[PETITION] Rockstar North, Do not kill Grand Theft Auto

[.Smaher.]

@Xenoxx

But the CORE GAME was Singleplayer based, the only thing they did not do is release free Updates for it, simple.

But GTA V on its own if you like it or not, was a Singleplayer based game at its release.

Duh. I'm not sounding that the core game was SP based, but for now, the whole game might as well be centered upon single player seeing as how that gets the most attention. Edited September 12, 2015 by .Smaher.

[XenoxX]

@Xenoxx

But the CORE GAME was Singleplayer based, the only thing they did not do is release free Updates for it, simple.

But GTA V on its own if you like it or not, was a Singleplayer based game at its release.

Duh. I'm not sounding that the core game was SP based, but for now, the whole game might as well be centered upon single player seeing as how that gets the most attention.

 

What do you mean?

 

So R* should release Singleplayer updates instead of Online ones?

See how that worked out for IV.....

[.Smaher.]

 

@Xenoxx

But the CORE GAME was Singleplayer based, the only thing they did not do is release free Updates for it, simple.

But GTA V on its own if you like it or not, was a Singleplayer based game at its release.

Duh. I'm not sounding that the core game was SP based, but for now, the whole game might as well be centered upon single player seeing as how that gets the most attention.

 

What do you mean?

 

So R* should release Singleplayer updates instead of Online ones?

See how that worked out for IV.....

 

Yes, that's exactly what I'm saying. At least from now. They should stop sucking off Online for a little bit and let the SP players enjoy themselves. It's not that hard of a concept no matter how you put it.

[XenoxX]

 

 

@Xenoxx

But the CORE GAME was Singleplayer based, the only thing they did not do is release free Updates for it, simple.

But GTA V on its own if you like it or not, was a Singleplayer based game at its release.

Duh. I'm not sounding that the core game was SP based, but for now, the whole game might as well be centered upon single player seeing as how that gets the most attention.

 

What do you mean?

 

So R* should release Singleplayer updates instead of Online ones?

See how that worked out for IV.....

 

Yes, that's exactly what I'm saying. At least from now. They should stop sucking off Online for a little bit and let the SP players enjoy themselves. It's not that hard of a concept no matter how you put it.

 

I think having a Singleplayer as a long term project doesn't make any sense and R* shouldn't try it.

Same buisness practice will be used by the new Hitman game which will release piece by piece, and believe me its not a good idea.

 

I would rather have Rockstar releasing their new game faster.

 

You also have to consider Online does not need that much resources.

[.Smaher.]

 

I think having a Singleplayer as a long term project doesn't make any sense and R* shouldn't try it.

Same buisness practice will be used by the new Hitman game which will release piece by piece, and believe me its not a good idea.

 

I would rather have Rockstar releasing their new game faster.

 

You also have to consider Online does not need that much resources.

 

If it doesn't need that much resources, then why do they have the whole SP team working on it? Such bullsh*t and denial. How is having a separate team for Sngleplayer such a bad idea? Is GTA not a Singleplayer based game? And now all of a sudden it's a bad thing?

 

If they went back to having separate teams for Online and SP, we'd be getting stuff out for SP much quicker.

 

Also, Hitman and GTA V are two completely different games.

Edited September 12, 2015 by .Smaher.

[XenoxX]

 

 

I think having a Singleplayer as a long term project doesn't make any sense and R* shouldn't try it.

Same buisness practice will be used by the new Hitman game which will release piece by piece, and believe me its not a good idea.

 

I would rather have Rockstar releasing their new game faster.

 

You also have to consider Online does not need that much resources.

 

If it doesn't need that much resources, then why do they have the whole SP team working on it? Such bullsh*t and denial. How is having a separate team for Sngleplayer such a bad idea? Is GTA not a Singleplayer based game? And now all of a sudden it's a bad thing?

 

If they went back to having separate teams for Online and SP, we'd be getting stuff out for SP much quicker.

 

Hitman and GTA V are two completely different games.

