Have a Question? V3

[Alexander]

Can I get AIDS or HIV from frequent wanking?

You seem to have bigger problems to worry about than HIV

[Memes]

 

 

 

 

Can I get AIDS or HIV from frequent wanking?

No.

What if he masturbate with an hiv infected needle?

 

What if he asks Ann the meth dealer or Jim the pimp to wank him off?What if he lost his virginity to a stuffed turkey?

 

Serious Question:Is Carnage, the symbiote, ever going to be in another comic book?

[Reformed Squid]

 

 

Can I get AIDS or HIV from frequent wanking?

No.

What if he masturbate with an hiv infected needle?

 

Then he'd have bigger problems to worry about. Like his sanity.

 

Edit: I found a battery in my garage. Would I be able hook this battery up to a power supply and power a Desktop PC? You know, without having anything plugged into any wall, like a laptop works when it's on battery. (It's called a Makita 9000, pretty sure it's used to charge power tools or something. Just curious, I really doubt it could be done)

 

Edited February 23, 2015 by Cloudee

[krashr]

 

 

I've never been able to figure out this riddle, and I'm hoping someone here could provide a solution to it.

 

Your trapped in a room. One door leads to salvation and wealth beyond your wildest dreams and the other leads to the most sickeningly-cruel hell imaginable. There are also two birds in the room. One is always bad and always will lie the other quite the opposite, always good and always truthful. You don't know which door is which and you also don't know which bird is which. The birds however know exactly which door leads to salvation and which door leads to damnation. As soon as you open a door your stuck with it. You can only ask 1 question to one bird. How do you figure out which door leads to heaven?

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Are we that old that this isn't the FIRST thing that pops into kids mind's these days?

 

i was thinking a similar thing this morning as i sat in my rocking chair on the front porch yelling at whipper snappers..

 

[TheGodDamnMaster]

If you have the means to save someone who is about to die but choose not to intervene, are you responsible for their death?

 

Say, for instance, that a CEO of a pharmaceutical company has the choice of whether or not to manufacture a proven cure for a horribly-debilitating terminal disease. However, the target market are impoverished peoples living in third world nations who would likely never be able to get the company a return on the massive investment it would take to mass produce the drug. If that CEO decided not to fund the development and shelved the drug indefinitely, would the CEO be responsible for the millions of people who are set to die from the disease over the next few years?

[Memes]

Can someone solve this riddle: i can be bent.I can be broken. I can be opened or closed. I am sealed by hands. What am I? It been bugging me for days? I feel as if I know the answer, but can't remember it.

Edited February 23, 2015 by T_0_P_H_A_T

[TheGodDamnMaster]

A contract? Some people (see Marcus Lemonis) seal their arrangements with a handshake, contracts can be broken (just look at NDAs), and the terms "open" and "close" can be attached to the word.

Edited February 23, 2015 by WhatsStrength

[Alexander]

A deal?

[Memes]

A deal?

Yeah, I think that was it. Being a riddle, I usually have my own answer.

A hooker so jacked up on heroin she thinks your dick is a snickers bar, so you have to punch her in the mouth but you want to keep going so you bend her over and put it in even though she said not to.

I'm sorry I had to. But you're both right, I'm sure.

Edited February 23, 2015 by T_0_P_H_A_T

[Fonz]

If you have the means to save someone who is about to die but choose not to intervene, are you responsible for their death?

 

Say, for instance, that a CEO of a pharmaceutical company has the choice of whether or not to manufacture a proven cure for a horribly-debilitating terminal disease. However, the target market are impoverished peoples living in third world nations who would likely never be able to get the company a return on the massive investment it would take to mass produce the drug. If that CEO decided not to fund the development and shelved the drug indefinitely, would the CEO be responsible for the millions of people who are set to die from the disease over the next few years?

Legally, no, but conscience goes a long way, and that would be at least negligence motivated by greed. In my opinion, yes, the CEO would be responsible. Edited February 23, 2015 by Black_MiD

[Alexander]

Is that how you treat your hookers?

 

@WhatStrength yeah, that CEO is guilty of letting all those people die, but nobody would give a damn.

E: Black_MiD is right, he is not legally guilty.

Edited February 23, 2015 by AlexanderS4

[Memes]

Is that how you treat your hookers?

 

@WhatStrength yeah, that CEO might be guilty of letting all those people die, but nobody would give a damn.

Yes.

