Players are voting for you to be removed from the session. Improve your behavior or you will be kicked.

[flexcreator]

You friendly to people who p*ss you off?

 

You don't have to be friendly with those, but you still can be polite.

As an alternative to griefing, you can simply refuse to leave by starting a job.

 

If they decide to attack you, well, you can still remain polite while killing them.

[Black-Dragon96]

Carry on making yourself look stupid by all means.

 

If 1 person out of the 7.6 billion on the planet reacts to an action in a specific way then it cannot be denied that that action has caused the reaction.

It can be denied. Simply because the other 7,599... Billion people can react in a diffrent way. It was the free decision of the single person to react in a specific way (unless we are talking about body reflexes here).

 

If I punch you in the nose and punch Voodoo Hendrix in the nose but only one of you bleeds does that mean punching you in the nose wasn't the cause of you bleeding? Hell, let's kick it up... if I punched every single person in the world in the nose and it was only your nose which was bleeding, does that mean my punch wasn't the cause of you bleeding? No. It clearly was the cause. The same applies here.

This example does not really work since it is not my free decision if I start bleeding or not. Your example only proves that an action causes a reaction wich I never denied while my example proved that a specific reaction gets caused by the free decision of a person.

 

It isn't about free will, you are clutching at straws with that one. I've not stated that my reactions are uncontrollable, they are very much controllable. I still have the same free will I always have. I could choose not to be a dick however I choose to offer the same amount of courtesy to those who voted as they showed me. I choose to stoop to the level of those who attempted to bully me out of a lobby. Where did I say or even imply free will is revoked?

 

I cannot react to an action if the action has not been made. I cannot react to a vote to kick if that vote has not been cast. The action of voting causes the reaction of retaliation. How in the blue hell are you not grasping this simple concept?

"The reaction can not happen without the action." Thats 100% correct and I never disagreed with that.

However you reaction is not the action of revenge itself but the action of deciding if you want revenge or not and you decision causes the revenge (or not).

If the reaction would be the action of revenge itself it would show the absence of free will because you would have not be able to react in another way.

 

The votekicker is responsible for the action of kicking you wich causes your reaction (wich the kicker is partially responsible for too) to decide if you want revenge or not wich causes your free will action to grief the sh*t out of the votekickers (the action you and you alone are responsible for).

 

Gonna answer the rest at a later point. No time atm.

[Lonely-Martin]

 

 

<snip>

f*ck statistics, it doesn't matter if 1 person, 100 people or 18.5% of people act in the same manner as I do, disputing that voting to be kicked cannot be proven to cause retaliation is incorrect as it does for me. It does for friends. It does for some in this topic and it does for many others who play the game (I assume this last one).

 

You can narrow it down, sure. It may only be the case on Xbox One since that's what I play on.

 

So let me try to understand something...

 

You and your friends, and the few guys here are what you are using to say that, at least on Xbox, that everyone reacts the same.

 

2 things. Are all those in here actually all on Xbox?.

 

Also, I'm assuming you've scanned every Xbox user while there and seen that everyone reacts the same?. You can prove this?.

 

Clearly not, so it's not a general consensus, obviously. No-one can provide one, not for, not against. Aside R* maybe.

 

By your logic, because I play on PS4 and don't react to being kicked, in any way really, so that means PS4 is clean and safe for all to use. After all, how I play and see things is clearly the only f*cking possibility. Because I don't cheat or glitch, I'm safe to use the Demonic logic and assume that all these cheaters and glitches used against me at times are a figment of my imagination, lol.

 

/s.

 

It really is your way or the highway isn't it. You are so egotistical 'Oh I gotta prove you wrong' Even though you CANNOT provide a shred of true facts here.

 

Yes, being kicked can lead to a revenge attack, or more. But the fact that it can lead to absolutely f*ck all, says it all. Can, could, might, should, possibly, probably. None of which means Certainly!.

 

People choose their reactions, and some aren't petty, some can't be bothered, some know they'll lose, and some have more important things to worry about than the couple of minutes to get a new session.

 

You cannot bring facts and numbers to this, there is no proof. (Not without extensive research and full access to data/all peoples answers.