 

Its not about the games but about the fact of releasing a Singleplayer game piece by piece, also the guy obviously LIED when he said their whole team is working on Online, thats such BS, because the Free Mode Event Update will of course be alot of fun, but its not that high of production value that a whole team is working on it.

 

Now just imagine same types of Updates which are there for Online would be there for Singleplayer(which a lot of them pretty much are)

It wouldn't change anything...

[CynicalRise]

Edited September 12, 2015 by TheProcrastinatingMath

[.Smaher.]

 

Its not about the games but about the fact of releasing a Singleplayer game piece by piece, also the guy obviously LIED when he said their whole team is working on Online, thats such BS, because the Free Mode Event Update will of course be alot of fun, but its not that high of production value that a whole team is working on it.

 

Now just imagine same types of Updates which are there for Online would be there for Singleplayer(which a lot of them pretty much are)

It wouldn't change anything...

 

Who said anything about piece by piece? All people are asking for is that Singleplayer be shown some attention, and that Rockstar not devote all of theirs to their baby Online. If SP had the same type of updates that Online has, I bet as many people wouldn't be complaining about it, now would they? The fact that SP is missing a lot in comparison to Online should be a wake up call that Rockstar doesn't care as much for SP as they do for Online.

 

You'd think the quote from Rockstar themselves would be enough to confirm that. Yet there's always gotta be that one person in denial.

 

And what proof have you to say that the Creative Director lied without of course, "thinking so"? He, himself already confirmed it, so just taking it with a grain of salt would just lead to conspiracy territory.

Edited September 12, 2015 by .Smaher.

[MyName'sJeff]

 

 

 

I think having a Singleplayer as a long term project doesn't make any sense and R* shouldn't try it.

Same buisness practice will be used by the new Hitman game which will release piece by piece, and believe me its not a good idea.

 

I would rather have Rockstar releasing their new game faster.

 

You also have to consider Online does not need that much resources.

 

If it doesn't need that much resources, then why do they have the whole SP team working on it? Such bullsh*t and denial. How is having a separate team for Sngleplayer such a bad idea? Is GTA not a Singleplayer based game? And now all of a sudden it's a bad thing?

 

If they went back to having separate teams for Online and SP, we'd be getting stuff out for SP much quicker.

 

Hitman and GTA V are two completely different games.

 

Its not about the games but about the fact of releasing a Singleplayer game piece by piece, also the guy obviously LIED when he said their whole team is working on Online, thats such BS, because the Free Mode Event Update will of course be alot of fun, but its not that high of production value that a whole team is working on it.

 

Now just imagine same types of Updates which are there for Online would be there for Singleplayer(which a lot of them pretty much are)

It wouldn't change anything...

 

Why would the guy lie about the whole team working on Online? It was a direct quote from Rockstar, stop defending them as if you work for them or something. If Rockstar doesn't want to bother with SP from now on, especially with GTA 6, I can guarantee you GTA 6 will literally flop before it even comes out because GTA is and always will be a SINGLE PLAYER based game overall. Online can be evolved at the same time with decent amount of effort, but Rockstar don't want to do that, they'd rather completely shut out the adults and mature people and save their energy for the immature c*nts and little sh*ts who play the infamous online. The solution is simple, there should be two big teams working on Single Player and online. What's the f*cking problem here?

[.Smaher.]

The solution is simple, there should be two big teams working on Single Player and online. What's the f*cking problem here?

 

There is no problem there. Some people just like to ignore problems and dismiss what's on the other side of the glass wall.

 

 

 

I just came up with that.

Edited September 12, 2015 by .Smaher.

[KashKashMania]

I always wonder why people start these petitions here. Like how many times do people have to say that R* don't run or even pay attention to these forums beyond finding glitches to patch? I could see advertising a petition you have going on social club or somethin, but like i haven't seen anyone do that yet? Not to mention these forums represent only a small fraction of the players.

 

 

 

My 2¢? There's a better chance of R* advancing the Online story than there is of them giving SP additional content at this point. Chances are they know just how many people are playing SP vs MP every single day and they're gonna give content to which ever side is playing more.

