Suicidal grievers?

[bruvs-mcfc]

 

 

 

 

 

I use it after I kill someone when I've taken irreparable damage or if the cops are eatin' away at my health bar so we can both spawn with equal health. If you have a problem with that, then you only want your kills spoon-fed to you and therefore can go f*ck yourself.

 

Thank you.

 

 

 

 

 

Or you could simply stay alive and not die.

 

kill and surviving > kill and suicide.

 

 

Some of you just want to wiggle around with a gun and play strafe and shoot....knowing full well that COPS will swarm in seconds. That sh*t won't work in GTA O free roam unless do some thinking.

 

Me... id rather die to the cops OR to to a player then commit suicide, and its easy to stay alive if you try to stay alive. Suicide is such a weak ass way to play, and i sure as hell don't need it. I guess you guys do

Hulio, no one is fallin' for your elitist sh*t. We all know you're lyin'. Why is it when someone says "black" you have to scream "white!"? Do you get a sick thrill out of startin' arguments or somethin'?

 

Anyway, as I have said. If players hate someone for a totally logical tactic then they can go fornicate theirselves with an iron.

"Logical" how is it even close to becoming a logical tactic , nobody has yet even come close to explaing why killing yourself or getting killed by the cops is any different on both counts you die and respawn some so I think it's possibly you talking Bullsh*t and trying to justify a tactic that is used by people who do not possess the skill to fight other playersIt is fair is it not? You both spawn with equal health, if a player kills you on half health and can only kill you on half health then I think it is totally logical. How is it logical that a player who I just killed can come back alive in the first place? What I use EWO for is as logical as this game will get. Period.

 

 

I use snacks before you start screamin'. You just don't get enough to last a war.

 

P.S. If I "lack skills" to kill the player on half-health then he surely must be worse if he was killed in the first place (seriously, think about that).

 

If another player or the same player kills me on half-health then I'd consider that a scrap-kill. Nothin' to do with skill. Bein' ballsy gets you killed. If you want to win then you do what I do.

 

So to rephrase, if people complain about me choosin' Easy Way Out maybe they should've killed me 1st rather than complainin' about me doin' it because they aren't good enough to kill me on full health. That makes you a hypocrite in all honesty. You lack the skill/know-how to kill me and then complain when I kill myself after I kill you. If you killed me first, then there would be no quarrel with it. *Drops mic*

 

(*****Who is really the worse player in this predicament?******)

No it's not fair is it , but that's exactly the reason you do it ,cos other does not start with full health when he kills you he carrys on with what's left , so I'd say it's far from fair being given full health constantly , and just saying something is fair is not a valid explanation , what difference does it make if you kill yourself or someone kills you ?????

[Dr Labuschagne]

12 year old ISIS cos players probably...

[BlackHeartedGovernor]

 

 

 

 

 

 

I use it after I kill someone when I've taken irreparable damage or if the cops are eatin' away at my health bar so we can both spawn with equal health. If you have a problem with that, then you only want your kills spoon-fed to you and therefore can go f*ck yourself.

 

Thank you.

 

 

 

 

 

Or you could simply stay alive and not die.

 

kill and surviving > kill and suicide.

 

 

Some of you just want to wiggle around with a gun and play strafe and shoot....knowing full well that COPS will swarm in seconds. That sh*t won't work in GTA O free roam unless do some thinking.

 

Me... id rather die to the cops OR to to a player then commit suicide, and its easy to stay alive if you try to stay alive. Suicide is such a weak ass way to play, and i sure as hell don't need it. I guess you guys do

Hulio, no one is fallin' for your elitist sh*t. We all know you're lyin'. Why is it when someone says "black" you have to scream "white!"? Do you get a sick thrill out of startin' arguments or somethin'?

 

Anyway, as I have said. If players hate someone for a totally logical tactic then they can go fornicate theirselves with an iron.

"Logical" how is it even close to becoming a logical tactic , nobody has yet even come close to explaing why killing yourself or getting killed by the cops is any different on both counts you die and respawn some so I think it's possibly you talking Bullsh*t and trying to justify a tactic that is used by people who do not possess the skill to fight other playersIt is fair is it not? You both spawn with equal health, if a player kills you on half health and can only kill you on half health then I think it is totally logical. How is it logical that a player who I just killed can come back alive in the first place? What I use EWO for is as logical as this game will get. Period.

