Adversary Mode Disparage Thread

[Con9mm]

 

 

 

A group random people saying no Rockstar do it this way. Amazing.

 

No matter how bad an adversary mode is...it's far better than anything the community could think up.

First, we're not the ones getting paid to develop the game. That's their job, and lately they've sucked at it.

 

Lap dogs like you are what's amazing. There no incentive for them to do better if people gleefully gobble up just any crap they put out. If R* sh*t in your mouth, you'd swear it tastes like chocolate, and beg for more. Pathetic.

 

 

In case you haven't noticed, you are immensely outvoted. Just because R* can do no wrong in your eyes, doesn't mean we can't hold them to a higher standard.

With Rockstar feces in my mouth listen really closely...

You don't even have to play this game. You could be getting a manicure instead.

Don't worry I'm working on submitting the next GTA game for all your cry babies...

Grand Theft Auto: Barbie. You know where everybody gets their way and wishes come true.

 

It's a video game with free content. Man, when some of you reach adulthood you are going to be so lost, so stay with Mom and Dad for as long as you can.

 

Oh wow you changed all of our minds! Not.

 

We don't like the direction the game's going. We are the game's customers.

 

So we're voicing our opinions.

 

If you don't like that, you don't have to listen. Don't click on threads like these.

Okay Barbie.

You spent $120.00 and you sound broke.

Edited February 26, 2016 by Day Reaper

[Ziggy_Ivanhoe]

 

I'm gonna laugh my ass off if some huge update drops in the next few weeks along the lines of Heists. It is possible that R* is simultaneously working on something big while giving us little filler updates to keep things fresh in the meantime. I mean maybe these adversary modes that "90%"(someone threw that out there earlier I believe) of the players hate are being made by some unknown developer in Korea while the real R* is making something epic.

Close my friend, very close. Everyone desires something big in this game whether they publicly voice it or not. It does not take small teams or little time to make big updates or games in themselves, it takes the average modeler 2-3 hours to make a high poly small prop with no error, no NGons, no clipping errors. This is before textures and physics/riging, so throw maybe 2 more hours on top of that. 5 hours approx for something as simple as a sprunk can. Modes with existing content and maybe a few texture edits? Possibly 20 hours all together that's split among various people. They don't rush these things, but they don't make them elaborate for the purpose of saving some time to do bigger things.

 

 

Oh don't get me wrong, I was kind of just joking around with that comment. I actually have done a few video game related things including modelling and texturing, lighting, setting up LODs, the whole works. I know it's actually a time consuming process to get it all working cohesively. Never got the hang of rigging. People think game design is easy when exact opposite is true. You can put years into a project and it can still be a total bust on release. It's a difficult industry, that's why it's better to support the devs that do it well, like R*.

[SIXGOD666]

 

A group random people saying no Rockstar do it this way. Amazing.

 

No matter how bad an adversary mode is...it's far better than anything the community could think up.

First, we're not the ones getting paid to develop the game. That's their job, and lately they've sucked at it.

 

Lap dogs like you are what's amazing. There no incentive for them to do better if people gleefully gobble up just any crap they put out. If R* sh*t in your mouth, you'd swear it tastes like chocolate, and beg for more. Pathetic.

 

 

In case you haven't noticed, you are immensely outvoted. Just because R* can do no wrong in your eyes, doesn't mean we can't hold them to a higher standard.

They won't do anything to help you if you just complain about it to other people. They could change what you want but why would they take your advice of what the game needs when you come across as a combative and uncooperative person on this forum? Please, help us all out and tell rockstar support, I believe if we all did that instead of complaining they would have a better reason to make less adversary modes. But remember, that could just mean bigger dry gaps between the bigger things we get. Edited February 26, 2016 by SIXGOD666

[Con9mm]

 

Lucky for me I have a computer with Internet service and have actually visited a website called YouTube and watched the new adversary modes to get a "feel" for what they are like before I play them. its like a sneak-peek, it's pretty amazing, like a crystal ball made from interwebz.

