The Next DLC Discussion Thread

[LeAuxChord]

 

 

 

I just want more Pfisters, hell the Porsche 918 would be enough for me. Only three cars under the Pfister brand and two are in GTA CTW. Over a decade of GTA games and only 3 Pfisters, wot. And the Comet has been the same since 2008 with the exception of its spoiler. Cmon Rockstar, you can do better than that. Give us more Pfisters. Bring one of the Pfisters from GTA CTW and make its design resemble a Porsche 918 with a roofless option. They did it with the Mamba, so why not bring and old Pfister to the HD era?

I'd like a 918 Spyder with a removable hardtop and a 991 GT3 RS with options to remove the spoiler.

These are cars that could reel in a lot of players. sh*t I'd actually use a Shark Card. I mean a 918 Spyder? A targa hyper car? Sign me up!

911 GT3 RS and a Cayman GT4 would be nice. Even a Panamera Turbo to compete with the Rapide/Exemplar.

Oh yeah, definitely a Panamera.

 

Like they need to get on that sh*t. Those Panameras are fast as f*ck and handle just like 911s. It's crazy. We need something to compete with the Schafter V12 directly. Hell, if it handles like a Comet then it just might be the best car in the game for me!

 

They don't really handle like em...like at all. But I see what ya'll mean, we definitely need some more Pfisters in this game. I still cant believe after 2 years we still only have just one.

[Gnocchi Flip Flops]

 

 

 

 

I just want more Pfisters, hell the Porsche 918 would be enough for me. Only three cars under the Pfister brand and two are in GTA CTW. Over a decade of GTA games and only 3 Pfisters, wot. And the Comet has been the same since 2008 with the exception of its spoiler. Cmon Rockstar, you can do better than that. Give us more Pfisters. Bring one of the Pfisters from GTA CTW and make its design resemble a Porsche 918 with a roofless option. They did it with the Mamba, so why not bring and old Pfister to the HD era?

I'd like a 918 Spyder with a removable hardtop and a 991 GT3 RS with options to remove the spoiler.

These are cars that could reel in a lot of players. sh*t I'd actually use a Shark Card. I mean a 918 Spyder? A targa hyper car? Sign me up!

911 GT3 RS and a Cayman GT4 would be nice. Even a Panamera Turbo to compete with the Rapide/Exemplar.

Oh yeah, definitely a Panamera.

 

Like they need to get on that sh*t. Those Panameras are fast as f*ck and handle just like 911s. It's crazy. We need something to compete with the Schafter V12 directly. Hell, if it handles like a Comet then it just might be the best car in the game for me!

 

They don't really handle like em...like at all. But I see what ya'll mean, we definitely need some more Pfisters in this game. I still cant believe after 2 years we still only have just one.

 

Compared to other sedans, the Panamera handles like a sports car. Okay it ain't no 911 GT3 but it sure as hell is agile.

[OVO]

I'm sorry that I'm late to the party, I've missed too much. I know this has already been posted but damn

 

 

plz dont kill me

Edited February 22, 2016 by Bershka

[MusicMan05]

 

On topic, uh, definitely digging the idea of a map expansion. Other than that thing I won't mention, it's one of the only things that I think would get me back to playing GTA long term again.

 

If they do it though, it should definitely be joint to the current map, without any need for loading. I don't know if it's technically possible for them to do that, but it'd be awesome. Plus there'd finally be a reason to use some of the plane - they'd have enough distance to make their slight speed advantage over helicopters worth it.

If they did a map expansion to the current game I'd imagine it'd be like GTA IV Episodes. It could work something like this:

 

1.) Start GTA V

2.) Choose V (Los Santos) or one of the Story Expansions (Located in a new City)

3.) While on the loading screen you can select to join straight to Online as usual or wait until you load into Story Mode

4.) Once in GTA: Online you can travel between maps. The first time traveling to the new location is by airplane. It shows a similar scene to the one when you first start GTA:Online and you're greater by a member of that city's crime world. From that point on, your free to travel between that city and any other by the following methods:

-Airport ~ Purchase a ticket. ($100-1,000) The loading screen is of the plane flying above the clouds, and landing at the airport. You gain control of your character outside of the gate of the city you left from.