 

 

I use snacks before you start screamin'. You just don't get enough to last a war.

 

P.S. If I "lack skills" to kill the player on half-health then he surely must be worse if he was killed in the first place (seriously, think about that).

 

If another player or the same player kills me on half-health then I'd consider that a scrap-kill. Nothin' to do with skill. Bein' ballsy gets you killed. If you want to win then you do what I do.

 

So to rephrase, if people complain about me choosin' Easy Way Out maybe they should've killed me 1st rather than complainin' about me doin' it because they aren't good enough to kill me on full health. That makes you a hypocrite in all honesty. You lack the skill/know-how to kill me and then complain when I kill myself after I kill you. If you killed me first, then there would be no quarrel with it. *Drops mic*

 

(*****Who is really the worse player in this predicament?******)

No it's not fair is it , but that's exactly the reason you do it ,cos other does not start with full health when he kills you he carrys on with what's left , so I'd say it's far from fair being given full health constantly , and just saying something is fair is not a valid explanation , what difference does it make if you kill yourself or someone kills you ?????"Fair isn't a valid explanation"? I'm gonna assume that was the crack talkin'.

 

The point here is a lot of players hold kill-scores as trophies. I don't take kindly to gettin' beat by someone who can only kill me on half health. So I started usin' EWO. Now they complain because they rely on a player to be in a lesser physically healthy state to be able to kill them. Besides, what else is there to talk about? There is no valid reason for arguin' against it. If you kill the guy who uses it before he kill you then you're fine, if you can't do that then get better. Simple. I can't stress that enough. I hated gettin' killed on half-health. Instead of wastin' time gettin' better, I adapted and chose the easy way out. Adaption is they key to winning. You don't need to get better at the game when you can just take the EWO. As I said, all people care about is winning. Not the skill.

Edited August 26, 2015 by BlackHeartedGovernor

[PS-GTAIVplayer]

Nerfing (so suicide harms k/d or similar) an abusive tactic by the Suicide Girls might be good except that a person can die by suicide if they don't throw a grenade far enough or fire a shot from a Rhino at a point blank wall by mistake.

[Hunter]

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

I use it after I kill someone when I've taken irreparable damage or if the cops are eatin' away at my health bar so we can both spawn with equal health. If you have a problem with that, then you only want your kills spoon-fed to you and therefore can go f*ck yourself.

 

Thank you.

 

 

 

 

 

Or you could simply stay alive and not die.

 

kill and surviving > kill and suicide.

 

 

Some of you just want to wiggle around with a gun and play strafe and shoot....knowing full well that COPS will swarm in seconds. That sh*t won't work in GTA O free roam unless do some thinking.

 

Me... id rather die to the cops OR to to a player then commit suicide, and its easy to stay alive if you try to stay alive. Suicide is such a weak ass way to play, and i sure as hell don't need it. I guess you guys do

Hulio, no one is fallin' for your elitist sh*t. We all know you're lyin'. Why is it when someone says "black" you have to scream "white!"? Do you get a sick thrill out of startin' arguments or somethin'?

 

Anyway, as I have said. If players hate someone for a totally logical tactic then they can go fornicate theirselves with an iron.

"Logical" how is it even close to becoming a logical tactic , nobody has yet even come close to explaing why killing yourself or getting killed by the cops is any different on both counts you die and respawn some so I think it's possibly you talking Bullsh*t and trying to justify a tactic that is used by people who do not possess the skill to fight other players

It is fair is it not? You both spawn with equal health, if a player kills you on half health and can only kill you on half health then I think it is totally logical. How is it logical that a player who I just killed can come back alive in the first place? What I use EWO for is as logical as this game will get. Period.

 

 

I use snacks before you start screamin'. You just don't get enough to last a war.

 

P.S. If I "lack skills" to kill the player on half-health then he surely must be worse if he was killed in the first place (seriously, think about that).

