Red Dead Redemption 2: Discussion & Speculation (Part 1)

[kudasai]

No.

[Rockstar Vienna]

No.

Well, who would have thought!?

[kudasai]

 

No.

Well, who would have thought!?

 

Not Red Dead related. But people found some curious things related to Agent. http://gtaforums.com/topic/413482-agent/page-34

[Rockstar Vienna]

Not Red Dead related. But people found some curious things related to Agent. http://gtaforums.com/topic/413482-agent/page-34

Yeah, heard about that. I think Rockstar should put Agent out of its misery already. I don't think we'll ever see it.

[Dee-account-with-1kbans]

 

 

I think what we will see is a bunch of people complaining saying things like why isn't it like RDR1, or RDR1 had this why doesn't RDR2 have it? Pretty much like the transition from SA to IV or IV to V.

Yeah! Why do fans complain when a sequel in the works for 8 years regresses!?

This game has to have all the features the first one had and more to satisfy players. There should be no reason why it shouldnt. R* has lots of employees and multiple studios have been working on this for years

Every game they make is different so it's understandable that they remove some stuff and then add other stuff instead. Imagine if every single GTA was very similar to the last one that came before it that would be kinda boring TBH. Let's just hope they don't screw up the gameplay by messing up the physics or by removing crouching.

 

I don't really see them removing a lot of things in Red Dead Redemption 2 that were in RDR1.

One would argue that GTAV needed the crouch and park our mechanic and switching shoulders more than V did. That regression is still mind boggling

[Stellasin]

Car physics were also much better, gta 5 is more arcade like.

Car handling was more realistic in GTA IV but it made driving at high speeds really hard. With that handling you can never finish a race in GTA Online. But still you could do some cool drifting and stuff.

[Kirsty]

We'll be giving away some Red Dead soaps via our Twitter account soon

 

Can't wait for Rockstar to launch some new collectibles for the game.

 

https://twitter.com/RedDeadNet/status/871046076891107329

[otachi]

How about we lock this thread until further info about the game?.

 

 

ADMIN,lock this thread now...................pls.

[RedDagger]

how bout you stop visiting this thread til we get further info ya negative knee

 

lock your face

[BLOOD]

Dayuum I am missing kirsty's old profile already....Haha. Anyway, Stellasin I think the Ragdolls are okay but yeah IV wins on that.

[Kirsty]

Dayuum I am missing kirsty's old profile already....Haha.

 

K* will be back soon.

[Zello]

I can see myself playing RDR2 the protagonist riding a horse with this playing

[Video]

[otachi]

how bout you stop visiting this thread til we get further info ya negative knee

 

lock your face

Ok,sounds alright.

[BLOOD]

 

Dayuum I am missing kirsty's old profile already....Haha.

K* will be back soon.

Nice to hear that

 

Edit.

Edited June 4, 2017 by BLOOD

[Dee-account-with-1kbans]

 

Dayuum I am missing kirsty's old profile already....Haha.

 

K* will be back soon.

 

is that you on your profile? Im sorry in advance

[Kirsty]

This is off-topic but I'll link this post to explain http://gtaforums.com/topic/805545-gtaforums-q-a/?p=1069614365

[Tyler]

 

 

Dayuum I am missing kirsty's old profile already....Haha.

 

K* will be back soon.

 

is that you on your profile? Im sorry in advance

 

 

It's actually me

[Dee-account-with-1kbans]

We'll be giving away some Red Dead soaps via our Twitter account soon

 

Can't wait for Rockstar to launch some new collectibles for the game.

 

https://twitter.com/RedDeadNet/status/871046076891107329

uhhh soaps? lol

Edited June 4, 2017 by DeeDogg_

[Jason]

 

 

Dayuum I am missing kirsty's old profile already....Haha.

 

K* will be back soon.

 

is that you on your profile? Im sorry in advance

 

 

[éX-Driver]

 

I think what we will see is a bunch of people complaining saying things like why isn't it like RDR1, or RDR1 had this why doesn't RDR2 have it? Pretty much like the transition from SA to IV or IV to V.

Yeah! Why do fans complain when a sequel in the works for 8 years regresses!?

This game has to have all the features the first one had and more to satisfy players. There should be no reason why it shouldnt. R* has lots of employees and multiple studios have been working on this for years

That makes sense until you realise Red Dead games are period pieces. They have to be be realistic to the time period in which they are set. It's extremely unlikely Red Dead 3 will take place after 1911/1914, the time period of Redemption. So of course some of the weapons and technology are going to be more dated in comparison. It's like complaining you can't drive a Koenigsegg in 80s Vice City.