 

Genuinely, you text here like an adult, and cannot see this... Very deliberate dude, as it's just simply wrong. The second 1 person on Xbox doesn't react/overreact. Ends that 100% you mention.

 

(Again, lol).

[Guest]

 

 

 

<snip>

 

f*ck statistics, it doesn't matter if 1 person, 100 people or 18.5% of people act in the same manner as I do, disputing that voting to be kicked cannot be proven to cause retaliation is incorrect as it does for me. It does for friends. It does for some in this topic and it does for many others who play the game (I assume this last one).

 

You can narrow it down, sure. It may only be the case on Xbox One since that's what I play on.

 

So let me try to understand something...

 

You and your friends, and the few guys here are what you are using to say that, at least on Xbox, that everyone reacts the same.

 

2 things. Are all those in here actually all on Xbox?.

 

Also, I'm assuming you've scanned every Xbox user while there and seen that everyone reacts the same?. You can prove this?.

 

Clearly not, so it's not a general consensus, obviously. No-one can provide one, not for, not against. Aside R* maybe.

 

By your logic, because I play on PS4 and don't react to being kicked, in any way really, so that means PS4 is clean and safe for all to use. After all, how I play and see things is clearly the only f*cking possibility. Because I don't cheat or glitch, I'm safe to use the Demonic logic and assume that all these cheaters and glitches used against me at times are a figment of my imagination, lol.

 

/s.

 

It really is your way or the highway isn't it. You are so egotistical 'Oh I gotta prove you wrong' Even though you CANNOT provide a shred of true facts here.

 

Yes, being kicked can lead to a revenge attack, or more. But the fact that it can lead to absolutely f*ck all, says it all. Can, could, might, should, possibly, probably. None of which means Certainly!.

 

People choose their reactions, and some aren't petty, some can't be bothered, some know they'll lose, and some have more important things to worry about than the couple of minutes to get a new session.

 

You cannot bring facts and numbers to this, there is no proof. (Not without extensive research and full access to data/all peoples answers.

 

Genuinely, you text here like an adult, and cannot see this... Very deliberate dude, as it's just simply wrong. The second 1 person on Xbox doesn't react/overreact. Ends that 100% you mention.

 

(Again, lol).

 

Second sentence you're absolutely incorrect and I have never implied or stated that I speak for everyone. In fact, I speak for myself only.

 

I am not claiming everyone reacts the same way. I am stating that if only 1 person reacts in a specific way they still react to an action. Nowhere have I ever said nor implied that 1 reaction is the same for all or that 1 reaction can be classed as the normal reaction. I have said that even if only 1 reaction, the action still caused it, in that singular instance.

 

Never have I said 100% of reactions are the same. I have no idea where you got this from. If anythiing, 100% of reactions to voting to be kicked (whatever the reaction is) are due to the vote to be kicked, that's just obvious and a redundant figure (can't react without an action).

Edited February 8, 2018 by Guest

[Guest]

Gonna answer the rest at a later point. No time atm.

I wouldn't bother to be honest. Clearly you, if you're not being a troll, can't grasp what's being said by many and can't understand where many are coming from. You have even said, in that last reply, something which we have been telling you but you denying is correct.

 

No offence but you're either a moron or a troll and I will not be responding, explaining, arguing, proving, correcting or otherwise with you further unless the ridiculousness of your posts comes down.

[Lonely-Martin]

 

 

<snip>

Second sentence you're absolutely incorrect and I have never implied or stated that I speak for everyone. In fact, I speak for myself only.

 

I am not claiming everyone reacts the same way. I am stating that if only 1 person reacts in a specific way they still react to an action. Nowhere have I ever said nor implied that 1 reaction is the same for all or that 1 reaction can be classed as the normal reaction. I have said that even if only 1 reaction, the action still caused it, in that singular instance.

 

Never have I said 100% of reactions are the same. I have no idea where you got this from. If anythiing, 100% of reactions to voting to be kicked (whatever the reaction is) are due to the vote to be kicked, that's just obvious and a redundant figure (can't react without an action).

 

Good to know, but you were trying to use your interpretation as general fact. Many times now too, not just here.