-Yacht ~ Tell your Yacht Captain where to lay anchor on the other map. ($25K) Loading screen of your Yacht heading across the ocean and cuts to the current scene of the Yacht pulling up to the chosen destination

-Airplane/Boat/Swimming - head towards the edge of the map in the direction of the city you're attempting to travel to. (To go from LS to LC head NE, and from LC to LS head SW.) The loading screen is either the plane flying above the clouds, the boat traveling across the water, or your character swimming. Once you load in you load into the edge of the map from where you came. (So from LS to LC, in the SE of LC and from LC to LS in the NW of LS) There could be an award for each city for swimming between LS and that City.

 

When traveling you can travel with Friends/Crew Members/Organization Members that own the expansion locations. Anyone that doesn't own the expansion can't purchase a plane ticket or will be kicked off of the Yacht or removed from the airplane/boat once it leaves the current map.

[Pizentu]

Can we be courteous and stop with the quote train crap. Especially with pictures/Lots of pictures. After the second or third quote, snip out the majority or "spoiler" tab it. Im coming to see what Ive missed the past day or so and scroll through pages of quote/picture trains.

[TheFranchise]

Unbanned.

 

 

On topic, uh, definitely digging the idea of a map expansion. Other than that thing I won't mention, it's one of the only things that I think would get me back to playing GTA long term again.

 

Aw sh*t.

 

If they do it though, it should definitely be joint to the current map, without any need for loading. I don't know if it's technically possible for them to do that, but it'd be awesome. Plus there'd finally be a reason to use some of the plane - they'd have enough distance to make their slight speed advantage over helicopters worth it.

[HeavyDuke]

Unbanned.

 

 

On topic, uh, definitely digging the idea of a map expansion. Other than that thing I won't mention, it's one of the only things that I think would get me back to playing GTA long term again.

 

If they do it though, it should definitely be joint to the current map, without any need for loading. I don't know if it's technically possible for them to do that, but it'd be awesome. Plus there'd finally be a reason to use some of the plane - they'd have enough distance to make their slight speed advantage over helicopters worth it.

 

Hunter got unbanned, light the beacons!

I'm sorry that I'm late to the party, I've missed too much. I know this has already been posted but damn

 

 

plz dont kill me

Hot coffee mode story dlc?

Edited February 22, 2016 by HeavyDuke

[Hunter]

 

Unbanned.

 

 

On topic, uh, definitely digging the idea of a map expansion. Other than that thing I won't mention, it's one of the only things that I think would get me back to playing GTA long term again.

 

Aw sh*t.

 

If they do it though, it should definitely be joint to the current map, without any need for loading. I don't know if it's technically possible for them to do that, but it'd be awesome. Plus there'd finally be a reason to use some of the plane - they'd have enough distance to make their slight speed advantage over helicopters worth it.

 

 

 

 

Hunter got unbanned, light the beacons!

 

 

 

I'll have my flares at the ready lol, could get hot here.

[AUScowboy]

I love gtaf memes. From nick testbranch to Hunter madness... tthis place cracks me da fuq up!

[Member's Only]

Don't forget the forced realistic steak meem from pre-release days.

[tenpennyisplainevil]

Question: I have 8.7 mil. Should I blow it all on a yacht (the thing I want most in the current GTAO) or wait for Lowrider 2 to see if there's something that costs more than a million or two that I want? My fingers are itching to click "buy", tbh. Think something huge will come in the near future (that costs mutliple millions)?

[AUScowboy]

I missed that one, care to share?

 

Damn, playing all the double pay missions these past few days has my expectations growing. I want new stuff, i want it soon. Seeing as this thread has become a wishlist pretty much, heres me hoping we get the hunter and some new bikes with loads of customization!