But seriously, saying "you don't know what you are getting into" when there are copious resources is lazy.

I mean if you wake up start the game up and just enter the new stuff without research, well then, you just an eager beaver aren't ya!

That's clearly not what I meant. Isn't English your main language? Let me say the exact same things again, in a slightly different way.

 

When you press quick join -> race, you wanted to race and you at least get some kind of race. If you really want a land race, you retry a couple times and you get a land race.

 

When you press quick join -> adversary, you don't know whether it will be Slasher or Relay or something else that has nothing in common. You don't want that stuff, there is a specific kind of adversary mode you want. You retry and retry and retry but you keep getting all those adversary modes that you don't want.

 

I hope you understand this time. I don't want to repeat myself again.

Seriously I agree. Don't need you to regurgitate anything, ever.

Instead work on leveling up your IQ as only a moron would expect to enter the "Quick Jobs" and EXPECT to be sent where they wanted to go.

Wow. Before you try and insult people , please, take an IQ test, they are free on the web.

R* named it "Quick Job" and not held your hand and called it "Random Job".

You know what I do when I want something specific?

I use the other menu, I can send you a video tutorial, just let me know.

Edited February 26, 2016 by Day Reaper

[Shneb]

Adversary modes are just filler content in between major updates, but I don't see why it always has to be adversary modes. How about missions or survivals or Last Team Standings or something?

[TexasRocks]

 

 

A group random people saying no Rockstar do it this way. Amazing.

 

No matter how bad an adversary mode is...it's far better than anything the community could think up.

First, we're not the ones getting paid to develop the game. That's their job, and lately they've sucked at it.

 

Lap dogs like you are what's amazing. There no incentive for them to do better if people gleefully gobble up just any crap they put out. If R* sh*t in your mouth, you'd swear it tastes like chocolate, and beg for more. Pathetic.

 

 

In case you haven't noticed, you are immensely outvoted. Just because R* can do no wrong in your eyes, doesn't mean we can't hold them to a higher standard.

They won't do anything to help you if you just complain about it to other people. They could change what you want but why would they take your advice of what the game needs when you come across as a combative and uncooperative person on this forum? Please, help us all out and tell rockstar support, I believe if we all did that instead of complaining they would have a better reason to make less adversary modes. But remember, that could just mean bigger dry gaps between the bigger things we get.Sorry, nobody is listening at R*. I've written several polite and courteous emails to them, and never got anything but the same old tired automated reply. Nobody reads our email. The best we can hope for is that somebody there out of curiosity actually reads forums like this to see what people think of their work. Hopefully the massive rejection of their adversary modes would make them think. Edited February 26, 2016 by TexasRocks

[TyrionV]

So you wrote a couple of emails and Rockstar didn't do what you wanted?

 

Are you serious? That's ridiculous, they should have stopped what they were doing and called you up for advice on how to do it.

[SIXGOD666]

 

 

 

A group random people saying no Rockstar do it this way. Amazing.

No matter how bad an adversary mode is...it's far better than anything the community could think up.

First, we're not the ones getting paid to develop the game. That's their job, and lately they've sucked at it.

Lap dogs like you are what's amazing. There no incentive for them to do better if people gleefully gobble up just any crap they put out. If R* sh*t in your mouth, you'd swear it tastes like chocolate, and beg for more. Pathetic.

In case you haven't noticed, you are immensely outvoted. Just because R* can do no wrong in your eyes, doesn't mean we can't hold them to a higher standard.

They won't do anything to help you if you just complain about it to other people. They could change what you want but why would they take your advice of what the game needs when you come across as a combative and uncooperative person on this forum? Please, help us all out and tell rockstar support, I believe if we all did that instead of complaining they would have a better reason to make less adversary modes. But remember, that could just mean bigger dry gaps between the bigger things we get.Sorry, nobody is listening at R*. I've written several polite and courteous emails to them, and never got anything but the same old tired automated reply. Nobody reads our email. The best we can hope for is that somebody there out of curiosity actually reads forums like this to see what people think of their work. Hopefully the massive rejection of their adversary modes would make them think.

