Future DLC Discussion Thread

[Hunter]

They should add the aircraft carrier into free mode with the Hunter on it.. Can´t understand why it isn´t.

I know right? At the very least, it should be there on current gen. The PS4/Xbox One are meant to be more powerful than the 360/PS3, so they should use this power to put things like the aircraft carrier in.

 

Plus everything's there. The aircraft carrier has been made by Rockstar (obviously), and I'm pretty sure on PC you could mod it in somehow. It's the same deal with the Hunter - they made a model of it, and even have sound effects, plus the muzzle flash for its gun. But it's not there.

Edited February 4, 2016 by Icantthinkofonew

[RJDean]

I hope they will add the option to sell Pegasus vehicles/aircrafts and not having to pay everytime you need them.

[Guest Member1651236]

I hope they will add the option to sell Pegasus vehicles/aircrafts and not having to pay everytime you need them.

This. I always see people asking for us to be able to sell pegasus vehicles but Rockstar seem to brush it off like it's nothing, when in reality, as soon as you buy a new Pegasus vehicle, you notice the faults, deal with them for a while and eventually get bored of that vehicle and want to sell it. I seriously only use two or three of my Pegasus vehicles, and I think I have most of them now, if not all of them that I bought after doing a megaton of heists. I regret buying most of them.

Edited February 4, 2016 by Member1651236

[Guest Member1651236]

"It doesn't really matter about 'other things'.. Other bad decisions should not mean they should throw the book out of the window.

 

The only way to add a jet pack to free roam and not make it look stupid. Would be a free roam event type of thing...

If a jet pack become available to buy.. everyone would buy it.. everyone would use it. Price would not matter... And the end result is GTA O would look more like a space shooter."

 

I can't help but to agree on that free roam event idea, or maybe even as an optional vehicle you could have in the Content Creator. I'm sure many fun stunt maps could be made for both the Hunter and the Jetpack. - also excuse the lack of a quote, I'm not very good at this whole individual quote from a quote train thing.

 

Maybe not being able to buy it isn't such a bad idea, but having it in Content Creator should be something for sure, or maybe at least an Adversary Mode to go with it, just like Slasher, Beast VS Slasher and whatever else is silly.

I just feel that while it may look silly, Rockstar are certainly going to continue making unrealistic things like that, and so adding a Jetpack would probably be one of the more realistic things. Grand Theft Auto V feels like it has become something with wacky things as standard, Single Player has UFOs, aliens, bigfoot, a ghost and everything else, while Grand Theft Auto Online has overpowered vehicles that you can call in, homing launchers, proximity mines, yachts everywhere and a game full of people driving super cars. Maybe a jetpack could have a fuel system in place or an overheating system to stop you constantly being in the air, but it's one of the most sane ideas so far when you consider jets have unlimited rockets, unlimited cannon use, the ability to call in a hydra and the ability to dodge homing missiles if done right. I think it's important to remember that the Hydra came with the Heists update, so it could be reasonable that a Hunter and even a Jetpack could come with a second instalment (if it ever happens) the Heists update was one of the most crazy updates on GTA, completely bullet proof cars that can take a heavy sniper to the glass and walk it off like it was nothing, hydras, Insurgent that can survive multiple RPGs/tank shots/sticky bombs, an insurgent variant with a gun on top, the Savage, Valkyrie, a rebel with a gun on top, a bike that has boost you can toggle and everything else. If not with a second instalment of Heists, a throwback or military DLC would both fit the Hunter and Jetpack.

 

EDIT: Just another thought, anyone else think they should have added the Super Drop Diamond with the Ill Gotten Gains update? A roofless Super Diamond would make a great addition while we wait for roofless supercars like a roofless Zentorno and what not. I hope I'm not the only one who would instantly buy a roofless Zentorno no matter the price - just as long as it got rid of those horrible holes anyway.

 

 

 

Edited February 4, 2016 by Member1651236

[eyman]

A Jetpack in GTA SA was said to cost 60 million dollars, I can only imagine what it would cost in GTA Online...

[Anachronistic]

Wuy is this place so dead lol?

Well we know the next 1 or 2 updates. I think Fun said they don't start update 3 until update 1 is dropping so we won't get any more info until that happens.

[Guest Member1651236]

A Jetpack in GTA SA was said to cost 60 million dollars, I can only imagine what it would cost in GTA Online...

A small loan of 60 million GTA dollars.

Edited February 4, 2016 by Member1651236

[GrandTheftPots]

Franklin at it again is this new or old ?

 

https://www.instagram.com/p/BBXpYpWEf5M/

[Claude_Lib]

https://www.instagram.com/p/BBXpYpWEf5M/

404

[eyman]

Franklin at it again is this new or old ?

 

https://www.instagram.com/p/BBXpYpWEf5M/

I know The In game clip (of the ruiner) is from Franklin's Trailer IIRC. most likely that video of the three of them was filmed a long time ago (someone check that I cant find it on the internet. Interview with SKEETV)

Edited February 4, 2016 by eyman

[mirthless]

Maybe it was uploaded and quickly deleted?

