franchise2020 Posted January 9, 2003 Share Posted January 9, 2003 i know this topic is prolly old but f*ck searchin for it to see if it is...but how many of you people hate these fuggin critics for their bullsh*treviews of the game..they act like Tommy Fuggin Vercetti is a bad guy or somethin...i mean come on...hell if anything Tommy is the good guy and he jus wants to rid the city of all the drug lords and mafia and all...now im sure that 95% of those critic bastards have never taken the time toplay the dame game...nudity...aint no damn nudity...hell the last time i checked the girls dont have nipples...hell...i jus got one fuggin thing to say to these mutha fuggas...play the dame game...beginning to end...play all 100% and then im sure youll mind will change...btw...i give the damn thing a 10 out of 10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
All_Vice_City Posted January 9, 2003 Share Posted January 9, 2003 Those crutics are fuggin annoying, they don't like anything that not rated E. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
franchise2020 Posted January 9, 2003 Author Share Posted January 9, 2003 preach it vice...preach it Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aggressor27 Posted January 9, 2003 Share Posted January 9, 2003 Fella's, fellas, calm down, and have a seat so I can talk to you for a minute. I said sit down! Alright. The fault of these reviewers lay in their review. They constantly write about how they played the game, and how the game allows violence toward innocent civilians. One pud from CNN.com described how he could kill a cop, steal his weapon, shoot civilians, steal a car, and run people over with it. He also adds how it discussed him. I ask this, why is he doing all of this in the game when the perimeters within the game don't require you to hurt innocent people in order to complete the game. In a nut shell, they are all friggin, sorry, fuggin hypocrytes. The ability to hurt civilians is at player descretion and is in no way neccessary to achieve 100% in the game. Even the rampages are aimed towards gangs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
crescend0 Posted January 9, 2003 Share Posted January 9, 2003 fugg yeah!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
turgon Posted January 9, 2003 Share Posted January 9, 2003 I ask this, why is he doing all of this in the game when the perimeters within the game don't require you to hurt innocent people in order to complete the game. you do have to kill innocent people to complete the game., get your facts straight. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aggressor27 Posted January 10, 2003 Share Posted January 10, 2003 Name one mission where you have to kill a civilian in order to complete the game. And to dumb it down for you, a civilian is defined as someone not involved in crime or a criminal organization. Next time, beat the game before putting your two cents in, pud. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AlianAnt Posted January 10, 2003 Share Posted January 10, 2003 Hes probily saying that maby a guy is running way on the sidewalk and you ahve to run a few people over to get to him. Its still a load of crap. SHOOT YOUR GUN! Metal up your ass! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aggressor27 Posted January 10, 2003 Share Posted January 10, 2003 No, his exact words are "you do have to kill innocent people to complete the game., get your facts straight." Yes, it's innevitable that you're gonna wind up killing civilians, but you don't have to in order to complete the game. And you people missed my entire point. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
All_Vice_City Posted January 10, 2003 Share Posted January 10, 2003 aggressor27 is right there is no misson where it tells you to kill innocent civilians, if you do kill civilians its our fault not R*. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aggressor27 Posted January 10, 2003 Share Posted January 10, 2003 exactly, All_Vice, it's at player's discretion. Which is my point, these critics play the game, do nothing but kill cops and run down civilians, and talk about how it discusted(sp) them. Friggin' hypocrites need to play the game the way it was intended. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Quintin Vance Posted January 10, 2003 Share Posted January 10, 2003 The only mission were you hurt or kill innocent people is the firsts assination mission were you kill the Pizza boy.....what the helld he do? Anyway you also beat up innocent jurors and smash there cars to get there votes or somthing to save Giorgio Forelli..... but besides that....who cares, if this offends you simply dont get a M rated game. You might as well get a Rated R movie and Critisize that because Arnold Shwarzni**er kills people with gattling guns. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aggressor27 Posted January 10, 2003 Share Posted January 10, 2003 First of all, the Pizza Boy was a Neo Nazi punk, and nobady likes them. Second, the juror sold poison milk to school children. Nah, but seriously, the guy had a vendetta against the pizza boy for a reason, I know it's said but I can't really remember why right now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
All_Vice_City Posted January 10, 2003 Share Posted January 10, 2003 Anyway you also beat up innocent jurors and smash there cars to get there votes or somthing to save Giorgio Forelli..... He never had to hurt the jurors, he never even had to touch them, he just had to smash up there cars. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aggressor27 Posted January 10, 2003 Share Posted January 10, 2003 Nah, All_vice, I think he's refering to the first mission where you have to beat that guy with a hammer, can't remember if he's juror or not though... But you don't kill him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