 

Yes, representative of you/your friends/crew. But not Xbox as a whole, lol. Good to know though.

 

Stop antagonising Black-Dragon man, we all have our views, if you want to ignore him, do it. Don't keep saying it, lol. That's attention seeking.

 

(And with that, I go back to my reading, great thread. Totally understand much form many POV's quite honestly).

[Black-Dragon96]

I wouldn't bother to be honest. Clearly you, if you're not being a troll, can't grasp what's being said by many and can't understand where many are coming from. You have even said, in that last reply, something which we have been telling you but you denying is correct.

Well I do bother because I prefer to answer when I am questioned.

I do understand where you are coming from, I simply think you are incorrect and I explain why I think so.

I dont care what many people say, because just because many people say something that does not mean they are correct. A couple of hundert years ago many people said the earth is flat and just a few said its round. Today we all know that the many people saying the earth is flat were incorrect.

 

Ok, you asked how I react to getting shot at.

Well I pull out a gun that i see fit and shoot back.

However it is my decision to shoot back, my own free will and by that my responsiblity. I could also run away or switch sessions but I choose to fight back.

 

That I react is not my responsibility because every action causes a reaction and no matter what I do (shooting back or switching sessions), I react. The way I react however IS my responsibility because I choose the way I react and I am aware that my action (the act of shooting back) will cause a reaction (the other player deciding what he will do about me shooting back). The other guy then is responsible for the way he reacts about me shooting back.

 

The responsibility of a person for doing an action ends when the person reacting has chosen the way he wants to react.

 

No offence but you're either a moron or a troll and I will not be responding, explaining, arguing, proving, correcting or otherwise with you further unless the ridiculousness of your posts comes down.

You are not obligated to respond you are free to react to my posts however you wish. My posts are far from ridiculous, imo.

[Guest]

Good to know, but you were trying to use your interpretation as general fact. Many times now too, not just here.

 

Yes, representative of you/your friends/crew. But not Xbox as a whole, lol. Good to know though.

 

Stop antagonising Black-Dragon man, we all have our views, if you want to ignore him, do it. Don't keep saying it, lol. That's attention seeking.

 

(And with that, I go back to my reading, great thread. Totally understand much form many POV's quite honestly).

The general fact I've been pushing is that, regardless of topic or action, if a single reaction happens it is still a reaction. Even if I am alone, my reaction of attacking on a vote to be kicked is still a reaction and therefore goes against Hei3enberg's claim that neither can be proven. My play style that I claim to use is proof that the reaction being discussed does happen.

 

This has never been claimed to be the general response, I do not believe it was even implied either.

 

My reaction to being voted to be kicked is a direct result from that action and therefore those who vote cannot excuse themselves from being at least partly responsible for the reaction. If a vote never come, the attack wouldn't come. Freewill or whatever other crazy excuse for justification that a voter is excused from any responsibility is just crazy talk, freewill is not, nor has ever been, affected nor implied to be affected.

 

The bottom line still remains that if you vote to kick a player, for any reason (even if genuine reasons) then be prepared for a reaction or be damn sure the kick happens. We (attackers) can be just as childish as you (voters).

[Lonely-Martin]

 

<snip>

My reaction to being voted to be kicked is a direct result from that action and therefore those who vote cannot excuse themselves from being at least partly responsible for the reaction.

 

They don't, lol. You're arguing with yourself then.

 

People are accepting it's a poor move and a potential catalyst for the reactions that come. The reaction though, is all personal choice, not fact, only in your case, as it clearly antagonises you. (Again, not saying it should/shouldn't). But you we're trying to say all Xbox users react like you. Not true, but we've cleared that up. End of chat (For us two).

[Guest]

They don't, lol. You're arguing with yourself then.

 

People are accepting it's a poor move and a potential catalyst for the reactions that come. The reaction though, is all personal choice, not fact, only in your case, as it clearly antagonises you. (Again, not saying it should/shouldn't). But you we're trying to say all Xbox users react like you. Not true, but we've cleared that up. End of chat (For us two).

