Quantcast
Jump to content
Search In
  • More options...
Find results that contain...
Find results in...
    1. Welcome to GTAForums!   (85,238 visits to this link)

    2. News

    1. GTA Online

      1. Find Lobbies & Players
      2. Guides & Strategies
      3. Vehicles
      4. Content Creator
      5. Help & Support
    2. Crews

      1. Events
      2. Recruitment
    1. Grand Theft Auto Series

    2. GTA Next

    3. GTA V

      1. PC
      2. Guides & Strategies
      3. Help & Support
    4. GTA IV

      1. Episodes from Liberty City
      2. Multiplayer
      3. Guides & Strategies
      4. Help & Support
      5. GTA Mods
    5. GTA Chinatown Wars

    6. GTA Vice City Stories

    7. GTA Liberty City Stories

    8. GTA San Andreas

      1. Guides & Strategies
      2. Help & Support
      3. GTA Mods
    9. GTA Vice City

      1. Guides & Strategies
      2. Help & Support
      3. GTA Mods
    10. GTA III

      1. Guides & Strategies
      2. Help & Support
      3. GTA Mods
    11. Top Down Games

      1. GTA Advance
      2. GTA 2
      3. GTA
    12. Wiki

      1. Merchandising
    1. GTA Modding

      1. GTA V
      2. GTA IV
      3. GTA III, VC & SA
      4. Tutorials
    2. Mod Showroom

      1. Scripts & Plugins
      2. Maps
      3. Total Conversions
      4. Vehicles
      5. Textures
      6. Characters
      7. Tools
      8. Other
      9. Workshop
    3. Featured Mods

      1. DYOM
      2. OpenIV
      3. GTA: Underground
      4. GTA: Liberty City
      5. GTA: State of Liberty
    1. Red Dead Redemption 2

    2. Red Dead Redemption

    3. Rockstar Games

    1. Off-Topic

      1. General Chat
      2. Gaming
      3. Technology
      4. Programming
      5. Movies & TV
      6. Music
      7. Sports
      8. Vehicles
    2. Expression

      1. Graphics / Visual Arts
      2. GFX Requests & Tutorials
      3. Writers' Discussion
      4. Debates & Discussion
    1. Forum Support

    2. Site Suggestions

Curtis

Would you like Las Venturas to Return?

The Poll  

149 members have voted

  1. 1. Las Venturas?

  2. 2. Would you want the desert area around Las Venturas to return too?

  3. 3. Gambling?

    • Of course! There is no Las Vegas/Las Venturas with no gambling!
    • Yes.
    • No.
    • Maybe/Unsure


Recommended Posts

MojoGamer

 

I'd like to see the Northern San Andreas (LV and SF) after Vice City.

 

I want that before another game set in Vice City tbh, the latter is just too similiar to Los Santos. LV and SF together would provide a refreshing change after Los Santos.

 

Here's the problem LV is nowhere near SF in real life if you looked at a map. R* seems to be going for realism this time around and putting two cities that are nowhere near each other in real life sounds pretty unrealistic. While it's a nice idea I just don't see it happening.

I'd rather see a standalone SF with Oakland across the bridge and maybe include some more of Northern California by adding a version of Sacramento.

My thoughts exactly.

 

If I see SF paired with LV I'm gonna f*cking flip.

 

Personally I dont care in this case. Its not like they are that far apart in real life. I dont think either city can carry its own game so pairing them together makes sense.

 

SF and LV paired up wouldn't make sense.

Rockstar already said it was nearly impossible to pair LS with SF

That said SF's time has passed and doesn't need an excusive game.

Just finish the remaining locations (LV&VC) as the main focus and SF as a prologue.

Like users said, its unrealistic, a bygone and will flip.

Give us the locked islands with LV & VC again and not another dumbed down paired SF n LS w/ LV.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Journey_95

 

 

I'd like to see the Northern San Andreas (LV and SF) after Vice City.

 

I want that before another game set in Vice City tbh, the latter is just too similiar to Los Santos. LV and SF together would provide a refreshing change after Los Santos.

 

Here's the problem LV is nowhere near SF in real life if you looked at a map. R* seems to be going for realism this time around and putting two cities that are nowhere near each other in real life sounds pretty unrealistic. While it's a nice idea I just don't see it happening.

I'd rather see a standalone SF with Oakland across the bridge and maybe include some more of Northern California by adding a version of Sacramento.

My thoughts exactly.

 

If I see SF paired with LV I'm gonna f*cking flip.

 

Personally I dont care in this case. Its not like they are that far apart in real life. I dont think either city can carry its own game so pairing them together makes sense.

 

SF and LV paired up wouldn't make sense.

Rockstar already said it was nearly impossible to pair LS with SF

That said SF's time has passed and doesn't need an excusive game.

Just finish the remaining locations (LV&VC) as the main focus and SF as a prologue.

Like users said, its unrealistic, a bygone and will flip.

Give us the locked islands with LV & VC again and not another dumbed down paired SF n LS w/ LV.

 

And how would LV and VC together fit? I mean I prefer those cities to SF as well but pairing them seems way sillier than SF and LV.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
MojoGamer

 

 

 

I'd like to see the Northern San Andreas (LV and SF) after Vice City.

