Jump to content
    1. Welcome to GTAForums!

    1. GTANet.com

    1. GTA Online

      1. Los Santos Drug Wars
      2. Updates
      3. Find Lobbies & Players
      4. Guides & Strategies
      5. Vehicles
      6. Content Creator
      7. Help & Support
    2. Red Dead Online

      1. Blood Money
      2. Frontier Pursuits
      3. Find Lobbies & Outlaws
      4. Help & Support
    3. Crews

    1. Grand Theft Auto Series

      1. Bugs*
      2. St. Andrews Cathedral
    2. GTA VI

    3. GTA V

      1. Guides & Strategies
      2. Help & Support
    4. GTA IV

      1. The Lost and Damned
      2. The Ballad of Gay Tony
      3. Guides & Strategies
      4. Help & Support
    5. GTA San Andreas

      1. Classic GTA SA
      2. Guides & Strategies
      3. Help & Support
    6. GTA Vice City

      1. Classic GTA VC
      2. Guides & Strategies
      3. Help & Support
    7. GTA III

      1. Classic GTA III
      2. Guides & Strategies
      3. Help & Support
    8. Portable Games

      1. GTA Chinatown Wars
      2. GTA Vice City Stories
      3. GTA Liberty City Stories
    9. Top-Down Games

      1. GTA Advance
      2. GTA 2
      3. GTA
    1. Red Dead Redemption 2

      1. PC
      2. Help & Support
    2. Red Dead Redemption

    1. GTA Mods

      1. GTA V
      2. GTA IV
      3. GTA III, VC & SA
      4. Tutorials
    2. Red Dead Mods

      1. Documentation
    3. Mod Showroom

      1. Scripts & Plugins
      2. Maps
      3. Total Conversions
      4. Vehicles
      5. Textures
      6. Characters
      7. Tools
      8. Other
      9. Workshop
    4. Featured Mods

      1. Design Your Own Mission
      2. OpenIV
      3. GTA: Underground
      4. GTA: Liberty City
      5. GTA: State of Liberty
    1. Rockstar Games

    2. Rockstar Collectors

    1. Off-Topic

      1. General Chat
      2. Gaming
      3. Technology
      4. Movies & TV
      5. Music
      6. Sports
      7. Vehicles
    2. Expression

      1. Graphics / Visual Arts
      2. GFX Requests & Tutorials
      3. Writers' Discussion
      4. Debates & Discussion
    1. Announcements

    2. Forum Support

    3. Suggestions

Pfister 811 Discussion


Hong Meiling
 Share

Recommended Posts

tumblr_o9hkcgYbWf1r6fr4fo1_1280.jpgtumblr_o9hkcgYbWf1r6fr4fo2_1280.jpg

tumblr_o9hkcgYbWf1r6fr4fo3_1280.jpg

 

 

Not the best quality. I will get better photos later today.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

With this whole badge glitch thing, I hope we can get Rockstar to sort it out. I'm going to send a ticket now to see if they listen.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Schroebedroeber

I dont know if there where more posts about this fact discussion, didnt real all pages

 

 

 

 

 

Again, this is not the "fact" I'm talking about. Please read dictionary:
http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/fact
http://www.dictionary.com/browse/fact
http://dictionary.cambridge.org/pt/dicionario/ingles/fact

There's nothing saying it is a fact only if science proves that. Again, the example: The guy bought a car (true) - fact, simple as that. You won't need a "scientific data" to prove that.

Lets now, have a number example: from 10 people, with a decent sense (not 10 years kids playing GTA), 8 of them think "X" car is ugly. The common sense then claims the car is ugly, and it becomes a fact. I'm not saying the car is really ugly, it is a matter of taste, but by common sense they found it ugly, they consider it ugly. It doesn't means people won't buy that. In example, we have the X80 Proto. Ugly, but fastest and the most expensive (give "status" - BS), and people buy it. Easy as that.
Now, I claim X thing is ugly, and from 10 people, 8 agree with me. So, are most of us abnormal? Or is it a fault of a company of feeding players with crap cars, crap design, and fantasy-based poor-quality models? Seriously.

Keep thinking "Oh, but if they think this car is ugly, it is just their opinion". R* loves it, really, because they can keep giving you sh*tty things. And no, I don't "know most people", I saw most people complaining about 811's Spoiler, and same with Comet. Now we need some science here, with a complete study just to proof (something obvious) that "X" thing is ugly according to common tastes? Lets call it "different" then, not ugly anymore.

