Is anyone disapointed in GTA V PC Colors and graphics?

[TheRealFookin]

WARNING:

A bit of bad language is used. If you get offended by this then leave

 

WARNING:

IF ANY KID WILL COME IN MY COMMENTS AND WRITE SOME RANDOM PIECE OF SH*T OUT OF THEIR ASS IT WILL BE IGNORED BY ME, CAUSE I DON'T GIVE A F*CK ABOUT YOUR DUMB A$$ HATE COMMENT.

IF MY OPINION DOESN'T MATCH UP WITH YOURS THEN TELL ME YOUR OPINION ON THE GRAPHICS!

 

I recently realised that GTA V on the PC is not as realistic as I thought it would be at the start, I thought it would have, better coloring on the roads and a better graphics, yes yes yes, there is anti aliasing but it's undenyable on how the games graphics pretty much looked the same but not too different, just a bit of change were made about the pc version, but personally I was dissapointed about the FPS I was getting, like 60 on max and minimum 30, I just wanted a bit more tentions from Rockstar

 

 

 

 

AND FOR F*CKS SAKES ROCKSTAR GAMES, MAKE THE GRASS HAVE SOME TYPE OF OPTIMIZATION!!! OR FIX IT!!!!!

[Raj The Rager]

I don't see any big deal. It looks great graphically. Especially on PC.

Edited March 3, 2016 by Chamberman20

[Blackened]

Specs? Mine's looks great.

 

 

 

Edited March 3, 2016 by Blackened

[TheRealFookin]

I play GTA V on max settings (With MSAA X4)

I don't see any big deal. It looks great graphically. Especially on PC.

I think the game was lacking color

[Totallycasual]

Looks amazing to me but im playing with everything on ultra, let me guess, you have a potato of a PC and expected the game to look better than PS4+Xbox1?

[ChiroVette]

I agree, graphics are amazing. Though I am the first to admit that the PS3/360 versions are NOWHERE NEAR as nice as the next gen and PC versions!

[Blackened]

I think the game was lacking color

Seriously?

 

 

 

 

Is there a particular area you're talking about? If you're playing on PC, you can fix this pretty easily.

Edited March 3, 2016 by Blackened

[TheRealFookin]

I agree, graphics are amazing. Though I am the first to admit that the PS3/360 versions are NOWHERE NEAR as nice as the next gen and PC versions!

Just more color would be cool, but graphics and sweetfx mods help resolve this

[Blackened]

 

I agree, graphics are amazing. Though I am the first to admit that the PS3/360 versions are NOWHERE NEAR as nice as the next gen and PC versions!

Just more color would be cool, but graphics and sweetfx mods help resolve this

 

By the way, I was asking for your PC specs, not settings.

[TheRealFookin]

Looks amazing to me but im playing with everything on ultra, let me guess, you have a potato of a PC and expected the game to look better than PS4+Xbox1?

No, I got a 980, playing everything on max (Counting MSAA)

[Blackened]

I use FXAA on 4K. Where did you get the impression that the PC version would look realistic? The art style is consistant across generations/platforms.

Edited March 4, 2016 by Blackened

[Totallycasual]

 

Looks amazing to me but im playing with everything on ultra, let me guess, you have a potato of a PC and expected the game to look better than PS4+Xbox1?

No, I got a 980, playing everything on max (Counting MSAA)

 

 

Do you maybe have a sh*tty old monitor with washed out colors?

[TheRealFookin]

 

 

Looks amazing to me but im playing with everything on ultra, let me guess, you have a potato of a PC and expected the game to look better than PS4+Xbox1?

No, I got a 980, playing everything on max (Counting MSAA)

 

 

Do you maybe have a sh*tty old monitor with washed out colors?

 

nah its good its an asus gaming laptop

[Osho]

Sorry, but it looks and feels brilliant, to me. I agree on the part regarding the grass, they really hurt the FPS on highest settings. The fix to that is to install sone mods that offer some optimized solutions.

[ChiroVette]

Sorry, but it looks and feels brilliant, to me.

I agree. I don't know what the OP is seeing, but it sure ain't what I'\m seeing. I think the colors are vibrant and jump off the screen!

 

I am no a graphics expert, though, so what you guys are saying about the grass may be true. Its just not something on my radar, to \be honest.

[TheRealFookin]

I use FXAA on 4K. Where did you get the impression that the PC version would look realistic? The art style is consistant across generations/platforms.