 

I loved SP, and i'd love a prequel for Trevor, post Yankton heist and how he got to San Andreas and all that. Then either a sequel or prequel for Franklin a year in either direction. But chances are they'll throw Online forward a couple months to the time of GTA:V and we'll get jobs that vaguely relate to all the stuff in 5 and then the the thefts and heists from SP will hit the news, etc. etc. and Trevor will tell you Ron's gonna take over for a bit and Ron's gonna send you on weird ass missions to steal weird ass sh*t. Lamar will have you picking up the drugs for Stretch, and chances are you'll be the one to pick stretch up and, of course, sh*t will go wrong and you'll end up trying to outrun someone. Around the same time Madrazo will tell you to avoid the house and he'll have you start coming to his ranch. Lester will probably have you torch his old warehouse. Stretch will be intro'd as another contact. Etc. etc. etc.

 

But of course, i left out the best part, we'll get more threads complaining about it from people who can't seem to get the hint and understand that priorities change and business plans aren't legally binding documents, even if said in an interview, on tape, and will change in a moments notice if the opportunity to make more money arises or they feel that the cost will be too high to return any form of a profit. You can only go so far and do so much in terms of catering to the customer. Companies will always cater to the bigger customer base first, the bigger one has more money and people need to realize that if R* goes belly up GTA dies. So would you rather have some occasional additions to missions and Online, or call it quits with 5 right now and never see another GTA game in the series all together and have R* liquidate and shut down their servers across the board, LG and NG included while still holding the rights to the franchise and preventing any other developer from continuing on.

 

It's a business, not a non-profit, and this isn't a R* run website your petitions are nothing more than aesthetic on this site.

 

 

[fac316]

 

 

Jesus Christ people. All of you that are bitching about SP being short changed because of online, do you really expect anyone to believe you didn't get your $60 worth? Come on, I want the SP DLC too, but quit whining. Even if it never comes, and even if V wasn't your favorite game in the series, you ABSOLUTELY got your money's worth a long time ago. This place is getting unbearable.

Thats not even the main problem. Are you even reading the posts correctly?

 

People are pissed because Rockstar's hard on for Online is getting worse.

 

They talk as if its the best thing thats ever happened to GTA and put most of their people to work on sh*tty Online.

Thats definitely NOT a good sign for future Rockstar games.

What's the story in other forums or the internet? If people from only this forum say "Rockstar should focus on single-player", I don't think there is a chance of success. If a lot people from Reddit, other gaming forums, and in fact any other internet place could support your petition, it could very well get into the eyes of R*, otherwise it will just many of the ignored petitions.

The GTA subreddit is full of Online fanboys I doubt they care about SP

 

R*s focus on Online at the moment does not mean they won't release any Singleplayer games in the future its clear that a new Red Dead or even Agent is in the works.Agent and the new red dead will have worser sp. Just the way of the times as a hardcore fan we will always be left to slaughter in the name of casual gamers.

[King Vercetti]

I absolutely loved Episodes from Liberty City and would kill to have a new installment similar to that. But you have to realize that it did terribly from a financial standpoint, and they even said in the past they would never release another standalone episode of that nature again. Now, maybe they changed their mind and decided they would, and maybe they didn't. But you can't blame rockstar for the fact that it sold poorly. The money IS in online now, and the fact that they are putting more effort into that is just common sense. Should they still have a team devoted to SP content? Absolutely. I've never disagreed on that. It seems like no matter what the f*ck I do, I end up getting attacked for being a fanboy just because I am trying to speak common sense around here.

 

The problem isn't people like me or Xenoxx, we are just trying to logical. The problem is the people that just keep bashing every move Rockstar makes because it's the cool thing to do now. Are they totally blameless? Not course not. Again, that's why I'm really f*cking pissed about being attacked numerous times in one night when you can read my post history and see I have been just as critical of them as anyone else has regarding their handling of the DLC. Instead, some of you want to lash out if you see anything even slightly resembling reason. I am a gamer and a business person. I understand both sides here. As a gamer, I get why you all are upset. But as someone that has studied business my whole life and ran several of my own, I get why they are doing what they are doing. You would do the same if the shoe was on the other foot. Everyone is going to rally behind the side that supports them most, and that's understandable.