The reason it won't is because even if they did come here looking for ideas they won't be taking suggestion ed that are not delivered properly by people who just look like haters. I can tell you there are more people that read the emails than people that read these forums, and the people that do read your emails owe you nothing but the automated response, a definite yes or no to your ideas would look bad on them because just having read the idea they don't know if it's possible yet. What kind of responses would you people want rockstar to spend their precious content creating time on that is so important?

[LL Cool L]

opinions are not facts.....I enjoy a few and do not like a few

 

does not mean the ones I do not like are crap....

 

 

 

 

PvP may not be everyone's cup of tea but it is more dynamic and challenging than PvE, you never know wat you are gonna get against another player, another human being, its always different

 

playing enough against the cpu and you just learn how to win....which can get boring really quickly, players are not even sure if they want a challenge or not......everything is other OP, needs buffing or unbalanced to you guys

Edited February 26, 2016 by LL Cool L

[theEwing1979]

I genuinely enjoyed slasher and extraction but I hardly ever get invites for them now. When I host it takes forever to get a decent amount of people to join and then quite often people leave before it's over. These days it seems to me around 70% of the player base are just free roamers doing the odd job to pay for their ammo.

[Ziggy_Ivanhoe]

 

 

 

 

 

 

A group random people saying no Rockstar do it this way. Amazing.

 

No matter how bad an adversary mode is...it's far better than anything the community could think up.

First, we're not the ones getting paid to develop the game. That's their job, and lately they've sucked at it.

 

Lap dogs like you are what's amazing. There no incentive for them to do better if people gleefully gobble up just any crap they put out. If R* sh*t in your mouth, you'd swear it tastes like chocolate, and beg for more. Pathetic.

 

 

In case you haven't noticed, you are immensely outvoted. Just because R* can do no wrong in your eyes, doesn't mean we can't hold them to a higher standard.

They won't do anything to help you if you just complain about it to other people. They could change what you want but why would they take your advice of what the game needs when you come across as a combative and uncooperative person on this forum? Please, help us all out and tell rockstar support, I believe if we all did that instead of complaining they would have a better reason to make less adversary modes. But remember, that could just mean bigger dry gaps between the bigger things we get.

Sorry, nobody is listening at R*. I've written several polite and courteous emails to them, and never got anything but the same old tired automated reply. Nobody reads our email. The best we can hope for is that somebody there out of curiosity actually reads forums like this to see what people think of their work. Hopefully the massive rejection of their adversary modes would make them think.

 

 

Well, I doubt they would take the time to reply to you personally. They probably get thousands upon thousands of emails a day. You want them taking the time to respond to all of them? You sent in your suggestions to the proper place, kudos to you, but they don't owe a personalized messsage in return. They do respond to actual technical issues though.

Edited February 26, 2016 by Kahkenbols

[Hunter]

 

 

 

His opinion is that no one is allowed to criticize these modes.

 

Take a look at the first trailer for GTA V - you can see the Hydra in that. You can also see the Dodo.

 

There are also files in the game for a vehicle called a "Hind" (which is the Savage). Those were in since the start.

 

This whole "no one can complain, it's free, you're all entitled" sh*t got old fast. It's like a bad joke. And if anyone actually believes in the s**t they spew out, they're either a troll (like shadow), or a Nazi. They may also be a terrorist.

Meanwhile your opinion appears to be no one that likes these modes or hates them as much as you is just a controlling Nazi/terrorist that don't allow others their opinions. When you're the one coming down on those who opinion differs from yours. He was brining up a legitimate point anyways. It's not like you paid for a season pass expecting PvE content, but instead got a ton of PVP continent you didn't want. Instead you ignored that and went to name calling. Just like you ignored my point that AM's hardly take away from development resources preventing them from "so much more things players want" instead. This entitled complaining the moment Rockstar does another AM has been getting old for months now.

