GTA VI and it's fate

[Faris01]

Theres a high chance that GTA VI won't be released soon enough.

Rockstars will add additional DLCs ('sick of them) for GTA Online and hopefully Episodic expansion packs for GTA V.

Also there's the non-existent San Andreas Stories (According to Rockstar,"The Introduction" erased the need for a prequel of this game,but as you know,Rockstar changed it's mind on many occasions through time.)

It's no secret that GTA VI will be most probably set in Vice City.

(rumors that it will take place in London or a city which would be based on Chicago is totally B.S.)

There are so many unfinished things which Rockstar has to do before working on GTA VI.

Who knows...perhaps Rockstar will start working on a 2D/3D Project?

Edited May 1, 2016 by Faris01

[Pedinhuh]

Hold on a second, let me consult my magic fortune-teller crystal ball...

[Megumi]

Only time will tell.

[Nico]

Also there's the non-existent San Andreas Stories (...) perhaps Rockstar will start working on a 2D/3D Project?

People still believe that San Andreas Stories is possible?

 

The 3D era is ended, resuming it would be a step back. They worked a lot on IV's and V's stories, plus they cannot make the mistake of "changing universes" again.

[Gtaman_92]

It would be f*ck up if they set in in Liberty City again.

[Osho]

I worry that GTA 6 might be another disappointment. Like already mentioned, only time will tell.

[Faris01]

resuming it would be a step back

 

Indeed,it would be a step back for the graphics,

but since 2008.,R*'s gaming technology advanced and creating a 3D game on the same level of a game from 2004 is relatively easy for a multi-millionaire company.It's like Ubisoft creating Tetris.

Also there are so many GTA San Andreas fans (27 million copies were sold,and god knows how many were pirated)

So it would be a project which would definitely pay off.

Edited May 2, 2016 by Faris01

[kBlaise]

 

resuming it would be a step back

 

Indeed,it would be a step back for the graphics,

but since 2008.,R*'s gaming technology advanced and creating a 3D game on the same level of a game from 2004 is relatively easy for a multi-millionaire company.It's like Ubisoft creating Tetris.

Also there are so many GTA San Andreas fans (27 million copies were sold,and god knows how many were pirated)

So it would be a project which would definitely pay off.

 

It's not just about the graphics, the standards of AAA games in terms of gameplay, controls, mission design and user experience (!) have improved IMMENSELY since 2004. Rockstar North has no nostalgia goggles on so this won't happen.

 

I love Vice and SA but it really is a pain playing them these days, the horrible clunky controls and the way the camera acts sometimes drive me nuts. Back then it was totally ok but now we got used to more user friendly experiences during the 7th generation.

Edited May 2, 2016 by kBlaise

[Osho]

R*'s gaming technology02advanced and creating a 3D game on the same level of a game from 2004 is relatively02easy for a multi-millionaire company.It's like Ubisoft creating Tetris.

No. Its not easy at all. In fact, AAA games involve a lot of challenges and can take incredibly long to make, going through many stages of revision from art assets, scripting, cutscenes, and a lot of other stuff that require good planning and management. The bigger the ambition and various studios with different teams involved, the greater becomes the need for coordination across the teams to pull off.

Refer: How are large, open world games, like GTA V made?

Also, check out: HOW TO MAKE CALL OF DUTY KILLER FOR LESS

Reading the blog you'll realize how stupidly complex game development seems to have become under the AAA development model with bigger budget and Hollywood type studios. They are not making games but producing some big budget Hollywood movie, and even after such huge amounts of hard work the end product of a game is still sh*t, which makes these Hollywood studios worse than the smaller teams of independent developers that still offer satisfying and innovative games to justify the price.

. 02 I love Vice and SA but it really is a pain playing them these days, the horrible clunky controls and the way the camera acts sometimes drive me nuts..

Then play the PC version. You even have the option to mod and improve them for good.

The standards of AAA games may have increased in terms of technology and budget but they are still making games with sh*tty console hardware in mind. Check the differences between V on PS3 and PC and you'll realize what I'm trying to say. In fact, the old game Mafia City of Lost Heaven ( PC ) that started with just a team of five people and grew to 18 working on the game seems incredibly polished and top notch across the board than AAA titles like IV and V made with millions and bigger studio labels and still don't feel as polished nor able to run smoothly but struggles to run on the hardware they were made for.

Graphics are great but the standards of the overall gameplay and content in general still seems to be far behind than many old games.

[Faris01]

 

 

and the end product of a game is still sh*t

Are you implying that GTA San Andreas was sh*t?

[Nah nah nah Gta 6]

Truly, none of us here know what the final product of GTA VI is going to be like, not even R*.

[evd]

It's no secret that GTA VI will be most probably set in Vice City.

