Quantcast
Jump to content
Search In
  • More options...
Find results that contain...
Find results in...
    1. Welcome to GTAForums! (92,464 visits to this link)

    2. News

    1. GTA Online

      1. Find Lobbies & Players
      2. Guides & Strategies
      3. Vehicles
      4. Content Creator
      5. Help & Support
    2. Crews

      1. Events
      2. Recruitment
    1. Grand Theft Auto Series

    2. GTA Next

    3. GTA V

      1. PC
      2. Guides & Strategies
      3. Help & Support
    4. GTA IV

      1. Episodes from Liberty City
      2. Multiplayer
      3. Guides & Strategies
      4. Help & Support
      5. GTA Mods
    5. GTA Chinatown Wars

    6. GTA Vice City Stories

    7. GTA Liberty City Stories

    8. GTA San Andreas

      1. Guides & Strategies
      2. Help & Support
      3. GTA Mods
    9. GTA Vice City

      1. Guides & Strategies
      2. Help & Support
      3. GTA Mods
    10. GTA III

      1. Guides & Strategies
      2. Help & Support
      3. GTA Mods
    11. Top Down Games

      1. GTA Advance
      2. GTA 2
      3. GTA
    12. Wiki

      1. Merchandising
    1. GTA Modding

      1. GTA V
      2. GTA IV
      3. GTA III, VC & SA
      4. Tutorials
    2. Mod Showroom

      1. Scripts & Plugins
      2. Maps
      3. Total Conversions
      4. Vehicles
      5. Textures
      6. Characters
      7. Tools
      8. Other
      9. Workshop
    3. Featured Mods

      1. DYOM
      2. OpenIV
      3. GTA: Underground
      4. GTA: Liberty City
      5. GTA: State of Liberty
    1. Red Dead Redemption 2

    2. Red Dead Redemption

    3. Rockstar Games

    1. Off-Topic

      1. General Chat
      2. Gaming
      3. Technology
      4. Programming
      5. Movies & TV
      6. Music
      7. Sports
      8. Vehicles
    2. Expression

      1. Graphics / Visual Arts
      2. GFX Requests & Tutorials
      3. Writers' Discussion
      4. Debates & Discussion
    1. Forum Support

    2. Site Suggestions

Son of Zeus

How would you rate the map of GTA V?

How would you rate the map of V?  

356 members have voted

  1. 1. On a scale of 1-10, how would you rate it?

    • 1 (Absolutely sh*tty)
      13
    • 2 (Awful)
      2
    • 3 (Poor)
      6
    • 4 (Below average)
      17
    • 5 (Average)
      31
    • 6 (Above average)
      24
    • 7 (Good map overall, despite some major flaws)
      105
    • 8 (Very good map with some minor flaws)
      87
    • 9 (An extremely well-crafted map)
      46
    • 10 (Just perfect, best map in the series)
      25


Recommended Posts

Son of Zeus

I'd say it's a 7. Good map overall, despite some major flaws. The layout is bad in places, so the Paleto Forest doesn't feel like a forest and the Grand Senora Desert is neither grand nor does it feel like a desert. Also, the mountains are too many and feel like filler. All these flaws are IMO of course.

 

Still, it's a good map to drive around and take in the scenery or just fool around.

 

Rate above + reasons below.

Edited by Son of Zeus

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Blackened

8/10

 

Flaws aren't significant enough to hamper my enjoyment, but could be better.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Cheatz/Trickz

It's a 6 for me, if it was just LS, it would be a 7, but the countryside is just so undeveloped and wasteful it knocks it down one.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Algonquin Assassin

7/10. Whilst it's indeed a very nice looking and detailed map I just don't get the sense that it's really bigger than SA, RDR and GTA IV combined. I also don't like the "crater" like feel by the surrounding mountains.

 

So whilst it's visually quite stunning I think design and structure could be much better.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Osho

Based on the vanila version, sadly the game has a lot of wasted space, and so I'm inclined to give a 6, but since I'm playing because of the awesome PC version and fabulous mods, I'd say, 8.