[BLOOD]

This is off-topic but I'll link this post to explain http://gtaforums.com/topic/805545-gtaforums-q-a/?p=1069614365

For real . Well good to know anyway

 

Edit: It will be cool to get an animated series (kid-friendly version) based on Red Dead Redemption produced by 9 Story Media which by Strauss Zelnick's controlling stake via ZMC, could be presume as sister company to Take-Two Interactive. It will just be free licensing.

Edited June 4, 2017 by BLOOD

[Dee-account-with-1kbans]

 

 

I think what we will see is a bunch of people complaining saying things like why isn't it like RDR1, or RDR1 had this why doesn't RDR2 have it? Pretty much like the transition from SA to IV or IV to V.

Yeah! Why do fans complain when a sequel in the works for 8 years regresses!?

This game has to have all the features the first one had and more to satisfy players. There should be no reason why it shouldnt. R* has lots of employees and multiple studios have been working on this for years

That makes sense until you realise Red Dead games are period pieces. They have to be be realistic to the time period in which they are set. It's extremely unlikely Red Dead 3 will take place after 1911/1914, the time period of Redemption. So of course some of the weapons and technology are going to be more dated in comparison. It's like complaining you can't drive a Koenigsegg in 80s Vice City.

 

Umm where was I complaining about the dated technology? Can you highlight it for me? Thanks. Im talking about game features that should carry over and be more fleshed out. Features that would obviously make sense in its time frame

 

This is off-topic but I'll link this post to explain http://gtaforums.com/topic/805545-gtaforums-q-a/?p=1069614365

For real . Well good to know anyway

 

[Dee-account-with-1kbans]

 

This is off-topic but I'll link this post to explain http://gtaforums.com/topic/805545-gtaforums-q-a/?p=1069614365

For real . Well good to know anyway

 

Edit: It will be cool to get an animated series (kid-friendly version) based on Red Dead Redemption produced by 9 Story Media which by Strauss Zelnick's controlling stake via ZMC, could be presume as sister company to Take-Two Interactive. It will just be free licensing.

 

uhh i dont think that will ever happen

[BLOOD]

DeeDogg_: It will get the RDR franchise exposed to every audience even kids growing up. Like how that film to GTA2 exposed the GTA franchise even way before the phenomenal that was III.

 

Edit: My former neighbor's kid back in my old address got my own original RDR [he was about ten or so then].

Edited June 4, 2017 by BLOOD

[éX-Driver]

 

 

 

I think what we will see is a bunch of people complaining saying things like why isn't it like RDR1, or RDR1 had this why doesn't RDR2 have it? Pretty much like the transition from SA to IV or IV to V.

Yeah! Why do fans complain when a sequel in the works for 8 years regresses!?

This game has to have all the features the first one had and more to satisfy players. There should be no reason why it shouldnt. R* has lots of employees and multiple studios have been working on this for years

That makes sense until you realise Red Dead games are period pieces. They have to be be realistic to the time period in which they are set. It's extremely unlikely Red Dead 3 will take place after 1911/1914, the time period of Redemption. So of course some of the weapons and technology are going to be more dated in comparison. It's like complaining you can't drive a Koenigsegg in 80s Vice City.

 

Umm where was I complaining about the dated technology? Can you highlight it for me? Thanks. Im talking about game features that should carry over and be more fleshed out. Features that would obviously make sense in its time frame

Gotta be honest, didn't read any of your prior comments. Just read the one I responded to and made a judgement call as to what you were referring to.

[Dee-account-with-1kbans]

DeeDogg_: It will get the RDR franchise exposed to every audience even kids growing up. Like how that film to GTA2 exposed the GTA franchise even way before the phenomenal that was III.

 

Edit: My former neighbor's kid back in my old address got my own original RDR [he was about ten or so then].

think about what you're saying... a kids cartoon based off of red dead redemption. a brutal and cold western game with nudity, sexual references, swearing, gore, and mature adult themes. it aint even in the realm of possibility

[BLOOD]

Yeah but RDR have emotional characters unlike the GTA Universe [except for some supporting characters].

 

Edit: It does not necessary have to be RDR-titled but more like a spin-off inspired by the RDR Universe.

Edited June 4, 2017 by BLOOD

[Zello]

There's already a TV show about RDR

 

This is also Trailer 2

[Dee-account-with-1kbans]

http://boards.4chan.org/v/thread/379016883

 

before it gets spreaded, its obviously bullsh*t

[Kirsty]

Game is about Jack Marston?!