 

The Hydra and the Dodo are not in the first trailer for GTA V. I'm pretty sure what you're referring to as the Hydra in the second release trailer was a beta version of the Laser. That model was later altered and turned into the Hydra. (The one in the trailer is missing the vector thrust nozzles on the side, so it wasn't a VTOL jet and not the Hydra when it was shown.) Are you also going to complain that the Hydra doesn't fire both missles simultaneously like the jet in the trailer did?

 

 

 

My opinion is that these game modes suck, and we have the right to say that they suck without some delicate little buttercup jumping at us to defend Rockstar.

 

And yes, you are a Nazi, a terrorist, and god knows what else.

 

And yes, the Hydra is in the trailer, as well as the Dodo. And there are files for the Savage.

Edited February 26, 2016 by Icantthinkofonew

[Nomis24]

Some of them are fun and there is potential for cool game mode. By getting these out by the numbers like they do there is better chance of getting good adversary mode. But I rather have 5 new contacts mission added here and there instead.

 

A sort of gun game that you progress throught different weapons every kills or few kills like in COD or Battlefield 4 could be a great addition to the deathmatch genre and would probably fall in the adversary mode categorie.

 

But yeah in general there is more adversary mode that i dont really enjoy then the one I enjoy.

Edited February 26, 2016 by Nomis24

[Commander S]

A lot of the time, I get the feeling they're quick 'filler' things that can be thrown together out of existing assets, as a way of having something 'new' to announce between actual content updates. Which is alright, I guess - it's not like doing so takes a massive amount of development time out of coming up with something substantial.

But if they really are being slapped together as hastily-assembled things to tide players over, I wouldn't expect a massive amount of thought or balancing going into 'em. I mean, look at the lack of consideration given to balancing new cars when it comes to performance/class allocation - if that's the standard to expect, then why would something as slight as a new adversary mode expect to get any kind of adequate balancing/play-testing, either?

Lastly, the 'gimmicky' nature of some of these does make me feel like they're being targeted towards YouTube types - hopefully just the 'let's play'-ers, and not the "Hi, I do daily, top-notch' GTA 5 Online videos - smash that 'like' button while I steal other people's stuff!" crowd, because if that's really where R*'s starting to focus their efforts (i.e., parasites who are nothing but toxic for the larger community), I don't know anymore...

[REDDICE]

They added 8 new missions with the lowrider update but you hardly ever see people playing them

 

we just have to accept the fact at GTAO players only do 75% Free-roam 15% Heists 10% Everything else

[Miss Malevolent]

I honestly don't play any adversary modes unless someone suggests it. Not my thing. So I wouldn't mind a moratorium on them in favor of some more contact missions.

[Commander S]

They added 8 new missions with the lowrider update but you hardly ever see people playing them

 

we just have to accept the fact at GTAO players only do 75% Free-roam 15% Heists 10% Everything else

 

I miss the old Freemode stuff - armoured trucks, smuggler planes, or even more recent stuff like 'Distract Cops'. They at least felt like 'things taking place in the fictional setting', rather than out-of-context mini-games that suck you out of the game world unless you stick to a private session.

 

Sad thing with Lamar's lowrider missions was that the cutscenes and extra stuff were really good ...but the payouts aren't as good as even regular contact missions, you need 2-4 players to pull them off, and R* went with the (IMO boneheaded) move of structuring them like Heists missions - should have done them like regular missions (1 life minimum, and the mission doesn't insta-fail if someone dies/leaves).

[SIXGOD666]

I honestly don't play any adversary modes unless someone suggests it. Not my thing. So I wouldn't mind a moratorium on them in favor of some more contact missions.

If they were to add missions what would you want them to be?

[MusicMan05]

My opinion is that these game modes suck, and we have the right to say that they suck without some delicate little buttercup jumping at us to defend Rockstar.

 

And yes, you are a Nazi, a terrorist, and god knows what else.

 

And yes, the Hydra is in the trailer, as well as the Dodo. And there are files for the Savage.

