GTA 6 Leaks & Hints Topic.

[tinhead]

4 minutes ago, ReginaPhalange said:

@tinhead

 

Joined: 09/13/2019  Nice try.

I've got to go to dinner soon, but wanted to check the thread before I go- I have written and proofread 5 paragraphs of text that are easily explained and given direct citations to evidence to support them. This is a speculation, leaks, and hints thread, is it not? You have plenty of room to debate anything at all that I've said, physical models from this fake, any kind of UI, hell, I gave a number of counterarguments myself, ideas for people to look into to disprove it- and the best you've got is the age of the account? Seriously? If you're just here to sh*tpost, wouldn't there be an offtopic for that??

[Bruno1612]

20 minutes ago, ReginaPhalange said:

@tinhead

 

Joined: 09/13/2019  Nice try.

He aint leaking anything, hes just sharing his own opinion on the subject! If he got here and said "guys look at this new leak, like and comment what you think" then it would be suspicious... but thats not the case! 

[GTAhare]

What’s interesting about all this is that this guy actually did work for Rockstar. It may actually be possible the runaway picture may actually be real though I’m not sure about the other “leaks.” Although looking at his other works he’s very talented the runaway picture does have a lot of details. Either he’s very sophisticated or this may actually be a real image.

[Eadwine_]

11 minutes ago, GTAhare said:

What’s interesting about all this is that this guy actually did work for Rockstar. It may actually be possible the runaway picture may actually be real though I’m not sure about the other “leaks.” Although looking at his other works he’s very talented the runaway picture does have a lot of details. Either he’s very sophisticated or this may actually be a real image.

 

The thing is his earlier "leaks" (the big ear guy and old school police car) has already been debunked, so why would he first share two fake pics and then a "legit" gameplay pic? Why not just post the gameplay pic and leave it at that? He would be discrediting himself for no reason. Makes me think the airport pic is fake as well.

[CarltonDanks69]

..Why are we suddenly having a political discussion?

This is GTAForums not CSPANForums

[Zello]

8 minutes ago, CarltonDanks69 said:

..Why are we suddenly having a political discussion?

This is GTAForums not CSPANForums

Talking about GTA can feel like talking about politics sometimes 

[gta7dev]

You know it's a fake leak when Microsoft Flight Simulator 2004 has better graphics.

[JamesG]

8 hours ago, tinhead said:

My friend and I (Benefactor69) both collaborated and did a lot of research on the runway picture posted here. Despite the cousin's comments we are very convinced it is an early screenshot of the game. I'm not saying it with complete certainty, but the amount of time and effort that someone has placed into it is way beyond the scope of most of the people who have generated fake leaks. We've done a lot of research and cited evidence that seems to back up most of the claims made about the game taking place in the past. Given that, according to his cousin, he did work at Rockstar and was in a position to take the photo is enough to prove it as such. Why he would release fake leaks, and then attempt to release the real one after the fact I do not know. There is an obvious quality difference between the faked images and the one taken of the runway. I have nothing to prove or disprove the sunglasses image, but given it seems to be taken on the same monitor as the runway picture I would assume there is a greater chance of it being authentic. We have made an infographic that contains most of the condensed information and is easy to follow.

or

https://imgur.com/gallery/1h5KOZi

The first thing that we noticed about the picture is that the airport is unique, we didn't recognize it from V or IV. When checking the original map from Vice City, the placement of the landing strips are the same. It appears that the end of the runways toward the ocean have been shortened, with more hangars added. However, whoever created it might have done this to obscure more of the map, so we wanted more information to back it up. We found another map on Rockstar's own website from 2012, that included hangars with identical airplane placement as the screenshot. We have correlated the locations of the focal points to their approximate locations on the map. Moving onto the design of the airport, it easily fits within the context of the game. Not that it's something that's supposed to be architecturally significant, it bears an uncanny resemblance to a 1980 photo taken during a strike at Miami International. The style of the lights on the runway, a detail that would have been completely overlooked by someone without the knowledge of design history in North America, is also in a vintage style. We found a similar light on Flickr, which lists the decade as 1970s. Moving onto the planes themselves, all of the visible ones have all been decorated accurately to the 70s-80s. Some seem to match more than others (USAir graphics on the plane parked in the FlyUS bay are almost exact) but all have been redone. The most resembling plane appears to be Adios Airlines, the color and name placement are both the same between GTA V and this leak, but it too has been done differently. There has been a white stripe added that follows the body of the plane, and then continues upwards on the fin. Someone might have been skilled and knowledgeable enough to catch one of these details, but highly unlikely that they would have gotten all of them correct.

