Jump to content
  1. Welcome!

    1. Welcome to GTAForums!

  2. News

    1. GTANet.com

  3. Multiplayer

    1. GTA Online

      1. Los Santos Drug Wars
      2. Updates
      3. Find Lobbies & Players
      4. Guides & Strategies
      5. Vehicles
      6. Content Creator
      7. Help & Support

    2. Red Dead Online

      1. Blood Money
      2. Frontier Pursuits
      3. Find Lobbies & Outlaws
      4. Help & Support

    3. Crews

  4. Grand Theft Auto

    1. Grand Theft Auto Series

      1. Bugs*
      2. St. Andrews Cathedral

    2. GTA VI

    3. GTA V

      1. Guides & Strategies
      2. Help & Support

    4. GTA IV

      1. The Lost and Damned
      2. The Ballad of Gay Tony
      3. Guides & Strategies
      4. Help & Support

    5. GTA San Andreas

      1. Classic GTA SA
      2. Guides & Strategies
      3. Help & Support

    6. GTA Vice City

      1. Classic GTA VC
      2. Guides & Strategies
      3. Help & Support

    7. GTA III

      1. Classic GTA III
      2. Guides & Strategies
      3. Help & Support

    8. Portable Games

      1. GTA Chinatown Wars
      2. GTA Vice City Stories
      3. GTA Liberty City Stories

    9. Top-Down Games

      1. GTA Advance
      2. GTA 2
      3. GTA
  5. Red Dead

    1. Red Dead Redemption 2

      1. PC
      2. Help & Support

    2. Red Dead Redemption

  6. Modding

    1. GTA Mods

      1. GTA V
      2. GTA IV
      3. GTA III, VC & SA
      4. Tutorials

    2. Red Dead Mods

      1. Documentation

    3. Mod Showroom

      1. Scripts & Plugins
      2. Maps
      3. Total Conversions
      4. Vehicles
      5. Textures
      6. Characters
      7. Tools
      8. Other
      9. Workshop

    4. Featured Mods

      1. Design Your Own Mission
      2. OpenIV
      3. GTA: Underground
      4. GTA: Liberty City
      5. GTA: State of Liberty
  7. Rockstar

    1. Rockstar Games

    2. Rockstar Collectors

  8. Community

    1. Off-Topic

      1. General Chat
      2. Gaming
      3. Technology
      4. Movies & TV
      5. Music
      6. Sports
      7. Vehicles

    2. Expression

      1. Graphics / Visual Arts
      2. GFX Requests & Tutorials
      3. Writers' Discussion
      4. Debates & Discussion
  9. GTANet

    1. Announcements

    2. Support

    3. Suggestions

GTAForums does NOT endorse or allow any kind of GTA Online modding, mod menus, tools or account selling/hacking. Do NOT post them here or advertise them, as per the forum rules.

R* fun police patched MP2SP glitch

hyperar

By hyperar
in GTA Online

 Share

Recommended Posts

Arrows to Athens

Arrows to Athens

Posted
Posted (edited)

 

 

 

no one knows, but the point is for all we know this supposed "harmless" glitch could have potentially caused issues which left Rockstar with no choice but to patch it before it were to get to the point of possibly causing problems...

 

 

 

 

 

Rockstar would then have to specify what kind of issues it would cause or would cause, otherwise it's asinine to just patch it without a good reason.

Edited by Fearx--
  • ten-a-penny
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
dewtech

dewtech

Posted
Posted

 

 

 

 

no one knows, but the point is for all we know this supposed "harmless" glitch could have potentially caused issues which left Rockstar with no choice but to patch it before it were to get to the point of possibly causing problems...

 

 

 

 

 

Rockstar would be obliged to specify what kind of issues it would cause, otherwise it's asinine to just patch it without a godd reason.

 

 

Why would they? It's their game, they can patch it if they feel the need too, no requirement to explain it to anybody.

  • shadowoperative
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Arrows to Athens

Arrows to Athens

Posted
Posted (edited)

 

 

 

 

 

no one knows, but the point is for all we know this supposed "harmless" glitch could have potentially caused issues which left Rockstar with no choice but to patch it before it were to get to the point of possibly causing problems...

 

 

 

 

 

Rockstar would be obliged to specify what kind of issues it would cause, otherwise it's asinine to just patch it without a godd reason.