And that is your opinion, which you are more than entitled to having. However no one, but the developers, are entitled to what or should be added. Especially when you haven't purchased anything, such as a season pass that promised PvE but instead you got PvP. Then you'd have an argument and could seek a refund because they gave false advertisement and you were entitled to receiving what you paid for. This is just a free little game mode added how long after the game released? Just because AM modes aren't your cup of tea, doesn't mean someone else could have fun with them. And you're not entitled to Rockstar adding the Hunter or PvE modes. Sure you can complain, but you should respect anyone else's opinion that different from yours. Instead your brash reaction to something you don't like, heck, something you've even admitted you won't try, and then labeling anyone that din't share your disdain a Nazi, etc makes you the Nazi for not respect that they're opinion can be different from yours and not be wrong. Besides if you're not going to touch it, move on and wait for a proper update before complaining about what Rockstar didn't add that you wanted.

 

And can you show me were the Dodo appears in first trailer as I'm not seeing it? I do see a plane that looks awfully similar to the Hydra, but I recall people refering to it as the Beta version of the Laser. Besides, I'll say it again, Rockstar didn't cut and then sell anything to you as it would have been added back in via a free update. It's not like they locked it behind a paid story mode update or something.

 

Oh, and I haven't defended the AM types. I'm defending that Rockstar can very well be working on an large update and that a tiny AM being added has little to no effect on the development of said update. Something you keep pushing aside to attack me and anyone else. Likely because you got yourself exited that a Rhino vs Hunters AM would be another update like the January of 2016 update and the game mode would add in the Hunter. Instead your delicate little feelings got hurt, because you worked yourself up for nothing. Now you're taking it out on Rockstar, and other members that won't gang up on Rockstar with you, over nothing.

 

Otherwise I agree with most of the things other posters have said. The quick menu does, and has needed to be changed for awhile. And not just for choosing specific AM but for Captures too. Which wouldn't be to hard to add a sub category after choosing the main job type.

 

That being said, complaining about it not being changed with the Rhino Hunt is the same as complaining about it after the Halloween Surprise, Running Back AM, Every Bullet Counts AM, Festive Surprise 2015, Be My Valentine and now Rhino Hunt AM. It's not like Rockstar just released an update were they could have changed it, but opted not to. Personally, I'll save my complaints until after the next update, unless Rockstar finally changes it. Then there'd at least be a good reason to complain about what was "missing" in the update, that could have improved the overall experience. Not what wasn't changed with an "update" that never happened.

[GTAFanClub]

It's simple. If you don't like them, don't play them.

[TexasRocks]

 

 

 

 

A group random people saying no Rockstar do it this way. Amazing.

No matter how bad an adversary mode is...it's far better than anything the community could think up.

First, we're not the ones getting paid to develop the game. That's their job, and lately they've sucked at it.

Lap dogs like you are what's amazing. There no incentive for them to do better if people gleefully gobble up just any crap they put out. If R* sh*t in your mouth, you'd swear it tastes like chocolate, and beg for more. Pathetic.

In case you haven't noticed, you are immensely outvoted. Just because R* can do no wrong in your eyes, doesn't mean we can't hold them to a higher standard.

They won't do anything to help you if you just complain about it to other people. They could change what you want but why would they take your advice of what the game needs when you come across as a combative and uncooperative person on this forum? Please, help us all out and tell rockstar support, I believe if we all did that instead of complaining they would have a better reason to make less adversary modes. But remember, that could just mean bigger dry gaps between the bigger things we get.

Sorry, nobody is listening at R*. I've written several polite and courteous emails to them, and never got anything but the same old tired automated reply. Nobody reads our email. The best we can hope for is that somebody there out of curiosity actually reads forums like this to see what people think of their work. Hopefully the massive rejection of their adversary modes would make them think.The reason it won't is because even if they did come here looking for ideas they won't be taking suggestion ed that are not delivered properly by people who just look like haters. I can tell you there are more people that read the emails than people that read these forums, and the people that do read your emails owe you nothing but the automated response, a definite yes or no to your ideas would look bad on them because just having read the idea they don't know if it's possible yet. What kind of responses would you people want rockstar to spend their precious content creating time on that is so important?Don't be ridiculous. I'm not asking for a yes or no. Just a genuine acknowledgment from an actual person that the email has been read. I've never heard of anyone getting an actual reply. Nobody reads those emails.

