GTA 6 Leaks & Hints Topic.

[burger_mike]

5 hours ago, Len Lfc said:

Doesn't mean we have to keep feeding the trolls, providing them with more incentive to keep trolling. If there's nothing to discuss, there's nothing wrong with not saying much. 

Aaaaaand what if its not a troll? Tinheads thoughtful comment has some things worth mentioning, I don’t understand why you are so hostile towards it, this is a discussion forum for a game, not for politics. 

 

Edited September 15, 2019 by Equatecurl

[Pink Pineapple]

I welcome good fakes. It's fun when they get posted.

[Kris194]

7 hours ago, Benefactor69 said:

What I have gathered from this saga is that the "leaker" is supposedly a disgruntled former employee of Rockstar India who created some fake leaks in an attempt to hint at something to do with GTA VI.

It seems odd that he would fake leaks when he could have leaked something real, although I suppose in a way he did leak some sort of hint if what he says is true. Even as he acknowledged that the leaks were fake he still maintains that he used to work for Rockstar, and was trying to hint at something. If I had to guess, and assuming he did work for Rockstar, I think the hint is the setting of Vice City.

 

Tinhead isn't related to the leaker, I know him. It should be obvious in the postings of the two as well. The leaker's numerous accounts all post in run on sentences using broken English, and make various claims about himself. Tinhead writes with proper English and grammar and discusses the historical accuracy of the contents in the airport picture assuming it's meant to be set in the past.

Not the same person.

If this guy worked for Rockstar he would be like 4th source "saying", that GTA VI will be set in Vice City + numerous Vice City hints in GTA Online.

[burger_mike]

6 minutes ago, Kris194 said:

If this guy worked for Rockstar he would be like 4th source "saying", that GTA VI will be set in Vice City + numerous Vice City hints in GTA Online.

Hints in online?

[Kris194]

 

 

Edited September 15, 2019 by Kris194

[Rocketeer]

8 hours ago, Benefactor69 said:

What I have gathered from this saga is that the "leaker" is supposedly a disgruntled former employee of Rockstar India who created some fake leaks in an attempt to hint at something to do with GTA VI.

It seems odd that he would fake leaks when he could have leaked something real, although I suppose in a way he did leak some sort of hint if what he says is true. Even as he acknowledged that the leaks were fake he still maintains that he used to work for Rockstar, and was trying to hint at something. If I had to guess, and assuming he did work for Rockstar, I think the hint is the setting of Vice City.

I don't think Rockstar India hires people below the age of 18.

For people who still believe he's an ex Rockstar employee and his leaks are real, I want you to check this out:
https://www.instagram.com/beast_baron/

Now compare the image in his account to the very first "face leak".
Notice something? The glasses and ears?

This dude has probably trolled the Cyber Punk community too.

Edited September 15, 2019 by Rocketeer

[burger_mike]

11 minutes ago, Rocketeer said:

I don't think Rockstar India hires people below the age of 18.

For people who still believe he's an ex Rockstar employee and his leaks are real, I want you to check this out:
https://www.instagram.com/beast_baron/

Now compare the image in his account to very first "face leak".
Notice something? The glasses and ears?

This dude has probably trolled the Cyber Punk community too.

No one is believing his leaks man, the only one that has credibility is the plane one because it is in a totally different style from the rest of them and has all these details that I doubt this retard would be able to recreate himself. 

[cav00man]

41 minutes ago, Kris194 said:

 

 

Why would they have GTA VI references in GTA Vice City, a game released in 2002. This is plain stupid.

[Kris194]

Title of the movie is misleading, go and watch this.

[deadasdisco]

I saw this 2k games stunt casting call recently and I think its related to Hangar 13's new IP or another unannounced game but who knows. Rockstars main mocap studio is in NY but i'm pretty sure they have used other ones. Thought i'd share regardless cause who really knows.

 

 

"SF Bay area stunt performers motion capture auditions

Who: Stunt performers and screen fighters – punch/kick performance and reactions, bullet hits and various falls. Pedestrian, special or creature movement, weapons.