 

 

Why would they? It's their game, they can patch it if they feel the need too, no requirement to explain it to anybody.

 

That's like saying Rockstar can get rid of crew colour pearlescents and they wouldn't have to explain to anybody as to why they would. They should just leave it as that simply because it's their game. So, Rockstar can just nerf the hell out of mission payouts and not have to provide any reason as to why they did?

Edited by Fearx--
Link to comment
Share on other sites
shadowoperative

shadowoperative

Posted
Posted

MP2SP with Trevor trailer still works.

 

DLC should've been in SP in the first place.

 

Cash cards.

 

 

 

Just play in MP. I don't see the issue.

 

Money is the issue

You already own the car.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Pizentu

Pizentu

Posted
Posted (edited)

How does one do this glitch?

Drive a MP car into Trevors garage.

Switch to Trevor. Go to Trevors garage and 9 times out of 10 you will see your car there.

 

 

How does one do this glitch?

 

it's patched, so it does not work anymore.

 

Its not patched.

 

MP2SP with Trevor trailer still works.

 

DLC should've been in SP in the first place.

 

Cash cards.

 

 

Just play in MP. I don't see the issue.

 

Money is the issue

You already own the car.

 

In single player you can customize the car as much as you want and try multiple paint schemes and rims without wasting all your money. Also there is a way to get cars you dont own in MP. So again, his statement of Money being an issue still rings true.

Edited by Pizentu
Link to comment
Share on other sites
dewtech

dewtech

Posted
Posted

 

 

 

 

 

 

no one knows, but the point is for all we know this supposed "harmless" glitch could have potentially caused issues which left Rockstar with no choice but to patch it before it were to get to the point of possibly causing problems...

 

 

 

 

 

Rockstar would be obliged to specify what kind of issues it would cause, otherwise it's asinine to just patch it without a godd reason.

 

 

Why would they? It's their game, they can patch it if they feel the need too, no requirement to explain it to anybody.

 

That's like saying Rockstar can get rid of crew colour pearlescents and they wouldn't have to explain to anybody as to why they would. They should just leave it as that simply because it's their game. So, Rockstar can just nerf the hell out of mission payouts and not have to provide any reason as to why they did?

 

 

If they wanted to, yes they could. As I said, it's their game, they get the control. If you can't live with that, then maybe playing the game isn't the right thing to do.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Arrows to Athens

Arrows to Athens

Posted
Posted

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

no one knows, but the point is for all we know this supposed "harmless" glitch could have potentially caused issues which left Rockstar with no choice but to patch it before it were to get to the point of possibly causing problems...

 

 

 

 

 

Rockstar would be obliged to specify what kind of issues it would cause, otherwise it's asinine to just patch it without a godd reason.

 

 

Why would they? It's their game, they can patch it if they feel the need too, no requirement to explain it to anybody.

 

That's like saying Rockstar can get rid of crew colour pearlescents and they wouldn't have to explain to anybody as to why they would. They should just leave it as that simply because it's their game. So, Rockstar can just nerf the hell out of mission payouts and not have to provide any reason as to why they did?

 

 

If they wanted to, yes they could. As I said, it's their game, they get the control. If you can't live with that, then maybe playing the game isn't the right thing to do.

 

Then don't complain if they wiped out your entire garage tomorrow.

  • ten-a-penny
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
dewtech

dewtech

Posted
Posted

Haha, is that some kind of retarded threat? Or are you just that far up your own ass you think you've some kind of authority?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Pizentu

Pizentu

Posted
Posted

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

no one knows, but the point is for all we know this supposed "harmless" glitch could have potentially caused issues which left Rockstar with no choice but to patch it before it were to get to the point of possibly causing problems...

 

 

 

 

 

Rockstar would be obliged to specify what kind of issues it would cause, otherwise it's asinine to just patch it without a godd reason.

 

 

Why would they? It's their game, they can patch it if they feel the need too, no requirement to explain it to anybody.

 

That's like saying Rockstar can get rid of crew colour pearlescents and they wouldn't have to explain to anybody as to why they would. They should just leave it as that simply because it's their game. So, Rockstar can just nerf the hell out of mission payouts and not have to provide any reason as to why they did?

 

 

If they wanted to, yes they could. As I said, it's their game, they get the control. If you can't live with that, then maybe playing the game isn't the right thing to do.