What settings option makes the game look ugly like FXAA, I tried finding it

[Fuzzknuckles]

This really isn't an appropriate question in the console section. Requested a move to PC.

[Blackened]

 

I use FXAA on 4K. Where did you get the impression that the PC version would look realistic? The art style is consistant across generations/platforms.

 

What settings option makes the game look ugly like FXAA, I tried finding itWhat?

 

If AA is of such huge importance, use SSAA. MSAA is more taxing than it's worth, and the difference between 2x and 4x is negligable. Maxing out settings in most games is usually a waste of frame rate, which isn't an issue with the game. Know your GPU's limits and work within those confines. Hell, even me using FXAA at 3840x2160 is kind of a waste, but the frame rate isn't impacted too much for it to matter.

 

By the way, I noticed you had a laptop, which means your 980 is a 980m, which is very different in performance terms to 980. Thermal throttling being one of the major factors. The 980m is substantially less powerful than the 980 desktop counterpart.

 

http://laptopmedia.com/reviews/nvidia-geforce-gtx-980m-vs-geforce-gtx-980-4k-showdown-and-benchmarks/

Edited March 4, 2016 by Blackened

[stobe187]

 

 

I use FXAA on 4K. Where did you get the impression that the PC version would look realistic? The art style is consistant across generations/platforms.

What settings option makes the game look ugly like FXAA, I tried finding it

What?

 

If AA is of such huge importance, use SSAA. MSAA is more taxing than it's worth, and the difference between 2x and 4x is negligable. Maxing out settings in most games is usually a waste of frame rate, which isn't an issue with the game. Know your GPU's limits and work within those confines. Hell, even me using FXAA at 3840x2160 is kind of a waste, but the frame rate isn't impacted too much for it to matter.

 

By the way, I noticed you had a laptop, which means your 980 is a 980m, which is very different in performance terms to 980. Thermal throttling being one of the major factors. The 980m is substantially less powerful than the 980 desktop counterpart.

 

http://laptopmedia.com/reviews/nvidia-geforce-gtx-980m-vs-geforce-gtx-980-4k-showdown-and-benchmarks/

 

 

So a laptop with "everything" maxed, the game doesn't have color and looks sh*tty. Hmm...

[TheRealFookin]

 

 

I use FXAA on 4K. Where did you get the impression that the PC version would look realistic? The art style is consistant across generations/platforms.

What settings option makes the game look ugly like FXAA, I tried finding it

What?

 

If AA is of such huge importance, use SSAA. MSAA is more taxing than it's worth, and the difference between 2x and 4x is negligable. Maxing out settings in most games is usually a waste of frame rate, which isn't an issue with the game. Know your GPU's limits and work within those confines. Hell, even me using FXAA at 3840x2160 is kind of a waste, but the frame rate isn't impacted too much for it to matter.

 

By the way, I noticed you had a laptop, which means your 980 is a 980m, which is very different in performance terms to 980. Thermal throttling being one of the major factors. The 980m is substantially less powerful than the 980 desktop counterpart.

 

http://laptopmedia.com/reviews/nvidia-geforce-gtx-980m-vs-geforce-gtx-980-4k-showdown-and-benchmarks/

 

http://www.amazon.com/G751JY-WH71-WX-17-Inch-GeForce-Version/dp/B015QZPRW4/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1457126712&sr=8-1&keywords=gaming+laptop+980

[FourFingersOfFun]

Op probably just has a crappy laptop screen with washed out colours lol.

[TheRealFookin]

Op probably just has a crappy laptop screen with washed out colours lol.

OHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH,

 

Idk http://www.amazon.com/G751JY-WH71-WX-17-Inch-GeForce-Version/dp/B015QZPRW4/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1457126712&sr=8-1&keywords=gaming+laptop+980

[FourFingersOfFun]

 

Op probably just has a crappy laptop screen with washed out colours lol.

OHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH,

 

Idk http://www.amazon.com/G751JY-WH71-WX-17-Inch-GeForce-Version/dp/B015QZPRW4/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1457126712&sr=8-1&keywords=gaming+laptop+980

Ah, I assumed it was going to be a TN panel lmao. Try adjusting the color settings in the GeForce control panel.

[XenoxX]

Regarding the "grass optimization" the problem is not the grass but the MSAA,
MSAA is very taxing with little result I recommend frame scaling to replace AA methods, it looks and runs better.