For the topic; 6.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
shadowoperative

A 9 out of 10. Sandy Shores and Paleto Bay are amazing.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
UshaB

7/10. It looks nice. It didn't feel up to potential, not sure why. Maybe the pedestrians needed to tone down the satire. The mountains felt underused. I feel like it needed a secret cabin, or cave that led to an underground mine or underneath the water fall. Needed more trees. I wanted to see a big motherf*cking lumberjack dude cuttin' down some fresh wood. Also, I feel like Sandy Shores could of been expanded somehow. It needs more interiors, interiors everyyyyyyyywherrrrrrrrrrrre.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
CarlitoDorito

9. Incredibly detailed and more varied than any map I've seen in a game. Needs more interiors.

Edited by CarlitoDorito

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Fuzzknuckles

Gave it a 9. I love how smooth the transition between environments is when you're on the freeway and the variety itself is impressive. LS is a well balanced city considering how well it's been designed to reflect the goings on in the story. The mountains look stunning and provide a lot of goofy play opportunities. The sea and the undersea world are beautiful and terrifying at depth. Raton Canyon is the most stunning video game location I've ever seen. There's so much opportunity to use the many vehicles at hand, from low-flying the river to skydiving into the city. Quite simply, for me, the best video game map to date, and certainly the best in GTA history. Hundreds of roof tops to explore, little hidden alley ways, hidden easter eggs around the map... Just incredible.

 

That said, it's not perfect. A little bigger all over would have been nice, though not particularly necessary, just because I love to explore.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
The7thOne

*Post deleted.

Edited by The7thOne

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
ChiroVette

A 9 out of 10. Sandy Shores and Paleto Bay are amazing.

 

Same here!I knocked off the one point since they didn't include Fierro, Venturras, Red County, and Back-O-Beyond (or equivalent areas with different names)

 

Had they tried to top San Andreas's map in HD, I think it would have been the best map in the series.

Edited by ChiroVette

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Whyohwhy

Ill give it a 9 but its still the best map in the series. For me, just the vast variety of great looking terrain to drive through in what is the best vehicle selection in any GTA makes it better than any other game world to me. Sure it could have been better but the past GTA maps have way, WAY more room for improvement than 5. 5's los Santos seems like it has all the best road layouts from the 3 main cities in SA condensed into one and its way more fun to go off road in 5, especially in first person mode.

 

And 5s map is beautiful in a way that none of the older maps were. Maybe one could argue that this is because its the most recent so obviously its gonna have better graphics...and I agree. At the moment GTA 5 is the best looking GTA game world and the rest look like sh*t in comparison and GTA 6 will probably make 5 look sh*tty. Looks are obviously not the only thing to consider when comparing maps but it does make it better in one aspect.

 

This poll is a loaded question though in that it implies that 5's map has to be a 10 to be the best map in the series and, by extension, one or more of the other gta maps are 9/10. To me, 5's map is a 9 and and the closest to it is probably SA which might just scrape an 8 and then 4 which is around a 6 or 7.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
shadowoperative

It was created by an IV fan who hates V. Consider the source. I hated IVs map. Gray and brown copy and paste with no driving freedom.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Fuzzknuckles

This poll is a loaded question though in that it implies that 5's map has to be a 10 to be the best map in the series and, by extension, one or more of the other gta maps are 9/10.

 

 

It really is loaded. It's almost as if this is designed to result in either a full sweep of people claiming San An's map is the best or IV's map is the best.

 

For me, V's map provided me with a sense of freedom that previous maps never achieved. Particularly on foot. Walking the map end to end takes a long time but you do get that sense of being in real world locations. One of the things that helps this is the lighting, I think. The daylight feels so close to real, and I've never felt this in other games, no matter how graphically impressive they were. This was also the case on the PS3 version. Even though the PS3 was starting to show its age, the game looked fantastic and felt great to be in. The PS4 version takes this further with the extra foliage and wildlife. It's really an impressive and highly immersive map.

Edited by Fuzzknuckles

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Maibatsu545

4/10 below average for the GTA series.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
ChiroVette

 

This poll is a loaded question though in that it implies that 5's map has to be a 10 to be the best map in the series and, by extension, one or more of the other gta maps are 9/10.

 

 

It really is loaded. It's almost as if this is designed to result in either a full sweep of people claiming San An's map is the best or IV's map is the best.