[Payne Killer]

 

Is that how you treat your hookers?

 

@WhatStrength yeah, that CEO might be guilty of letting all those people die, but nobody would give a damn.

Yes.How much did you pay?

[Memes]

 

 

Is that how you treat your hookers?

 

@WhatStrength yeah, that CEO might be guilty of letting all those people die, but nobody would give a damn.

Yes.

How much did you pay?About 10 dollars.

[Alexander]

 

 

Is that how you treat your hookers?

 

@WhatStrength yeah, that CEO might be guilty of letting all those people die, but nobody would give a damn.

Yes.

How much did you pay?Did you killed after and got your money back?

 

 

GTA Reference, don't freak out

 

Edited February 23, 2015 by AlexanderS4

[Payne Killer]

 

 

 

 

Is that how you treat your hookers?

 

@WhatStrength yeah, that CEO might be guilty of letting all those people die, but nobody would give a damn.

Yes.

How much did you pay?

About 10 dollars.

 

[Memes]

 

 

 

Is that how you treat your hookers?

 

@WhatStrength yeah, that CEO might be guilty of letting all those people die, but nobody would give a damn.

Yes.

How much did you pay?Did you killed after and got you're money back?

 

 

GTA Reference, don't freak out

 

Yeah, I killed her and got the money back.

 

 

Then I went home to play GTA.

[Jolly Swagman]

 

Can I get AIDS or HIV from frequent wanking?

No.

 

Dude, that's not cool..

 

They guy came he looking for some information and you give him this false answer like its some kind of joke. How would you feel if they take your answer as correct and end up getting sick with the Aids? No so funny now is it.

 

@IIOctaneIl: Don't listen to these jokers. Masturbation is still even today one of the leading causes of aids/ HIV. It was the main reason of the big rise in HIV cases in the 80's as it was around this time masturbation became more socially acceptable, leading to the rise in cases.

 

That's not to say you cannot masturbate in (relative) safety. Always use proper protection and put on a condom before having your fun time. There will still be a slight risk of infection however the chances of it happening are almost negligible if you use a properly fitting condom. I must stress however that it still isnt entirely safe and there are a still a few thousand cases that are transmitted this way annually. Please also note that condoms do not protect against other forms of masturbation related ailments including hairy palm and blindness.

Edited February 23, 2015 by Jolly Swagman

[Dottie]

good ole Jolly swagman....

[Reformed Squid]

The member you hate most on this forum is about to get hit by a train and die forever, and the only way they can survive is if you yell at them to move. Do you save their life or say nothing and let them die?

Edited February 23, 2015 by Cloudee

[LightningLord]

The member you hate most on this forum is about to get hit by a train and die forever, and the only way they can survive is if you yell at them to move. Do you save their life or say nothing and let them die?

...save them?

[Memes]

The member you hate most on this forum is about to get hit by a train and die forever, and the only way they can survive is if you yell at them to move. Do you save their life or say nothing and let them die?

Well. Someone is going to die. Not saying names. But still.

 

What's_a _username is so dead.

Edited February 23, 2015 by T_0_P_H_A_T

[Saikou]

I would help them, lol.

 

In exchange they owe me their life, if not, I'll feed them to my goons

[Alexander]

I'd tell him... and then push that f*cker, with a "I want you to look me in the eyes when I kill you!" Expression on my face.

Edited February 23, 2015 by AlexanderS4

[TheGodDamnMaster]

I don't think I could do that to anyone I've encountered online or off. I wouldn't even do that to Hitler, he probably deserves a sentence of perpetual death for a period that is equal to the combined total of every minute that every person spent suffering under his rule.

Edited February 23, 2015 by WhatsStrength

[Dottie]

The member you hate most on this forum is about to get hit by a train and die forever, and the only way they can survive is if you yell at them to move. Do you save their life or say nothing and let them die?

Id tell him to move then call them an asshole

[Share Sharqi]

I think the critical point is here is that, although it is perfectly legal to refrain from intervention, you are almost certainly a psychopath if you choose to do so.

[Saikou]

Briefs or boxers? Which is more comfortable? I've only tried boxers, so if anyone has tried both, has a sane mind and could give me his opinion on them, that would be great...

 

 

I realize I probably should've Google'd this, but oh well...

 

Edited February 23, 2015 by Edwin

[Coin]

I find boxers to be more comfortable.

 

But really, it depends.

[PhillBellic]

I prefer briefs.