Mr. Polaco, what you've just posted is one of the most insanely idiotic things I have ever read. At no point in your rambling, incoherent response were you even close to anything that could be considered a rational thought. Everyone in this thread is now dumber for having read it. I award you no points, and may God have mercy on your soul.
I agree wholeheartedly and 100% with Psoloquoise.

Polaco, I read the definitions you linked to, and they correspond with my existing notions of what facts are. The definitions you linked to do not back up your assertions.

The quality of beauty, or lack thereof, is subjective. It cannot be measured quantitatively.

Let me explain in very simple terms why the beauty (or lack thereof) of an object cannot be factual: it is not a property of the object being evaluated; rather, it exists solely in the minds of the people looking at the object.

Consider a statue that has a mass of 100 kilograms. The mass is a property of the object. It is a fact that it has a mass of 100 kg. It doesn't matter if you believe that it does or doesn't have a mass of 100 kg. It doesn't matter if you and I agree that it has a mass of 100 kg. The truth that it has a mass of 100 kg is independent of your beliefs or perceptions, or mine, or anyone else's. But the beauty of that statue doesn't exist within the statue itself; it is not an inherent property of the statue, like its mass is. The beauty exists only in the mind of the person looking at it. If every single person who sees the statue says it's beautiful, it is still not a fact that it's beautiful, but it would in that case be a fact that everyone agrees it is beautiful.

 

 

No you do not agree with Psoloquoise.

Psoloquoise is saying, that if enough people think the car is ugly, it becomes a fact the car is ugly...
Yes, its a fact there are people that think its ugly, but its also a fact there are people that think its beautiful...
Now that i think about it.. this is a pretty stupid discussion (opinion)
But hey.. not everyone has the same opinion.. (fact)
:lol::panic:

:lol: :panic:

 

Edited by Schroebedroeber
Link to comment
Share on other sites

OfficialTwiggz

With this whole badge glitch thing, I hope we can get Rockstar to sort it out. I'm going to send a ticket now to see if they listen.

Could you send me the link to send them a ticket, as well? It's extremely cosmetic but it's noticeable.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

B00Minyourface

I really want to try this car out, but there's been some really mixed reviews on handling. Does anybody know what the resale value is?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

With this whole badge glitch thing, I hope we can get Rockstar to sort it out. I'm going to send a ticket now to see if they listen.

Could you send me the link to send them a ticket, as well? It's extremely cosmetic but it's noticeable.

 

 

 

With this whole badge glitch thing, I hope we can get Rockstar to sort it out. I'm going to send a ticket now to see if they listen.

Could you send me the link to send them a ticket, as well? It's extremely cosmetic but it's noticeable.

 

Yeah, this is the link:

https://support.rockstargames.com/hc/en-us/requests/new

 

If that doesn't work just type in 'Rockstar Ticket' and it should come up with how to do it. Hopefully we can get them aware of the glitch quick so it can get sorted.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Im sorry to say but I find the design of this car to be ugly as hell, However im glad they are adding supercars every week, and the hybrid thing is pretty cool as well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Affalterbach

Best looking car in game. At first i disliked it by seeing the pictures, but in game its such a great car, i even like the spoiler.

 

SDJ0Lkn.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Stop bothering me with these videos, guy doesnt know his sh*t.

You have to break a little bit earlier with the 811, i just got a 0:56:620 on cutting coroners, couple 100th faster than the x80, acceleration is great, good buy!

Edited by Foppezão
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It looks good from the back but overall it's not a good looking car. Great drive though and I might pick one up for that reason.

 

Still can't believe that they made another Pfister with a contentious spoiler.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

whywontyoulisten

Still can't believe that they made another Pfister with a contentious spoiler.

At least this one doesn't look like it should be removable; it's obviously part of the design.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

DarkSavageDeathlyCloud

25 laps stock 811 best lap: 01:00:771

25 laps stock osiris: 00:58:060

25 laps stock X80: 00:57:267

 

Track: cutting coroners "original, rockstar created"

 

Though i honestly feel i made slight mistakes with everything but maybe the x80...yea...no way i coud have gone even under 59:50 seconds with the stock 811, let alone get to nearly 00:58.

I do how ever feel the handling of the 811 being bad just aint true.

