Heists should be locked until the player reaches level 50?

[Niko the awesome]

The player can't join or host a heist until he reaches level 50. What do you guys think?

[Zenki s14]

No

[Rt001]

No

[whywontyoulisten]

/thread

[Nick1020]

I've seen players as low as level 20 complete pac standard but I'm with ya on this to an extent.

Edited January 4, 2016 by Nick1020

[rlk232]

I support this idea, with the exception of Fleeca. That should unlock at 20.

[REXX]

First time I did PS, I was doing it with randoms. Had a rank 1 join and was better than the others. Rank means nothing in this game.

[Niko the awesome]

I've seen players as low as level 20 complete pac standard but I'm with ya on this to an extent.

I agree some low levels are really good, but most of them have 0 skill.

[No_Future]

how about no?

[Nick1020]

 

I've seen players as low as level 20 complete pac standard but I'm with ya on this to an extent.

I agree some low levels are really good, but most of them have 0 skill.And chances are, it's probably someone's second character.

[Zenki s14]

Level doesn't determine skill, and if it did most high levels think to highly of themselves and suck. Also heavy vest > level of player

[Sugarfoot]

I agree with this overall. I've played with low ranks that were successful but not often enough because I still kick them from my heist these days. Sometimes I'll join as a random for someone's heist and encounter the low rank chaos lol.

 

It's like the lottery. Sometimes you just get lucky when you find a good low rank. Maybe a stat in the menu telling us how many heist people successfully completed would be helpful. Like they do with races.

Edited January 4, 2016 by UNRULYWOE

[Yukinoshita]

Absolutely not.

What if the player is using the second character? You'd miss a nice jolly and many low levels can prove to be better than a level over 100

 

Even if the guy isn't a pro, everyone has to start somewhere. Everyone had to but with time (and sometimes with people) we managed to reach where we are now. If you look at it, it's a bit like the relationship between Michael and Franklin, teacher and pupil.

Just be patient and give advices if you have problems with a newbie, don't just kick him (unless he's a kid and has a stupid name like "PROsn1perXxX")

 

Sorry if I sounded so serious it wasn't my intention

Edited January 4, 2016 by Yukinoshita

[MikeyDLuffy]

Sounds like a bad, unfair idea to me. Plenty of players lower than 50 can ace heists.

[ClaudeSpeed1911]

Heists are allready hard to join and you want it to be harder?

[MikeyDLuffy]

Sounds like a bad, unfair idea to me. Plenty of players lower than 50 can ace heists.

[Niko the awesome]

Level doesn't determine skill, and if it did most high levels think to highly of themselves and suck. Also heavy vest > level of player

Most players don't know about the heavy vest.

[Silencer81]

The player can't join or host a heist until he reaches level 50. What do you guys think?

Yes, I'm all for it. Do the same for Survival and some contact missions. Don't know why a level 7 would want to do a Survival with such limited health, weapons and ammo. Most don't seem to even have played singleplayer.

 

R* should use level unlock for much more stuff.

Edited January 4, 2016 by Silencer81

[XxX19Dude95XxX]

No you can't barley get players as it is

[Niko the awesome]

 

The player can't join or host a heist until he reaches level 50. What do you guys think?

Yes, I'm all for it. Do the same for Survival and some contact missions. Don't know why a level 7 would want to do a Survival with such limited health, weapons and ammo. Most don't seem to even have played singleplayer. Contact mission should be available for all levels.

[Dondara]

No. If you don't want lowbies, kick them yourself. Let's not make rules for things you can take care of yourself.

[AlienTwo]

No

 

 

 

No

 

 

 

/thread

 

 

how about no?

 

 

Absolutely not.

 

 

Sounds like a bad, unfair idea to me.

 

No.

[Picadorito]

No, my secondary character always was the male, and when I started this new character, I went to host Series A right from the start and while some idiot were leaving because they hadn't the confidence on a level 13 I proved those who joined me that there's easy stuff.

 

After nearly three years Is easy to say that most of the players with low level are those who are starting the second char.

[MikeyDLuffy]

 

No

 

 

 

No

 

 

 

/thread

 

 

how about no?

 

 

Absolutely not.

 

 

Sounds like a bad, unfair idea to me.

 

No.

 

Are you disagreeing, if so why?

[dzian]

If Rank meant something in this game then perhaps.

 

But rank is nothing more than an artificial time lock that stops you getting a few items until you've played the game for x number of hours.

[Absolut]

Hell no, I'm starting my second character and i am absolutely clueless what the hell I've done during the start earlier. No contact missions, I'm getting kicked out of everything that i join (lvl 170 or so on 1st character) - except races, but don't own personal cars so am getting beaten at them. And i couldn't buy the better parts anyhow, since everything is level locked.

Don't especially like Deathmatches etc, and by having lower overall energy and no options to buy armor, they would be a slaughter. So overall i really don't think that the first steps should be made any more difficult.

And to Everyone that disagrees; start a 2nd character from the scratch.

[AlienTwo]

 

 

No

 

 

 

No

 

 

 

/thread

 

 

how about no?

 

 

Absolutely not.

 

 

Sounds like a bad, unfair idea to me.

 

No.

 

Are you disagreeing, if so why?

 

I was just adding my voice to the resounding chorus of "No, this thread's proposition is a ridiculous one and isn't even worthy of being a thread in the first place."

Edited January 4, 2016 by AlienTwo

[DrSweatySphincter]

Just last night I helped a level 22 go from 200,000 to 800,000 dollars by doing two pacific standard finales with good cuts. Soooooooooooo no.

[Yukinoshita]

 

 

 

No

 

 

 

No

 

 

 

/thread

 

 

how about no?

 

 

Absolutely not.

 

 

Sounds like a bad, unfair idea to me.

 

No.

 

Are you disagreeing, if so why?

 

I was just adding my voice to the resounding chorus of "No, this thread's proposition is a ridiculous one and isn't even worthy of being a thread in the first place."

 

In few words: this thread is as useful as the tractor

[MikeyDLuffy]

Understood, carry on as you were sir.