What did you enjoyed at GTA V?

[RazelRim]

I only enjoyed the new features and the online mode

 

The storyline was a piece of crap

Edited November 22, 2015 by RazelRim

[UshaB]

I'll come back when I think of one.

[Gummy]

The world

[TheGodDamnMaster]

-The map, while not my favorite in the series, was very well-done. The only thing I would change would be to expand Paleto Forest.

-I thought the voice acting and mo-cap work was superb, possibly the best I've seen in a game.

-The weapon wheel is a welcome addition to the series.

-Multiple playable characters made for some interesting mission replays. A cutscene for one character may start much earlier (chronologically) for one character than another.

-Driving was handled well, and this is coming from someone who actually enjoyed IV's driving.

 

The real sin of this game is that it just didn't take some of its aspects far enough. For instance, I would have like to have seen a more engaging and fleshed-out property management system. I also think the in-mission switches between characters weren't always varied enough. We needed more missions like Three's Company.

Edited November 22, 2015 by TheFoxRiverFugitive

[Xing of Virtue]

The police chases using FPV during a rainstorm.

 

Edited November 22, 2015 by Xing of Virtue

[Algonquin Assassin]

Player and vehicle customising. I like all the different clothing options (Though I wish we had a bit more freedom to choose what we can wear with what). Other that that it's neat.

 

Customising vehicles is pretty cool too. Being a car guy I love customising various cars and such. Mostly old school muscle.

Edited November 22, 2015 by PulpFiction

[PoeticWhisper]

Customization
The Map
Michael
The Voice Acting
The Story (Yes I enjoyed it)
The Driving(No I didn't suck at IV, I just prefer V's it's less of a hassle to drive)
Mission Checkpoints
Weapon Wheel
GTA Online

[Maxxeine]

*Post deleted.

Edited October 8, 2017 by The7thOne

[DANIEL3GS]

How the city looks like from further away.

[TheOneLibertonian]

I enjoyed many aspects of GTA V. I loved the Vehicle and Character Customization a lot. I think it's the best in the series in terms of customization. I genuinely enjoyed tricking my rides and buying clothes for my characters. Also I enjoyed Snapmatic, which is one of the best aspects of GTA V. I love taking photos of the beautiful Southern San Andreas. One of the better and underutilized features in GTA V. Last, but not least Director Mode was a blast! It gave me massive amounts of fun and freedom within the Director Mode. One of my favorite update features, IMO.

[SmileyBandito]

I love the driving in GTA V. It's so fun and responsive, great for cruising around.

[sammystarock]

The map.

The map in GTA V is beautiful. It's a shame that I can't feel emotionally bound to it with the entire gaming experience of GTA V being that mediocre, but Los Santos and its surroundings still remain very beautiful.

 

The driving.

Call me crazy. I love the driving in GTA IV and V. I feel like V's driving really fits the game. If it would have been a touch more realistic and had a subtle body roll in addition though, it would have been perfect.

 

Flying.

I find flying to be extremely immersive. The plane controls, the responsive way it's moving, the camera angle adjusting beautifully to the plane's position - it all feels so energetic and fun.

 

The story.

 

 

 

 

Edited November 22, 2015 by mistersam

[HaythamKenway]

https://youtu.be/ABcXyZn9xjg?t=14m1s

 

Just replace "Anakin" with Trevor.

[PhillBellic]

The Police and Emergency Vehicle Lighting.

[Algonquin Assassin]

The Driving(No I didn't suck at IV, I just prefer V's it's less of a hassle to drive)

 

Yes you did. Stupid casual.

 

 

 

 

Edited November 22, 2015 by PulpFiction

[Raider4ever]

Survivals, wish they kept making more. Crew colors.

[Dangerous and sad]

3 character system, Trevors criminal activities, robbing amoured trucks and stores, The world allows me to be creative. I can roleplay with F acting as if he's a rich gang-banger hanging out with CGF with chop or Lamar. Just a great shame that F didn't have any scripted criminal activites that Trevor had

[Voggs]

-The detail of the world, I'm not a huge fan of the map layout but, I gotta give them props (no pun intended) for how detailed it is. The colors, the models.

-The switchable characters system, this got me excited ever since Gameinformer announced it.

-The radio stations in CG.

-Vehicle and weapon variety.

-The water.

-The explosions, the shaking and blur effect they cause on the screen... kinda gets me hard. In the good way.

-Snapmatic and the R* Editor, seriously, f*ckin awesome, and I wish it comes back.

-The Original Score, really well done and catchy.

-The clothing change/buy system.

[Cheatz/Trickz]

The detail is the absolute best thing about the game, LS looks amazing, just wish there was more interactivity with it. Character customisation is overrated in my opinion, changing clothes is enough and there's a decent, though boring selection in V.

