We need to talk about shark cards

[D T]

In the beginning of GTA Online, you could buy all the important items in this game for less than 2 million, and the shark card closest to that price was 20 dollars. Essentially, Rockstar believed $20 was a fair price to reward someone with end-game content. Which sounded reasonable enough at the time. The problem is Rockstar gradually raised the price of all in-game content over the years, from high-end cars to basic clothing. Yet they've made absolutely no adjustments to shark card prices. And as a result, players must now spend 100 dollars just to own all the important items in this game.

 

I think it's about time Rockstar lowers the price of shark cards, or triples their in-game value. This is ridiculous.

[SHADOW OPS]

Here ya go.

 

http://gtaforums.com/topic/823972-gtao-the-official-btch-moan-topic/

[Jenkiiii]

"We" need to talk about shark cards, or "you" need to talk about shark cards?

 

It's been said a million times before, sorry mate.

[DeXiovi]

Maybe if you spend the time you use to complain on actually playing GTA, you wouldn't need to waste money on shark cards.

Just a thought.

[D T]

"We" need to talk about shark cards, or "you" need to talk about shark cards?

 

It's been said a million times before, sorry mate.

That's the kind of downer attitude that allows such unethical business practices to prosper.

[SoDank_ItPainsMe]

Again so soon?

[eyman]

They are overpriced imo, but people still continue to buy them. Overpiced content means people have to buy $8m $hark Card now and tbh It would be ludicrous in Rockstar's POV to change the pricing of content now.

Maybe in there future games they can justify them.

E: I feel this thread may get locked soon

Edited August 26, 2017 by eyman

[REXX]

To be honest, Shark Cards have already been discussed literally more than anything else in the GTAO section of the forums. I've never needed them, never will.

[oleg_aka_djmeg]

i agree, but this has been discussed here a million times.

[RedDagger]

Aye, this thread doesn't seem like it's got anywhere to go.