[shadowoperative]

Question: I have 8.7 mil. Should I blow it all on a yacht (the thing I want most in the current GTAO) or wait for Lowrider 2 to see if there's something that costs more than a million or two that I want? My fingers are itching to click "buy", tbh. Think something huge will come in the near future (that costs mutliple millions)?

I would wait.

[beretta-gt88]

 

 

It drives amazing, just cant stand to look at it. I bought a CHEETAH over it, a f*ckin CHEETAH lol.

I got three other supercars besides the Zen anyway. You know, the new top three. The Osiris, T20, and the 900R.

I only have one super car. The T20:

https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcSP7LeR8gcnsV94JOhEjb0c_z4udXkeusCEedUI4MIbv3ckh9GEjQ

Why? Because the other supers don't feel like real super cars. They either drive like go karts or lack in textures. The T20 is a real super car.

 

And I want another hybrid hyper car just like it, Pfister.

 

There's no point in adding another car if the acceleration and top speed cap doesn't get removed first,what's the point of a super car that can't go faster than 122mph or 130mph it's pathetic!

[REVENGE777]

Don't forget the forced realistic steak meem from pre-release days.

good lord the necro

[Irish45455]

Question: I have 8.7 mil. Should I blow it all on a yacht (the thing I want most in the current GTAO) or wait for Lowrider 2 to see if there's something that costs more than a million or two that I want? My fingers are itching to click "buy", tbh. Think something huge will come in the near future (that costs mutliple millions)?

To be honest, you could buy the yacht and then grind on all contact missions are double day and possibly recoup your losses and if not, come pretty damn close. There's plenty of time left before the end of double money and RP. For all we know Low 2 could come out in March. So if you feel inclined to buy the yacht, I don't see why not.

Edited February 23, 2016 by Irish45455

[tenpennyisplainevil]

 

Question: I have 8.7 mil. Should I blow it all on a yacht (the thing I want most in the current GTAO) or wait for Lowrider 2 to see if there's something that costs more than a million or two that I want? My fingers are itching to click "buy", tbh. Think something huge will come in the near future (that costs mutliple millions)?

To be honest, you could buy the yacht and then grind on all contact missions are double day and possibly recoup your losses and if not, come pretty damn close. There's plenty of time left before the end of double money and RP. For all we know Low 2 could come out in March. So if you feel inclined to buy the yacht, I don't see why not.

 

Yeah I guess you're right. I made 1 mil just today (and I didn't even spend the fulll day on it). I'm off this week, so could easily make 2-3 million, if not more. I'll buy it, thanks

[Re-Dragon-Cro]

 

Question: I have 8.7 mil. Should I blow it all on a yacht (the thing I want most in the current GTAO) or wait for Lowrider 2 to see if there's something that costs more than a million or two that I want? My fingers are itching to click "buy", tbh. Think something huge will come in the near future (that costs mutliple millions)?

To be honest, you could buy the yacht and then grind on all contact missions are double day and possibly recoup your losses and if not, come pretty damn close. There's plenty of time left before the end of double money and RP. For all we know Low 2 could come out in March. So if you feel inclined to buy the yacht, I don't see why not.

 

Agree, and even if he finds something which could be 1 car atleast its going to take around a mill. just for it(considering how the previous lowrider and racer cars were pricey)So getting up to a mill. should be pretty easy with the ongoing 2x cash missions. Even just doing VIP and contact missions combo alone you could farm up money pretty fast.

Edited February 23, 2016 by Re-Dragon-Cro

[REVENGE777]

steven ogg is done with gta. he's on to bigger and better things.

[Gnocchi Flip Flops]

 

 

 

It drives amazing, just cant stand to look at it. I bought a CHEETAH over it, a f*ckin CHEETAH lol.

 

I got three other supercars besides the Zen anyway. You know, the new top three. The Osiris, T20, and the 900R.