Edited November 23, 2015 by Cheatz_N_Trickz

[DANIEL3GS]

The detail is the absolute best thing about the game, LS looks amazing, just wish there was more interactivity with it. Character customisation is overrated in my opinion, changing clothes is enough and there's a decent, though boring selection in V.

I can't be the only one thinking Los Santos isn't that detailed. Well atleast on LG don't know about CG. But conpared to IV meh.

[Peppa Pig]

Nothing.

[Cheatz/Trickz]

I can't be the only one thinking Los Santos isn't that detailed. Well atleast on LG don't know about CG. But conpared to IV meh.

I'm talking graphically detailed. Beyond the graphics it may well as be an empty cardboard box due to the blandness. Maybe it was fridge brilliance of R* to make LS a plastic city, but it doesn't feel "alive" like IV.

[XenoxX]

 

I can't be the only one thinking Los Santos isn't that detailed. Well atleast on LG don't know about CG. But conpared to IV meh.

I'm talking graphically detailed. Beyond the graphics it may well as be an empty cardboard box due to the blandness. Maybe it was fridge brilliance of R* to make LS a plastic city, but it doesn't feel "alive" like IV.

 

huh?

In V people are actualy doing things, at almost every iconic place there are people wandering, lieng on the beach, weightlifting, jogging, cleaning windows, partieng on a mini van bus, looking for the way, having a prostitute...

the only thing IV has is pretty much a postman.

 

And the detail regarding the map in V is objectively better than IVs, in V every place is not only gameplay wise but also realisticly accurate representing real life counterparts in LA and simultaniously offering a huge amount of detail on the streets, shops, etc.

[DANIEL3GS]

 

 

I can't be the only one thinking Los Santos isn't that detailed. Well atleast on LG don't know about CG. But conpared to IV meh.

I'm talking graphically detailed. Beyond the graphics it may well as be an empty cardboard box due to the blandness. Maybe it was fridge brilliance of R* to make LS a plastic city, but it doesn't feel "alive" like IV.

 

huh?

In V people are actualy doing things, at almost every iconic place there are people wandering, lieng on the beach, weightlifting, jogging, cleaning windows, partieng on a mini van bus, looking for the way, having a prostitute...

the only thing IV has is pretty much a postman.

 

And the detail regarding the map in V is objectively better than IVs, in V every place is not only gameplay wise but also realisticly accurate representing real life counterparts in LA and simultaniously offering a huge amount of detail on the streets, shops, etc.

 

 

Ehre you're wrong. People are doing more things in GTAIV then in V. The only thing i mostly see is, people on their smartphones and npcs smoking. In GTAIV there is so much more. Also no there aren't many details on the streets like in GTAIV, the streets feel like plastic. The shops are more detailed but thats because there are like 6 shops, which all look the same. (24/7 and the liquor store) The only thing which is more detailed in LS are the buildings.

Edited November 23, 2015 by DANIEL3GS

[XenoxX]

 

 

 

I can't be the only one thinking Los Santos isn't that detailed. Well atleast on LG don't know about CG. But conpared to IV meh.

I'm talking graphically detailed. Beyond the graphics it may well as be an empty cardboard box due to the blandness. Maybe it was fridge brilliance of R* to make LS a plastic city, but it doesn't feel "alive" like IV.

 

huh?

In V people are actualy doing things, at almost every iconic place there are people wandering, lieng on the beach, weightlifting, jogging, cleaning windows, partieng on a mini van bus, looking for the way, having a prostitute...

the only thing IV has is pretty much a postman.

 

And the detail regarding the map in V is objectively better than IVs, in V every place is not only gameplay wise but also realisticly accurate representing real life counterparts in LA and simultaniously offering a huge amount of detail on the streets, shops, etc.

 

 

Ehre you're wrong. People are doing more things in GTAIV then in V. The only thing i mostly see is, people on their smartphones and smoking. In GTAIV there is so much more. Also no there aren't many details on the streets like in GTAIV, the streets feel like plastic. The shops are more detailed but thats because there are like 6 shops, which all look the same. (24/7 and the liquor store) The only thing which is more detailed in LS are the buildings.

 

Give me some examples of what people do in IV?

Because I cannot rememmber any, besides maybe one or two drug dealers.

[MissMartaGirl777]

That's right

[DANIEL3GS]

 

 

 

 

I can't be the only one thinking Los Santos isn't that detailed. Well atleast on LG don't know about CG. But conpared to IV meh.

I'm talking graphically detailed. Beyond the graphics it may well as be an empty cardboard box due to the blandness. Maybe it was fridge brilliance of R* to make LS a plastic city, but it doesn't feel "alive" like IV.

 

huh?

In V people are actualy doing things, at almost every iconic place there are people wandering, lieng on the beach, weightlifting, jogging, cleaning windows, partieng on a mini van bus, looking for the way, having a prostitute...

the only thing IV has is pretty much a postman.

 

And the detail regarding the map in V is objectively better than IVs, in V every place is not only gameplay wise but also realisticly accurate representing real life counterparts in LA and simultaniously offering a huge amount of detail on the streets, shops, etc.