(rumors that it will take place in London or a city which would be based on Chicago is totally B.S.)

Source for both?

[Guest Guest176525326]

GTA VI will be all online and VR based - you heard it here first.

[RedDagger]

There's a pretty much 0% chance that VI will natively support VR, let alone focus on VR. To put it one way, V runs at 1080p 30fps on current gen consoles, so a sequel to a game with that kinda performance is simply not going to be VR.

[BachU8]

They worked a lot on IV's and V's stories,

In GTA IV maybe but not in GTA V, at all.

[Guest Guest176525326]

There's a pretty much 0% chance that VI will natively support VR, let alone focus on VR. To put it one way, V runs at 1080p 30fps on current gen consoles, so a sequel to a game with that kinda performance is simply not going to be VR.

 

Wrong. You maybe forgetting that GTA VI will come out in around 2018/2019, PS4 Neo will be released later this year.

[RedDagger]

PS4 Neo will probably be capable of just playing 4K video and slightly improved graphics, the difference will be paltry compared to what's needed to bridge the hardware gap between something that can barely be played at 1080p 30fps and the performance required for VR.

 

It's worth noting that the recommended requirements for basic VR (games that are nowhere near the computational intensity of GTA V) are a fair bit higher than current gen consoles, and will no doubt be higher than whatever upgraded versions of the consoles that may be released. GTA V VR is just about possible on high-end PCs, it's an impossibility on PS4/PS4.5, and VI VR is far out of the question on current hardware.

[Guest Guest176525326]

PS4 Neo will probably be capable of just playing 4K video and slightly improved graphics, the difference will be paltry compared to what's needed to bridge the hardware gap between something that can barely be played at 1080p 30fps and the performance required for VR.

 

It's worth noting that the recommended requirements for basic VR (games that are nowhere near the computational intensity of GTA V) are a fair bit higher than current gen consoles, and will no doubt be higher than whatever upgraded versions of the consoles that may be released. GTA V VR is just about possible on high-end PCs, it's an impossibility on PS4/PS4.5, and VI VR is far out of the question on current hardware.

 

GTA VI Online: VR on PS5 2019

Edited May 2, 2016 by Guest176525326

[Marty892]

It's no secret that GTA VI will be most probably set in Vice City.

and I think its rather unlikely.

R* always change the vibe with each title, LC in IV was cold and grey, LS in V was super sunny and vibrant, VC would be pretty much the same as LS.

San Fierro or Las Venturas are more likely but I hope they go with completely new city this time.

[Official General]

 

It's no secret that GTA VI will be most probably set in Vice City.

(rumors that it will take place in London or a city which would be based on Chicago is totally B.S.)

Source for both?Don't think you even need a source for that. The next GTA has to be set in Vice a City, where else would it be ?

 

No, they are not going to do Chicago, Washington, D.C, Detroit, etc. And don't even bother say silly stuff like London, Paris, Tokyo or whatever, because Rockstar have stated numerous times that they will not set GTA in locations outside of the USA, as nowhere else is suited to the way they make the game.

Edited May 2, 2016 by Official General

[evd]

San Fierro

Carcer City

Las Venturas

North Yankton

somewhere south

 

the next gta doesnt have to be Vice City. it may, but there are NEW cities to be created and expand this 3 states oriented world.

Edited May 2, 2016 by evd

[thatstupidbug]

3D era may be over, but why not giving the players some real nostalgia?

 

After playing trough metal gear solid V with the "playstation 1 snake" costume, i wish there will be a "classic" outfit for our nexf protagonist(s).

 

https://i.ytimg.com/vi/8Z5inEWHg_Y/maxresdefault.jpg

Edited May 2, 2016 by thatstupidbug

[Official General]

San Fierro

Carcer City

Las Venturas

North Yankton

somewhere south

 

the next gta doesnt have to be Vice City. it may, but there are NEW cities to create and expand this 3 states oriented world.

Can't see it happening.

 

I'm pretty certain that Las Venturas and San Fierro will not be revisited in an entirely separate GTA game from V. If the two cities are revisited, it's gonna be in a SP expansion/DLC of V. LV and SF belong in the same regions as LS, it just don't make sense to put them in completely separate titles.

 

Carcer City ? Very slim possibility, but highly unlikely, it's gonna be based on Chicago or another Midwest city which is gonna be too similar to NYC, which LC had already well covered not too long ago with IV.

 

North Yankton ? Lol, get lost. Why some people in here have a big hard-on for this insignificant, boring cold, snowy Midwestern town, I have no idea. Either way, consider this crossed off the list, because it's definitely not getting its own game.

 

Somewhere south ? You said it, VC and South Florida.