 

For me, V's map provided me with a sense of freedom that previous maps never achieved. Particularly on foot. Walking the map end to end takes a long time but you do get that sense of being in real world locations. One of the things that helps this is the lighting, I think. The daylight feels so close to real, and I've never felt this in other games, no matter how graphically impressive they were. This was also the case on the PS3 version. Even though the PS3 was starting to show its age, the game looked fantastic and felt great to be in. The PS4 version takes this further with the extra foliage and wildlife. It's really an impressive and highly immersive map.

 

 

Totally agree. And remember that technically animals are part of the "map," too, which adds a whole new dimension to the gameplay.

 

Also, I don't think that the OP meant this to be a straight up X/10 grading system. I think 10 is meant to depict the best map of the series, not necessarily a quality of "10/10," per se. Technically it is the best map of the series, BUT I still only gave it a 9 because, to be honest, I think if San Andreas was done not on the PS2, but a true HD map, and there were animals, that would be the best map of the series.

 

Still, V's map is insanely good!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
CarlitoDorito

I like that if it wasn't for the internet, there's quite a few things i wouldn't know are there. Also the ocean, best game ocean I've seen, especially in a game with so much other stuff happening. The mine is really creepy, you may expect their to be something in it, even when you know there isn't. I like the little islands, waterfalls. All very nice. Theres times i just look at the game. Not something I've really done before, but some of the views, the lovely lighting, reflections, things moving and atmosphere like no game I've played yet.

 

It seems the impressive draw distance even on last gen makes things seem smaller than they actually appear. I'd have liked a bit more of it, a bit more desert although the desert is bigger than it appears. There's an area with small sand dunes near u-tool, more of that would be good.

Edited by CarlitoDorito

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Osho

One of the things that helps this is the lighting, I think.

If you get a chance to play on PC, then do try Black-Out, makes the use of lighting system for covering the LS in dark. It opens up more gameplay possibilities altogether..

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Lethal-lock

Minus the overkill on mountains for padding i think the map is amazing :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Son of Zeus

It was created by an IV fan who hates V. Consider the source.

I'm neither a IV fan nor do I hate V. You really need to stop assuming that anyone who criticises V is a IV fan.

 

 

 

This poll is a loaded question though in that it implies that 5's map has to be a 10 to be the best map in the series and, by extension, one or more of the other gta maps are 9/10.

No. It implies that anyone giving a full 10 obviously considers it to be the best map in the series, either tied with some othe GTA or standalone. Someone may give a 9 or 8 or 7 and still consider it to be the best in the series.

Edited by Son of Zeus

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Sonny F

(Very good map with some minor flaws)

 

When I saw this part of the map for the first time,

 

78dJezS.jpg

 

I thought that it is a huge residential neighborhood like Lincoln Heights in L.A., but it is nothing but a dirty roads and some industrial objects. This place sucks.

 

+ Forest sucks.

 

+ Desert is too small.

 

I always wished GTA neighborhoods to be large, like real neighborhoods are, one day. Not those 'standard GTA neighborhoods' consisted of just 3-4 blocks. And finally, we have Vinewood Hills and La Puerta, they're large enough for me. Also big thanks to R* for countryside with small towns, I really love the atmosphere of a small town since GTA SA, this is what I really missed in IV.

 

SRd7Yw8.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
CarlitoDorito

Despite there not being enough interiors, I love the exteriors. I'm not sure how many unique buildings there are. Hundreds definitely. Every house in the game has a different design, some with details found nowhere else in the game. Paleto bay is brimming with detail, peds having bbq's in their gardens, people sitting, drinking, dancing and using the bbq anyway, which i guess could be considered a bbq.

 

I like the easter eggs, al dente's was mentioned in IV and exists in V, eugenics too. Almost every store has its own name, many are jokes, references, some are quite clever. A small area like mirror park has more variation in design than some full games, which is madness really but also true. The little things combine for me into a big whole and there's so many little things. The layout i can live with.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Fuzzknuckles

 

One of the things that helps this is the lighting, I think.

If you get a chance to play on PC, then do try Black-Out, makes the use of lighting system for covering the LS in dark. It opens up more gameplay possibilities altogether..