 

Then don't complain if they wiped out your entire garage tomorrow.

 

Your single Player garage? Why would they wipe that? Do you even know what youre talking about?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Arrows to Athens

Arrows to Athens

Posted
Posted (edited)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

no one knows, but the point is for all we know this supposed "harmless" glitch could have potentially caused issues which left Rockstar with no choice but to patch it before it were to get to the point of possibly causing problems...

 

 

 

 

 

Rockstar would be obliged to specify what kind of issues it would cause, otherwise it's asinine to just patch it without a godd reason.

 

 

Why would they? It's their game, they can patch it if they feel the need too, no requirement to explain it to anybody.

 

That's like saying Rockstar can get rid of crew colour pearlescents and they wouldn't have to explain to anybody as to why they would. They should just leave it as that simply because it's their game. So, Rockstar can just nerf the hell out of mission payouts and not have to provide any reason as to why they did?

 

 

If they wanted to, yes they could. As I said, it's their game, they get the control. If you can't live with that, then maybe playing the game isn't the right thing to do.

 

Then don't complain if they wiped out your entire garage tomorrow.

 

Your single Player garage? Why would they wipe that? Do you even know what youre talking about?

 

Please do point out 'Single Player' in that post. I'll give you a cookie if you do.

Edited by Fearx--
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Pizentu

Pizentu

Posted
Posted (edited)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

no one knows, but the point is for all we know this supposed "harmless" glitch could have potentially caused issues which left Rockstar with no choice but to patch it before it were to get to the point of possibly causing problems...

 

 

 

 

 

Rockstar would be obliged to specify what kind of issues it would cause, otherwise it's asinine to just patch it without a godd reason.

 

 

Why would they? It's their game, they can patch it if they feel the need too, no requirement to explain it to anybody.

 

That's like saying Rockstar can get rid of crew colour pearlescents and they wouldn't have to explain to anybody as to why they would. They should just leave it as that simply because it's their game. So, Rockstar can just nerf the hell out of mission payouts and not have to provide any reason as to why they did?

 

 

If they wanted to, yes they could. As I said, it's their game, they get the control. If you can't live with that, then maybe playing the game isn't the right thing to do.

 

Then don't complain if they wiped out your entire garage tomorrow.

 

Your single Player garage? Why would they wipe that? Do you even know what youre talking about?

 

Please do point out 'Single Player' in that post. I'll give you a cookie if you do.

 

This thread is about

"C* fun police patched MP2SP glitch"

The only thing you could be talking about other than that is Perlesants. WTF would R* wipe your garage over that?

Edited by Pizentu
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Arrows to Athens

Arrows to Athens

Posted
Posted (edited)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

no one knows, but the point is for all we know this supposed "harmless" glitch could have potentially caused issues which left Rockstar with no choice but to patch it before it were to get to the point of possibly causing problems...

 

 

 

 

 

Rockstar would be obliged to specify what kind of issues it would cause, otherwise it's asinine to just patch it without a godd reason.

 

 

Why would they? It's their game, they can patch it if they feel the need too, no requirement to explain it to anybody.

 

That's like saying Rockstar can get rid of crew colour pearlescents and they wouldn't have to explain to anybody as to why they would. They should just leave it as that simply because it's their game. So, Rockstar can just nerf the hell out of mission payouts and not have to provide any reason as to why they did?

 

 

If they wanted to, yes they could. As I said, it's their game, they get the control. If you can't live with that, then maybe playing the game isn't the right thing to do.

 

Then don't complain if they wiped out your entire garage tomorrow.

 

Your single Player garage? Why would they wipe that? Do you even know what youre talking about?

 

Please do point out 'Single Player' in that post. I'll give you a cookie if you do.

 

This thread is about

"C* fun police patched MP2SP glitch"

The only thing you could be talking about other than that is Perlesants. WTF would R* wipe your garage over that?

 

Thay guy was saying that Rockstar can do anything within the game, Online or SP, and not have to provide any reason for it since it's their game. So, I said that if Rockstar wiped out his entire online garage, then he shouldn't complain because it's their game so they can do anything they want according to him.

Edited by Fearx--
Link to comment
Share on other sites
dewtech

dewtech

Posted
Posted

It's a huge difference between doing that and removing something that wasn't supposed to happen in the first place though. Your right, but I for a fact know that won't happen. They could turn round and turn it all off tomorrow, but once again, that is rather unlikely.