Exept for it not being the best going over kerbs, it is not that bad over those either an without kerbs the handling feels good...no oversteer or understeer noticed...even not that hard to recover once spinning out

 

Edit: i do not put offroad tires on any of my sports and supers

 

More edit: forgot screen pictures..sh*t...ah well...feel free then to take my statements as invalid

Edited by goldadderXD
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

GodAllMarley

Why are people saying this is a Awd vehicle?? Not in this thread, but online and YouTube vids.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

DarkSavageDeathlyCloud

 

 

Stop bothering me with these videos, guy doesnt know his sh*t.

You have to break a little bit earlier with the 811, i just got a 0:56:620 on cutting coroners, couple 100th faster than the x80, acceleration is great, good buy!

Wich one though ?

I beleve by now they have atleast 2 cutting coroners

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Pfister 811 is the fastest land vehicles in the game, beating The Hakuchou and The Banshee 900R.

 

 

 

Incredible!

Edited by Matyrosas
  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Im a very good driver and a can drive it but this car make me feel sad you are not gone feel wow about this car its sucks so bad

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

 

Stop bothering me with these videos, guy doesnt know his sh*t.

You have to break a little bit earlier with the 811, i just got a 0:56:620 on cutting coroners, couple 100th faster than the x80, acceleration is great, good buy!

Wich one though ?

I beleve by now they have atleast 2 cutting coroners

 

That cutting corners is made by him and its actually "Cutting Coners GP" not the R* one.

 

If we shouldn't trust a guy who test all vehicles in the game fairly using a single track with statistic, I don't know who to trust or listen to. (For opinions with proof of course)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Stop bothering me with these videos, guy doesnt know his sh*t.

If he doesn't know sh*t and you are such excellent driver you shoud race him and post the results.

 

As for 811, it is my new favorite, now matter how slow or fast it's.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

TeammateHelper

Well, it's definitely not as race-ready as the T20 or X80.

 

However, I like it. I don't race anyway, so speed isn't my concern. Handling and braking feels compatible to how I normally drive. It's nice.

 

Now, mission-wise, really nice. The back isn't BP but the window's tiny enough for you not to get shot by Merryweather. Sides of the car also are a good height when taking cover, besides the front side area of course.

 

EDIT: Most importantly for me, it's the car that managed to replace the Bestia GTS as my daily driver. Even the Times-eighty couldn't do that.

Edited by TeammateAssist
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

Again, this is not the "fact" I'm talking about. Please read dictionary:

http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/fact

http://www.dictionary.com/browse/fact

http://dictionary.cambridge.org/pt/dicionario/ingles/fact

 

There's nothing saying it is a fact only if science proves that. Again, the example: The guy bought a car (true) - fact, simple as that. You won't need a "scientific data" to prove that.

 

Lets now, have a number example: from 10 people, with a decent sense (not 10 years kids playing GTA), 8 of them think "X" car is ugly. The common sense then claims the car is ugly, and it becomes a fact. I'm not saying the car is really ugly, it is a matter of taste, but by common sense they found it ugly, they consider it ugly. It doesn't means people won't buy that. In example, we have the X80 Proto. Ugly, but fastest and the most expensive (give "status" - BS), and people buy it. Easy as that.

Now, I claim X thing is ugly, and from 10 people, 8 agree with me. So, are most of us abnormal? Or is it a fault of a company of feeding players with crap cars, crap design, and fantasy-based poor-quality models? Seriously.

 

Keep thinking "Oh, but if they think this car is ugly, it is just their opinion". R* loves it, really, because they can keep giving you sh*tty things. And no, I don't "know most people", I saw most people complaining about 811's Spoiler, and same with Comet. Now we need some science here, with a complete study just to proof (something obvious) that "X" thing is ugly according to common tastes? Lets call it "different" then, not ugly anymore.

Mr. Polaco, what you've just posted is one of the most insanely idiotic things I have ever read. At no point in your rambling, incoherent response were you even close to anything that could be considered a rational thought. Everyone in this thread is now dumber for having read it. I award you no points, and may God have mercy on your soul.
I agree wholeheartedly and 100% with Psoloquoise.

 

Polaco, I read the definitions you linked to, and they correspond with my existing notions of what facts are. The definitions you linked to do not back up your assertions.

 

The quality of beauty, or lack thereof, is subjective. It cannot be measured quantitatively.

 

Let me explain in very simple terms why the beauty (or lack thereof) of an object cannot be factual: it is not a property of the object being evaluated; rather, it exists solely in the minds of the people looking at the object.