 

If another player or the same player kills me on half-health then I'd consider that a scrap-kill. Nothin' to do with skill. Bein' ballsy gets you killed. If you want to win then you do what I do.

 

So to rephrase, if people complain about me choosin' Easy Way Out maybe they should've killed me 1st rather than complainin' about me doin' it because they aren't good enough to kill me on full health. That makes you a hypocrite in all honesty. You lack the skill/know-how to kill me and then complain when I kill myself after I kill you. If you killed me first, then there would be no quarrel with it. *Drops mic*

 

(*****Who is really the worse player in this predicament?******)

No it's not fair is it , but that's exactly the reason you do it ,cos other does not start with full health when he kills you he carrys on with what's left , so I'd say it's far from fair being given full health constantly , and just saying something is fair is not a valid explanation , what difference does it make if you kill yourself or someone kills you ?????"Fair isn't a valid explanation"? I'm gonna assume that was the crack talkin'.

 

 

The point here is a lot of players hold kill-scores as trophies. I don't take kindly to gettin' beat by someone who can only kill me on half health. So I started usin' EWO. Now they complain because they rely on a player to be in a lesser physically healthy state to be able to kill them. Besides, what else is there to talk about? There is no valid reason for arguin' against it. If you kill the guy who uses it before he kill you then you're fine, if you can't do that then get better. Simple. I can't stress that enough. I hated gettin' killed on half-health. Instead of wastin' time gettin' better, I adapted and chose the easy way out. Adaption is they key to winning.

You don't need to get better at the game when you can just take the EWO. As I said, all people care about is winning. Not the skill.

 

I'm not so sure. If people don't care about skill at all, and just want to win by any means possible, then why doesn't everyone just go the whole way and turn god mode on? I'm not saying gta's gameplay takes a massive amount of skill, but there has to be some vague amount for the game to be competitive, and if it's not somewhat competitive, what's the point?

 

If no player can be better/more practiced than another, the game just becomes a boring, monotonous flip of a coin. You might win, you might not.

 

Besides, if every player should just do whatever they can to win, why don't you just spend all your time in a tank/jet?

[BlackHeartedGovernor]

Nerfing (so suicide harms k/d or similar) an abusive tactic by the Suicide Girls might be good except that a person can die by suicide if they don't throw a grenade far enough or fire a shot from a Rhino at a point blank wall by mistake.

Or add full health regen. Why is it people are only interested in gettin' rid of features rather than changin' them?

[BlackHeartedGovernor]

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

I use it after I kill someone when I've taken irreparable damage or if the cops are eatin' away at my health bar so we can both spawn with equal health. If you have a problem with that, then you only want your kills spoon-fed to you and therefore can go f*ck yourself.

 

Thank you.

 

 

 

 

 

Or you could simply stay alive and not die.

 

kill and surviving > kill and suicide.

 

 

Some of you just want to wiggle around with a gun and play strafe and shoot....knowing full well that COPS will swarm in seconds. That sh*t won't work in GTA O free roam unless do some thinking.

 

Me... id rather die to the cops OR to to a player then commit suicide, and its easy to stay alive if you try to stay alive. Suicide is such a weak ass way to play, and i sure as hell don't need it. I guess you guys do

Hulio, no one is fallin' for your elitist sh*t. We all know you're lyin'. Why is it when someone says "black" you have to scream "white!"? Do you get a sick thrill out of startin' arguments or somethin'?

 

Anyway, as I have said. If players hate someone for a totally logical tactic then they can go fornicate theirselves with an iron.

"Logical" how is it even close to becoming a logical tactic , nobody has yet even come close to explaing why killing yourself or getting killed by the cops is any different on both counts you die and respawn some so I think it's possibly you talking Bullsh*t and trying to justify a tactic that is used by people who do not possess the skill to fight other players

It is fair is it not? You both spawn with equal health, if a player kills you on half health and can only kill you on half health then I think it is totally logical. How is it logical that a player who I just killed can come back alive in the first place? What I use EWO for is as logical as this game will get. Period.

 

 

I use snacks before you start screamin'. You just don't get enough to last a war.

