[Spoiler alert] Did rockstar try to BURY the franchise with Gta 5 ?

[SuperGTFan]

Hi , I'm new to the forums , my first post actually ,

 

so as the title said , I have noticed that many of the iconic protagonists are either getting killed or being considered dead .

 

packie mcreary said in the paleto bank job that niko Bellic is "probably dead "

 

, franklin and lamar said in hood safari that the grove street families are either dead or Became CEO [ referencing Carl Johnson ] ,

 

Johnny Klebitz is confirmed dead ,

 

Both Michael De Santa and Trevor Philips Fates are optional [ due to them being the antagonists themselves ] ,

 

Lester said in "Casing the jewel store " that " the crew in the south all went down " might be referencing Tommy Vercetti from Vice City ,

 

This leaves Franklin Clinton , Luis Lopez , Huang Lee , Toni Cipriani , and Claud Speed The last untouched protagonists [ I know that Victor Vance was killed at the beginning of Vice City ]

 

Note that I'm well aware of this whole 3D and Hd universe thing .

 

So what you guys think ? Keep in mind those were only my opinions .

Edited April 20, 2015 by SuperGTFan

[Uncle Sikee Atric]

The franchise is so brutal, killings are numerous and body counts are high, so notable characters suffer the same fate.

 

There are no reasons why R* cannot introduce new replacements for them, with new voice actors....

 

Pointless poll really.

[GN 92]

Depends

 

There are lots of opinions, especially from V haters.

 

But if you think a billion dollar franchise is being buried, you're an idiot.

[lastmanonearth]

I think they`re killing off old characters to remove any speculation of them coming back, because Rockstar always want to try out new characters, no matter how many fans the old ones may have.

[TheOneLibertonian]

Depends

 

There are lots of opinions, especially from V haters.

 

But if you think a billion dollar franchise is being buried, you're an idiot.

You know what? I don't hate V, neither IV fans or SA fans. It's just freaking disappointing and misunderstood, but in no way R* is trying to bury GTA. That would be stupid if R* were trying to bury their biggest franchise, as a matter of fact, GTA is the series that gave R* popularity and money. They use all that money to make another stellar video game. But please stop, just stop.

[StellarRunner]

Gta? Bury? Oh come on... A franchise which doesn't have any serious competitors can't be bury.

[Edward Nashton]

I don't see how they're burying the franchise, with every subsequent release of a GTA game, you always play as a brand new character(s), killing off previous protagonists may piss people off but it doesn't hurt the next game at all. Pointless poll - the knee-jerk reaction crowd is going to love this, though, just for the title alone...

Edited April 20, 2015 by Edward Nashton

[chilleverest]

Do a bit of research and post a thread....Rockstar have already mentioned their inspirations for gta 6.

[Fuzzknuckles]

Think of it like the death card in Tarot.

 

It either means death, or new beginnings. Kill off your legacy, start a new one.

 

But I don't agree, they are not idiots, they would not try to kill the one game that actually keeps the studio afloat - the other games, MP, RDR, etc - these are not their cash cows and wouldn't keep them going if they were all they released. They need an enduring franchise like GTA to keep the studio alive.

[lastmanonearth]

I voted "I don`t know" because I didn`t fully understand the question. Of course they don`t want to sweep their cash cow, their baby under the rug! But maybe they`re just symbolizing to us the the old era is dead and buried and that it`s time for change. Unfortunately the change couldn`t have been worse this time around!

Do a bit of research and post a thread....Rockstar have already mentioned their inspirations for gta 6.

Really? I`d really like to know what it is. Searching "Rockstar, inspiration and GTA 6" came up with nothing good.

Edited April 20, 2015 by lastmanonearth

[Big Gta fan]

 

Depends

 

There are lots of opinions, especially from V haters.

 

But if you think a billion dollar franchise is being buried, you're an idiot.

You know what? I don't hate V, neither IV fans or SA fans. It's just freaking disappointing and misunderstood, but in no way R* is trying to bury GTA. That would be stupid if R* were trying to bury their biggest franchise, as a matter of fact, GTA is the series that gave R* popularity and money. They use all that money to make another stellar video game. But please stop, just stop.

 

Sam or his brother dan houser said before the release of gta iv that all characters from the 3d universe are Dead.............i don't understand why would people bring up the subject now after V.

Edited April 20, 2015 by Big Gta fan

[Son of Zeus]

No. Why will they bury it? They're gonna milk the cow as long as possible. The SP has been wounded by the Online, hopefully not dead yet.

 

Johnny's incident was done for cheap shock value to make Trevor look like a badass. Really cringeworthy, I wonder what prompted Dan(or is it Sam?) to write that part. Maybe they forgot that the DLC's had their fans too.

 

Packie's talk about Niko is just a reference to IV. I doubt he's dead, but hopefully he'll get killed in the next game. I can imagine MVC dancing with joy.

 

Similarly, mentions of CJ are just throwbacks to fans. R* have said the 3D era and HD era are different.

 

The supposed reference to VC is vague, I don't think it's a reference to VC.

Edited April 20, 2015 by Son of Zeus

[Fuzzknuckles]

No. Why will they bury it? They're gonna milk the cow as long as possible. The SP has been wounded by the Online, hopefully not dead yet.

 

Johnny's incident was done for cheap shock value to make Trevor look like a badass. Really cringeworthy, I wonder what prompted Dan(or is it Sam?) to write that part. Maybe they forgot that the DLC's had their fans too.