 

Now I will address some of the concerns posted about the image, the logo placement above the hangars, the mismatched minimap, and the lights on the runway. Assuming the game is still in alpha, these are all things that would still need worked before the final release. I would guess that the Adios logo is currently upside down because these are not the final textures, as the logos don't seem to match their counterparts on the restyled planes. They are probably placeholders until the finalized versions are done, depending how early the game is in development. This also could have meant the faker wanted the picture to come across as more realistic, so they would have used the logos everyone would recognize. But why take the time and effort to redesign the planes in a lore-friendly and vintage way, then not give the same treatment to the billboards? If I were faking it, I would have made the visible logos vintage, because they are much more visible, and less likely anyone would bother to look at the graphics on the planes. The next thing I have read people disproving the image with is the mismatched location of the player on the minimap. This is good criticism, and something that I wonder about, too. I find it highly unlikely that they would be worrying about the map function this early in production, and rather, the gameplay and mechanics. The artists may not be done making the map itself, and is just a static image for now. Someone could have photoshopped it over, I agree, but I do not recognize the UI from any game, past or present. If anyone knows of a close enough example, it would be very useful in disproving the image. It's circular, in the same style as IV, but someone has taken the time to make it appear three-dimensional, and overlay the bars from an aeronautical artificial horizon. The icons also seem to be in a similar style to the ones in RDR2, which I believe would have been much harder to implement in V or IV. Another interesting note, which is much more obvious than the other small artistic details mentioned above, is the floppy disk saving icon. It's the most visible detail pointing to an 80s setting, but it too could have been overlaid onto a still image. The final major criticism seems to be the lights on the runway, which doesn't make sense to me either. Although they are an era appropriate style, it appears the closest to the ocean would clip the planes' wings when landing or launching. I don't have any rebuttal to this, and it's not something that makes any sense. It could be something that they missed, and will be changed before the final build of the game.

If you made it through the wall of text, congrats, I think there's a lot of good debate in this image than what's been addressed here or anywhere else. Anyone is free to use, share, or post the infographic we made.

I agree. I'm not saying it's real, but the airport image is the one that has my attention. Imagine the amount of effort one would have to put into that, to recreate all that, with era appropriate objects and planes. Would someone put that effort into a fake? And the mini-map having RDR2 elements. Why would someone think to do that in a leak? And it makes sense to borrow realism elements from RDR2. Although the green circle throws me off because that colour isn't era appropriate, it should be more a pastel green, but it could just be placeholder.  But it could just be flight simulator. Flight Sim X, X-Plane or something. 

 

Look, even though the others are fake, the dude used to work at Rockstar India, who handle art, animation, and play testing. Could it be possible that at least one person at India has inside scoop on the setting and era and it at least spread with word of mouth, so the dude created fake leaks to show us? It's not about the images themselves, it's about what's IN the images. Pictures say a thousand words, right? And who leaked the RDR2 map? Could that have been from India? Rockstar India done some work on RDR2. So why not GTA VI?

 

Though, probably just wishful thinking. GTA in Vice City, Liberty City, and South America in the 70s + 80s would be a dream come true for me. (I actually did have a dream over a year ago about playing a next-gen game based in gritty 70s New York, I was driving a Dodge Monaco taxi in the Bronx with the twin towers in the background. I assumed it to be NY Noire until recently when someone "leaked" on Reddit... And I also dreamed Mafia II 10 years ago before I even knew it was a thing, driving the 55 Bel Air on the golden bricky roads the game has, which I ended up repeating in game. Some kinda video game oracle). 

Edited September 14, 2019 by JamesG

[Rocketeer]

**Sigh**

The new account claiming the leak is real is extremely skeptical.
I'm pretty confident that the person who "had a fight with his cousin" yesterday never worked for Rockstar India in his life.

The first "leak" with the face in it doesn't seem real either. Send me a PM here and I'll show you what I'm talking about.
Edit: Can't send it here for obvious reasons, just PM me.
 

Edited September 14, 2019 by Rocketeer

[1023023023XD]

@Rocketeeru did real work R* india?

 

[Rocketeer]

8 minutes ago, privatepradana said:

@Rocketeeru did real work R* india?

 

No.

Just observe the way he's trying to convince people that he worked for Rockstar.
It's funny that people believe his cousin somehow knows every move of his in detail.

I will not discuss this further, I don't want to get in trouble with the mods.
Send me a PM and I'll show you something regarding the first leak.