 

Ehre you're wrong. People are doing more things in GTAIV then in V. The only thing i mostly see is, people on their smartphones and smoking. In GTAIV there is so much more. Also no there aren't many details on the streets like in GTAIV, the streets feel like plastic. The shops are more detailed but thats because there are like 6 shops, which all look the same. (24/7 and the liquor store) The only thing which is more detailed in LS are the buildings.

 

Give me some examples of what people do in IV?

Because I cannot rememmber any, besides maybe one or two drug dealers.

Homeless people at fires, standing in line to get in a club, taking money out of atm machines, buy hot dogs, drink coffees, throw trash out of the car... Those are just some things NPC's are doing everywhere. While in GTAV things only happen at certain places like the beach. If i take that in there would be: NPC's who bowl, do darts, drink, watch TV, shop inside porn shops, actually being inside a club and dancing... Edited November 23, 2015 by DANIEL3GS

[CarlitoDorito]

So many reasons. On current gen anyway, the game is alive, so much freedom. To balance this out 'the game isn't alive, there is no freedom'. I've saved myself from Internet wrath.

[XenoxX]

 

 

 

 

 

I can't be the only one thinking Los Santos isn't that detailed. Well atleast on LG don't know about CG. But conpared to IV meh.

I'm talking graphically detailed. Beyond the graphics it may well as be an empty cardboard box due to the blandness. Maybe it was fridge brilliance of R* to make LS a plastic city, but it doesn't feel "alive" like IV.

 

huh?

In V people are actualy doing things, at almost every iconic place there are people wandering, lieng on the beach, weightlifting, jogging, cleaning windows, partieng on a mini van bus, looking for the way, having a prostitute...

the only thing IV has is pretty much a postman.

 

And the detail regarding the map in V is objectively better than IVs, in V every place is not only gameplay wise but also realisticly accurate representing real life counterparts in LA and simultaniously offering a huge amount of detail on the streets, shops, etc.

 

Ehre you're wrong. People are doing more things in GTAIV then in V. The only thing i mostly see is, people on their smartphones and smoking. In GTAIV there is so much more. Also no there aren't many details on the streets like in GTAIV, the streets feel like plastic. The shops are more detailed but thats because there are like 6 shops, which all look the same. (24/7 and the liquor store) The only thing which is more detailed in LS are the buildings.

 

Give me some examples of what people do in IV?

Because I cannot rememmber any, besides maybe one or two drug dealers.

Homeless people at fires, standing in line to get in a club, taking money out of atm machines, buy hot dogs, drink coffees, throw trash out of the car... Those are just some things NPC's are doing everywhere. While in GTAV things only happen at certain places like the beach. If i take that in there would be: NPC's who bowl, do darts, drink, watch TV, shop inside porn shops, actually being inside a club and dancing...

 

All of above mentioned is also in V; in addition to the other living NPCs doing garden work, works on the streets etc.

[DANIEL3GS]

 

 

 

 

 

 

I can't be the only one thinking Los Santos isn't that detailed. Well atleast on LG don't know about CG. But conpared to IV meh.

I'm talking graphically detailed. Beyond the graphics it may well as be an empty cardboard box due to the blandness. Maybe it was fridge brilliance of R* to make LS a plastic city, but it doesn't feel "alive" like IV.

 

huh?

In V people are actualy doing things, at almost every iconic place there are people wandering, lieng on the beach, weightlifting, jogging, cleaning windows, partieng on a mini van bus, looking for the way, having a prostitute...

the only thing IV has is pretty much a postman.

 

And the detail regarding the map in V is objectively better than IVs, in V every place is not only gameplay wise but also realisticly accurate representing real life counterparts in LA and simultaniously offering a huge amount of detail on the streets, shops, etc.

 

Ehre you're wrong. People are doing more things in GTAIV then in V. The only thing i mostly see is, people on their smartphones and smoking. In GTAIV there is so much more. Also no there aren't many details on the streets like in GTAIV, the streets feel like plastic. The shops are more detailed but thats because there are like 6 shops, which all look the same. (24/7 and the liquor store) The only thing which is more detailed in LS are the buildings.

 

Give me some examples of what people do in IV?

Because I cannot rememmber any, besides maybe one or two drug dealers.

Homeless people at fires, standing in line to get in a club, taking money out of atm machines, buy hot dogs, drink coffees, throw trash out of the car... Those are just some things NPC's are doing everywhere. While in GTAV things only happen at certain places like the beach. If i take that in there would be: NPC's who bowl, do darts, drink, watch TV, shop inside porn shops, actually being inside a club and dancing...

 

All of above mentioned is also in V; in addition to the other living NPCs doing garden work, works on the streets etc.

Yeah there really are people dancing, playing bowling, throwing trash out of the window, being in pornshops? Could you show me where and i just listed a few, i bet there some users who could list more.