 

It is Rockstar's playpen that your allowed access, they make the rules and have the right to enforce them, however they see fit.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Arrows to Athens

Arrows to Athens

Posted
Posted (edited)

It's a huge difference between doing that and removing something that wasn't supposed to happen in the first place though. Your right, but I for a fact know that won't happen. They could turn round and turn it all off tomorrow, but once again, that is rather unlikely.

 

It is Rockstar's playpen that your allowed access, they make the rules and have the right to enforce them, however they see fit.

No, they cannot remove something and not provide a good reason for it. That's asinine. They removed the crew colour pearlescents and chrome + crew colour, but they didn't provide any good reason as to why they removed it from the game. It caused no harm to the game itself, and it actually gave players more options with the colours. Heck, players even spent a lot of money on them too, and isn't that what Rockstar wants? They were fun, but they removed it anyway. Any sane person would think that's absurd.

Edited by Fearx--
Link to comment
Share on other sites
dewtech

dewtech

Posted
Posted

 

It's a huge difference between doing that and removing something that wasn't supposed to happen in the first place though. Your right, but I for a fact know that won't happen. They could turn round and turn it all off tomorrow, but once again, that is rather unlikely.

 

It is Rockstar's playpen that your allowed access, they make the rules and have the right to enforce them, however they see fit.

No, they cannot remove something and not provide a good reason for it. That's asinine. They removed the crew colour pearlescents and chrome + crew colour, but they didn't provide any good reason as to why they removed it from the game. It caused no harm to the game itself, and it actually gave players more options with the colours. Heck, players even spent a lot of money on them too, and isn't that what Rockstar wants? They were fun, but they removed it anyway. Any sane person would think that's absurd.

 

 

I'm not saying it is right, your reading between the lines, I'm saying they can do it though. Try actually reading instead of just acting like a professional c*nt...

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Arrows to Athens

Arrows to Athens

Posted
Posted (edited)

 

 

It's a huge difference between doing that and removing something that wasn't supposed to happen in the first place though. Your right, but I for a fact know that won't happen. They could turn round and turn it all off tomorrow, but once again, that is rather unlikely.

 

It is Rockstar's playpen that your allowed access, they make the rules and have the right to enforce them, however they see fit.

No, they cannot remove something and not provide a good reason for it. That's asinine. They removed the crew colour pearlescents and chrome + crew colour, but they didn't provide any good reason as to why they removed it from the game. It caused no harm to the game itself, and it actually gave players more options with the colours. Heck, players even spent a lot of money on them too, and isn't that what Rockstar wants? They were fun, but they removed it anyway. Any sane person would think that's absurd.

 

 

I'm not saying it is right, your reading between the lines, I'm saying they can do it though. Try actually reading instead of just acting like a professional c*nt...

 

So now you're going to resort to profanity, I see. Is that how you reason with people? Do you not possess the sufficient bandwidth to be able to string together a coherent and mature conversation? Or have your pathological insecurities got the best of you?

Edited by Fearx--
  • ten-a-penny
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
GIRR

GIRR

Posted
Posted

My question is how do you know these glitches aren't efftecting anyone? For all you know the minute you glitch 40 people get dropped from online

Link to comment
Share on other sites
dewtech

dewtech

Posted
Posted

 

 

 

It's a huge difference between doing that and removing something that wasn't supposed to happen in the first place though. Your right, but I for a fact know that won't happen. They could turn round and turn it all off tomorrow, but once again, that is rather unlikely.

 

It is Rockstar's playpen that your allowed access, they make the rules and have the right to enforce them, however they see fit.

No, they cannot remove something and not provide a good reason for it. That's asinine. They removed the crew colour pearlescents and chrome + crew colour, but they didn't provide any good reason as to why they removed it from the game. It caused no harm to the game itself, and it actually gave players more options with the colours. Heck, players even spent a lot of money on them too, and isn't that what Rockstar wants? They were fun, but they removed it anyway. Any sane person would think that's absurd.

 

 

I'm not saying it is right, your reading between the lines, I'm saying they can do it though. Try actually reading instead of just acting like a professional c*nt...

 

So now you're going to resort to profanity, I see. Is that how you reason with people? Do you not possess the sufficient bandwidth to be able to string together a coherent and mature conversation? Or have your pathological insecurities got the best of you?