Edited September 14, 2019 by Rocketeer

[Len Lfc]

10 hours ago, tinhead said:

I've got to go to dinner soon, but wanted to check the thread before I go- I have written and proofread 5 paragraphs of text that are easily explained and given direct citations to evidence to support them. This is a speculation, leaks, and hints thread, is it not? You have plenty of room to debate anything at all that I've said, physical models from this fake, any kind of UI, hell, I gave a number of counterarguments myself, ideas for people to look into to disprove it- and the best you've got is the age of the account? Seriously? If you're just here to sh*tpost, wouldn't there be an offtopic for that??

That's cool and all, but it's still fake.

[Youallknowme]

4 hours ago, JamesG said:

I agree. I'm not saying it's real, but the airport image is the one that has my attention. Imagine the amount of effort one would have to put into that, to recreate all that, with era appropriate objects and planes. Would someone put that effort into a fake? And the mini-map having RDR2 elements. Why would someone think to do that in a leak? And it makes sense to borrow realism elements from RDR2. Although the green circle throws me off because that colour isn't era appropriate, it should be more a pastel green, but it could just be placeholder.  But it could just be flight simulator. Flight Sim X, X-Plane or something. 

 

Look, even though the others are fake, the dude used to work at Rockstar India, who handle art, animation, and play testing. Could it be possible that at least one person at India has inside scoop on the setting and era and it at least spread with word of mouth, so the dude created fake leaks to show us? It's not about the images themselves, it's about what's IN the images. Pictures say a thousand words, right? And who leaked the RDR2 map? Could that have been from India? Rockstar India done some work on RDR2. So why not GTA VI?

 

Though, probably just wishful thinking. GTA in Vice City, Liberty City, and South America in the 70s + 80s would be a dream come true for me. (I actually did have a dream over a year ago about playing a next-gen game based in gritty 70s New York, I was driving a Dodge Monaco taxi in the Bronx with the twin towers in the background. I assumed it to be NY Noire until recently when someone "leaked" on Reddit... And I also dreamed Mafia II 10 years ago before I even knew it was a thing, driving the 55 Bel Air on the golden bricky roads the game has, which I ended up repeating in game. Some kinda video game oracle). 

Some one got the hint right

12 hours ago, tinhead said:

My friend and I (Benefactor69) both collaborated and did a lot of research on the runway picture posted here. Despite the cousin's comments we are very convinced it is an early screenshot of the game. I'm not saying it with complete certainty, but the amount of time and effort that someone has placed into it is way beyond the scope of most of the people who have generated fake leaks. We've done a lot of research and cited evidence that seems to back up most of the claims made about the game taking place in the past. Given that, according to his cousin, he did work at Rockstar and was in a position to take the photo is enough to prove it as such. Why he would release fake leaks, and then attempt to release the real one after the fact I do not know. There is an obvious quality difference between the faked images and the one taken of the runway. I have nothing to prove or disprove the sunglasses image, but given it seems to be taken on the same monitor as the runway picture I would assume there is a greater chance of it being authentic. We have made an infographic that contains most of the condensed information and is easy to follow.

or

https://imgur.com/gallery/1h5KOZi

The first thing that we noticed about the picture is that the airport is unique, we didn't recognize it from V or IV. When checking the original map from Vice City, the placement of the landing strips are the same. It appears that the end of the runways toward the ocean have been shortened, with more hangars added. However, whoever created it might have done this to obscure more of the map, so we wanted more information to back it up. We found another map on Rockstar's own website from 2012, that included hangars with identical airplane placement as the screenshot. We have correlated the locations of the focal points to their approximate locations on the map. Moving onto the design of the airport, it easily fits within the context of the game. Not that it's something that's supposed to be architecturally significant, it bears an uncanny resemblance to a 1980 photo taken during a strike at Miami International. The style of the lights on the runway, a detail that would have been completely overlooked by someone without the knowledge of design history in North America, is also in a vintage style. We found a similar light on Flickr, which lists the decade as 1970s. Moving onto the planes themselves, all of the visible ones have all been decorated accurately to the 70s-80s. Some seem to match more than others (USAir graphics on the plane parked in the FlyUS bay are almost exact) but all have been redone. The most resembling plane appears to be Adios Airlines, the color and name placement are both the same between GTA V and this leak, but it too has been done differently. There has been a white stripe added that follows the body of the plane, and then continues upwards on the fin. Someone might have been skilled and knowledgeable enough to catch one of these details, but highly unlikely that they would have gotten all of them correct.