 

Regarding the graphics, in my honest opinion the graphics look very decent, lighting effects, visual fidelity, distance scaling etc.

however I have one quarrel with the graphics, the Textures, i think they are too low res(even on highest settings), but I realize that current tech does not allow open world games to have even better Texture quality.

 

I think overall its a good port, but only if you have up-to-date software, allways when I forget to update Windows 10, GTA Vs performance gets worse, but when I update again the performance is back up again.

[TheRealFookin]

Regarding the "grass optimization" the problem is not the grass but the MSAA,

MSAA is very taxing with little result I recommend frame scaling to replace AA methods, it looks and runs better.

 

Regarding the graphics, in my honest opinion the graphics look very decent, lighting effects, visual fidelity, distance scaling etc.

however I have one quarrel with the graphics, the Textures, i think they are too low res(even on highest settings), but I realize that current tech does not allow open world games to have even better Texture quality.

 

I think overall its a good port, but only if you have up-to-date software, allways when I forget to update Windows 10, GTA Vs performance gets worse, but when I update again the performance is back up again.

If you look closly up the walls in the game it is very unclear and they dont have quality to it

[Blackened]

Wall textures are better affected by anisotropic filtering which can be run at max (x16) fairly easy. This will improve texture quality at angled viewing. Tessellation will add greater depth and clarity to walls. Running max AA because walls appear blurry is not the answer.

 

If you're talking about the generally low res textures, there are mods available.

 

 

 

 

I use FXAA on 4K. Where did you get the impression that the PC version would look realistic? The art style is consistant across generations/platforms.

 

What settings option makes the game look ugly like FXAA, I tried finding it

What?

If AA is of such huge importance, use SSAA. MSAA is more taxing than it's worth, and the difference between 2x and 4x is negligable. Maxing out settings in most games is usually a waste of frame rate, which isn't an issue with the game. Know your GPU's limits and work within those confines. Hell, even me using FXAA at 3840x2160 is kind of a waste, but the frame rate isn't impacted too much for it to matter.

By the way, I noticed you had a laptop, which means your 980 is a 980m, which is very different in performance terms to 980. Thermal throttling being one of the major factors. The 980m is substantially less powerful than the 980 desktop counterpart.http://laptopmedia.com/reviews/nvidia-geforce-gtx-980m-vs-geforce-gtx-980-4k-showdown-and-benchmarks/

 

http://www.amazon.com/G751JY-WH71-WX-17-Inch-GeForce-Version/dp/B015QZPRW4/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1457126712&sr=8-1&keywords=gaming+laptop+980Are you showing me your laptop? Or are you telling me you have a "980"? Because it says in the title of the product page that it's a 980m, meaning "mobile". Laptops don't have the capability or power to run desktop-class GPUs. Edited March 5, 2016 by Blackened

[Jeffrowxpmax]

Turn up the Digital vibrance.

[XenoxX]

 

Regarding the "grass optimization" the problem is not the grass but the MSAA,

MSAA is very taxing with little result I recommend frame scaling to replace AA methods, it looks and runs better.

 

Regarding the graphics, in my honest opinion the graphics look very decent, lighting effects, visual fidelity, distance scaling etc.

however I have one quarrel with the graphics, the Textures, i think they are too low res(even on highest settings), but I realize that current tech does not allow open world games to have even better Texture quality.

 

I think overall its a good port, but only if you have up-to-date software, allways when I forget to update Windows 10, GTA Vs performance gets worse, but when I update again the performance is back up again.

If you look closly up the walls in the game it is very unclear and they dont have quality to it

 

Yes I know, its only noticeable in first person or certain camera angles, but its an open world game, and therefor has some limitations in terms of texture quality which come with it, I think its fine overall though.

And graphics overall also look very good in my opinion, especially the draw distance.

[Maryo_Nicle7]

Never for me, it's much colorful and superb better than GTA IV, that's all, nothing's dissapointing.

[LazlowsucksiloveslutS]

I too have a problem with GTAV's colors and graphics. Maybe the game looks realistic when played at Ultra settings but I don't have that powerful system, I can only speak for myself here. I don't like V's graphics because they are too cartoonish. When I turn everything up that I am able to without exceeding VRAM, it makes the game even more Cartoon Network. For instance I can't stand the graphics when I play with: 16x AF, AO enabled, FXAA enabled - they only seem to make graphics uglier. That's why I prefer to play with everything off, for textures are much more natural this way.