I only have one super car. The T20:https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcSP7LeR8gcnsV94JOhEjb0c_z4udXkeusCEedUI4MIbv3ckh9GEjQ

Why? Because the other supers don't feel like real super cars. They either drive like go karts or lack in textures. The T20 is a real super car.

And I want another hybrid hyper car just like it, Pfister.

 

There's no point in adding another car if the acceleration and top speed cap doesn't get removed first,what's the point of a super car that can't go faster than 122mph or 130mph it's pathetic!Aesthetics. All I care about is looks and the way it drives. Speed? I couldn't care less if I'm honest. Edited February 23, 2016 by Scaglietti

[nicktestbranch]

I love gtaf memes. From nick testbranch to Hunter madness... tthis place cracks me da fuq up!

At least the former is the only real thing happening here, which is saying something. (and no I'm not talking about myself)

[interfreak]

Last Console Generation:

 

 

 

Current Console Generation:

FTFY. Seriously, we've hade XB1 and PS4 for over 2 years now, its long passed referring to them as next gen..

[Gnocchi Flip Flops]

 

Last Console Generation:Current Console Generation:

FTFY. Seriously, we've hade XB1 and PS4 for over 2 years now, its long passed referring to them as next gen..

They'll be referred to as next-gen until the next generation.

[Maxxeine]

 

 

 

 

 

This map is still perfect. I would be happy for any new map atually.

Who knows, maybe something like that is already done and they just wait the time to publish it.

This would be abesolutely amazing, and I feel some day we'll get something like this, hopefully with the next GTA (VI). I'm still hoping/thinking Liberty City will come to online, and than for GTA VI we'll get either San Fierro, Las Venturas, or a combination of both.

This would be horrible in Online. Just imagine 90% of the players being in LS and a few in SF and LV. If we get this, the maps should (IMO) be separate. You should choose which map you want to play Online in and in SP you should be able to fly to a different map from the airport (like in SA, but with a loading screen). For single player, the loading screen should be a first person view inside the plane so it feels like there is no loading and you're just flying. Would be better for both performance and gameplay

I would personally like it better if we had everything in the same instance and we could drive to the new island. However, I don't think that's gonna happen. It doesn't make sense lore-wise, it would probably be harder to optimize and they'd have to make a big change to a part of the map to get the bridge in and it could just look really akward. A separate island within its own instance is probably how it's going to be implemented, (if there's even going to be a map addition)it would just be easier for R* and it's usually how these things are handled.

 

 

I have to agree. I would much rather have the entire map all in ONE instance. Even if it means having to spread out 30 players more. Why? Because f*** playing online with random players. The PC version has been swarmed with cheaters/hackers since April and there's no sign of that being fixed ever. So I only play with my large group of friends in private sessions. There's still AI walking around and plenty to do in a massive map, even without random players driving down the road here and there. I think going on a road trip with friends through that massive desert would be amazing, especially if you head to freakin Las Venturas and start causing havoc on the strip. I also love the idea of the massive mountain ranges and what appears to be flat valleys or forests to go through. I would definitely wish for a map just like that.

I think Rockstar Could more than likely do both approaches:

 

Current Console Generation:

 

For the rest of the current GTA: Online and current gen consoles they'd do more seperate 32 player island maps. The new maps could either be large $40 DLCs or standalone games featuring the names of the locations. (Similar to VC and SA.)

 

Next Console Generation:

 

 

 

 

For next gen, they could create a new GTA Universe with GTA:VI and GTA:Online II. VI would utilize some of the map assests from the HD Universe and recreate them into one massive continent. Imagine one map that has the following States:

 

Alderny

Liberty

San Andreas (north and south)

North/South Yankton

Florida

 

They could even create additional states not visited in any 2D, 3D, and HD GTA. GTA Online II'S open world structure could be more like TDU2/The Crew, with instanced lobby's based on location in the game world. That way players could travel from LS to LC/VC by either: car, bike, train, plane, boat, yacht, running, swimming, or whatever else they feel like using to get there.