 

Now I will address some of the concerns posted about the image, the logo placement above the hangars, the mismatched minimap, and the lights on the runway. Assuming the game is still in alpha, these are all things that would still need worked before the final release. I would guess that the Adios logo is currently upside down because these are not the final textures, as the logos don't seem to match their counterparts on the restyled planes. They are probably placeholders until the finalized versions are done, depending how early the game is in development. This also could have meant the faker wanted the picture to come across as more realistic, so they would have used the logos everyone would recognize. But why take the time and effort to redesign the planes in a lore-friendly and vintage way, then not give the same treatment to the billboards? If I were faking it, I would have made the visible logos vintage, because they are much more visible, and less likely anyone would bother to look at the graphics on the planes. The next thing I have read people disproving the image with is the mismatched location of the player on the minimap. This is good criticism, and something that I wonder about, too. I find it highly unlikely that they would be worrying about the map function this early in production, and rather, the gameplay and mechanics. The artists may not be done making the map itself, and is just a static image for now. Someone could have photoshopped it over, I agree, but I do not recognize the UI from any game, past or present. If anyone knows of a close enough example, it would be very useful in disproving the image. It's circular, in the same style as IV, but someone has taken the time to make it appear three-dimensional, and overlay the bars from an aeronautical artificial horizon. The icons also seem to be in a similar style to the ones in RDR2, which I believe would have been much harder to implement in V or IV. Another interesting note, which is much more obvious than the other small artistic details mentioned above, is the floppy disk saving icon. It's the most visible detail pointing to an 80s setting, but it too could have been overlaid onto a still image. The final major criticism seems to be the lights on the runway, which doesn't make sense to me either. Although they are an era appropriate style, it appears the closest to the ocean would clip the planes' wings when landing or launching. I don't have any rebuttal to this, and it's not something that makes any sense. It could be something that they missed, and will be changed before the final build of the game.

If you made it through the wall of text, congrats, I think there's a lot of good debate in this image than what's been addressed here or anywhere else. Anyone is free to use, share, or post the infographic we made.

Nice research you are almost correct except the lights are just a temporary objects of distraction, so was everything. Sometimes reality just slips under your eye and you can't even see it. 

We didn't start the fire
It was always burning
Since the world's been turning
We didn't start the fire
No we didn't light it
But we tried to fight it

we were just fuelling it just ensuring the fire doesn't dim down.

[Youallknowme]

3 hours ago, Rocketeer said:

**Sigh**

The new account claiming the leak is real is extremely skeptical.
I'm pretty confident that the person who "had a fight with his cousin" yesterday never worked for Rockstar India in his life.

The first "leak" with the face in it doesn't seem real either. Send me a PM here and I'll show you what I'm talking about.
Edit: Can't send it here for obvious reasons, just PM me.
 

Working for a company whose main goal is to generate revenue it's hard to say he might not be working for rockstar as per your belief, may be he is working for take two .who knows ,you haven't met that guy yet. So you don't even know what he is up to. Maybe he does work for take two maybe he isn't fired maybe all this a well planned stunt who knows. Yeh who knows well you all know the truth that was made to look like truth. All this was a well planned way ahead not to trick innocent fans but people like you who  to act like fuel to continue the topic long after its shut down.

It's not as simple as it looks

Peace

 

Edited September 14, 2019 by Youallknowme

[Lexiture]

Just now, Youallknowme said:

Working for a company who has main goal is to generate revenue it's hard to say he might not be working for rockstar as per your belief, may be he is working for take two .who knows ,you haven't met that guy yet. So you don't even know what he is up to. Maybe he does work for take two maybe he isn't fired maybe all this a well planned stunt who knows. Yeh who knows well you all know the truth that was made to look like truth. All this was a well planned way ahead not to trick innocent fans but people like you who  to act like fuel to continue the topic long after its shut down.

It's not as simple as it looks

Peace

 

Youallknowme

Player Hater

New Members

Joined: 09/14/2019

[Rocketeer]

13 minutes ago, Youallknowme said:

Working for a company whose main goal is to generate revenue it's hard to say he might not be working for rockstar as per your belief, may be he is working for take two .who knows ,you haven't met that guy yet. So you don't even know what he is up to. Maybe he does work for take two maybe he isn't fired maybe all this a well planned stunt who knows. Yeh who knows well you all know the truth that was made to look like truth. All this was a well planned way ahead not to trick innocent fans but people like you who  to act like fuel to continue the topic long after its shut down.

It's not as simple as it looks

Peace

 

AaryeshAd, no matter how many accounts you make, you can't fool me.
I have proof of what I'm saying. 

I honestly think you're having delusions. 
The way you make new accounts, defend your claims and pretend to be someone else.