Parkour/gymnast – Acrobatic abilities, tumbling and special skills

Dance – all styles – prepare your own demo and choice of music

Circus – acro and partner skills, contortion, juggling, object manipulation (sword, staff)

Where: 2k Games (petaluma)

When: Monday, July 29th, 2019

Callbacks: Wednesday, July 31st, 2019"

 

 

Casting Link

[Len Lfc]

32 minutes ago, deadasdisco said:

Rockstars main mocap studio is in NY but i'm pretty sure they have used other ones.

I'm no expert, but from everything I've heard or read from GTA IV through RDR2. They usually do work out of NY. Solo was from LA, and even he had to work at NY. Also, Hangar 13 are based in Novato, CA. Right next to SF. Of course things can change, but I wouldn't bank on that being Rockstar. Great find though! 

[deadasdisco]

Just now, Len Lfc said:

I'm no expert, but from everything I've heard or read from GTA IV through RDR2. They usually do work out of NY. Solo was from LA, and even he had to work at NY. Also, Hangar 13 are based in Novato, CA. Right next to SF. Of course things can change, but I wouldn't bank on that being Rockstar. Great find though! 

Yeah you're absolutely correct! However I would not be surprised if they have procedures like this to not arouse public suspicion. I'm pretty certain sometimes with VO they do side characters and such outside of NY, from what I think was an RDR2 casting call. Who even knows with Rockstar lmao

[Len Lfc]

2 minutes ago, deadasdisco said:

Yeah you're absolutely correct! However I would not be surprised if they have procedures like this to not arouse public suspicion. I'm pretty certain sometimes with VO they do side characters and such outside of NY, from what I think was an RDR2 casting call. Who even knows with Rockstar lmao

It's entirely possible. Still worth noting of course. One thing that gets me though, is that first part matches the sorts of stuff Tim Neff does. The dance/circus stuff, I have no idea if he'd do. But Tim mentioned GTA 6 since 2017, I get the feeling that may have been there because he was scheduled to do that, after RDR2? I know they use more than one stunt performer. But still, just made me think. 

[Zello]

 

Old video but theres only one thing that reminds me of the dancing in that description.

[Len Lfc]

15 minutes ago, Zello said:

 

Old video but theres only one thing that reminds me of the dancing in that description.

Or Manny Escuela or Elizabeta Torres

 

[Dasmann25]

Why would such person make a fake GTA 6 leak and trick other GTA fans? Rad2525, your cousin is just a disrespectful little sh*t. 

 

First, he got fired by Rockstar Games for faking the leak of the game.

 

 

 

Second, he got hired by a NDA employee and created 3d fake images.

 

 

And finally last, he fooled everyone with his evidence.

 

 

 

 

That isn't cool to fool a GTA fan faking the leak of this game. Making fake images? That isn't good because you will be fired and you will be exposed.

 

 

 

 

 

 

RadRad25, thank you for joining GTA Forums.

Edited September 15, 2019 by Dasmann25

[DEALUX]

I thought one of the Houser brothers mentioned in a recent interview that they don't even know what they would do for a new GTA game, which suggests that they're not really working on one atm.

[Len Lfc]

2 minutes ago, DEALUX said:

I thought one of the Houser brothers mentioned in a recent interview that they don't even know what they would do for a new GTA game, which suggests that they're not really working on one atm.

The thing is, in the professional world, you have to lie. To avoid spoilers, to avoid suspicion, to downplay something in favour of something else, to deflect or change the subject. They've done it before. I'm not saying don't believe them, but just take what they say at face value, in terms of speculation, while keeping in mind they may well just be lying. 

 

Quote

"It's really unclear what we would even do with it, let alone how upset people would get with whatever we did.

Both intense liberal progression and intense conservatism are both very militant, and very angry."

It depends on how you perceive his words too. What they would do with it in terms of story? Marketing? What they would do with the satire or gameplay? I think any smart business company knows what they're going to do next, before they finish their current project. I doubt they're only just thinking of what to do. How the hell do you do pre production if you don't know?

 

If Roger Clarks first day on set for RDR2 was August 2013, then by now you'd expect work on GTA 6 to have begun. It's been nearly a year since RDR2 released.