There is one who constantly is attempting to completely excuse the voters from any blame and even has this crazy idea that those being voted, according to our logic, have an uncontrollable desire to attack. Who cannot comprehend that the actions of a voter are the sole cause of a reaction of retaliation, despite attempting to point out that the retaliation cannot happen with nothing to retaliate against.

 

I don't dispute some have accepted this and claim it's a dick move, catalyst etc. There's not much back and forth there. I don't claim it isn't personal choice, I'm very open that I choose to f*ck sh*t up if someone pisses on my shoes. What I am trying to get at (and I think you now have realised this) is, if you don't piss on my shoes I don't interfere with your game, if you do, I'll be putting that shoe up your ass.

 

Where have I ever said all xbox users react like me? You have misunderstood what I said, I have never stated any such thing nor implied it. I quote;

 

Therefore, even if I am alone in this, voting to kick can, and does, result in retaliation.

 

f*ck statistics, it doesn't matter if 1 person, 100 people or 18.5% of people act in the same manner as I do, disputing that voting to be kicked cannot be proven to cause retaliation is incorrect as it does for me. It does for friends. It does for some in this topic and it does for many others who play the game (I assume this last one).

 

You can narrow it down, sure. It may only be the case on Xbox One since that's what I play on. We do not know, unless someone steps up, that the same applies on PS4 and PC. However, to claim "Neither of you can prove or disprove the causality dilemma that vote kicks will provoke the attackers" is incorrect as I will step up and admit that vote kicks will provoke me.

This is the only time I have mentioned Xbox One and therefore this must be what you refer to.

It's pretty clear that I am speaking only of myself here, and pretty clear that I am stating that because I retaliate to a vote that you cannot dispute that voting causes retaliation. That single instance, me, retaliating, means that it happens. This was in response to Heisenberg's claim. No way, however you read that, does it state or imply that I am claiming all xbox one users or all players on any system follow suit.

 

The first few words of the first line of what I quoted from myself above state "even if I am alone in this". How on Earth did you manage to take that as claiming it's all xbox one users?

 

Read what's written, it's not like I'm being cryptic about a thing.

[Lonely-Martin]

^ I disagree completely. My posts are reflective of all of our previous conversations too, as always with anyone, and as I'd expect of me. That in mind, as I said...

 

End of chat (For us two).

 

...but go nuts.

 

Peace out.

Edited February 8, 2018 by KWF1981

[Guest]

^ I disagree completely. My posts are reflective of all of our previous conversations too, as always with anyone, and as I'd expect of me. That in mind, as I said...

 

End of chat (For us two).

...but go nuts.

 

Peace out.

 

Ah, this again...

 

So I show that I clearly talk of only myself and all of a sudden it's other conversations and you're out.

 

 

FYI I have NEVER explained my retaliation towards voters in any other topic. No previous conversation would imply that this conversation was about all xbox players. In fact I clearly stated I was talking of just myself in the post which you claim I generalised and stated all xbox players.

 

But sure, post crap, claim I have said what I haven't said at all, ever and then run away when it comes to light. Twisting words in an attempt to disregard something hasn't worked for you here. I really thought you were better than that and had hoped previous attempts at twisting words were just misunderstanding, I guess I judged you very wrongly.

[Lonely-Martin]

Ah, this again...

So I show that I clearly talk of only myself and all of a sudden it's other conversations and you're out.

 

 

FYI I have NEVER explained my retaliation towards voters in any other topic. No previous conversation would imply that this conversation was about all xbox players. In fact I clearly stated I was talking of just myself in the post which you claim I generalised and stated all xbox players.

 

But sure, post crap, claim I have said what I haven't said at all, ever and then run away when it comes to light. Twisting words in an attempt to disregard something hasn't worked for you here. I really thought you were better than that and had hoped previous attempts at twisting words were just misunderstanding, I guess I judged you very wrongly.

 

I accept my faults. I know I misinterpreted some stuff, but the highlighted bit says it all.

 

IMO, you've called me a cheat, and assumed much of me over some topics, I just don't care what you think. I look more to contribute to productive topics and hope my ideal changes I often request are to the benefit of all players, however they play. And because I don't like one over the other personally, I'm seen as weak by a few, including you.