Edited September 14, 2019 by Rocketeer

[burger_mike]

12 hours ago, ReginaPhalange said:

@tinhead

 

Joined: 09/13/2019  Nice try.

People join all the time whenever the leaks start to spice up, his join date means nothing, he has 5 paragraphs explaining why.

[Youallknowme]

3 minutes ago, Rocketeer said:

AaryeshAd, no matter how many accounts you make, you can't fool me.
I have proof of what I'm saying. 

I honestly think you're having delusions. 
The way you make accounts. defend your claims and pretend to be someone else.

You have already become a fool getting trapped real deep . I am not making any claims or defending my claims, I just am here to say, my job is done . I hinted the people who understood it. And for a fact you believe  those faked images maybe I even faked my name maybe my name is not even aaryeshad, maybe this guy has nothing to do with all this.you are still not understanding all this. And I ain't going to post more because someone else is being hired to do so.

[burger_mike]

2 hours ago, Len Lfc said:

That's cool and all, but it's still fake.

This is a discussion thread, and day old account knows more about the forums than you do. 

[GTK0HLK]

if it keeps going either something will be shut down again.., or completely locked is the feeling..,

there is no even real discussion or speculation about it.., just a back and forth..,

 

if there is nothing new, then let's wait for it..,

 

better than this.., which has already been dealt with..,

and it being dealt with a second time doesnt bode well..,

[bashovski]

You made me register here to write this, have you ever seen terminal building of an airport "blocking", or being placed in front of the runway? That would make it impossible and extremely dangerous for airplanes to land as seen on the 'leaked' screenshot. Please, stop speculating about this non-sense leaks.

[Len Lfc]

4 minutes ago, bashovski said:

You made me register here to write this, have you ever seen terminal building of an airport "blocking", or being placed in front of the runway? That would make it impossible and extremely dangerous for airplanes to land as seen on the 'leaked' screenshot. Please, stop speculating about this non-sense leaks.

People will say the other end is clear, but that's not how it works. Both ends need to be clear, so aircraft can approach and take off both ways, depending on wind direction. 

[Youallknowme]

Sorry guys for faking those images and wasting a lot of your time.

I am going to leave the forum's. And if in future there are any leaks it won't be me. All the accounts are fake so are the names of people . I didn't feel like insulting the community I just wanted to spread some information with those fakes. I am sorry if it hurt somebody. You won't see me doing any other stuff like this in future so forgive me. Thank you and peace 

[Bruno1612]

2 minutes ago, Youallknowme said:

Sorry guys for faking those images and wasting a lot of your time.

I am going to leave the forum's. And if in future there are any leaks it won't be me. All the accounts are fake so are the names of people . I didn't feel like insulting the community I just wanted to spread some information with those fakes. I am sorry if it hurt somebody. You won't see me doing any other stuff like this in future so forgive me. Thank you and peace 

All these accounts? You mean:

@tinhead @Benefactor69 @aaryeshad @Youallknowme

So you faked a leak, but the information hidden inside them is real? Then you saw that nobody was understanding, you tried to explain and was shot down again?

 

Man, these last 3 pages on the forum are craziness, I dont have a single clue of what is happening...

[Youallknowme]

4 minutes ago, Bruno1612 said:

All these accounts? You mean:

@tinhead @Benefactor69 @aaryeshad @Youallknowme

So you faked a leak, but the information hidden inside them is real? Then you saw that nobody was understanding, you tried to explain and was shot down again?

 

Man, these last 3 pages on the forum are craziness, I dont have a single clue of what is happening...

Tinhead and benefactor69 were not me those are actual innocent GTA fans.

Anybody just ban me permanently

Thank you

Edited September 14, 2019 by Youallknowme

[Bruno1612]

29 minutes ago, Youallknowme said:

Tinhead and benefactor69 were not me those are actual innocent GTA fans.

Anybody just ban me permanently

Thank you

So:

The leaks were fake? -Yes.

Youallknoe me is aaryeshad? - Yes.

Were there any hidden messages or information about gta 6 in any of those leaks?

And who is @Rad2525? Is his account faked by you too? Or he is actually your cousin? Or you faked a cousin? 

Edited September 14, 2019 by Bruno1612

[monochrome_infinity]

This entire fake leak saga has been extremely entertaining

[Lordani_66]

4 minutes ago, monochrome_infinity said:

This entire fake leak saga has been extremely entertaining

Right? The most in the whole series. No wonder, we have never been waiting for a GTA game for so long.

[Auditore]

Its crazy how many people like to  fake leaks,why waste your time with bullsh*t?Its actually f*ckin pathetic 

[CarltonDanks69]

wtf is going on..