 

 

 

 

A group random people saying no Rockstar do it this way. Amazing.

 

No matter how bad an adversary mode is...it's far better than anything the community could think up.

First, we're not the ones getting paid to develop the game. That's their job, and lately they've sucked at it.

 

Lap dogs like you are what's amazing. There no incentive for them to do better if people gleefully gobble up just any crap they put out. If R* sh*t in your mouth, you'd swear it tastes like chocolate, and beg for more. Pathetic.

 

 

In case you haven't noticed, you are immensely outvoted. Just because R* can do no wrong in your eyes, doesn't mean we can't hold them to a higher standard.

They won't do anything to help you if you just complain about it to other people. They could change what you want but why would they take your advice of what the game needs when you come across as a combative and uncooperative person on this forum? Please, help us all out and tell rockstar support, I believe if we all did that instead of complaining they would have a better reason to make less adversary modes. But remember, that could just mean bigger dry gaps between the bigger things we get.

Sorry, nobody is listening at R*. I've written several polite and courteous emails to them, and never got anything but the same old tired automated reply. Nobody reads our email. The best we can hope for is that somebody there out of curiosity actually reads forums like this to see what people think of their work. Hopefully the massive rejection of their adversary modes would make them think.

 

Well, I doubt they would take the time to reply to you personally. They probably get thousands upon thousands of emails a day. You want them taking the time to respond to all of them? You sent in your suggestions to the proper place, kudos to you, but they don't owe a personalized messsage in return. They do respond to actual technical issues though.

Sigh. Then why give us the email? They know they're not going to read or reply to any of them. Why pretend? Nobody expects an answer to every email. One every once in a while would suffice. Even if it's just me hearing about somebody else once got a reply. I've never heard of it, have you? Doubt it. Edited February 26, 2016 by TexasRocks

[Voit Turyv]

All these years and we have not seen a classic demolition derby so far.

[TexasRocks]

So you wrote a couple of emails and Rockstar didn't do what you wanted?

 

Are you serious? That's ridiculous, they should have stopped what they were doing and called you up for advice on how to do it.

Nice ridiculous assumption. Piss off with your stupidity.

[KemikalMbalinsce]

some adversary modes are fun but it's getting old and boring. Rhino hunt is the worst

[DBrasco]

Adversary modes are just filler content in between major updates, but I don't see why it always has to be adversary modes. How about missions or survivals or Last Team Standings or something?

 

I'm sure you're referring to Executives and other Criminals, the last major update.

[Hunter]

 

My opinion is that these game modes suck, and we have the right to say that they suck without some delicate little buttercup jumping at us to defend Rockstar.

 

And yes, you are a Nazi, a terrorist, and god knows what else.

 

And yes, the Hydra is in the trailer, as well as the Dodo. And there are files for the Savage.

And that is your opinion, which you are more than entitled to having. However no one, but the developers, are entitled to what or should be added. Especially when you haven't purchased anything, such as a season pass that promised PvE but instead you got PvP. Then you'd have an argument and could seek a refund because they gave false advertisement and you were entitled to receiving what you paid for. This is just a free little game mode added how long after the game released? Just because AM modes aren't your cup of tea, doesn't mean someone else could have fun with them. And you're not entitled to Rockstar adding the Hunter or PvE modes. Sure you can complain, but you should respect anyone else's opinion that different from yours. Instead your brash reaction to something you don't like, heck, something you've even admitted you won't try, and then labeling anyone that din't share your disdain a Nazi, etc makes you the Nazi for not respect that they're opinion can be different from yours and not be wrong. Besides if you're not going to touch it, move on and wait for a proper update before complaining about what Rockstar didn't add that you wanted.

