, me or anyone else is a means to an end and not a way of trolling - or at least that is not the intention.

 

You talk about being reasonable. I've said before that kicking others who did nothing to you is not okay. But there's more to it than that. If you're really so reasonable, start to acknowledge that they have something to lose and (unless you started something like a sale yourself in that time) you don't. Reasonable is understanding where someone is coming from when they're not trying to hurt you. And reasonable would also be understanding that Rockstar simply made some awful game design choices over the years when it comes to GTA:O.

 

I understand your frustration and I'm sure most here do. Almost everyone has experience with being kicked for seemingly no (good) reason at all. It's not fun. It leaves a sour taste in the mouth, figuratively speaking. It's unfinished business and most likely you feel like you have to get a response in but that's often impossible. This all makes sense. But try to detach from that before arguing about this specific issue so you can see the other side of it.

Personally, I'd rather get kicked ten times from public sessions by scared CEOs than ever lose a large shipment worth hundreds of thousands or anything worth one or two million dollars.

[kcole4001]

11 hours ago, KWF1981 said:

They don't want to game with or around you. Their game too, and unfortunately, you alone in that scenario lose out.

 

All R* for enabling grief and giving people an option to force people out. The whole system is f*cked. But to see folk wanting peace as 'they started it' is very school playground like, lol. After all, why would you want to stay among players you dislike, lol. Just wasting your time too because it really isn't teaching anyone anything they don't know about this game.

Very much this!  /\

 

Acting hostile when people expect you to act hostile, and they clearly do if they vote to kick you, is not going to change how they regard you or anyone else.

All it does is reinforce what they already know: the 'community' outside of their group of friends is untrustworthy.

 

Nothing will fix this until (if) invite only sessions where you can sell are implemented.

 

All the while R* sits back and laughs while the players fight each other.

[Verbal Soze]

2 hours ago, BlackMilk said:

This has all been explained numerous times already. I don't know who is actually arguing that kicking other players who never made a move on them isn't a dick move. What is being argued is that it is one of the safest ways to conduct business in public sessions that is hard (near impossible) to do alone. Not everything can be solo'd easily.

 

It is the choice of the players to kick others to protect their stock but it was not their decision to put these features into the game that require more safety than public sessions can offer by default. If you are oblivious to the time and money investment people put into these businesses, you'll understand why they kick strangers indiscriminately. If you can ever be bothered to, ask someone on this forum who admits to doing that if they actually feel good about it. I don't think they do in most cases if they weren't being attacked. But often times it seems a necessary evil.

 

With the incompetence of many players accidents are likely to happen even between friends and crewmembers. Anyone you don't personally know that you run into online is a potential and likely threat. Posters like yourself prove this over and over again by saying you'll go after the players trying to kick you. For them, what is and isn't a dick move isn't relevant. The results are. They know that they cannot trust strangers because anyone can attack at any given time with a great number of tools of destruction. And yeah, you can tell them you're friendly. But unless you were literally born yesterday and quickly learned how to speak, you should be well aware that both in real life and online people are capable of this little thing called lying. Or changing their minds. That's not even taking into consideration misunderstandings.

 

This isn't the same as random douchebags on games like Counter-Strike (or in my more recent experience, the first Killing Floor and other zombie games) servers kicking other players because they get off on the control. This is people trying to make sure they don't lose their massive investments to a random jerk in a public session. Kicking you, me or anyone else is a means to an end and not a way of trolling - or at least that is not the intention.

 

You talk about being reasonable. I've said before that kicking others who did nothing to you is not okay. But there's more to it than that. If you're really so reasonable, start to acknowledge that they have something to lose and (unless you started something like a sale yourself in that time) you don't. Reasonable is understanding where someone is coming from when they're not trying to hurt you. And reasonable would also be understanding that Rockstar simply made some awful game design choices over the years when it comes to GTA:O.

 

I understand your frustration and I'm sure most here do. Almost everyone has experience with being kicked for seemingly no (good) reason at all. It's not fun. It leaves a sour taste in the mouth, figuratively speaking. It's unfinished business and most likely you feel like you have to get a response in but that's often impossible. This all makes sense. But try to detach from that before arguing about this specific issue so you can see the other side of it.

