FUEL feature

[Khaisz]

If this ever happand ^{_{(which it won't)}}, I would just get a scipttrainer that allows me to have unlimited gas and get banned by R* and call it a 11/10 game and then watch it die within a week.

[JUSTEATTACOS]

I like the idea of such a feature.would be hilarious if u were chasing a bounty and they just ran out of gas.

[Pedinhuh]

If this feature sucks soo much then tell me why there are thousands of downloads of this mods on 5mods.com , and that majority of the community rated it greatly?

 

Hell, if I'm not mistaken, the V section of theses forums used to support this feature.

[Khaisz]

If this feature sucks soo much then tell me why there are thousands of downloads of this mods on 5mods.com , and that majority of the community rated it greatly?

 

Hell, if I'm not mistaken, the V section of theses forums used to support this feature.

I'm just assuming that the people who like this, are the people who also want to roleplay reallife in a videogame.

[shadowoperative]

If this feature sucks soo much then tell me why there are thousands of downloads of this mods on 5mods.com , and that majority of the community rated it greatly?

 

Hell, if I'm not mistaken, the V section of theses forums used to support this feature.

Because that community is worse than this one.

[hugh750]

the mafia games 1 and 2 had a fuel feature that worked well (even though they where single player pc games).

it added to the fun in the game, in the 1st game your gas tank could be shot and you could leak fuel.

i do agree on the fuel idea for gta online.

[-Morbid-]

Honestly, I'd like a more "hardcore" GTA with more realistic driving, fuel use (not super restrictive though), and reasons to own vehicles other than super cars, like actually needing to haul things for missions so an SUV or pick up truck would come in handy, and trucks and the like actually being better at going off road than cars, maybe some sorta loose speed limits (it wasn't bad in Mafia II), and more realistic damage.

 

Of course I'd like that to carry over to other aspects as well, like guns not being super accurate, carry a more realistic amount of ammo and explosives, better stealth and more reasons to avoid the police, less logic-less limitations forced by the game and instead make them a choice where players need to weigh risk vs reward or cost vs reward.

[Pedinhuh]

 

If this feature sucks soo much then tell me why there are thousands of downloads of this mods on 5mods.com , and that majority of the community rated it greatly?

 

Hell, if I'm not mistaken, the V section of theses forums used to support this feature.

I'm just assuming that the people who like this, are the people who also want to roleplay reallife in a videogame.

No, what you and everybody else here is doing is bash on OP with your "hilarious" ironies.

 

Seroiusly, I remember seeing this feature being requested all the way back in GTA: San Andreas, by these forums aswell.

[DarkSavageDeathlyCloud]

The only thing wrong is supers and sport cars being able to offroad better then real offroaders and anything else.

 

The fuel idea is plain bad

[Pedinhuh]

The only thing wrong is supers and sport cars being able to offroad better then real offroaders and anything else.

 

The fuel idea is plain bad

This is down to the game's driving physics.

The fuel idea is good if it's implemented right, like it was in Mafia 2. You guys seriously need to open your damn minds..

[shadowoperative]

 

The only thing wrong is supers and sport cars being able to offroad better then real offroaders and anything else.

 

The fuel idea is plain bad

This is down to the game's driving physics.

The fuel idea is good if it's implemented right, like it was in Mafia 2. You guys seriously need to open your damn minds..

Or go play Mafia 2.

[JAKEBAB]

 

So now you're trying to insult anyone who has a different opinion then you has as well?

 

Gameplay > Realism

 

Filling up my tank IRL is not really the highlight of the day, and I drive a friggen Mini which has a tiny tiny tank, certainly not wanting the added tedium in my gameplay.

 

You drive a mini?! Is it an original mini or the bmw one?

[Yukinoshita]

So you want to create a new Day-z? GTA-Z.

 

 

No

[DarkSavageDeathlyCloud]

 

The only thing wrong is supers and sport cars being able to offroad better then real offroaders and anything else.

The fuel idea is plain bad

This is down to the game's driving physics.