[GRANDHEIST]

It seemed more like that Houser was talking about difficulties setting VI in modern day

 

in other words hinting a past setting

[Len Lfc]

Just now, GRANDHEIST said:

It seemed more like that Houser was talking about difficulties setting VI in modern day

 

in other words hinting a past setting

Yeah, that's the obvious take away. And what I'm inclined to believe too. However, I think it may also just be his way of saying "Forget about GTA for a bit, buy RDR2! We spent 5 years on this, and we need to make the money back!" lol

[Len Lfc]

6 minutes ago, Damien Scott said:

VI is supposed to be the opposite of V, just like V was the opposite of IV

I don't think we should view it as explicit as that. Unless there are quotes out there that I'm unaware of. My take has always been that Rockstar just kinda' what what they'd like to do. The reason why they did LS again was because "They felt they had unfinished business in SoCal" and "Wanted to do a faithful recreation of SoCal, like they did NY in IV" Pretty sure that's from the gameinformer article.  You could also say if that is the case (what you say) why did they do Vice City and then San Andreas in 2002 & 04? Different times, and I wouldn't actually argue that. But still. 

[PUTKA]

4 hours ago, deadasdisco said:

I saw this 2k games stunt casting call recently and I think its related to Hangar 13's new IP or another unannounced game but who knows. Rockstars main mocap studio is in NY but i'm pretty sure they have used other ones. Thought i'd share regardless cause who really knows.

 

 

"SF Bay area stunt performers motion capture auditions

Who: Stunt performers and screen fighters – punch/kick performance and reactions, bullet hits and various falls. Pedestrian, special or creature movement, weapons.

Parkour/gymnast – Acrobatic abilities, tumbling and special skills

Dance – all styles – prepare your own demo and choice of music

Circus – acro and partner skills, contortion, juggling, object manipulation (sword, staff)

Where: 2k Games (petaluma)

When: Monday, July 29th, 2019

Callbacks: Wednesday, July 31st, 2019"

 

 

Casting Link

Most likely H13, indeed.

It's amusing how people still confuse 2K for Take Two.

[Len Lfc]

4 minutes ago, PUTKA said:

Most likely H13, indeed.

It's amusing how people still confuse 2K for Take Two.

It's also amazing how many people think Grand Theft Auto is the only major series TT have. 

[Len Lfc]

2 minutes ago, Damien Scott said:

Yeah, a lot has changed. Compare IV to V and RDR to RDR 2. IV is gritty and dark, V is bright and funnier, RDR has the classic western feeling, RDR 2 felt like a modern western. The way I see it, VI will be completely different from V.

Having said that, though Even RDR2 was a lot... funnier? It was gritty like IV, but not overly dark or depressing. It still had it's balance of fun and silliness. lenny, the british guy with the animals, etc... I do think that is what GTA 6 will be like. I don't know what tone it will have, but I don't expect it to be without levity or moments of silliness I just wouldn't 'expect' them to alternate. Good is good, at the end of the day. Rockstar don't need to do the opposite of V. GTA 6 will sell regardless. Just depends on what Rockstar want to do. And I have no idea what that is. I could guess or speculate, but knowing what they want to do, vs what they will or can... impossible.

[Bruno1612]

I've read the last few pages and I think nobody understood what I did.

The images Aaryeshad posted are all fake, montage. The real part are the hints in the images. The neon, purple setting; the old chevy at purple night; the floppy disk icon and the lamps; THOSE are the hints which, according to the leaker itself, suggest what/how gta 6 will be like.

 

All the accounts below were created by the leaker, to perform certain purposes.

 

Aaryeshad - "leakers account." Its sole purpose is to share the images.

 

Rad2525 - "cousins account." Its purpose is to hint us that the images are fake, but the leaker DID work at R* India.

 

Youallknowme - its purpose is to clarify the message he was trying to send, and that is that the game will be in the past, in Miami, for all the little hints I quoted in the first paragraphs.

 

This is my theory, and I am surprised no one even thought of that, even as an option or supposition.

[Len Lfc]

1 minute ago, Bruno1612 said:

I've read the last few pages and I think nobody understood what I did.

The images Aaryeshad posted are all fake, montage. The real part are the hints in the images. The neon, purple setting; the old chevy at purple night; the floppy disk icon and the lamps; THOSE are the hints which, according to the leaker itself, suggest what/how gta 6 will be like.

 

All the accounts below were created by the leaker, to perform certain purposes.

 

Aaryeshad - "leakers account." Its sole purpose is to share the images.