Personally, I'd rather get kicked ten times from public sessions by scared CEOs than ever lose a large shipment worth hundreds of thousands or anything worth one or two million dollars.

MTU, NAT TEST, or task manager in Pc if you want to play safe, everything IS doable in solo, if you can think new ways, you can do that can't you? Thinking i mean...

13 hours ago, KWF1981 said:

Yeah, we'll go around in circles here. A group of friends ain't choosing to keep doing that every time someone pops in, lol. But alas, it's better to ask/try other ways of course.

 

To me, it's the game. It's poisonous in places. So I just avoid the lot, lol. Sooner heist and race with randoms, lol.

 

(Luckily though, this nightclub plays right into my natural, lone wolf ways. Happy days, as it means I can now use old businesses again, lol).

 

Folk shouldn't take it so personal.

But still even though this game is broken, you can't just kick people like that, they're enjoying the game in their own way, MTU, NAT test or Task manager is the right way if you want to play it safe

 

And yes the nightclub is a great addition as it's not a PvP stuff it's pure fun...

[Guest Member2756931]

Double standards, that is all there is to it.

 

a random is in the session, best kick em.

 

Gta community is toxic.

 

Can't have it both ways. But let's blame it all on Rockstar, they made me do it. But when they advise to deatroy cargo, thats on the player.

 

It's laughable the extent some will go to in order to releive themselves of blame.

[Black-Dragon96]

3 hours ago, YouKnowWhoIAm said:

So you wouldnt regret attempting to kick someone for them to turn around, invite two friends in who constantly orbital cannon using the glitch while the guy you tried to kick is going around in an r2k messing you up too?

First of all I personaly do not kick players (except for scriptkids and other specific people) so the following is just hypothetical:

Why should I? I expected the other player to be hostile (like probaly 75% of all gta online players are) and attack me, without me doing anything to him.

I expected the attack to happen either way so why should I regret it to try to prevent it?

 

3 hours ago, YouKnowWhoIAm said:

You're blinkered if you think this is acceptable behaviour. It's as toxic as the rest of the community. At least wait for thr deluxo/stromberg/akula etc to come out before throwing a hissy fit about someone else daring to join a public session.

Under the current circumstances it is acceptable.

Sure I get pissed too if it happens to me but I understand why they do it and I dont behave like a 12 year old kid and blow their a$$ up because 1.) it wont change anything and 2.) would be a waste of my time.

Kicking someone from a lobby who was there first (aka. 2 fresh joined players kick out the player who "made" the solo public lobby) however is not acceptable. That guys has probably no intention of attacking you, otherwise he would not sit in solo public in the first place.

 

3 hours ago, YouKnowWhoIAm said:

But whatever man, I've seen enough of your posts to know theres little point in even trying to discuss when you're involved.

There is a point in discussing things when I am involved as long as you do not expect to change my opinion.

[Lonely-Martin]

1 hour ago, Verbal Soze said:

But still even though this game is broken, you can't just kick people like that, they're enjoying the game in their own way, MTU, NAT test or Task manager is the right way if you want to play it safe

You miss the point, friends don't stay in session together long after the MTU thing and no-one's constantly doing it all night, lol. 

 

And, technically, you can indeed just kick people just like that. No reasons asked.

 

Like I said, we'll go round in circles. Especially if you misread or cherry pick parts of the conversation. It's simple, broad, and broken. Nothing much to add.

43 minutes ago, YouKnowWhoIAm said:

Double standards, that is all there is to it.

 

a random is in the session, best kick em.

 

Gta community is toxic.

 

Can't have it both ways. But let's blame it all on Rockstar, they made me do it. But when they advise to deatroy cargo, thats on the player.

 

It's laughable the extent some will go to in order to releive themselves of blame.

Not really, at least on my part. I just don't run businesses with or around others. But because I'm at peace, doesn't mean groups/crews don't want to be together.

 

And clearly as R* are the ones that changed the game after 2 releases, it's all on them, lol. The reporting and kicking abuses aren't new, just grew is all, lol.

[Nutduster]

Hey, it's THIS thread again! Woohoo!

 

On topic: I dropped into a lobby this morning and within 30 seconds of exiting my nightclub, I was getting votes against me.  There were only 4 other players and two of them were registered so it wasn't hard to tell who for sure was involved.  Started good ol' Hostile Takeover for 30 minutes of consequence-free killing, but it turned out they quit after 10.  Your lobby?  No, now it's MY lobby. 