franchise2020 Posted January 10, 2003 Author Share Posted January 10, 2003 I think we all have agreed that its not neccessary to kill innocent people to complete the game...the pizza boy and the phone guy had problems wit each other and he wanted you to kill the bastard..no innocense there...the juror's were jus plain corrupt...face it...everyone you kill on the missions has to do wit somethin fuggin bad...the innocent people are up to you poor civilians on whether you want to kill em or not...frankly i think its a waste of time to do somethin like that...all it does is give you a wanted level that was totally unnecessary...BASICALLY: KILL AT YOUR OWN RISK!!!!...but yeah i agree...the critics seem to point out that you CAN kill innocent people...and lets face it the cops arent exactly innocent...i mean how many times have you guys seen cops beat the livin hell outta someone...granted maybe that person deserved it...but somehow i highly doubt it...ok back on point...they say you CAN kill them but its up to you whether you do or not... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aggressor27 Posted January 10, 2003 Share Posted January 10, 2003 I agree franchy, but we gotta consider that we play the bad guy in the game. So in essence, killing cops would be considered wrong in the real world. That's granted, so I'll give 'em that much, but as far as civilians go, they're wrong. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
machete-onurmum Posted January 10, 2003 Share Posted January 10, 2003 critics suk. they probably dont even hav a ps2 or even GTA vc or 3. Im a betta critic than any of em asholes, im a true gamer and therefore i would know if GTA is good or not, and it beats the hell outta any other game in the planet Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tuff_luv_capo Posted January 10, 2003 Share Posted January 10, 2003 I beleive, "Messing with the Man" may have soemthing to do with extreme violence and civilian casualties. And "Hit The Courier", you to blow up an innocent government worker to get the materials needed to fake money. Oh, and what about "Kill The Wife"? Or "Checkpoint Charlie?"...err, well....nvm. But I think I made my point there. Not to mention the mission "Sir Yes Sir" where government official's and military members' lives are at the control of you and your stolen tank. And "Demoliton Man" is completely based destroying a building full of construction workers for profit only. I think I could add another one too, like the "Blow up 12 cars" rampages where they are located in areas filled with civilian cars, and people as well. And what if you don't have to have people in the cars? Well what about the BOAT rampage where you have to sink innocent boaters? No way to line up boats there. I think I made my point. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
All_Vice_City Posted January 10, 2003 Share Posted January 10, 2003 I forgot about all those missons, but still all those critcs are tight up old people that got to bed at 6:30 and read a book for an hour in bed, then go to sleep. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aggressor27 Posted January 11, 2003 Share Posted January 11, 2003 Yeah, well, uh, yeah. My point is, what's the critics doing running down civilians and wasting cops instead of playing the missions. F*ck the civilians. In Vice City, they are all involved in a child porn scheme, that's why they deserve to die. But I don't remember killing civilians in Checkpoint Charlie. That's that stupid mission with the boat ramps, right? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tuff_luv_capo Posted January 11, 2003 Share Posted January 11, 2003 But I don't remember killing civilians in Checkpoint Charlie.... hahaha I should have put that in [sarcasm][/sarcasm] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tenacious_Dude Posted January 11, 2003 Share Posted January 11, 2003 what about the one where u have to kill the chef for his phone? the wife in waste the wife was a b*tch. shes that retard on the streets that says stuff like "oh, like totally bump into me" and stuff. every time i see 1 of them i blow their brains out Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tenacious_Dude Posted January 11, 2003 Share Posted January 11, 2003 I beleive, "Messing with the Man" may have soemthing to do with extreme violence and civilian casualties. And "Hit The Courier", you to blow up an innocent government worker to get the materials needed to fake money. Oh, and what about "Kill The Wife"? Or "Checkpoint Charlie?"...err, well....nvm. But I think I made my point there. Not to mention the mission "Sir Yes Sir" where government official's and military members' lives are at the control of you and your stolen tank. And "Demoliton Man" is completely based destroying a building full of construction workers for profit only. I think I could add another one too, like the "Blow up 12 cars" rampages where they are located in areas filled with civilian cars, and people as well. And what if you don't have to have people in the cars? Well what about the BOAT rampage where you have to sink innocent boaters? No way to line up boats there. I think I made my point. sorry bout second post but; the government b*tch had a chick shooting u on top of her car and another car with people in it ramming u. and if u went into the place with her car they shoot u. and demolition man-them builders tried to hit me with their hammers. tha bastards. messing with the man is probably the only one with like violence and stuff. but who gives a sh*t it just computer animated squares with computert animated blood. when r these old bastards gunna realize that its not real? p.s. u dun kill ne1 in sir yes sir. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now