 

Rad2525 - "cousins account." Its purpose is to hint us that the images are fake, but the leaker DID work at R* India.

 

Youallknowme - its purpose is to clarify the message he was trying to send, and that is that the game will be in the past, in Miami, for all the little hints I quoted in the first paragraphs.

 

This is my theory, and I am surprised no one even thought of that, even as an option or supposition.

Well the accounts involved were all banned. It's best to leave that behind now and move on.

[Bruno1612]

2 minutes ago, Len Lfc said:

Well the accounts involved were all banned. It's best to leave that behind now and move on.

Makes sense, considering they were all the same person like I said. But it is best to leave it all behind, I spend too much time in this site...

Edited September 15, 2019 by Bruno1612

[GTK0HLK]

Difficulties..,

more like difficulties at the moment, cause of things.., but that does not implicitly deny or approve of anything..,

its like saying.., everyone wants something and the water heads in that direction.., and people are faking leaks.., so it must BE so and so location..,

 

all it literally says that at the moment it would be a bit of a mess to get it right..,

the ways it can be taken is it wont be any time soon.., that it probably wont touch topics or spend more time trying to figure out how to spend time with those topics in a different form than it was from V..,

 

(while i clearly dont want it to be a certain direction)

im not throwing it out..,

i feel like even though a part of the community had some dislikes and likes about V, R* is taking into account most of what they got(even from Online)..,

Most of their player base at this point has spent quite along time away from the game.., and while two locations are different in tone.., the land and feeling will always be the same..,

V had you reach the top..,

IV was an Arrival..,

i dont think most would want VI to be where it all falls down/apart in that city..,

(they have the image of VC as it was then)

if anything.., VI could be a setup for what comes after it..,

 

too many one-liners being thrown around with the attempt to remove options..,

[Bruno1612]

7 minutes ago, GTK0HLK said:

Difficulties..,

more like difficulties at the moment, cause of things.., but that does not implicitly deny or approve of anything..,

its like saying.., everyone wants something and the water heads in that direction.., and people are faking leaks.., so it must BE so and so location..,

 

all it literally says that at the moment it would be a bit of a mess to get it right..,

the ways it can be taken is it wont be any time soon.., that it probably wont touch topics or spend more time trying to figure out how to spend time with those topics in a different form than it was from V..,

 

(while i clearly dont want it to be a certain direction)

im not throwing it out..,

i feel like even though a part of the community had some dislikes and likes about V, R* is taking into account most of what they got(even from Online)..,

Most of their player base at this point has spent quite along time away from the game.., and while two locations are different in tone.., the land and feeling will always be the same..,

V had you reach the top..,

IV was an Arrival..,

i dont think most would want VI to be where it all falls down/apart in that city..,

(they have the image of VC as it was then)

if anything.., VI could be a setup for what comes after it..,

 

too many one-liners being thrown around with the attempt to remove options..,

Im sorry, im not a native english speaker, i dont understand your point. Could you summarize what you meant?

[Kris194]

2 hours ago, Damien Scott said:

Exactly. VI is supposed to be the opposite of V, just like V was the opposite of IV. That's why I think we shouldn't expect sunshine and palm trees again.

Why? Many GTA fans want to revisit Vice City and PS5/Project Scarlett will be way, way more powerful than PS2. Even if it will be set in 80s there will be huge difference between Vice City and GTA VI just like there is huge difference between San Andreas and GTA V. There is also big difference between Los Angeles and Miami, they are vastly different cities. Not to mention this.

Quote

Any chance that Vice City might return in a future GTA?

 

It is always a possibility. There are a few references to the city in our current-gen GTAs so it is part of that HD universe, and it is certainly somewhere we would love to revisit. However Vice City, perhaps more than any other GTA game, was as much about the era as the setting. Miami in the 1980’s is so iconic it would feel strange to revisit the city in a different time period.

 

Of course at some point we would like to have one big world containing all our cities and let the player fly between them and revisit their favorite areas, and in that context reimagining Vice City would be very interesting.

Ding, ding. That's the project they are talking about since a long, long time and I believe, that they will start this project with GTA VI: Online. With all the power PS5 will have it will be finally possible.

Edited September 15, 2019 by Kris194