 

Consider a statue that has a mass of 100 kilograms. The mass is a property of the object. It is a fact that it has a mass of 100 kg. It doesn't matter if you believe that it does or doesn't have a mass of 100 kg. It doesn't matter if you and I agree that it has a mass of 100 kg. The truth that it has a mass of 100 kg is independent of your beliefs or perceptions, or mine, or anyone else's. But the beauty of that statue doesn't exist within the statue itself; it is not an inherent property of the statue, like its mass is. The beauty exists only in the mind of the person looking at it. If every single person who sees the statue says it's beautiful, it is still not a fact that it's beautiful, but it would in that case be a fact that everyone agrees it is beautiful.

 

First, thank you for being smarter than most of people here, being patient and explaining on your conception what "fact" is. And thanks for understanding me.

 

I completely understand what you mean there. Yes, the mass can be proven to have X weight, and we don't need people to believe it or not, it is a fact.

 

Yes, "beauty", "intelligence" and such thing as that can not be measured, quatified. And then, we can not assume directly something is beautiful (or not). We get based on opinions then, and it shouldn't be considered as fact, to be honest, anyway you are not wrong when you say it is. I wasn't saying that based on Car Spoiler's, I was saying that based on how many people complained about it. That was the fact: most people don't like the Spoiler, and same happened with Comet.

 

@Psoloquoise:

...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

 

 

 

Stop bothering me with these videos, guy doesnt know his sh*t.

You have to break a little bit earlier with the 811, i just got a 0:56:620 on cutting coroners, couple 100th faster than the x80, acceleration is great, good buy!

Wich one though ?

I beleve by now they have atleast 2 cutting coroners

 

That cutting corners is made by him and its actually "Cutting Coners GP" not the R* one.

 

If we shouldn't trust a guy who test all vehicles in the game fairly using a single track with statistic, I don't know who to trust or listen to. (For opinions with proof of course)

 

Because he uses the same track for all cars, he is trustworthy? He is a sh*tty driver, but wants to post his videos as soon as possible, thats all i am saying.

You are the creator of Nuburgring right? thanks for that btw!

Edited by Foppezão
Link to comment
Share on other sites

B00Minyourface

 

 

 

 

 

 

Stop bothering me with these videos, guy doesnt know his sh*t.

You have to break a little bit earlier with the 811, i just got a 0:56:620 on cutting coroners, couple 100th faster than the x80, acceleration is great, good buy!

Wich one though ?

I beleve by now they have atleast 2 cutting coroners

 

That cutting corners is made by him and its actually "Cutting Coners GP" not the R* one.

 

If we shouldn't trust a guy who test all vehicles in the game fairly using a single track with statistic, I don't know who to trust or listen to. (For opinions with proof of course)

 

Because he uses the same track for all cars, he is trustworthy? He is a sh*tty driver, but wants to post his videos as soon as possible, thats all i am saying.

You are the creator of Nuburgring right? thanks for that btw!

I have a lot of love for Broughy and his videos, and in my opinion he's been proved right more often than not in his initial assessment of all the cars.

 

He's got as scientific a method as possible in terms of how he tests the cars, but at the end of the day he's one guy with a particular style of driving - and he's admitted plenty of times that there will be people out there who could do faster lap times on CC than he does. The way that he deliberately does the tests though is to try and drive a consistent racing line around the track without taking too many risks, but pushing the cars as hard as he can to ensure that each lap is consistent as possible.

 

best way to figure this one out is to either (a) buy the car and have a go in it, or (b) race against it in whatever super car you normally use and see if people are consistently doing better or worse in the T20 / X80 etc.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why are people saying this is a Awd vehicle?? Not in this thread, but online and YouTube vids.

probably because it is awd

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

So is this out for consoles today? I saw an 811 in a race I was in this morning (it finished 3rd), so I left the group after the race to buy one. Didn't see it at Legendary or SSASA sites before I had to leave for work.

Same for me =(

Third car, first row on Legendary.

 

My only, only issue (right now) is there's no badge on the front of the vehicle.

 

But this car is extremely lovely to drive and look at, I now own two.

 

Thanks. Wasn't there this morning, but it sounds like it'll be there when I get home later. I really like the look of it from the pics. Can't wait to test it out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • 1 User Currently Viewing
    0 members, 0 Anonymous, 1 Guest

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using GTAForums.com, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.