Edited May 3, 2016 by Official General

[evd]

Cool opinion bro

[Faris01]

It can't be North Yankton at all or Washington DC either;

They both have a low population and aren't metropolitan cities.

They aren't significant as an area for criminals.

And about Carcer City...

It indeed exists in the GTA universe but it's meant to be used for Manhunt only.

[Hazel Mae]

Placing it in Vice City again is a joke. Modern day Miami does not have the same sort of atmosphere and crime that it did in the 80s. And before you say that "OH THEY COULD SET IT IN THE 80S AGAIN", they would not. Rockstar does not retread like that. On top of that, it would RUIN what they've built up in this universe. LifeInvader, Snapmatic, any of the GTAO features, none of that would exist. Please don't delude yourself, it just sets you up for disappointment.

 

I'm assuming that they'll use a city they've made previously, like San Fierro or Las Venturas. But I see a newer Liberty City DLC for V before they create a brand new game and city.

Edited May 3, 2016 by Thugger

[Official General]

Placing it in Vice City again is a joke. Modern day Miami does not have the same sort of atmosphere and crime that it did in the 80s. And before you say that "OH THEY COULD SET IT IN THE 80S AGAIN", they would not. Rockstar does not retread like that. On top of that, it would RUIN what they've built up in this universe. LifeInvader, Snapmatic, any of the GTAO features, none of that would exist. Please don't delude yourself, it just sets you up for disappointment.

I'm assuming that they'll use a city they've made previously, like San Fierro or Las Venturas. But I see a newer Liberty City DLC for V before they create a brand new game and city.

I beg to differ, modern-day Miami has a lot to offer for a GTA setting. If you don't understand how then just Google stuff and you will see why. It's logical to believe it will be VC, as its been a long time since the first, and it's not had a HD makeover like LC and LS has. VC needs a HD facelift, it's long overdue. It's not a joke, it makes perfect sense.

 

They will not use SF and LV in a separate game from V, common SR se should tell you that. No, they are not going back to LC either, it's just not a plausible scenario, even for a DLC.

Edited May 3, 2016 by Official General

[Hazel Mae]

 

Placing it in Vice City again is a joke. Modern day Miami does not have the same sort of atmosphere and crime that it did in the 80s. And before you say that "OH THEY COULD SET IT IN THE 80S AGAIN", they would not. Rockstar does not retread like that. On top of that, it would RUIN what they've built up in this universe. LifeInvader, Snapmatic, any of the GTAO features, none of that would exist. Please don't delude yourself, it just sets you up for disappointment.

I'm assuming that they'll use a city they've made previously, like San Fierro or Las Venturas. But I see a newer Liberty City DLC for V before they create a brand new game and city.

I beg to differ, modern-day Miami has a lot to offer for a GTA setting. If you don't understand how then just Google stuff and you will see why. It's logical to believe it will be VC, as its been a long time since the first, and it's not had a HD makeover like LC and LS has. VC needs a HD facelift, it's long overdue. It's not a joke, it makes perfect sense.

 

They will not use SF and LV in a separate game from V, common SR se should tell you that. No, they are not going back to LC either, it's just not a plausible scenario.

I should Google what it's like to live in Florida even though I live in Florida. I clearly have no idea.

[Official General]

 

 

Placing it in Vice City again is a joke. Modern day Miami does not have the same sort of atmosphere and crime that it did in the 80s. And before you say that "OH THEY COULD SET IT IN THE 80S AGAIN", they would not. Rockstar does not retread like that. On top of that, it would RUIN what they've built up in this universe. LifeInvader, Snapmatic, any of the GTAO features, none of that would exist. Please don't delude yourself, it just sets you up for disappointment.

I'm assuming that they'll use a city they've made previously, like San Fierro or Las Venturas. But I see a newer Liberty City DLC for V before they create a brand new game and city.

I beg to differ, modern-day Miami has a lot to offer for a GTA setting. If you don't understand how then just Google stuff and you will see why. It's logical to believe it will be VC, as its been a long time since the first, and it's not had a HD makeover like LC and LS has. VC needs a HD facelift, it's long overdue. It's not a joke, it makes perfect sense.

They will not use SF and LV in a separate game from V, common SR se should tell you that. No, they are not going back to LC either, it's just not a plausible scenario.

I should Google what it's like to live in Florida even though I live in Florida. I clearly have no idea.

 

If (and that's a big IF) you live in modern-day Miami and Florida it makes no difference to me bro. If you live there and still claim it's not good enough for a GTA setting then you should know better than to say such bullsh*t.

 

Or maybe you just have view I deem stupid. One or the other.

[adriangolle]

I worry that GTA 6 might be another disappointment. Like already mentioned, only time will tell.

I hope until I will see that it will be good;). Until then, enjoy all GTA games that are already on the market.