The fuel idea is good if it's implemented right, like it was in Mafia 2. You guys seriously need to open your damn minds..

This is gta5....not mafia....whatever that game might be

I cant imagen how stupid it woud be to fill up my cars when im in the mountains and sh*t.

[richard1997jones]

I like the concept but it would get annoying and expensive quickly. I think its something rockstar should consider for GTA 6.

[Pedinhuh]

 

 

The only thing wrong is supers and sport cars being able to offroad better then real offroaders and anything else.

 

The fuel idea is plain bad

This is down to the game's driving physics.

The fuel idea is good if it's implemented right, like it was in Mafia 2. You guys seriously need to open your damn minds..

Or go play Mafia 2.

Nice counter argument you got there, pal. Almost made laugh.

 

 

Did anybody ever told you your one-liners are not funny?

[shadowoperative]

 

 

 

The only thing wrong is supers and sport cars being able to offroad better then real offroaders and anything else.

 

The fuel idea is plain bad

This is down to the game's driving physics.

The fuel idea is good if it's implemented right, like it was in Mafia 2. You guys seriously need to open your damn minds..

Or go play Mafia 2.Nice counter argument you got there, pal. Almost made laugh.

 

 

Did anybody ever told you your one-liners are not funny?

Only a small percentage that I don't care about.

[Khaisz]

 

 

If this feature sucks soo much then tell me why there are thousands of downloads of this mods on 5mods.com , and that majority of the community rated it greatly?

 

Hell, if I'm not mistaken, the V section of theses forums used to support this feature.

I'm just assuming that the people who like this, are the people who also want to roleplay reallife in a videogame.

No, what you and everybody else here is doing is bash on OP with your "hilarious" ironies.

 

Seroiusly, I remember seeing this feature being requested all the way back in GTA: San Andreas, by these forums aswell.

 

Well maybe they did request this back in the days, but that was back in the days, Now is the present and people have realized how stupid fuel would be in an open world game like GTAO.

 

Had this been an option for GTAV SP, I wouldn't have given a sh*t about this.

 

If I want to go driving offroad on my mountain bike, I don't want to have to go back in town once in awhile to refuel it or if it runs out in the middle of the mountain, walk 400-500 meters just so I can call the mechanic for the bike again but with fuel.

In my opinion this would just be tedious and boring, having to stop once in awhile just to refuel the car.

 

Imagine doing Pac Standard with this feature and then suddently having the bikes die on you about halfway up mount chilliad because there wasn't enough fuel in them, and now you have to walk rest of the path whille being shot on by cops and your 1mil you stole ends up being the minimum instead for each person.

Or maybe you are being the VIP in this new freeroam thingy, and you are being chased by people out in the desert just for you car to run out and they getting a cheap kill on you because "You wasn't driving economic".

 

I'm gonna be a bit dark here, but if I wanted GTAO to be more like reallife, I would just get a gun in reallife and pretend reallife is GTAO.

Just need to add respawn to reallife and it all would be perfect, right?

 

Although, I guess this all could depend on how much fuel you have in each car and what the rate it drains at is.

If I could drive around the map in a T20 10 times without having to fuel the car, then maybe ....

[GhostlySentinel]

I actually wouldn't mind this so much, but holy wall of text, OP!

 

Still, I figure that gas money is rolled into you mechanic's bill.

[Pedinhuh]

 

 

 

If this feature sucks soo much then tell me why there are thousands of downloads of this mods on 5mods.com , and that majority of the community rated it greatly?

 

Hell, if I'm not mistaken, the V section of theses forums used to support this feature.

I'm just assuming that the people who like this, are the people who also want to roleplay reallife in a videogame.

No, what you and everybody else here is doing is bash on OP with your "hilarious" ironies.

 

Seroiusly, I remember seeing this feature being requested all the way back in GTA: San Andreas, by these forums aswell.

 

Well maybe they did request this back in the days, but that was back in the days, Now is the present and people have realized how stupid fuel would be in an open world game like GTAO.

