Jitterdoomer Posted May 11, 2016 Share Posted May 11, 2016 (edited) QUAINT!!!! This is from Battlefield 1 Developer Roland Smedberg and this is how 2010 graphics looked like in this "new" game: Ow my sides it hurt! Hurts when I laugh at it! Edited May 11, 2016 by Jitterdoomer Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Presidential Posted May 11, 2016 Share Posted May 11, 2016 Call Of Duty: Spongebob Battlefield I'd honestly rather play this than any Call Of Duty game since Black Ops 2. Wastelander (Suzuki) 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Distrom Posted May 13, 2016 Share Posted May 13, 2016 So the trailer just reached 2 mil dislikes, it's about 77.000 dislikes away from becoming the second most disliked video on youtube. Also, I never imagined a BF trailer having more views than a CoD trailer. EvolvedWalker 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CrysisAverted Posted May 13, 2016 Share Posted May 13, 2016 You fruits believe the trailer to actually be worse than this how disgusting Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sir Michael Posted May 13, 2016 Share Posted May 13, 2016 The weird thing is that the trailer wouldn't have so many dislikes if wasn't a Call of Duty game. That's the most dislikes I've seen on an official video.. we usually see a like/dislike margin like that on fake videos. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
D9fred95 Posted May 14, 2016 Share Posted May 14, 2016 The weird thing is that the trailer wouldn't have so many dislikes if wasn't a Call of Duty game. That's the most dislikes I've seen on an official video.. we usually see a like/dislike margin like that on fake videos. Yeah, but it's full of that usual cliche stuff CoD does. Stuff like the slow motion action with voice overs as it fades in and to from black. Other games do that too obviously, but CoD has done it for pretty much every installment since MW1. Also, how lazy are IW that they are still using the same death animations that have existed since at least MW1? Clearly ragdolls are too much for them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dudclub55 Posted May 14, 2016 Share Posted May 14, 2016 The weird thing is that the trailer wouldn't have so many dislikes if wasn't a Call of Duty game. That's the most dislikes I've seen on an official video.. we usually see a like/dislike margin like that on fake videos. That's most likely the case, if a franchise gets milked, people will eventually bash on it regardless of how much it actually innovates per game and how much it does right. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
X S Posted May 16, 2016 Share Posted May 16, 2016 This is the best one I've seen yet. We meme nao. Octane, Landotel, PoeticWhisper and 3 others 6 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jitterdoomer Posted May 16, 2016 Share Posted May 16, 2016 Activision really needs new IPs instead of cashing in on COD and licensed games. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CrysisAverted Posted May 16, 2016 Share Posted May 16, 2016 Agreed, Activision should really start doing yearly releases of soccer, football etc games like EA Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chronic lumbago Posted May 16, 2016 Share Posted May 16, 2016 You fruits believe the trailer to actually be worse than thishttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kfVsfOSbJY0howdisgusting At least she has gotten better over the years. Activision can learn from rebecca. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jitterdoomer Posted May 16, 2016 Share Posted May 16, 2016 (edited) Agreed, Activision should really start doing yearly releases of soccer, football etc games like EAEA already own the rights to soccer (football) games and plus, sports is an overrated genre and why can't it be another GTA Clone or a light gun game where you use your gun controller and point at enemies to shoot on screen like Time Crisis does? EDIT: Why in the blazing hell that Call of Duty keeps promoting me on every videos that I watched? Edited May 16, 2016 by Jitterdoomer Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CrysisAverted Posted May 16, 2016 Share Posted May 16, 2016 Agreed, Activision should really start doing yearly releases of soccer, football etc games like EA light gun game where you use your gun controller and point at enemies to shoot on screen like Time Crisis does? call of duty on wii does that Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
