Should R* rebalance all the cars?

[teninchtoenail]

I think it might be a good idea to do a patch that rebalances all the cars. THere are clear outliers which are best in class, it doesn't really need to be that way. They could rebalance the cars so that there are more options so you dont see the same cars winning most races.

[Dr Labuschagne]

Nope...

[KingKV]

I do think there are few cars that need rebalancing but I don't think R* should rebalance all of them. Just because you see certain cars win a lot is because the people winning prefer that car based on its looks or how comfortable they feel driving it. But it doesn't mean you can't win a race unless you use certain cars, it just means you may need more practice racing so you can win with any car.

[Presidential]

Definitely not. I'd hate to have to relearn every car I own.

[Mach1bud]

Rebalance the cars performance? Hell no.

 

Maybe move the classes around some? Yes.

[Urustay Gordov Matt D.]

I think it might be a good idea to do a patch that rebalances all the cars. THere are clear outliers which are best in class, it doesn't really need to be that way. They could rebalance the cars so that there are more options so you dont see the same cars winning most races.

Yes, and the zentorno should be the first one in the list to be rebalanced

[8up local]

I think it might be a good idea to do a patch that rebalances all the cars. THere are clear outliers which are best in class, it doesn't really need to be that way. They could rebalance the cars so that there are more options so you dont see the same cars winning most races.

if this was to happen the majority of player be like....

 

[Hunter]

I'd rather see the Annihilator, Savage, and Valkyrie all rebalanced to be much stronger than they are now.

 

On topic, it's a bit late to change every car in the game isn't it? I do think it would be better though if, when Rockstar released a new car, it didn't just flat out beat every existing car in every possible way. Instead there should be more trade offs - one has better top speed; the other has better handling, etc.

 

As it is, it's just "this latest car replaces that, and the next along is better than that". This just leads to constantly outpricing some players from being competitive, which is a little unfair in my opinion.

[RustyShackleford]

They should try to add new cars in the classes that need them the most (sedans AND sports classics). Supers (the most popular of all classes) is fine with T20, Osiris, and Zentorno in the top 3. The top 3 supers have CLOSE lap time splits.

[DarkSavageDeathlyCloud]

stirling gt needs to lose the spoiler, the new schafters needs to be reclassed....thats it

 

edit: further stirling gt and the moroe coud use a spoiler maybe

Edited December 20, 2015 by goldadderXD

[VanessaMagick]

It would probably be an effective way to get people to sell their cars and get new ones. $$$$.

It would probably be an effective way to get people to sell their cars and get new ones. $$$$.

[Aether]

I think rockstar would serve well to give us more of a vareity of exhaust notes for our cars.

 

 

Like if you switch up the exhaust on your car from stock to side pipes/bigbore/etc or make engine upgrades one would think you should be able to hear them too.

[TCA]

No. Just no.

[We Are Ninja]

I think it might be a good idea to do a patch that rebalances all the cars. THere are clear outliers which are best in class, it doesn't really need to be that way. They could rebalance the cars so that there are more options so you dont see the same cars winning most races.

Agreed. Why should any cars be better than the others? All cars should be able to win races equally and 1st place should be rewarded because your car participated. I think we should have the same thing in real life because it doesn't make sense that some stupid Bugatti is faster than my Mazda. It doesn't really need to be that way.

[Misanthrope Z]

maybe make new classes for the lesser competitive cars.

 

rebalancing them would be retarded. an old Toyota Corolla doesn't stand a chance against a Nissan GTR.

 

end of story.

[8up local]

seriously though the vehicles do not need to be rebalanced, just reclassed.

[Miss Malevolent]

seriously though the vehicles do not need to be rebalanced, just reclassed.

I'm still trying to figure out why a Bison is considered a van?

[Wandering Bastard]

I'm pretty sure Rockstar doesn't give a crap about vehicle balance...

[We Are Ninja]

^ This.

 

This is Rockstar. Not Polyphony Digital. Not Turn 10. Not Codemasters. This is Grand Theft Auto. Not Project Cars. Not Drive Club.

Edited December 20, 2015 by We Are Ninja

[VanessaMagick]

^ This.

 

This is Rockstar. Not Polyphony Digital. Not Turn 10. Not Codemasters. This is Grand Theft Auto. Not Project Cars. Not Drive Club.

 

YEAH

 

IT'S GRAND THEFT AUTO, NOT GRAND THEFT RACING. YOU CAN'T RACE CARS IN GRAND THEFT AUTO, YOU CAN ONLY STEAL THEM

 

Seriously how many times are people going to use the title of the series to arbitrarily decide what people should and shouldn't do in them

[enjoyingorc6742]

i think rockstar should go through and fix what vehicles need to be fixed *points to v12 shafter and faction

[shadowoperative]

No. Just play the game and don't worry about things you can't control.

[Rammer2k]

I wouldn't say they should re balance any of the cars as far as performance goes, but a overhaul of which cars belong in which class would be nice. I stated a long while back that they should make a pickup truck class do vehicles like the Bison aren't labeled as Vans. And Vans such as the Moombeam aren't labeled as Muscle.

[The Lone Wanderer]

they should randomly swap all the handling files

 

adder for faggio etc

[Urustay Gordov Matt D.]

 

^ This.

 

This is Rockstar. Not Polyphony Digital. Not Turn 10. Not Codemasters. This is Grand Theft Auto. Not Project Cars. Not Drive Club.

YEAH

 

IT'S GRAND THEFT AUTO, NOT GRAND THEFT RACING. YOU CAN'T RACE CARS IN GRAND THEFT AUTO, YOU CAN ONLY STEAL THEM

 

Seriously how many times are people going to use the title of the series to arbitrarily decide what people should and shouldn't do in them

Soo ironic, then why GTA 4 had a perfect car physics and balance between each of them?

Its like Rockstar has been nerfed from then by new developers who know jack sh*t about cars and driving physics in gerenal

Edited December 20, 2015 by Urustay Gordov

[dewtech]

Do away with the classes and allow open racing if you ask me, use the stat bars (ok they'd have to make those work properly) and decide from there. We'd see a big variation in cars then.

 

And also change the handling so supers don't work offroad...

[Zee_Lolz]

 

 

^ This.

 

This is Rockstar. Not Polyphony Digital. Not Turn 10. Not Codemasters. This is Grand Theft Auto. Not Project Cars. Not Drive Club.

YEAH

 

IT'S GRAND THEFT AUTO, NOT GRAND THEFT RACING. YOU CAN'T RACE CARS IN GRAND THEFT AUTO, YOU CAN ONLY STEAL THEM

 

Seriously how many times are people going to use the title of the series to arbitrarily decide what people should and shouldn't do in them

Soo ironic, then why GTA 4 had a perfect car physics and balance between each of them?

Its like Rockstar has been nerfed from then by new developers who know jack sh*t about cars and driving physics in gerenal

 

Gta IV's handling was fun, but no where near perfect. I've download handling mods for IV in order to fix the cars from being so boaty. However, I do prefer IV's physics over V's.

[Arrows to Athens]

Why have the 'classes need rebalancing'' threads risen up in numbers since the release of the recent DLC?

[Foxy Stevenson]

agree with op I want my faggio to outrun a zentorno.

 

 

 

 

Seriously, nope. It's fine as it is.

[Mach1bud]

Why have the 'classes need rebalancing'' threads risen up in numbers since the release of the recent DLC?

Idk to be honest. Maybe because of the Armored Schafter being the new king of Sedans?