 

Care to explain why?

 

Had this been an option for GTAV SP, I wouldn't have given a sh*t about this.

 

If I want to go driving offroad on my mountain bike, I don't want to have to go back in town once in awhile to refuel it or if it runs out in the middle of the mountain, walk 400-500 meters just so I can call the mechanic for the bike again but with fuel.

 

Jerry can

 

In my opinion this would just be tedious and boring, having to stop once in awhile just to refuel the car.

 

it could be done in a way so you don't waste more than a couple of seconds at every refill

 

Imagine doing Pac Standard with this feature and then suddently having the bikes die on you about halfway up mount chilliad because there wasn't enough fuel in them, and now you have to walk rest of the path whille being shot on by cops and your 1mil you stole ends up being the minimum instead for each person.

 

Do you really think they would give us bikes without fuel??? Plus it's not like you can't jack any other car around

 

Or maybe you are being the VIP in this new freeroam thingy, and you are being chased by people out in the desert just for you car to run out and they getting a cheap kill on you because "You wasn't driving economic".

 

Refer to my replies above

 

I'm gonna be a bit dark here, but if I wanted GTAO to be more like reallife, I would just get a gun in reallife and pretend reallife is GTAO.

 

Well...we're talking about ONE feature, not the whole game, but if you're going to shoot people on your vicinity, then don't go blaming videogames, that's on you(also this joke was not of good taste)

 

Just need to add respawn to reallife and it all would be perfect, right?

 

Dude, really?

 

Although, I guess this all could depend on how much fuel you have in each car and what the rate it drains at is.

If I could drive around the map in a T20 10 times without having to fuel the car, then maybe ....

 

I wouldn't say 10 times because it would take over 100 minutes to empty the tank, making the feature meaningless, but maybe two laps(20 minutes, of full acceleration mind you)

Edited December 23, 2015 by pedinhuh

[FuqOutTheWay]

I remember people saying the same sh*t way back when vice city was the most recent gta. I have never understood it do you realise how much of a pain in the ass this would become after like 5 minutes.

[CountySheriff]

Keep track of your driving. Say every 50 miles, drive to your nearby gas station. Do this every 50 miles without fail and if you go even 0.01 over 50 miles, stop your car, and get a new one. Do this repeatedly OP for the rest of your GTA career.

 

How fun does that sound?

[Quinn_flower]

No!

[Pedinhuh]

Seriously, you guys are saying that this feature would be too annoying like every vehicle's tank would last for like 5 minutes, LOL.

Look at how it's done in Mafia 2, it's there but it's not a nuisance at all, unless you WANT to run out of fuel.

 

Jesus, I'm done here.

[Foxy Stevenson]

Op.

 

Step 1:Get a Pc with gta 5

Step 2:Get a mod for fuel in cars

Step 3:Be happy

Step 4:No more of these threads.

 

Ok? Thank you.

Edited December 23, 2015 by Foxy Stevenson

[enjoyingorc6742]

the only i want related to fuel is a Gas cap the behaves like old GTA vehicles did. one shot from the weakest pistol in the game and boom goes the gangbanger in a fully modded car

[K1FFLOM]

Why shouldn't R* implement a fuel-feature with the cars ?

 

We need to go to Ammunation for more ammo, lol !? Why shouldn't we go to LTD for a fill-up ??

 

 

Oh, and for the full-electric cars I would expect Tesla-like grid chargers around the map too. After paying so much for the game I really don't want to wait overnight for charging my Coil Roadster !

[Khaisz]

 

 

 

 

 

 

If this feature sucks soo much then tell me why there are thousands of downloads of this mods on 5mods.com , and that majority of the community rated it greatly?

Hell, if I'm not mistaken, the V section of theses forums used to support this feature.

I'm just assuming that the people who like this, are the people who also want to roleplay reallife in a videogame.

No, what you and everybody else here is doing is bash on OP with your "hilarious" ironies.