 

I could definitely see Rockstar adding LC, LV, SF to current gen, with the intention of utilizing them again in a future game. They wouldn't have to redesign the cities from scratch on next gen. Just update their textures and reconstruct their surrounding landmass to fit into a continent vs an island. (Or you could view it as them working on GTA VI, while releasing island "fragments" featuring the new city with some of its surroundings onto current gen to keep players interested and Sharkcards sales up. This way they you kill two birds with one stone and get feedback on the new locations before finalizing them for VI. Esentially GTAV/Online could be viewed as a Beta test for GTAVI/Online II on next gen.... Which would sound awfully familiar to last gen and current gen..)

 

Anyways as far as the next DLC, if it is Low Riders 2, I hope they add more of the Lowrider content from SA. As we all know, the main things Lowriders 1 added:

 

-Custom Shop

-Hydraulics

-Vehicle Remote System

-Adversary Mode types

-Lamar Missions

-Vehicles

-Clothing

-Weapons

 

I'm hoping Lowriders 2 would add:

 

-NOS

-Ability to lock hydraulics in place using either L3, like in SA, or double tap/hold x/R1 while holding the stick in the desired position.

-Hydraulic Remote operation

-Lowrider Challenges from SA as a new 2-8+ players Job Type. Players score points based on timing, and the player with the highest score wins. The score system wouldn't be that different from how parachuting is set up. Point would be rewarded based on accuracy: Perfect (15), Good (10), Poor (5) , and Bad (0).

-Standard Contact Missions ~ Simeon would send players to repo lowriders, Gerald/Lamar would want the other gangs lowriders torched or the drugs in them collected, Trevor would want the drugs being transported in Slamvans, etc

-Vehicles

-Clothing

-Weapons

 

 

This is entirely possible, but I disagree with creating a "new universe", since everything that's happened in the HD Universe (Niko, Johnny, the trio) wouldn't exist anymore, and I think it'd upset a lot of fans.

 

Also, with the way Rockstar has been boasting Online, there won't be an "Online II". Online IS Online. There's no sequel. They may upgrade RAGE, or maybe, create a new engine altogether, but there won't be a sequel to Online. That would simply be unnecessary, since Online is constantly expanding.

 

Map expansions are entirely possible, but the idea of creating a new universe is baffling. There's simply too much that would go to waste (see above). There's been far too much established in the HD Universe. Sure, they could reuse assets, but what good is it when everything that's happened in HD is no longer canon?

 

Online will stay Online. There's no need for a new Universe.

[Alvarez]

steven ogg is done with gta. he's on to bigger and better things.

 

Does he sound like angry Trevor in this ad?

[Gnocchi Flip Flops]

 

steven ogg is done with gta. he's on to bigger and better things.

Does he sound like angry Trevor in this ad?

He probably sounds like the nutcase he is lol

[Hunter]

 

 

 

There's no point in adding another car if the acceleration and top speed cap doesn't get removed first,what's the point of a super car that can't go faster than 122mph or 130mph it's pathetic!

 

That'd be cool, but more problematic than it seems.

 

Everything else in the game would also then need a speed buff, or you'd have cars outrunning planes and fighter jets ...

 

Making a jet go at 700mph would probably be impossible; things just surely couldn't load up in time?

 

Fun fact: I/the special helicopter can fly at over 200mph in reality.

[M.K.N.]

We'll probably need more Freemode Events such as Kill Frenzy from GTA 1. Who doesn't love to rack up points for killing peds, other players and vehicles (minus player-saved ones)?

[Hunter]

We'll probably need more Freemode Events such as Kill Frenzy from GTA 1. Who doesn't love to rack up points for killing peds, other players and vehicles (minus player-saved ones)?

Kill Frenzy was a beautiful thing.

 

I remember in GTA London, getting in the gold tank and doing that. Good times.