 

Fair play on my illiterate moments, I can misunderstand. But my seeing you judge me from the off, was never one. I felt you over stepped, so yes, I'll put my hands up here and accept I had contempt for you, so picked holes.

 

I'll back off, as I can already see I was petty there. That's all. Sorry for partly derailing the thread guys.

 

And out.

Edited February 8, 2018 by KWF1981

[Black-Dragon96]

There is one who constantly is attempting to completely excuse the voters from any blame and even has this crazy idea that those being voted, according to our logic, have an uncontrollable desire to attack. Who cannot comprehend that the actions of a voter are the sole cause of a reaction of retaliation, despite attempting to point out that the retaliation cannot happen with nothing to retaliate against.

I guess your talking about me in the first sentence.

I never excused the voters from any blame. I always agreed that voting someone just because he joined is a dick move and that that is the reason why me and my crew do it diffrent. I said that I personally wont blame them (aka I wont be mad at them) because I understand their motives, but I also understand why you are mad at them.

I also agreed that the revenge (or retaliation as you call it) can not happen without something to retaliate against. Thats simple logic.

 

Where you and I disagree is the responsibility for the form of the revenge and if the revenge for an action does happen.

You say that the action of revenge (your counter attack on the votekickers, the process of killing them) is a dircet result of the votekick.

I disagree with that because imo that would mean that you would not have a choice to do something else than revenge when you get votekicked. I think that the reaction to getting kicked is the act of deciding if you (the person getting kicked) wants revenge or not.

I tryed to explain that with the two cases example. It was clearly seeable that the decision of the person getting kicked made the diffrence.

You having to decide if you want retaliation or not, is the reaction, the consequence for the other guys kicking you and the votekickers are responsible for this reaction, these consequences.

But you actually counter attacking is your own free decision, your own action, your responsibility and you will have to face the consequences for your actions

 

 

 

If there are any missunderstandings caused by my poor wording I apologise for that.

Edited February 8, 2018 by Black-Dragon96

[Ice_cold2016]

 

You friendly to people who p*ss you off?

 

You don't have to be friendly with those, but you still can be polite.

As an alternative to griefing, you can simply refuse to leave by starting a job.

 

If they decide to attack you, well, you can still remain polite while killing them.

 

lol! Start a job and just sit there waiting for 25 minutes? lol Nah, i'd rather smash em. Hopefully it will teach them not to do it to others. And it gives me pleasure knowing that these vote kick muppets have gotten upset and rage quit.

[Nyamber]

lol! Start a job and just sit there waiting for 25 minutes? lol Nah, i'd rather smash em. Hopefully it will teach them not to do it to others.

It literally does the exact opposite.

[Bobfakkel]

 

 

Any none friends who joins my session gets votekicked when im with friends. Im not in the mood to wait and see if they are friendly or not or if they gonna use up VIP work time. Make your own solo session.

 

Some even try to sell or source(cant get kicked in such a mission) so we just blow them up then. Mission fail and bye.

 

Now I know this was never the intention of this system but it doesnt work vs griefers also. Full lobby and a handfull know it even excists so youll never get enough votes.

 

Not asking to argue but can you see the hypocrisy in what you do?

Im not English or American but I think you mean me griefing others out of the session? Or what was your point? Sorry but some things are hard to translate.

 

Anyways assuming you ment that then yes you are correct the griefer(me) abuses it to remove the possible friendly.

 

Im very friendly though and never ran around in normal lobbys to kill people. Blame R* for forcing jobs in public sessions before that I was allways in inv only ones.

 

Now it indeed became shoot(votekick) first ask questions later.

[Ice_cold2016]

 

lol! Start a job and just sit there waiting for 25 minutes? lol Nah, i'd rather smash em. Hopefully it will teach them not to do it to others.

It literally does the exact opposite.

 

It is inevitable that it will make some stop and some will continue regardless. I clearly let them know over the mic that vote kicking is counterproductive. Some of them even go on to apologise and realise it is wrong.

[Black-Dragon96]

lol! Start a job and just sit there waiting for 25 minutes? lol Nah, i'd rather smash em. Hopefully it will teach them not to do it to others. And it gives me pleasure knowing that these vote kick muppets have gotten upset and rage quit.