X S Posted May 16, 2016 Share Posted May 16, 2016 I just want to say, it is now apparent that leap-frogging in development is no longer a viable and long-term strategy. COD development, for lack of a better word, is a victim of its own success. It's clear from the start that when Infinity Ward set out to develop Infinite Warfare, the market research developed then could not have accurately predicted the state of gaming three years later. While it is true that many games go through several years of development, sometimes greater than two or three years, none of them actually have other studios representing the franchise during those downtimes. During Infinite Warfare's development, Activision released two other futuristic shooters, not expecting the community to exhaust themselves within the span of two futuristic themed releases. Not only was there Advanced Warfare and Black Ops 3, there was Destiny, Halo and Titanfall. So it is also quite obvious that they either did not consider the competition, or they irresponsibly thought that saturating the market with the "in" thing was the wiser financial choice. Activision needs to get rid of Infinity Ward, and at least go back to 2 developers with releases every other year or else COD will suffer this fate again; that's if it even recovers from Infinite Warfare and this current disaster. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DubzyNZ Posted May 17, 2016 Author Share Posted May 17, 2016 I just want to say, it is now apparent that leap-frogging in development is no longer a viable and long-term strategy. COD development, for lack of a better word, is a victim of its own success. It's clear from the start that when Infinity Ward set out to develop Infinite Warfare, the market research developed then could not have accurately predicted the state of gaming three years later. While it is true that many games go through several years of development, sometimes greater than two or three years, none of them actually have other studios representing the franchise during those downtimes. During Infinite Warfare's development, Activision released two other futuristic shooters, not expecting the community to exhaust themselves within the span of two futuristic themed releases. Not only was there Advanced Warfare and Black Ops 3, there was Destiny, Halo and Titanfall. So it is also quite obvious that they either did not consider the competition, or they irresponsibly thought that saturating the market with the "in" thing was the wiser financial choice. Activision needs to get rid of Infinity Ward, and at least go back to 2 developers with releases every other year or else COD will suffer this fate again; that's if it even recovers from Infinite Warfare and this current disaster. I say it's not 100% IW's fault, as they started developing this game 3 years ago and wouldn't have know 'most' of the hate that has occurred. They should just merge the sledgehammer, IW and 3arc as one company which is ruled by Treyarch, with releases every 2-3 years. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dudclub55 Posted May 17, 2016 Share Posted May 17, 2016 IW need to be let go since the guys behind MW and MW2 are gone, i mean, no wonder MW3 and doge fish lean warfare sucked so much, might as well hire some other random dev. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CrysisAverted Posted May 17, 2016 Share Posted May 17, 2016 IW need to be let go since the guys behind MW and MW2 are gone, i mean, no wonder MW3 and doge fish lean warfare sucked so much, might as well hire some other random dev. Yeah if IW wants to remain they should hire those guys who worked on Titanfall Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jitterdoomer Posted May 17, 2016 Share Posted May 17, 2016 (edited) Do you agree with his opinion on Facebook?Link: https://www.facebook.com/fraghero/videos/520018941515554/?comment_id=1748390865394035&comment_tracking=%7B%22tn%22%3A%22R0%22%7D It was also mentioned on this video (go to 4:25): The part where he says "soldiers of the future with high tech gear even dance to sh*t that kids do" made me chuckle. Edited May 17, 2016 by Jitterdoomer Payne Killer and SouthLand 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
X S Posted May 18, 2016 Share Posted May 18, 2016 (edited) The copy/paste criticism basically stems from their insistence on releasing a game every year. Again, if they would just stop with the annual releases, it wouldn't be much an issue. Yearly releases create a distorted perception of what qualifies as "change". Specifically, they don't allow for any noticeable leap in development, and it results in incremental changes only. That's why people cried "copy and paste". Edited May 18, 2016 by X S Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jitterdoomer Posted May 18, 2016 Share Posted May 18, 2016 (edited) Look at Assassin's Creed Syndicate or Unity, people didn't cry out "copy and paste!" because they used AnvilNext game engine since AC3 in 2012 that the older Anvil Engine was outdated after Revelations in 2011 whereas Call of Duty still uses the same engine as COD1 from 2003 onwards with slighter and less bigger updates. Hell, BF3 got a major overhaul on the game's engine after Bad Company 2 and it takes two years to leap up with the new engine. Edited May 18, 2016 by Jitterdoomer Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SouthLand Posted May 18, 2016 Share Posted May 18, 2016 There are a lot of wars from 1950-2016 to chose from and make a game about them. But no, that's not gonna happen. Also, why does the US army have to be involved in order to have a shooter? Why can't we have a proper game where about an interesting conflict that happened in real life even if the US army is not involved? USSR vs Afghanistan talibans for example... This propper mod for COD 2 about the Spanish Civil War is supper fun to play and very well made with very accurate facts. Plus you get two play on both sides and many factions: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
