Quantcast
Jump to content
Search In
  • More options...
Find results that contain...
Find results in...
    1. Welcome to GTAForums!   (86,222 visits to this link)

    2. News

    1. GTA Online

      1. Find Lobbies & Players
      2. Guides & Strategies
      3. Vehicles
      4. Content Creator
      5. Help & Support
    2. Crews

      1. Events
      2. Recruitment
    1. Grand Theft Auto Series

    2. GTA Next

    3. GTA V

      1. PC
      2. Guides & Strategies
      3. Help & Support
    4. GTA IV

      1. Episodes from Liberty City
      2. Multiplayer
      3. Guides & Strategies
      4. Help & Support
      5. GTA Mods
    5. GTA Chinatown Wars

    6. GTA Vice City Stories

    7. GTA Liberty City Stories

    8. GTA San Andreas

      1. Guides & Strategies
      2. Help & Support
      3. GTA Mods
    9. GTA Vice City

      1. Guides & Strategies
      2. Help & Support
      3. GTA Mods
    10. GTA III

      1. Guides & Strategies
      2. Help & Support
      3. GTA Mods
    11. Top Down Games

      1. GTA Advance
      2. GTA 2
      3. GTA
    12. Wiki

      1. Merchandising
    1. GTA Modding

      1. GTA V
      2. GTA IV
      3. GTA III, VC & SA
      4. Tutorials
    2. Mod Showroom

      1. Scripts & Plugins
      2. Maps
      3. Total Conversions
      4. Vehicles
      5. Textures
      6. Characters
      7. Tools
      8. Other
      9. Workshop
    3. Featured Mods

      1. DYOM
      2. OpenIV
      3. GTA: Underground
      4. GTA: Liberty City
      5. GTA: State of Liberty
    1. Red Dead Redemption 2

    2. Red Dead Redemption

    3. Rockstar Games

    1. Off-Topic

      1. General Chat
      2. Gaming
      3. Technology
      4. Programming
      5. Movies & TV
      6. Music
      7. Sports
      8. Vehicles
    2. Expression

      1. Graphics / Visual Arts
      2. GFX Requests & Tutorials
      3. Writers' Discussion
      4. Debates & Discussion
    1. Forum Support

    2. Site Suggestions

Sign in to follow this  
tonTeufel

What do you guys think of Intel's new x299 chipset?

Recommended Posts

tonTeufel

So I just watched Linus' (Linustechtips that is) video on the new i9 CPUs and x299 chipset and I was wondering if anybody here actually likes what Intel did with this new product line

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
K^2

I'm 100% with Linus on this one. More cores is a good thing, but what they did with architecture makes no sense. Unfortunately, the current situation is that for gaming, more than 4 cores / 8 threads is practically a waste. Even the few game engines that can utilize more cores properly benefit more from the quality of cores than count. So if you are building a gaming machine, 76XX and 77XX CPUs (depending on budget) are still your best friends. For all situations where you can actually make use of 18 cores, you should either be getting a server CPU or going with GPU compute/CUDA job. This new lineup isn't for gamers or enthusiasts, and that leaves me wondering who is it even for?

 

The main problem with today's CPU market is that games are stuck very firmly in 8 threads territory. XBox and PS4 both have 8 cores with no hyperthreading. In practice, you only get 6-7 usable threads on both systems, and that's what almost every game engine will target. Similarly, most recently built PCs have 4 physical cores with hyperthreading for the same 8 virtual cores. And again, leaving a thread to deal with any background OS tasks, your best bet is to target 6-7 threads. Typically, that means 1 main thread, 1 rendering thread, 4 worker threads, and one thread left over for misc asynchronous tasks which usually run without affinity. Many engines will spawn extra workers if there are more cores available, but then you just bottleneck on main or rendering and your frame rate remains effectively the same.

 

With that in mind, what I would much rather see Intel do is release mainstream CPUs with 6-8 physical cores for 12-16 threads, all in the vein of the 76XX/77XX families, with all the same features on individual cores. That would provide an incentive for game devs to target higher core counts.

 

In a way, AMDs Ryzen 5/7 families are actually doing more to help us get good high-core count optimized games. Their CPUs have weaker individual cores, even compared to vanilla 7600/7700, but make up for it with higher core count at lower price point. If enough people buy these chips, game devs will cater to them, and then the games running on R5/7 might actually outperform i5/7 counterparts. That should be the real wake-up call for Intel, not the potential future 16 core behemoth.

 

Intel has opportunity for preemptive strike here. General market, game-optimzied 6-8 core i5/i7 could completely ruin any future superiority AMD Ryzen might have. But once again, Intel seems to be playing reactive defense and releases CPU architectures nobody asked for.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Dealux

Affordable 8 core CPUs from Intel is a good thing though. If 8 cores is the future for mainstream users then AMD can't compete if the goal is the best performance possible.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

×

Important Information

By using GTAForums.com, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.