Trust me you wont teach them anything else than that they need to find a way to get you out of the session while you have a job running.

 

I bet that in a couple of months we will have topics with people complaining that they get booted to storymode (or maybe even DDoSed). Simply getting kicked will be you least problem then.

[Guest]

I bet that in a couple of months we will have topics with people complaining that they get booted to storymode (or maybe even DDoSed). Simply getting kicked will be you least problem then.

How much are you betting? I'll take that bet. This has been happening for well over a year now, 2 months and nothing will change. What do you say, put up a shark card of your choosing or was that bet just theoretical?..

[am30]

Quite sad that the people that do this are too dumb and/or lazy to create a solo public session or actually message the person their worried about to find out if they are going to be a problem or not.

 

I like to become increasingly annoying to them by any means possible. Nothing else to do in GTA O except be a d-bag to other plays, which is quite sad.

 

Lot of sadness connected with GTA O these days.

[am30]

 

Im very friendly though and never ran around in normal lobbys to kill people. Blame R* for forcing jobs in public sessions before that I was allways in inv only ones.

 

Now it indeed became shoot(votekick) first ask questions later.

 

 

No, I'm going to go ahead and blame you, not Rockstar on this one. True, it is not the ideal situation having to do these missions in public sessions but it is what it is. There is nothing stopping you from asking if someone is going to be a problem. Chances are they too are looking for an empty session and can't believe their luck when they find one with another likeminded bunch. Bit of a dick move to then grief the new person.

[Yellow Dog with Cone]

Quite sad that the people that do this are too dumb and/or lazy to create a solo public session or actually message the person their worried about to find out if they are going to be a problem or not.

 

I like to become increasingly annoying to them by any means possible. Nothing else to do in GTA O except be a d-bag to other plays, which is quite sad.

 

Lot of sadness connected with GTA O these days.

Actually, kicking players is to keep a solo public session from filling up and also we ask randoms to either behave or to leave thr session politely. In my crew's case, it's the second.

 

Also, there's the fact that there's no honor or trust whatsoever in GTAO and anyone will backstab you at any chance they have. How many stories of people who land in solo public sessions and claimed to be friendly, just to pull an Hydra and going straight to your sale?

[am30]

 

Quite sad that the people that do this are too dumb and/or lazy to create a solo public session or actually message the person their worried about to find out if they are going to be a problem or not.

 

I like to become increasingly annoying to them by any means possible. Nothing else to do in GTA O except be a d-bag to other plays, which is quite sad.

 

Lot of sadness connected with GTA O these days.

Actually, kicking players is to keep a solo public session from filling up and also we ask randoms to either behave or to leave thr session politely. In my crew's case, it's the second.

 

Also, there's the fact that there's no honor or trust whatsoever in GTAO and anyone will backstab you at any chance they have. How many stories of people who land in solo public sessions and claimed to be friendly, just to pull an Hydra and going straight to your sale?

 

 

Getting a solo public session and keeping it that way is easy.

 

Of course you'll get a few liars but most will be ok if you give them a chance.

[Rabid Vulpix]

Drive Half-Track in passive mode, deploy vehicle proximity mines on popular ground delivery routes.

When you see a sale being made, deactivate passive mode/activate vehicle proximity mines/NPC cars won't detonate them unless you are physically looking at them.

Get vote kicked by the CEO/Biker organization when your mines destroy one of their delivery vehicles, & they think you hack blew them up.

At least when I'm "rightfully" vote kicked these days, I'm being decently creative (& partially lazy) on disruptive measures to businesses.

I've come to accept now that being kicked is nothing compared to screwing a 1 million dollar sale, cause I have a X1X & can get into another session in like 1 minute.

 

 

HOWEVER:

I did have 2 random players join one of my "solo" public sessions the other day. Within 30 seconds of them joining, one of them sent me a message that said "Leave or be kicked."

Literally 2 players who tagged in on my solo created session tried to basically steal it from me, funny enough they panicked & left when I messaged back saying that I was sending a screenshot of their message to R*. Freakin little insensitive cowards, they couldn't even keep their cool when someone actually stood up to their bullying attempts. But seriously, it's gotten to the point where joining players now try to steal solo lobbies from people....amazing really. That's probably the most depressing thing I've seen in this game to date.