 

If you hate Rockstar for their decisions, fine, but quit attacking others that disagree with you. Narrow minded people that refuse to listen to reason and must resort to pitiful personal attacks are the very reason gamers have such a bad stigma in society. Grow up and act like a mature adult, and that can change in the future. We can all disagree and debate, and as a public forum, this should be as good a place as any to do so. But if all you can do is resort to bullying and name calling, no one is going to listen,and you are just making yourself look bad.

 

Xenoxx, I'm gonna get a sh*t ton of hate for this, but I have been reading your posts a lot lately and noticed that you have been perfectly reasonable in your comments as well, but every time you post in almost every thread, you get attacked as well. I've seen you get labelled a fanboy and a bunch of other things too, just because you said anything positive about GTA V. I'm sorry to see that happen, because lately in this section of the forum, it seems like the only way to get along is to spend your day attacking everything and anyone that liked anything about this game. This place is mostly full of great people, but the rotten few are making it unbearable to post. Things have hit an all time low. I swear we are getting worse than Reddit, and I never thought I would say that. I just hope it turns around, because I genuinely love this place and have met some amazing people in the last several years. Over two accounts, I have been a member here for over six years, and I've never seen it this bad.

[D9fred95]

I think having a Singleplayer as a long term project doesn't make any sense and R* shouldn't try it.

 

 

You also have to consider Online does not need that much resources.

 

Really? So despite that EFLC and Undead Nightmare are considered some of the best DLC ever created, they shouldn't try to do the same with GTA V because of Online? A griefers paradise full of little kids, trolls, hackers and cars that cost $800,000 which have handling worse than the normal traffic ones. Huh, seems pretty weird to abandon a strategy that works in favor of one that semi-works.

 

Also, Online doesn't need much resources? Hasn't there been about 30 patches, most relating to Online and it's still somewhat broken. In which case why is the entire GTA V staff working Online? So we can get more 3 car, 2 weapon and $10,000 baseball caps for online player style DLCs?

Edited September 12, 2015 by D9fred95

[Otselot]

[PETITION] Rockstar North, Do not make another GTA.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

You think this petition will do something? Huh? HUH??

Edited September 12, 2015 by Rard-Life

[King Vercetti]

I think IF such a large portion of the staff is working on online, that can only mean something large is in the works.

[Pizentu]

They are working on more than just online. They are working on other games and with the Posts from "Franklin" it appears they are working on story mode DLC. Just because they say they arent doesnt mean they arent. Its something they likely cant talk about now. All game companies have these "blackouts". They showed off something at E3 and it damn sure wasnt Rockstar Editor of the new free mode.

Edited September 12, 2015 by Pizentu

[Otselot]

They are working on more than just online. They are working on other games and with the Posts from "Franklin" it appears they are working on story mode DLC. Just because they say they arent doesnt mean they arent. Its something they likely cant talk about now. All game companies have these "blackouts". They showed off something at E3 and it damn sure wasnt Rockstar Editor of the new free mode.

Oh, so if they said they are working on a SP DLC doesn't mean they are?

[fac316]

I tell ya, the way R* is treating us SP players is reminding me abt how Catalina betrayed Claude in III.

[XenoxX]

I tell ya, the way R* is treating us SP players is reminding me abt how Catalina betrayed Claude in III.

Dude R* is not betraying you, they just are not releasing SP DLC for the game anymore.

 

Just be patient and wait for their next game which is going to be as high quality and probably also something new and fresh to play.

[XenoxX]

 

I think having a Singleplayer as a long term project doesn't make any sense and R* shouldn't try it.

 

 

You also have to consider Online does not need that much resources.