 

And can you show me were the Dodo appears in first trailer as I'm not seeing it? I do see a plane that looks awfully similar to the Hydra, but I recall people refering to it as the Beta version of the Laser. Besides, I'll say it again, Rockstar didn't cut and then sell anything to you as it would have been added back in via a free update. It's not like they locked it behind a paid story mode update or something.

 

Oh, and I haven't defended the AM types. I'm defending that Rockstar can very well be working on an large update and that a tiny AM being added has little to no effect on the development of said update. Something you keep pushing aside to attack me and anyone else. Likely because you got yourself exited that a Rhino vs Hunters AM would be another update like the January of 2016 update and the game mode would add in the Hunter. Instead your delicate little feelings got hurt, because you worked yourself up for nothing. Now you're taking it out on Rockstar, and other members that won't gang up on Rockstar with you, over nothing.

 

Otherwise I agree with most of the things other posters have said. The quick menu does, and has needed to be changed for awhile. And not just for choosing specific AM but for Captures too. Which wouldn't be to hard to add a sub category after choosing the main job type.

 

That being said, complaining about it not being changed with the Rhino Hunt is the same as complaining about it after the Halloween Surprise, Running Back AM, Every Bullet Counts AM, Festive Surprise 2015, Be My Valentine and now Rhino Hunt AM. It's not like Rockstar just released an update were they could have changed it, but opted not to. Personally, I'll save my complaints until after the next update, unless Rockstar finally changes it. Then there'd at least be a good reason to complain about what was "missing" in the update, that could have improved the overall experience. Not what wasn't changed with an "update" that never happened.

 

Look at around 0:25 - 0:28. It's hard to spot, and you don't see it for long, but it flies past:

 

 

 

Edit: Also, people who enjoy these modes aren't Nazis. It's the people who enjoy them, but won't allow others to criticize them.

Edited February 27, 2016 by Icantthinkofonew

[doors8077]

It's simple. If you don't like them, don't play them.

We know that.

[TexasRocks]

 

I honestly don't play any adversary modes unless someone suggests it. Not my thing. So I wouldn't mind a moratorium on them in favor of some more contact missions.

If they were to add missions what would you want them to be?

How bout this. I sent this one to the imaginary developers over two years ago.

 

 

Lester Mission:

 

A group of armed radical tree huggers have taken over a Ron Oil offshore drilling rig. As a result work has stopped, the rig workers have been sent home except for a corporate big wig who's being held hostage. Ron Oil stock has plummeted, and of course, Lester has heavily invested in it. Now he needs you to stealthily infiltrate the rig, taking out the radicals and rescuing the big wig, allowing the rig to get back to work so lester can profit when the stock rebounds.

 

 

Yeah they would need an oil rig. They made an aircraft carrier you see all of 5 minutes. This of course fits right in with Lester's stock market manipulations, and Rockstar's sense of humor and sarcasm.

 

It also would be a cool way to get boats and subs involved in the game.

[MusicMan05]

Look at around 0:25 - 0:28. It's hard to spot, and you don't see it for long, but it flies past:

 

 

Edit: Also, people who enjoy these modes aren't Nazis. It's the people who enjoy them, but won't allow others to criticize them.

Haha, you're right. That is hard to spot, and is why I never noticed it before.

 

Personally I see the Advisory Modes as Rockstar's way of introducing new game types without wanting to categorize them as deathmatch, versus mission, etc. Basically a random collection of PvP modes that we're not sure what to do with. It feels like the in between update AMs are created by some intern using the content creator, while the developers focus on the large update and/or future game. Just like how some weeks Rockstar fills the void with user made/Rockstar Verified PvP Jobs.

[JoeFury1997]

 

I like a few and play them every so often, obviously some of them suck and are a waste but I think we more should be added alongside contact missions, survivals etc, not just by itself. Why don't they add cops n crooks? Or make Snipers vs stunters and demo derby offical adversary modes? Maybe even an adversary mode which pits players against the AI similar to a mission.