Edited February 9, 2018 by Foreverpast

[Yellow Dog with Cone]

HOWEVER:

I did have 2 random players join one of my "solo" public sessions the other day. Within 30 seconds of them joining, one of them sent me a message that said "Leave or be kicked."

Literally 2 players who tagged in on my solo created session tried to basically steal it from me, funny enough they panicked & left when I messaged back saying that I was sending a screenshot of their message to R*. Freakin little insensitive cowards, they couldn't even keep their cool when someone actually stood up to their bullying attempts. But seriously, it's gotten to the point where joining players now try to steal solo lobbies from people....amazing really. That's probably the most depressing thing I've seen in this game to date.

Well, I can agree with you in this case, randoms hijacking a solo session from yours and kicking you from it is an even bigger dick move.

[Ghoffman9]

 

 

Quite sad that the people that do this are too dumb and/or lazy to create a solo public session or actually message the person their worried about to find out if they are going to be a problem or not.

 

I like to become increasingly annoying to them by any means possible. Nothing else to do in GTA O except be a d-bag to other plays, which is quite sad.

 

Lot of sadness connected with GTA O these days.

Actually, kicking players is to keep a solo public session from filling up and also we ask randoms to either behave or to leave thr session politely. In my crew's case, it's the second.

 

Also, there's the fact that there's no honor or trust whatsoever in GTAO and anyone will backstab you at any chance they have. How many stories of people who land in solo public sessions and claimed to be friendly, just to pull an Hydra and going straight to your sale?

 

 

Getting a solo public session and keeping it that way is easy.

 

Of course you'll get a few liars but most will be ok if you give them a chance.

 

Its entirely based on the connection and what mood the game is in that day. Sometimes a player or two might pop in despite doing a trick to isolate yourself. Happens to me every few months where someone comes in despite doing my trick to get solo sessions on Xbox One. This is what Voodoo and myself mean when we initiate kicks.

At that time we already done our tricks to get our own sessions but every now and again the game places someone in our session, so we kick people to ensure it remains a solo session.

 

We don't just stumble into a session and tell everyone to beat it. We do the trick and disconnect ourselves to our own session.

[Big Molio]

Well, I can agree with you in this case, randoms hijacking a solo session from yours and kicking you from it is an even bigger dick move.

So let me get this right. It’s okay to arbitrarily kick players who have the misfortune to land in a public session that you have deemed is yours, but if you’re on your own and a couple of randoms land in it and kick you out then that is not cool and, in the words of the guy above, they are freakin’ insensitive cowards and bullies who have “stolen” the session from you?

 

I’m lost for words lol

[Hécate-II]

 

HOWEVER:

I did have 2 random players join one of my "solo" public sessions the other day. Within 30 seconds of them joining, one of them sent me a message that said "Leave or be kicked."

Literally 2 players who tagged in on my solo created session tried to basically steal it from me, funny enough they panicked & left when I messaged back saying that I was sending a screenshot of their message to R*. Freakin little insensitive cowards, they couldn't even keep their cool when someone actually stood up to their bullying attempts. But seriously, it's gotten to the point where joining players now try to steal solo lobbies from people....amazing really. That's probably the most depressing thing I've seen in this game to date.

Well, I can agree with you in this case, randoms hijacking a solo session from yours and kicking you from it is an even bigger dick move.

 

 

It happens pretty often on PC despite its Hell easy there to use firewall method + whitelisting for a few friends, I blame PC players on this one, not R* fault if little groups(>4) can't do it.

[DeMinoTheDragon]

In all honestly, the only people I've seen use the kick feature are level 30-60 credit card kids who get angry in chat because the Oppressor doesn't make up for how bad they are.

 

Lo and behold, no one actually gives a f*ck despite the kid screaming in chat calling them all f*ggots and n****rs because they won't kick the player the kid wants kicked.

 

No one uses it for cheaters because it's honestly easier just to leave the lobby and join another one

Edited February 9, 2018 by That1Skeleton