 

In which case WOOHOO.

[GrandTheftPots]

@eyman I can't seem to find it too

 

@mirthless The video is still up not sure why the link isn't working for some...

 

ogg_steven left a comment on the video "They all seem like such sweet, gentle men!"

[eyman]

@eyman I can't seem to find it too

 

@mirthless The video is still up not sure why the link isn't working for some...

 

ogg_steven left a comment on the video "They all seem like such sweet, gentle men!"

That is odd, someone must have this interview somewhere.

 

Here is the link for the ones who cant get it. try it and see if it works

https://www.instagram.com/p/BBXpYpWEf5M/?taken-by=solo118

Edited February 4, 2016 by eyman

[LeakyLine]

 

I'd love to make a twodoor Mesa Grande Offroad racecar at Bennys

And 2th i'll go for a drag-conversion for some muscle car

With that Mesa idea can they have multiple Grill/headlight styles and multiple Roll bar and door styles?

I would love to see Jeep Yj, Jeep Cj and Jeep TJ, and their appropriate half doors, no doors and soft top doors and their fronts

And drag muscle cars, I would love to see some of the stuff we have here in Aus, such as a Sandman Ute or Van (both with and without windows) drag build (call it the dust dude or something) complete with working RHD and Statesman Front end conversion option

 

Imagine the Potential Liveries for Sandman Windowless Vans, as in Australia pretty much every 3rd sandman had their own mural on it

 

 

 

 

And of course we will have a livery for the Windowed Van and Ute

 

 

The older versions of these were the main reason Kombi Vans were not popular in Australia

 

Yes.

Yes.

Yes.

Yes.

 

Oh, I forgot to mention

 

YES.

[TacitusKilgore]

Guys, come on. You bet your ass Rockstar is making a SP DLC. You may be asking, "Why the hell are you so certain?" Well, let's go back to GTA IV. TBoGT and TLAD were obviously highly acclaimed by critics and GTA fans. You seriously think Rockstar won't do another paid DLC? Nonsense. It's coming and something tells me it's going to be set in San Fierro and Las Venturas. These two cities have only appeared once. Also, that same thing tells me that it'll release next year. 2017 will be a huge year for GTA V.

[eyman]

That interview is 2013

Guys, come on. You bet your ass Rockstar is making a SP DLC. You may be asking, "Why the hell are you so certain?" Well, let's go back to GTA IV. TBoGT and TLAD were obviously highly acclaimed by critics and GTA fans. You seriously think Rockstar won't do another paid DLC? Nonsense. It's coming and something tells me it's going to be set in San Fierro and Las Venturas. These two cities have only appeared once. Also, that same thing tells me that it'll release next year. 2017 will be a huge year for GTA V.

Maybe its coming, but not SF or LV for GTA V

Edited February 4, 2016 by eyman

[TacitusKilgore]

That interview is 2013

 

Guys, come on. You bet your ass Rockstar is making a SP DLC. You may be asking, "Why the hell are you so certain?" Well, let's go back to GTA IV. TBoGT and TLAD were obviously highly acclaimed by critics and GTA fans. You seriously think Rockstar won't do another paid DLC? Nonsense. It's coming and something tells me it's going to be set in San Fierro and Las Venturas. These two cities have only appeared once. Also, that same thing tells me that it'll release next year. 2017 will be a huge year for GTA V.

Maybe its coming, but not SF or LV for GTA V Why not SF or LV? Those two cities were connected to Los Santos in GTA SA as part of the state of San Andreas. It makes more sense than LC in all accounts.

[Hunter]

 

That interview is 2013

 

Guys, come on. You bet your ass Rockstar is making a SP DLC. You may be asking, "Why the hell are you so certain?" Well, let's go back to GTA IV. TBoGT and TLAD were obviously highly acclaimed by critics and GTA fans. You seriously think Rockstar won't do another paid DLC? Nonsense. It's coming and something tells me it's going to be set in San Fierro and Las Venturas. These two cities have only appeared once. Also, that same thing tells me that it'll release next year. 2017 will be a huge year for GTA V.

Maybe its coming, but not SF or LV for GTA V

Why not SF or LV? Those two cities were connected to Los Santos in GTA SA as part of the state of San Andreas. It makes more sense than LC in all accounts.

 

I'd love to see SF and LV come back. They'd be great.

 

Other places would do too though, just need somewhere new to explore/kill people in.

[MGgames100]

 

That interview is 2013

 

Guys, come on. You bet your ass Rockstar is making a SP DLC. You may be asking, "Why the hell are you so certain?" Well, let's go back to GTA IV. TBoGT and TLAD were obviously highly acclaimed by critics and GTA fans. You seriously think Rockstar won't do another paid DLC? Nonsense. It's coming and something tells me it's going to be set in San Fierro and Las Venturas. These two cities have only appeared once. Also, that same thing tells me that it'll release next year. 2017 will be a huge year for GTA V.