[MusicMan05]

 

Last Console Generation:

 

 

 

Current Console Generation:

FTFY. Seriously, we've hade XB1 and PS4 for over 2 years now, its long passed referring to them as next gen..

I was referring to current console generation as XB1/PS4 and next console generation as XB?/PS5. How people can think someone referring next gen as XB1/PS4 this long into the console cycle is beyond me...

 

This is entirely possible, but I disagree with creating a "new universe", since everything that's happened in the HD Universe (Niko, Johnny, the trio) wouldn't exist anymore, and I think it'd upset a lot of fans.

 

Also, with the way Rockstar has been boasting Online, there won't be an "Online II". Online IS Online. There's no sequel. They may upgrade RAGE, or maybe, create a new engine altogether, but there won't be a sequel to Online. That would simply be unnecessary, since Online is constantly expanding.

 

Map expansions are entirely possible, but the idea of creating a new universe is baffling. There's simply too much that would go to waste (see above). There's been far too much established in the HD Universe. Sure, they could reuse assets, but what good is it when everything that's happened in HD is no longer canon?

 

Online will stay Online. There's no need for a new Universe.

It would be no different than the 2D Era being replaced by the 3D era and the 3D era being replaced by the HD era. Or are you saying the fan base is so immature now that they wouldn't be able to handle a Universe wipe like Rockstar did when the created IV? I remember fans still being exited about the release of GTA IV, even though it ment everything that happened in III, Liberty City Stories, Vice City, Vice City Stories, and San Andreas was no longer relevant to the series. (The big disappointments about IV came from the lack of content when comparing IV to SA. Not CJ and company no longer existing in the new Universe.) The 3D Universe had far more established than the 2D and the HD Universes when it was replaced by the HD Universe. And as my example showed Rockstar could still do an few more stories in the HD Universe for the current console generation.

 

As to why a new GTA Universe is likely to happen again in the future is because of what Rockstar has said. They've mentioned in the past that they want to create one massive content. In order to do so, they'd have to set aside the current HD Universe island maps of Liberty, Alderny, San Andreas, and whatever maps they might make for the HD Universe in order to create a new massive one. (Just as they did when moving from the 2D-3D maps and 3D-HD maps.) When that happens, it's likely they'd wipe the slate clean again for the new map's (aka Universe) canon. Again, the HD Universe Liberty City is a different city than the ones that exist in the 2D and 3D Universe, due to the change in map. A Liberty City that's part of a new massive continent would be a different Liberty City than the HD Universe one, even if they reused map assets from the HD Universe. (Those assets could be street layout, district layouts, building designs with updated textures, etc. They wouldn't necessarily have to make the same changes that occured between 2D-3D and 3D-HD versions of Liberty City. Or the bigger changes that occured between 3D Los Santos/San Andreas to HD Los Santos/San Andreas.)

 

As far as Online and an Online II goes. The current interation of GTA:Online wouldn't be ending anytime soon. Besides, what would be so bad if after a 7-10 year run on PC/PS3/PS4/XB360/XB1 they create a new version referred to as GTA Online II for PC/PS5/XB1 that pushes it into something far better than the current GTA Online? (If it was a huge leap for next gen GTA:Online, wouldn't it likely be reffered to as Online II to distinguish itself from the original version?) How many other online games, outside of WoW, would have lasted that long before the developers create an improved version? To expect GTA Online to stay in the same rut for 10, 20 years is insane. Or would you rather have the same game engine, game play mechanics, net code, island maps, etc to still be used for GTA:Online for another 10+ years on next gen systems? I think it'd start to feel extremely outdated having the same Online that released on PS3/XB360 to still be used on PC/PS5/XB?. PS3/XB360 to PS4/XB1 was fine, but using the same thing for 3 console generations would get old, even if you redressed it with a new location every few years. Especially when they could create a better version. (Which I thought is the reason people dislike/get bored of Ubisoft games so much, since they rehash the same thing year after year with little change.)