 

Really? So despite that EFLC and Undead Nightmare are considered some of the best DLC ever created, they shouldn't try to do the same with GTA V because of Online? A griefers paradise full of little kids, trolls, hackers and cars that cost $800,000 which have handling worse than the normal traffic ones. Huh, seems pretty weird to abandon a strategy that works in favor of one that semi-works.

 

Also, Online doesn't need much resources? Hasn't there been about 30 patches, most relating to Online and it's still somewhat broken. In which case why is the entire GTA V staff working Online? So we can get more 3 car, 2 weapon and $10,000 baseball caps for online player style DLCs?

 

EFLC and Undead NIghtmare are some realy good DLCs however, as it seems R* North currently does not have the resources for it.

 

Also Online, no matter how much you try to denigrade it, is still fun to play for many people and you can do way more in it.

Also "full of little kids, trolls" reminds me kind of of this forum.

Regarding the prices, they are fine you have to work for your apartments and cars but thats the point, never I had to "grind" in GTA Online, I just play whats fun to me and get money along the way.

 

 

Also, Online doesn't need much resources? Hasn't there been about 30 patches, most relating to Online and it's still somewhat broken. In which case why is the entire GTA V staff working Online? So we can get more 3 car, 2 weapon and $10,000 baseball caps for online player style DLCs?

"Its still somewhat broken"

It is not broken, at all, just because some people experience connection errors it isn't broken...

Regarding Bugs and Glitches, there are realy not many and you usualy only find them if you look for them.

If you are reffering to the gameplay and overall principle, its not for everyone, but I like it, especialy with the new Free Mode Events it is going to be awesome.

 

I think when realy the entire key member of V development staff are working on Online it means something big is awaiting us, probably we are going to get some new gameplay enhancing Updates such as Free Mode events, as they said they are only the beginning.

[XenoxX]

 

 

 

Jesus Christ people. All of you that are bitching about SP being short changed because of online, do you really expect anyone to believe you didn't get your $60 worth? Come on, I want the SP DLC too, but quit whining. Even if it never comes, and even if V wasn't your favorite game in the series, you ABSOLUTELY got your money's worth a long time ago. This place is getting unbearable.

Thats not even the main problem. Are you even reading the posts correctly?

 

People are pissed because Rockstar's hard on for Online is getting worse.

 

They talk as if its the best thing thats ever happened to GTA and put most of their people to work on sh*tty Online.

Thats definitely NOT a good sign for future Rockstar games.

What's the story in other forums or the internet? If people from only this forum say "Rockstar should focus on single-player", I don't think there is a chance of success. If a lot people from Reddit, other gaming forums, and in fact any other internet place could support your petition, it could very well get into the eyes of R*, otherwise it will just many of the ignored petitions.

The GTA subreddit is full of Online fanboys I doubt they care about SP

 

R*s focus on Online at the moment does not mean they won't release any Singleplayer games in the future its clear that a new Red Dead or even Agent is in the works.Agent and the new red dead will have worser sp. Just the way of the times as a hardcore fan we will always be left to slaughter in the name of casual gamers.

 

Worse SP ?

 

I don't know about you but the Singleplayer of GTA V was rather good Max Payne 3 was good aswell, Red Dead was good.

 

What are you on about?

Just because YOU think GTA V isn't good for some little flaws it has, when do so.

GTA V was, and I will say it again, and again and again.

a realy awesome game which nailed the atmosphere of a Organic Soup Opera with entertaining writing freedom of how to explore the world, a beatifully crafted Openworld, narratively backed up Random Events and side activities, and of course a realy good graphical fidelity which can STILL hold up to most games, its even way better than MGS V regarding graphics.

 

Rockstar Games allways produces high quality innovative titles, every title they release has something new and fresh to it, at least every GTA.

And I believe Agent is going to be their next awesome game.

[fac316]

 

 

Its not about the games but about the fact of releasing a Singleplayer game piece by piece, also the guy obviously LIED when he said their whole team is working on Online, thats such BS, because the Free Mode Event Update will of course be alot of fun, but its not that high of production value that a whole team is working on it.