 

 

I tried reasoning, but you just tried to read what wasn't there, or ignore the point and go off on a tangent. Like most of GTAF, to be fair...

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Arrows to Athens

Arrows to Athens

Posted
Posted (edited)

 

 

 

 

It's a huge difference between doing that and removing something that wasn't supposed to happen in the first place though. Your right, but I for a fact know that won't happen. They could turn round and turn it all off tomorrow, but once again, that is rather unlikely.

 

It is Rockstar's playpen that your allowed access, they make the rules and have the right to enforce them, however they see fit.

No, they cannot remove something and not provide a good reason for it. That's asinine. They removed the crew colour pearlescents and chrome + crew colour, but they didn't provide any good reason as to why they removed it from the game. It caused no harm to the game itself, and it actually gave players more options with the colours. Heck, players even spent a lot of money on them too, and isn't that what Rockstar wants? They were fun, but they removed it anyway. Any sane person would think that's absurd.

 

 

I'm not saying it is right, your reading between the lines, I'm saying they can do it though. Try actually reading instead of just acting like a professional c*nt...

 

So now you're going to resort to profanity, I see. Is that how you reason with people? Do you not possess the sufficient bandwidth to be able to string together a coherent and mature conversation? Or have your pathological insecurities got the best of you?

 

 

I tried reasoning, but you just tried to read what wasn't there, or ignore the point and go off on a tangent. Like most of GTAF, to be fair...

 

You said they can, and I said that's absurd and illogical.

Edited by Fearx--
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Furry_Monkey

Furry_Monkey

Posted
Posted (edited)

 

 

 

 

 

It's a huge difference between doing that and removing something that wasn't supposed to happen in the first place though. Your right, but I for a fact know that won't happen. They could turn round and turn it all off tomorrow, but once again, that is rather unlikely.

 

It is Rockstar's playpen that your allowed access, they make the rules and have the right to enforce them, however they see fit.

No, they cannot remove something and not provide a good reason for it. That's asinine. They removed the crew colour pearlescents and chrome + crew colour, but they didn't provide any good reason as to why they removed it from the game. It caused no harm to the game itself, and it actually gave players more options with the colours. Heck, players even spent a lot of money on them too, and isn't that what Rockstar wants? They were fun, but they removed it anyway. Any sane person would think that's absurd.

 

 

I'm not saying it is right, your reading between the lines, I'm saying they can do it though. Try actually reading instead of just acting like a professional c*nt...

 

So now you're going to resort to profanity, I see. Is that how you reason with people? Do you not possess the sufficient bandwidth to be able to string together a coherent and mature conversation? Or have your pathological insecurities got the best of you?

 

 

I tried reasoning, but you just tried to read what wasn't there, or ignore the point and go off on a tangent. Like most of GTAF, to be fair...

 

You said they can, but I said that's absurd and illogical.

 

 

You can dislike it and disagree with it as much as you like, and we all understand why, but they can literally do anything they want, and no, they don't have to tell us anything. It's their game and the T&Cs that you implicitly agree to, just by playing the game, basically say as much.

 

Us not liking them removing something isn't enough reason for it to not be done. We are a tiny, tiny minority in a huge bank account player base. Most players don't even know about such things.

 

I think this forum (and other similar places) insulate us from the fact that most players haven't got a clue what's going on or what they're doing, and they're just having fun in ignorance of all this.

Edited by Furry_Monkey
  • Miss Malevolent
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Nick930930

Nick930930

Posted
Posted (edited)

Look.. another group of overly angsty kids upset that Rockstar is patching their game.

 

Get the f*** over it. Rockstar is the one that BUILT the game. Stop with the tired old "Rockstar hates fun" bullsh*t... it makes everyone who says that sound like a complete dipsh*t.

 

 

Ugh and the worst is the lot of you that are overly convinced Rockstar does things to sell cash cards.


They gave us this f***ing dlc for free... why are you bitching and moaning? It's all entirely 100% free. If you want it sooner, sure.. be a moron and buy a cash card. But i own the yachts, cars, etc and havent spent a single dime over the base game price and havent once had to cheat. The game gives you money all the time for nothing... hell.. it quite literally gives you $2000 every couple minutes for standing around doing nothing...