Maybe its coming, but not SF or LV for GTA V

Why not SF or LV? Those two cities were connected to Los Santos in GTA SA as part of the state of San Andreas. It makes more sense than LC in all accounts.

 

Because LC is already made! It's mapped, modelled etc.!

Why do people not understand, that LV, SF and VC would have been made from scratch?

Also, why the f*ck they would use a whole new map in DLC instead of new game? That doesn't make sense!

Edited February 4, 2016 by MGgames100

[eyman]

 

That interview is 2013

 

Guys, come on. You bet your ass Rockstar is making a SP DLC. You may be asking, "Why the hell are you so certain?" Well, let's go back to GTA IV. TBoGT and TLAD were obviously highly acclaimed by critics and GTA fans. You seriously think Rockstar won't do another paid DLC? Nonsense. It's coming and something tells me it's going to be set in San Fierro and Las Venturas. These two cities have only appeared once. Also, that same thing tells me that it'll release next year. 2017 will be a huge year for GTA V.

Maybe its coming, but not SF or LV for GTA V

Why not SF or LV? Those two cities were connected to Los Santos in GTA SA as part of the state of San Andreas. It makes more sense than LC in all accounts.

 

LC is anybodies guess. However LC is already made unlike SF and LV. and this is Rockstar we are talking about, one of the laziest Game Developers ever. Having SF and LV would require a lot of detail and development. if they are planning on creating SF and LV it is in their best interest to create it in a 60$ (£40/50 Euros) GTA. not a 30$ (£15/20 Euros) DLC. Don't get me wrong I would love to see LV and SF but there is very microscopic chance it will be in a GTA V DLC. SF and LV were not as detailed in GTA SA. that is why they were there, LS was very small in GTA SA as well.

Edited February 4, 2016 by eyman

[TacitusKilgore]

What if they have been working on SF and LV since release?

[Hunter]

Well we can only wait and see - personally I think LV and SF are as likely as LC. VC would also be great.

 

If they're going to go to enough effort to put in LC, then I'd imagine they'd be ditching the whole lazy approach to things. GTA IV might be newish, but it still doesn't mean it would be a piece of cake to put LC in either.

 

I'm cool with any new map though.

[eyman]

What if they have been working on SF and LV since release?

Yes, Probably have for GTA 6. SP DLC doesn't have to require a map expansion btw.

[BobFromReboot]

Well we can only wait and see - personally I think LV and SF are as likely as LC. VC would also be great.

 

If they're going to go to enough effort to put in LC, then I'd imagine they'd be ditching the whole lazy approach to things. GTA IV might be newish, but it still doesn't mean it would be a piece of cake to put LC in either.

 

I'm cool with any new map though.

 

Why would they ditch the lazy (cheap) way of doing things? For example, most of the animals in the game are reused models from Red Dead Redemption.

Edited February 4, 2016 by BobFromReboot

[Hunter]

 

 

 

Why would they ditch the lazy (cheap) way of doing things? For example, most of the animals in the game are reused models from Red Dead Redemption.

 

Even LC would take some amount of effort to add (much more than the usual updates anyway).

[eyman]

 

 

 

 

Why would they ditch the lazy (cheap) way of doing things? For example, most of the animals in the game are reused models from Red Dead Redemption.

 

Even LC would take some amount of effort to add (much more than the usual updates anyway).

 

 

but not as much a SF and LV (or VC)

 

 

nobody even guaranteed LC was coming

 

Edited February 4, 2016 by eyman

[MGgames100]

What if they have been working on SF and LV since release?

But again: why they would waste completly new city on $30 DLC, rather than whole game that costs $60?

Don't get me wrong I want to see new landscapes, but I don't see that happening in SP DLC! What is possible tho is LC and NY!

Just look how much NY map has changed from Old Gen version to NG version...

 

 

 

Edited February 4, 2016 by MGgames100

[Tez2]

https://steamdb.info/app/271590/history/

It seems some changes has been made inside R* studios.

Now we have "externalbuilds" and "qabeta".

Qabeta is the main development branch for online updates, but I'm not sure if "externalbuilds" is related to SP DLC or separated development branch for another online dev team.

If "externalbuilds" is related to online, then we will see more and more updates like the recent one.

Edited February 4, 2016 by funmw2

[eyman]

https://steamdb.info/app/271590/history/

It seems some changes has been made inside R* studios.

Now we have "externalbuilds" and "qabeta".

Qabeta is the main development branch for online updates, but I'm not sure if "externalbuilds" is related to SP DLC or separated development branch for another online dev team.

Anyone's guess at the moment. but these repetitive Online updates can't last forever.

also, I cant take anything you say seriously with that Cookie Profile Picture. lol

 

Edited February 4, 2016 by eyman

[Gnocchi Flip Flops]

What if they have been working on SF and LV since release?

Let's see. That's about 10-15 square miles of extensive detail and that's just the cities themselves. With the countryside, I'm sure it's damn near 60. I'm highly certain that they'd save all of that effort for a completely new game.

 

We're never getting SF and/or LV as DLCs. You can hang it up, it's never going to happen.