 

Now just imagine same types of Updates which are there for Online would be there for Singleplayer(which a lot of them pretty much are)

It wouldn't change anything...

 

Who said anything about piece by piece? All people are asking for is that Singleplayer be shown some attention, and that Rockstar not devote all of theirs to their baby Online. If SP had the same type of updates that Online has, I bet as many people wouldn't be complaining about it, now would they? The fact that SP is missing a lot in comparison to Online should be a wake up call that Rockstar doesn't care as much for SP as they do for Online.

 

You'd think the quote from Rockstar themselves would be enough to confirm that. Yet there's always gotta be that one person in denial.

 

And what proof have you to say that the Creative Director lied without of course, "thinking so"? He, himself already confirmed it, so just taking it with a grain of salt would just lead to conspiracy territory.

 

yea for whatever reason when we point of R* obvious faults and and claim the game is less then a 10 and we call them out for abandoning the one aspect that most of us (true diehards) in SP, but wait, if we say that we need to be on crazy pills.

[XenoxX]

 

 

 

Its not about the games but about the fact of releasing a Singleplayer game piece by piece, also the guy obviously LIED when he said their whole team is working on Online, thats such BS, because the Free Mode Event Update will of course be alot of fun, but its not that high of production value that a whole team is working on it.

 

Now just imagine same types of Updates which are there for Online would be there for Singleplayer(which a lot of them pretty much are)

It wouldn't change anything...

 

Who said anything about piece by piece? All people are asking for is that Singleplayer be shown some attention, and that Rockstar not devote all of theirs to their baby Online. If SP had the same type of updates that Online has, I bet as many people wouldn't be complaining about it, now would they? The fact that SP is missing a lot in comparison to Online should be a wake up call that Rockstar doesn't care as much for SP as they do for Online.

 

You'd think the quote from Rockstar themselves would be enough to confirm that. Yet there's always gotta be that one person in denial.

 

And what proof have you to say that the Creative Director lied without of course, "thinking so"? He, himself already confirmed it, so just taking it with a grain of salt would just lead to conspiracy territory.

 

yea for whatever reason when we point of R* obvious faults and and claim the game is less then a 10 and we call them out for abandoning the one aspect that most of us (true diehards) in SP, but wait, if we say that we need to be on crazy pills.

 

What no I just like to argue...

Also for me the game is a 9/10.

It would have been a 10 with more Gang Random events added which are repeatable, and some more activites for me.

[woggleman]

Petitions never work. What companies listen to is a numbers,

[SmileyBandito]

When CVG visited Rockstar to play the new Freeroam Update, they said Rockstar acknowledged story DLC "as a thing", but CVG suspects there's no definite timeframe as of now.

 

Watch the last minute of their most recent video.

[XenoxX]

Petitions never work. What companies listen to is a numbers,

Petitions are numbers in theory, but R* is not dependent on numbers, they have Social Club which tracks EVERYTHING Story Progresss, player behavious just everything.

[Otselot]

 

 

 

 

Jesus Christ people. All of you that are bitching about SP being short changed because of online, do you really expect anyone to believe you didn't get your $60 worth? Come on, I want the SP DLC too, but quit whining. Even if it never comes, and even if V wasn't your favorite game in the series, you ABSOLUTELY got your money's worth a long time ago. This place is getting unbearable.

Thats not even the main problem. Are you even reading the posts correctly?

 

People are pissed because Rockstar's hard on for Online is getting worse.

 

They talk as if its the best thing thats ever happened to GTA and put most of their people to work on sh*tty Online.

Thats definitely NOT a good sign for future Rockstar games.

What's the story in other forums or the internet? If people from only this forum say "Rockstar should focus on single-player", I don't think there is a chance of success. If a lot people from Reddit, other gaming forums, and in fact any other internet place could support your petition, it could very well get into the eyes of R*, otherwise it will just many of the ignored petitions.

The GTA subreddit is full of Online fanboys I doubt they care about SP

 

R*s focus on Online at the moment does not mean they won't release any Singleplayer games in the future its clear that a new Red Dead or even Agent is in the works.