Edited by Nick930930
  • shadowoperative
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Arrows to Athens

Arrows to Athens

Posted
Posted (edited)

Uhhh... did they not say themselves that they won't patch harmless glitches? Or am I actually wrong to say that? Now if they did say that, then we all know that they weren't speaking out of their hearts, but their asses. Also, they would have to specify the issues that a glitch would cause in order for its removal from the game, otherwise it's just stupid and goes against everything they've said.

Edited by Fearx--
  • ten-a-penny
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Rocket Skates

Rocket Skates

Posted
Posted (edited)

Forgive me for sounding dumb but what does this glitch do exactly?

Allows you to bring a vehicle that is only accessible in Online to Single Player.

 

Look.. another group of overly angsty kids upset that Rockstar is patching their game.

 

Get the f*** over it. Rockstar is the one that BUILT the game. Stop with the tired old "Rockstar hates fun" bullsh*t... it makes everyone who says that sound like a complete dipsh*t.

I think that's what Dewtech is trying to get across.

Edited by Passive Mode
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Miss Malevolent

Miss Malevolent

Posted
Posted

I think this forum (and other similar places) insulate us from the fact that most players haven't got a clue what's going on or what they're doing, and they're just having fun in ignorance of all this.

This needed to be posted twice.

  • Furry_Monkey
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Furry_Monkey

Furry_Monkey

Posted
Posted

Uhhh... did they not say themselves that they won't patch harmless glitches? Or am I actually wrong to say that? Now if they did say that, then we all know that they weren't speaking out of their hearts, but their asses. Also, they would have to specify the issues that a glitch would cause in order for its removal from the game, otherwise it's just stupid and goes against everything they've said.

 

Yes, but we don't know what is and isn't harmless, and there's no way for us to know. Take the example I gave earlier of a bug that could have caused hardware failure if left unchecked. They don't have to explain anything, whether you like it or not. Sorry, but that is just the way it is and not liking it won't change it. I believe we're lucky to even be told what they're patching when they give us DLC. This isn't like they're a software house and we've gone to them and requested a piece of software. That would demand the level of communication that you're suggesting, but a computer game doesn't.

  • Miss Malevolent
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Arrows to Athens

Arrows to Athens

Posted
Posted

 

Uhhh... did they not say themselves that they won't patch harmless glitches? Or am I actually wrong to say that? Now if they did say that, then we all know that they weren't speaking out of their hearts, but their asses. Also, they would have to specify the issues that a glitch would cause in order for its removal from the game, otherwise it's just stupid and goes against everything they've said.

 

Yes, but we don't know what is and isn't harmless, and there's no way for us to know. Take the example I gave earlier of a bug that could have caused hardware failure if left unchecked. They don't have to explain anything, whether you like it or not. Sorry, but that is just the way it is and not liking it won't change it. I believe we're lucky to even be told what they're patching when they give us DLC. This isn't like they're a software house and we've gone to them and requested a piece of software. That would demand the level of communication that you're suggesting, but a computer game doesn't.

 

No, they removed a glitch from the game. So, they now have to specify the issues that it would have caused to alert us. If they don't, they may have removed it because they felt like it, or for whatever crap reason.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Furry_Monkey

Furry_Monkey

Posted
Posted

 

 

Uhhh... did they not say themselves that they won't patch harmless glitches? Or am I actually wrong to say that? Now if they did say that, then we all know that they weren't speaking out of their hearts, but their asses. Also, they would have to specify the issues that a glitch would cause in order for its removal from the game, otherwise it's just stupid and goes against everything they've said.

 

Yes, but we don't know what is and isn't harmless, and there's no way for us to know. Take the example I gave earlier of a bug that could have caused hardware failure if left unchecked. They don't have to explain anything, whether you like it or not. Sorry, but that is just the way it is and not liking it won't change it. I believe we're lucky to even be told what they're patching when they give us DLC. This isn't like they're a software house and we've gone to them and requested a piece of software. That would demand the level of communication that you're suggesting, but a computer game doesn't.

 

No, they removed a glitch from the game. So, they now have to specify the issues that it would have caused to alert us. If they don't, they may have removed it because they felt like it, or for whatever crap reason.

 

 

I honestly don't understand where you're getting that from, because they don't have to tell us anything at all. What makes you say that they do?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • 1 User Currently Viewing
    0 members, 0 Anonymous, 1 Guest

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using GTAForums.com, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.

  I accept