X S Posted May 18, 2016 Share Posted May 18, 2016 Look at Assassin's Creed Syndicate or Unity, people didn't cry out "copy and paste!" lol yes they did AC suffers from the same ad naseum criticism that's been given to COD. That's why Ubisoft finally decided to hold off on a release this year. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jitterdoomer Posted May 18, 2016 Share Posted May 18, 2016 (edited) None of the other games in this generation other than AC3 took place during the Revolutionary War in FPS form, they NEEDED to think of this idea in FPS games like COD instead of "brainstorming" their ideas to be set in Space or in the Future. Edited May 18, 2016 by Jitterdoomer Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Richard Power Colt Posted May 18, 2016 Share Posted May 18, 2016 A lot of the dislikers will probably buy the game anyway. I think it'll take a while before COD truly dies. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chronic lumbago Posted May 18, 2016 Share Posted May 18, 2016 There are a lot of wars from 1950-2016 to chose from and make a game about them. But no, that's not gonna happen. Also, why does the US army have to be involved in order to have a shooter? Why can't we have a proper game where about an interesting conflict that happened in real life even if the US army is not involved? USSR vs Afghanistan talibans for example... This propper mod for COD 2 about the Spanish Civil War is supper fun to play and very well made with very accurate facts. Plus you get two play on both sides and many factions: Because 'Murica probably sells better. I could imagine any shooter not making america the good guys be controversial or even banned. Because 'Murica. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jitterdoomer Posted May 18, 2016 Share Posted May 18, 2016 (edited) http://www.gamespot.com/articles/top-ten-best-selling-us-games-of-2015-and-december/1100-6433845/ Indeed that BO3 was the number 1 best selling game in America, because it's just 'Murica fighting for their country that every COD games had. MW2, Ghosts, and Advanced Warfare had no problem having an American antagonists while Advanced Warfare and Ghosts have an American antagonist attacking their home country and people didn't complain that the Americans "betrayed" our nation. Edited May 18, 2016 by Jitterdoomer Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chronic lumbago Posted May 18, 2016 Share Posted May 18, 2016 (edited) Yeah but it's still good 'Muricans (or at least those on good america side)who fight bad 'Muricans. Do you seriously think we would ever get FPS games like: - Playing taliban against americans - playing as nazis against NATO - fully russian supporting game against america - basically being a protagonist in a war against america. Probably no. In MP sure but never in a single player campaign. I'm sure you remember the 'No Russian' controversy, now imagine a whole game like that. Edited May 18, 2016 by fashion ClaudeSpeed1911 and Jitterdoomer 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jitterdoomer Posted May 18, 2016 Share Posted May 18, 2016 (edited) Yeah that one, it makes MW2 to balance it out with "America always winning" trend in COD games despite "No Russian" being the most controversial mission in COD series next to "Davis Family Vacation" in MW3 where the American tourist family got killed by the gas attacks. To read more about how COD made America always winning, check out this reddit page from 3 years ago: https://m.reddit.com/r/Games/comments/1spiur/call_of_dutys_underlying_message_is_becoming_more/ In Black Ops II, one mission you play as Raul Menendez, the antagonist of the game where you have to shoot a US Admiral of the SS Obama ship to either kill or spare him for the game's outcome and in the 1986 mission he was a playable character with infinite health to rescue his sister Josefina from the Panamanian Public Forces. BO2 was the last game to took place in historic times and even Savimbi's family and the real Manuel Noriega himself sued the game for their portrayal in the game. Edited May 18, 2016 by Jitterdoomer Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CrysisAverted Posted May 22, 2016 Share Posted May 22, 2016 (edited) f*cking Activision got this on BO3 Oh boy you mean I get 1,000 cod points (a >$9.99 value) for the price of a $99 rehash?! "Players will embark on an unforgettable journey" and what? will end in a cliffhanger that we will never get a resolution to?! Edited May 22, 2016 by CrysisAverted Member's Only 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ClaudeSpeed1911 Posted May 22, 2016 Share Posted May 22, 2016 You know what the bigest shame in this? Its the fact that Raven is reduced to COD mappers and porters. Its the guys that gave us awesome games like this: God damn, that shotgun still gives me the chills to this day. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now