[BlackMilk]

6 hours ago, Verbal Soze said:

 if you can think new ways, you can do that can't you? Thinking i mean...

That's mighty ironic. And I am let down once again by someone I'm trying to help to understand something. You just keep posting with your anger instead of really using your brain. You didn't read my post at all.

And no, you can not solo everything. Don't make stuff up. If you want to keep acting like a child instead of a reasonable adult, go right ahead. Not going to put any more time into you.

 

Why do I even bother with these people..

[johnwontscore]

I don't know if anyone one has said this in the thread OP, but if you start a CEO job as soon as you see the kick warning, they can't kick you until the job ends, which gives you time to blow up all their stuff for them.

[Guest Member2756931]

You can also set up a crew with just you, on a kick vote join crew and you rejoin the same session, no kick votes and the kickers have that cooldown to deal with.

[Yellow Dog with Cone]

Here's a protip for y'all:

 

Next time you arrive in a lobby and you get kick notifications, there's this cool feature called "Find New Session" in the Pause > Online menu.

 

Not only you'll avoid getting kicked, it also will save both your time and theirs, everyone wins! Cool right?

 

Unless being petty as f*ck is your thing, that is.

 

Refusing to leave a lobby by exploiting the game and griefing it is the GTA Online equivalent of an small child throwing a tantrum because the rest of the kids don't want to play with him.

 

"mommy, the kids don't want to play with me, I'm gonna kick their sand castles and throw their toys away, bwahhh!!!"

[Verbal Soze]

1 hour ago, BlackMilk said:

That's mighty ironic. And I am let down once again by someone I'm trying to help to understand something. You just keep posting with your anger instead of really using your brain. You didn't read my post at all.

And no, you can not solo everything. Don't make stuff up. If you want to keep acting like a child instead of a reasonable adult, go right ahead. Not going to put any more time into you.

 

Why do I even bother with these people..

Keep you in the dark you know they all...

6 hours ago, KWF1981 said:

You miss the point, friends don't stay in session together long after the MTU thing and no-one's constantly doing it all night, lol. 

 

And, technically, you can indeed just kick people just like that. No reasons asked.

 

Like I said, we'll go round in circles. Especially if you misread or cherry pick parts of the conversation. It's simple, broad, and broken. Nothing much to add.

Not really, at least on my part. I just don't run businesses with or around others. But because I'm at peace, doesn't mean groups/crews don't want to be together.

 

And clearly as R* are the ones that changed the game after 2 releases, it's all on them, lol. The reporting and kicking abuses aren't new, just grew is all, lol.

What if i say i'm not like the others, what if i say i will never surrender...

[Gregistopal]

Simple fix if somebody has a mental state under one bar and hasn’t killed anybody unprovoked they cannot be kicked 

[Guest Member2756931]

1 hour ago, Voodoo-Hendrix said:

Here's a protip for y'all:

 

Next time you arrive in a lobby and you get kick notifications, there's this cool feature called "Find New Session" in the Pause > Online menu.

 

Not only you'll avoid getting kicked, it also will save both your time and theirs, everyone wins! Cool right?

 

Unless being petty as f*ck is your thing, that is.

 

Refusing to leave a lobby by exploiting the game and griefing it is the GTA Online equivalent of an small child throwing a tantrum because the rest of the kids don't want to play with him.

 

"mommy, the kids don't want to play with me, I'm gonna kick their sand castles and throw their toys away, bwahhh!!!"

So its not petty to boot players out of a public session without reason?

 

That player minding their own business poses such a threat you just HAVE to abuse a feature. But it's petty for someone else to abuse a feature when it could cause problems for you?

 

If that's not double standards I don't know what is.

[Dutchling]

12 minutes ago, YouKnowWhoIAm said:

So its not petty to boot players out of a public session without reason?

 

That player minding their own business poses such a threat you just HAVE to abuse a feature. But it's petty for someone else to abuse a feature when it could cause problems for you?

 

If that's not double standards I don't know what is.

You can’t reason with people who think they are entitled to whatever they want. Yea it’s so mature to bully someone out of a public game  “If we vote to kick you, you should just leave. Why? Because there is more of us than you and we said so!” Childish.