Seroiusly, I remember seeing this feature being requested all the way back in GTA: San Andreas, by these forums aswell.

Well maybe they did request this back in the days, but that was back in the days, Now is the present and people have realized how stupid fuel would be in an open world game like GTAO.

Care to explain why?

Had this been an option for GTAV SP, I wouldn't have given a sh*t about this.

If I want to go driving offroad on my mountain bike, I don't want to have to go back in town once in awhile to refuel it or if it runs out in the middle of the mountain, walk 400-500 meters just so I can call the mechanic for the bike again but with fuel.

Jerry can

In my opinion this would just be tedious and boring, having to stop once in awhile just to refuel the car.

it could be done in a way so you don't waste more than a couple of seconds at every refill

Imagine doing Pac Standard with this feature and then suddently having the bikes die on you about halfway up mount chilliad because there wasn't enough fuel in them, and now you have to walk rest of the path whille being shot on by cops and your 1mil you stole ends up being the minimum instead for each person.

Do you really think they would give us bikes without fuel??? Plus it's not like you can't jack any other car around

Or maybe you are being the VIP in this new freeroam thingy, and you are being chased by people out in the desert just for you car to run out and they getting a cheap kill on you because "You wasn't driving economic".

Refer to my replies above

I'm gonna be a bit dark here, but if I wanted GTAO to be more like reallife, I would just get a gun in reallife and pretend reallife is GTAO.

Well...we're talking about ONE feature, not the whole game, but if you're going to shoot people on your vicinity, then don't go blaming videogames, that's on you(also this joke was not of good taste)

Just need to add respawn to reallife and it all would be perfect, right?

Dude, really?

Although, I guess this all could depend on how much fuel you have in each car and what the rate it drains at is.
If I could drive around the map in a T20 10 times without having to fuel the car, then maybe ....

I wouldn't say 10 times because it would take over 100 minutes to empty the tank, making the feature meaningless, but maybe two laps(20 minutes, of full acceleration mind you)

 

 

 

How about this then?

Races.

Especially endurance races on tracks that don't pass by any gas station.

So fun right?

Being in the lead, or having a battle for the lead and suddently you run out of gas losing your lead, because you wasn't driving economic enough.

But I guess you could make a prop work like a gas station, but still what if you are battling for the lead and then you suddently have to stop and refuel the car.

But this won't have any point, because you are probably thinking about relpying with "They have to refuel in F1"

...

...

But I guess what I'm trying to say is that I want GTAO to be as far as possible away from Real Life mechanics as possible.

Because I don't want to play RL after coming home from RL.

It's like you would go to the movies to watch some pay thier bills, cook food, workout, etc and work at a work for 8 hours with absoulutly no action, comedy, romance or anything.

Just an 24 hour movie of someone doing what you already do in real life.

 

_{^{and with this, I have to go to work sadly.}}

[Lord_Valerius]

Lol I get that you want a more realistic game but all this would provide is a nuisance. No one wants to be interrupted while in the midst of a police chase by their goddam fuel tank being emptied. All of a sudden it would turn into Mad Max because no one would actually aim for the player, just for the fuel tank.

However, I would have a major advantage if the game introduced fuel because the Voltic is my favorite car. Yes, I have the T20, but the Voltic is just so good. And since its electric, your horribly twisted version of GTA would bow down to the Voltic as the new best car in the game. Do you really want to all be driving the same car?

[Khaisz]

Lol I get that you want a more realistic game but all this would provide is a nuisance. No one wants to be interrupted while in the midst of a police chase by their goddam fuel tank being emptied. All of a sudden it would turn into Mad Max because no one would actually aim for the player, just for the fuel tank.

However, I would have a major advantage if the game introduced fuel because the Voltic is my favorite car. Yes, I have the T20, but the Voltic is just so good. And since its electric, your horribly twisted version of GTA would bow down to the Voltic as the new best car in the game. Do you really want to all be driving the same car?

Dosn't Electic cars have a shorter drive range then a car that uses fuel?