Agent and the new red dead will have worser sp. Just the way of the times as a hardcore fan we will always be left to slaughter in the name of casual gamers.

 

Worse SP ?

 

I don't know about you but the Singleplayer of GTA V was rather good Max Payne 3 was good aswell, Red Dead was good.

 

What are you on about?

Just because YOU think GTA V isn't good for some little flaws it has, when do so.

GTA V was, and I will say it again, and again and again.

a realy awesome game which nailed the atmosphere of a Organic Soup Opera with entertaining writing freedom of how to explore the world, a beatifully crafted Openworld, narratively backed up Random Events and side activities, and of course a realy good graphical fidelity which can STILL hold up to most games, its even way better than MGS V regarding graphics.

 

Rockstar Games allways produces high quality innovative titles, every title they release has something new and fresh to it, at least every GTA.

And I believe Agent is going to be their next awesome game.

 

I was agreeing until the MGSV part, Just No.

[XenoxX]

 

 

 

 

 

Jesus Christ people. All of you that are bitching about SP being short changed because of online, do you really expect anyone to believe you didn't get your $60 worth? Come on, I want the SP DLC too, but quit whining. Even if it never comes, and even if V wasn't your favorite game in the series, you ABSOLUTELY got your money's worth a long time ago. This place is getting unbearable.

Thats not even the main problem. Are you even reading the posts correctly?

 

People are pissed because Rockstar's hard on for Online is getting worse.

 

They talk as if its the best thing thats ever happened to GTA and put most of their people to work on sh*tty Online.

Thats definitely NOT a good sign for future Rockstar games.

What's the story in other forums or the internet? If people from only this forum say "Rockstar should focus on single-player", I don't think there is a chance of success. If a lot people from Reddit, other gaming forums, and in fact any other internet place could support your petition, it could very well get into the eyes of R*, otherwise it will just many of the ignored petitions.

The GTA subreddit is full of Online fanboys I doubt they care about SP

 

R*s focus on Online at the moment does not mean they won't release any Singleplayer games in the future its clear that a new Red Dead or even Agent is in the works.

Agent and the new red dead will have worser sp. Just the way of the times as a hardcore fan we will always be left to slaughter in the name of casual gamers.

 

Worse SP ?

 

I don't know about you but the Singleplayer of GTA V was rather good Max Payne 3 was good aswell, Red Dead was good.

 

What are you on about?

Just because YOU think GTA V isn't good for some little flaws it has, when do so.

GTA V was, and I will say it again, and again and again.

a realy awesome game which nailed the atmosphere of a Organic Soup Opera with entertaining writing freedom of how to explore the world, a beatifully crafted Openworld, narratively backed up Random Events and side activities, and of course a realy good graphical fidelity which can STILL hold up to most games, its even way better than MGS V regarding graphics.

 

Rockstar Games allways produces high quality innovative titles, every title they release has something new and fresh to it, at least every GTA.

And I believe Agent is going to be their next awesome game.

 

I was agreeing until the MGSV part, Just No.

 

GTA V graphics are better than MGS V, thats fact.

[woggleman]

 

Petitions never work. What companies listen to is a numbers,

Petitions are numbers in theory, but R* is not dependent on numbers, they have Social Club which tracks EVERYTHING Story Progresss, player behavious just everything.

 

They are numbers but less than one percent even sign these things while sales show the true numbers about how many people are willing to pay for something. If online really were as hated as this forum makes it sound then nobody would play it or buy shark cards and R would abandon it. They would never sink money into something that nobody is interested in which is probably why they are reluctant to release SP DLC. People get mad at them for not doing it but the numbers for EFLC don't lie.

 

I agree with the Social Club thing which is probably why V is shorter than IV. Stats show that less than 30% of people even completed IV which is why they changed things. There is a huge discrepancy in what many people say on a message board vs what many people actually do and where they put their money. If there were a true market for sp DLC that would justify the money spent on development they would have been released by summer of 2014.