[Big Molio]

11 hours ago, Voodoo-Hendrix said:

Here's a protip for y'all:

 

Next time you arrive in a lobby and you get kick notifications, there's this cool feature called "Find New Session" in the Pause > Online menu.

 

Not only you'll avoid getting kicked, it also will save both your time and theirs, everyone wins! Cool right?

 

Unless being petty as f*ck is your thing, that is.

 

Refusing to leave a lobby by exploiting the game and griefing it is the GTA Online equivalent of an small child throwing a tantrum because the rest of the kids don't want to play with him.

 

"mommy, the kids don't want to play with me, I'm gonna kick their sand castles and throw their toys away, bwahhh!!!"

That ^ diatribe can be just as easily rewritten from the point of view of somebody who thinks kicking out players for nothing is childish, and petty as f*ck.

 

Refusing to accept the game is what it is by exploiting the kick function for no reason it is the GTA Online equivalent of small children throwing a tantrum because the big boy turned up and the rest of the kids don't want to play with him.

 

"mommy, we don't want to play with him, he might kick our sand castles and break our toys, make him go away bwahhh!!!"

 

You aren’t the arbiter of what is right here Voodoo, no matter how much you profess to be.

Edited August 13, 2018 by Big Molio

[Lonely-Martin]

30 minutes ago, Verbal Soze said:

What if i say i'm not like the others, what if i say i will never surrender...

Lol, you can say what you want. Just shows folk are right to persist with this. It clearly works, lol. Seems to wind the griefers up no end. Nothing pisses them off more than knowing they just cannot have an effect and being forced to surrender.

 

As this topic shows (again and again too). Those that are booted bitching here are clearly not happy with being forced to surrender. You really need to read these threads dude. It doesn't matter if you think you won't quit, it's often out of your hands.

 

(Again, a poor game design).

[justinlynch3]

2 hours ago, johnwontscore said:

I don't know if anyone one has said this in the thread OP, but if you start a CEO job as soon as you see the kick warning, they can't kick you until the job ends, which gives you time to blow up all their stuff for them.

This is what I was talking about when I said the other guy had thin skin.

 

From my perspective, why would you do this instead of just pausing your game and hitting new session.    If people are making sales in that lobby, your talking about potentially costing them hours if not days of effort why?   Because they want to be left alone and don't want strangers in their lobby?

 

Does being kicked bother you that much that you feel is justified to turn into a total jackass against the other people in the lobby?   

 

What exactly does this sort of action prove?     Well it (1) wastes your own time, (2) waste your own ammo, (3) doesn't teach other players anything as they'll see you as the asshole, and (4) though rare, I've seen players put in grieving reports on this kind of action.

 

So at the end of the day, what exactly does this accomplish?    It's a needless overreaction if you ask me, but that's just my opinion.

[Guest Member2756931]

8 minutes ago, KWF1981 said:

Lol, you can say what you want. Just shows folk are right to persist with this. It clearly works, lol. Seems to wind the griefers up no end. Nothing pisses them off more than knowing they just cannot have an effect and being forced to surrender.

 

As this topic shows (again and again too). Those that are booted bitching here are clearly not happy with being forced to surrender. You really need to read these threads dude. It doesn't matter if you think you won't quit, it's often out of your hands.

 

(Again, a poor game design).

It winds up more than just greifers. It will turn a peaceful, friendly player in to a greifer.

[Lonely-Martin]

9 minutes ago, YouKnowWhoIAm said:

It winds up more than just greifers. It will turn a peaceful, friendly player in to a greifer.

I'm peaceful and friendly (despite what I say here, lol), never thought too yet. I'm looking for a fun session, if I'm not welcome, with all due respect, f*ck 'em. I'll play elsewhere around those I seek like me. I know why I was booted, lol. Enjoy it folks.

 

I ain't wasting my time chasing players that want peace, that's just what R* want, lol. Cards gotta sell, I ain't no fool. R* do enough to contradict their own game and f*ck players over without me acting the tit because others want me gone.

 

If I want PvP, I chase those keen or running stuff that encourages PvP, like VIP challenges. Or, dare I say, a deathmatch... Remember those, anyone?

 

<Giggles>

Edited August 13, 2018 by KWF1981