 

True story, I got a complimentary copy code of V for PC from R* and when I tried to enter the code, it had already been used.

 

So I'm reluctant to pay for it when I should have got it for free! One day, however, I will probably get a copy and give the mods a try. Thanks for the recommendation!

Edited by Fuzzknuckles

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Misunderstood

I would give the map an 8. It has some flaws but I can look past them. The countryside and city both offer beautiful spots (and because of snapmatic, I can take sexy pictures) and the weather system makes the map even sexier. There are some things that annoy me like the highway that goes in a circle and the disappointing Paleto Forest but they don't make me hate the map or even disappointed. They're just things that simply annoy me every now and then.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
.Vooodu.

Id say its a near perfect 10. The only reason i say near perfect is because the map lacks alot interiors.

 

 

But its still a 10. San Andreas looks and feels as perfect. The attention to detail is mind blowing. I can't even bring myself to give anything lower then a 10 because nothing else compares to it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Failure

Not being harsh, and being too kind, I'd rate the map 4/10. The map is just a let-down in every way for V... R* made such amazing maps for IV and SA, and the make this s**t the map for V. This map is pretty good for the gameplay of Online, but isn't for V. A really tiny city which is only appealing for like 10 minutes, a boring and unattractive countryside which is just copy and paste and roads everywhere; designed just for Online. San Andreas did the same San Andreas state, and that 2004 game's map is just a million times better than what V had to offer.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
.Vooodu.

Not being harsh, and being too kind, I'd rate the map 4/10. The map is just a let-down in every way for V... R* made such amazing maps for IV and SA, and the make this s**t the map for V. This map is pretty good for the gameplay of Online, but isn't for V. A really tiny city which is only appealing for like 10 minutes, a boring and unattractive countryside which is just copy and paste and roads everywhere; designed just for Online. San Andreas did the same San Andreas state, and that 2004 game's map is just a million times better than what V had to offer.

 

 

 

You need to lay of the sh*tty drugs and uncross your eyes if you think GTA SA looks better then GTA Vs map.

 

Appealing for 10 minutes.. L M F A O!

 

I've been playing this game for 3 years... and its still appealing because it looks and feels so awesome.

 

 

I love reading bullsh*t... I mean i loved SA but it looks like horse ass compared to GTA V.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Failure

 

Not being harsh, and being too kind, I'd rate the map 4/10. The map is just a let-down in every way for V... R* made such amazing maps for IV and SA, and the make this s**t the map for V. This map is pretty good for the gameplay of Online, but isn't for V. A really tiny city which is only appealing for like 10 minutes, a boring and unattractive countryside which is just copy and paste and roads everywhere; designed just for Online. San Andreas did the same San Andreas state, and that 2004 game's map is just a million times better than what V had to offer.

 

You need to lay of the sh*tty drugs and uncross your eyes if you think GTA SA looks better then GTA Vs map.

 

 

You need to lay off the sh*tty drugs and uncross your eyes if you think GTA V's map looks better than GTA SA's map.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Osho

You need to lay off the sh*tty drugs and uncross your eyes if you think GTA V's map looks better than GTA SA's map.

You should use a better term than 'looks' because when it comes to looks, its really wrong to say, SA is better than V. Nowhere this argument will make sense to anyone.

Yiu might be talking about layout, feel, structure, design...then that can be debatable.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Blackened

Anything below a 6/10 is blatant nonsense. I don't care if you like the map or not, if you think this map is overall worse than average, you either refuse to acknowledge plus points or you are trying to have an edgy opinion.

 

IV and V's maps both annihilate 3D era maps in almost all respects, except perhaps character or art style. I can't take anybody seriously if they vote 5 or under, claiming 3D era maps to be better. They suck in comparison. Were they good at the time? Hell yeah. Are they still good? Hell yeah. Do they remotely compare on any fundamental level to HD maps? Absolutely not.

 

> from somebody who's played every game on release since 99

 

Edit: not to discredit anybody's opinion, but be realistic

Edited by The Six

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • 1 User Currently Viewing
    0 members, 0 Anonymous, 1 Guest

×

Important Information

By using GTAForums.com, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.