 

I want that before another game set in Vice City tbh, the latter is just too similiar to Los Santos. LV and SF together would provide a refreshing change after Los Santos.

 

Here's the problem LV is nowhere near SF in real life if you looked at a map. R* seems to be going for realism this time around and putting two cities that are nowhere near each other in real life sounds pretty unrealistic. While it's a nice idea I just don't see it happening.

I'd rather see a standalone SF with Oakland across the bridge and maybe include some more of Northern California by adding a version of Sacramento.

My thoughts exactly.

 

If I see SF paired with LV I'm gonna f*cking flip.

 

Personally I dont care in this case. Its not like they are that far apart in real life. I dont think either city can carry its own game so pairing them together makes sense.

 

SF and LV paired up wouldn't make sense.

Rockstar already said it was nearly impossible to pair LS with SF

That said SF's time has passed and doesn't need an excusive game.

Just finish the remaining locations (LV&VC) as the main focus and SF as a prologue.

Like users said, its unrealistic, a bygone and will flip.

Give us the locked islands with LV & VC again and not another dumbed down paired SF n LS w/ LV.

 

And how would LV and VC together fit? I mean I prefer those cities to SF as well but pairing them seems way sillier than SF and LV.

 

I didn't say "fit" or "pair", I said locate them together with the returning feature of "locked islands". Where 5 star police will hunt you down relentlessly, that way it will be more realistic and make sense too.

They will connect with Interstate 15 (LV) and Interstate 95 (Miami)

Edited by MojoGamer

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Maybach62

how about based in the 90s in HD

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
MojoGamer

how about based in the 90s in HD

It'll be better modern, cause of the developer's direction to finish up the HD era.

It would be cool to revisit the 90's, but it was already done in the 3D era.

If they do go back in time like the 1970s, Cuba would be a awesome settling for my CoD Black Ops nostalgia.

They could also do Max Payne 4 or GTA 7 in a post apocalypse settling in London or France.

The 90s again for the GTA Series, I will not tolerate.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Queen Elizabeth II

You won't tolerate 90s in GTA Series but you would tolerate a post apocalypse London/France!? What!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Mortsnarg

You won't tolerate 90s in GTA Series but you would tolerate a post apocalypse London/France!? What!

Of course the Queen would be against post apocalyptic London smh

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
anthony

f*ck yeah !

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Dan_1983

Wouldn't mind it. I'd rather see a city in the next GTA that hasn't been done before though.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1972

While I love the idea and would completely accept it if GTA6 was set in LV, I think I would rather see a darker city. Last time we had the shiny Los Santos.

 

I doubt R* could beat Watch Dogs 2's San Francisco either. A part of me hopes for a brand new location.

Edited by fashion

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
M*A*R*I*N*A

no, no, no. i hated las venturas

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
JustRob

While I love the idea and would completely accept it if GTA6 was set in LV, I think I would rather see a darker city. Last time we had the shiny Los Santos.

 

I doubt R* could beat Watch Dogs 2's San Francisco either. A part of me hopes for a brand new location.

 

You think Rockstar can't do better than f*cking Ubisoft? lol

 

If Rockstar did San Fierro in HD it would BLOW Watch Dogs 2 out of the water

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
MojoGamer

But it didn't blow Los Santos, so San Fierro is not likely due to Leslie Benzie's failed story dlcs.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
The Paradox

F**k Lv, it is the worst gta city ever. I really hate it and don't want it to return.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Shyabang Shyabang

An annual event like this one near Las Venturas:

 

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Gokuzbu

Las Venturas would be great why not. Maybe have San Fierro at the same time if you can.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Yinepi

Yes. Hell, anything with a large and real-looking desert is a welcome change of pace after GTAIV's grey urban sprawl, and GTAV's confused identity.

absolutely

 

providing rockstar uses a new engine (not like the one used for gta v) then the game would be perfect if set in las venturas. they could focus all their resources on making the actual city detailed with lots of interiors. make every hotel and casino enterable.

 

this is a map i did for my thread a while back

kcnk49.png

 

but just imagine, a huge las venturas with a massive desert that has small towns and crazy roadside attractions that you can interact with.

Personally, I'd seperate it have two counties, I'd put the mountain Mesa range on the bottom. Make the bay smaller, move LV, Area 69, Slag City, and Crag Town to the bottom, and put Fort Carson, Nippleton, and Ghost Town on the upper left and remove the two cities on the river area to simulate real Nevada state layout.

 

Bone County is based off Clark County and would then cover the areas of the bay, Las Venturas, Slag City, Sloan, Area 69, and Crag town, and another county based off Washoe County covering Nippleton, Fort Carson, and Ghost Town. If I may take a guess on the cities:

 

Area 69 - Area 51, NV

Fort Carson - Carson City, NV

Slag City - Henderson, NV

Crag Town - Boulder City, NV

Sloan - Panaca, NV

Nippleton - Reno, NV

Ghost Town - Gerlach, NV

Edited by Yinepi

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
ViceOfLiberty

I'd Nerf the bay and make a rendition of Reno/Tahoe

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×

Important Information

By using GTAForums.com, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.