 

P.S. If I "lack skills" to kill the player on half-health then he surely must be worse if he was killed in the first place (seriously, think about that).

 

If another player or the same player kills me on half-health then I'd consider that a scrap-kill. Nothin' to do with skill. Bein' ballsy gets you killed. If you want to win then you do what I do.

 

So to rephrase, if people complain about me choosin' Easy Way Out maybe they should've killed me 1st rather than complainin' about me doin' it because they aren't good enough to kill me on full health. That makes you a hypocrite in all honesty. You lack the skill/know-how to kill me and then complain when I kill myself after I kill you. If you killed me first, then there would be no quarrel with it. *Drops mic*

 

(*****Who is really the worse player in this predicament?******)

No it's not fair is it , but that's exactly the reason you do it ,cos other does not start with full health when he kills you he carrys on with what's left , so I'd say it's far from fair being given full health constantly , and just saying something is fair is not a valid explanation , what difference does it make if you kill yourself or someone kills you ?????"Fair isn't a valid explanation"? I'm gonna assume that was the crack talkin'.

 

 

The point here is a lot of players hold kill-scores as trophies. I don't take kindly to gettin' beat by someone who can only kill me on half health. So I started usin' EWO. Now they complain because they rely on a player to be in a lesser physically healthy state to be able to kill them. Besides, what else is there to talk about? There is no valid reason for arguin' against it. If you kill the guy who uses it before he kill you then you're fine, if you can't do that then get better. Simple. I can't stress that enough. I hated gettin' killed on half-health. Instead of wastin' time gettin' better, I adapted and chose the easy way out. Adaption is they key to winning.

You don't need to get better at the game when you can just take the EWO. As I said, all people care about is winning. Not the skill.

 

I'm not so sure. If people don't care about skill at all, and just want to win by any means possible, then why doesn't everyone just go the whole way and turn god mode on? I'm not saying gta's gameplay takes a massive amount of skill, but there has to be some vague amount for the game to be competitive, and if it's not somewhat competitive, what's the point?

 

If no player can be better/more practiced than another, the game just becomes a boring, monotonous flip of a coin. You might win, you might not.

 

Besides, if every player should just do whatever they can to win, why don't you just spend all your time in a tank/jet?

Players usually feel obligated to go get a jet if you get one. I like to keep it on foot at times but I'm all for winning. If they get a jet then so do I. I do spend little time in a jet because I don't have the elite experience and can't be assed gettin' better. A lot of players I've killed in tanks and jets leave straight after or go into Passive and get another one.

[.Vooodu.]

 

 

 

I use it after I kill someone when I've taken irreparable damage or if the cops are eatin' away at my health bar so we can both spawn with equal health. If you have a problem with that, then you only want your kills spoon-fed to you and therefore can go f*ck yourself.

 

Thank you.

 

 

 

 

 

Or you could simply stay alive and not die.

 

kill and surviving > kill and suicide.

 

 

Some of you just want to wiggle around with a gun and play strafe and shoot....knowing full well that COPS will swarm in seconds. That sh*t won't work in GTA O free roam unless do some thinking.

 

Me... id rather die to the cops OR to to a player then commit suicide, and its easy to stay alive if you try to stay alive. Suicide is such a weak ass way to play, and i sure as hell don't need it. I guess you guys do

Hulio, no one is fallin' for your elitist sh*t. We all know you're lyin'. Why is it when someone says "black" you have to scream "white!"? Do you get a sick thrill out of startin' arguments or somethin'?

 

Anyway, as I have said. If players hate someone for a totally logical tactic then they can go fornicate theirselves with an iron.

 

 

 

Ya... so thinking suicide spam is cop out makes me and elitist and liar.

 

 

...Ha.

 

You know, its funny when we agree about Passive abuse.. its cool.

We we disagree on suicide spam, now you think im the guy starting sh*t.

 

 

It just is what it is man. I could run around shooting players with the suicide option highlighted..offing myself constantly. I just think its f*ckin dumb, and i can`t force myself to play like that.

 

Hate me all you want. You`d have more fun against me then you would some clown who does. Thats the way i see it.

Edited August 28, 2015 by HulioG