 

Packie's talk about Niko is just a reference to IV. I doubt he's dead, but hopefully he'll get killed in the next game. I can imagine MVC dancing with joy.

 

Similarly, mentions of CJ are just throwbacks to fans. R* have said the 3D era and HD era are different.

 

The supposed reference to VC is vague, I don't think it's a reference to VC.

RE: Johnny - I think in part you're right, but I think it was also to illustrate that you can't get too attached to any character (as, potentially, you'll be killing one by the end of the game) and that the death of Johnny was the start of a new era. They wanted to kill off the dark, glum bleakness that TLAD, more than any other GTA game, polluted GTA with. TLAD, for me, is an interesting instalment, but one of the least enjoyable gaming experiences I've ever had. It introduced a few interesting mechanics, but it was bogged down with overwhelmingly depressing themes. Stomping on the head of that instalment was like, to me at least, they were saying 'cheer up muddy funksters, the new guard has arrived'.

[Big Gta fan]

No. Why will they bury it? They're gonna milk the cow as long as possible. The SP has been wounded by the Online, hopefully not dead yet.

 

Johnny's incident was done for cheap shock value to make Trevor look like a badass. Really cringeworthy, I wonder what prompted Dan(or is it Sam?) to write that part. Maybe they forgot that the DLC's had their fans too.

 

Packie's talk about Niko is just a reference to IV. I doubt he's dead, but hopefully he'll get killed in the next game. I can imagine MVC dancing with joy.

 

Similarly, mentions of CJ are just throwbacks to fans. R* have said the 3D era and HD era are different.

 

The supposed reference to VC is vague, I don't think it's a reference to VC.

About the johnny's incident.........you do know the motion capture for the game was done in 2010 (steven ogg said that himself) so the beloved johnny and his crew died 5 years ago...........i don't think they made it shortly before the release just to make trevor look badass it's true homie they are gone 5 years ago............and he is already badass and you probably hate him and think he is a pathetic Gta character despite he will scare the sh*t out of you if you saw him in real life only if you looked in his eyes...........especially his personality is inspired by the movie Bronson and bronson is a real life character and the guy always hit people.......so your point isn't valid..................And what makes you more sadder he become a drug addict who will die someday by a suicide or the drug itself.............or because he was killed by trevor maybe he died in a horrible way but at least a fast way in a matter of seconds and of course it's not fast like a shot to the head.

Edited April 20, 2015 by Big Gta fan

[walkingsickness]

I'm struggling to understand what the OP is trying to say. The franchise being buried based on the storyline ending up having a protagonist or a main charter dying at the end?

So how would the franchise be buried? Or the matter...what do you mean by "buried"?

 

I mean they can kill all of them and more...and create more with a new GTA. We didn't know about M,F,T before GTA V. They were created and (depending on your personal
choice) they can either be dead or living...but what does that matter? R* will create new ones. That's what you do to create a story for a game like this.

 

The real question you should of asked is "Is R* trying to "bury" the franchise, by focusing so much on Online and negating the story of GTA?"

 

To that answer I would say that they're trying....but us fans of the story of GTA won't let them do it!

[Big Gta fan]

I'm struggling to understand what the OP is trying to say. The franchise being buried based on the storyline ending up having a protagonist or a main charter dying at the end?

So how would the franchise be buried? Or the matter...what do you mean by "buried"?

 

I mean they can kill all of them and more...and create more with a new GTA. We didn't know about M,F,T before GTA V. They were created and (depending on your personal

choice) they can either be dead or living...but what does that matter? R* will create new ones. That's what you do to create a story for a game like this.

 

The real question you should of asked is "Is R* trying to "bury" the franchise, by focusing so much on Online and negating the story of GTA?"

 

To that answer I would say that they're trying....but us fans of the story of GTA won't let them do it!

 

Well i see a lot of players wants old protagonists to come back in a new game............i think that's what he want ...............and about the DLC story it will come of course shown fonteno said that himself......but to be honest i just want them to add lots of new missions and side activties in the same storyline........and iv dlc's came just one year after iv was released simply because they were working in iv dlc's before the release of gta 4 go a head and deny that there were plenty of cameos and mentions in iv story plus iv wasn't hard to make like V..........iv didn't had any stand out missions like an other gta have i only remember Three leaf glover and the ending and that's it.............And the pathaetic online fans won't let them bury online either.......so the best thing to do just report every gta v online video and channel to get them closed and remove gta v online from the forums.....Sorry for bad english

Edited April 20, 2015 by Big Gta fan

[thafablifee46]

Burythehatchet is a cool mission

[walkingsickness]

 

I'm struggling to understand what the OP is trying to say. The franchise being buried based on the storyline ending up having a protagonist or a main charter dying at the end?

So how would the franchise be buried? Or the matter...what do you mean by "buried"?

 

I mean they can kill all of them and more...and create more with a new GTA. We didn't know about M,F,T before GTA V. They were created and (depending on your personal

choice) they can either be dead or living...but what does that matter? R* will create new ones. That's what you do to create a story for a game like this.

 

The real question you should of asked is "Is R* trying to "bury" the franchise, by focusing so much on Online and negating the story of GTA?"

 

To that answer I would say that they're trying....but us fans of the story of GTA won't let them do it!

 

Well i see a lot of players wants old protagonists to come back in a new game............i think that's what he want ...............and about the DLC story it will come of course shown fonteno said that himself......but to be honest i just want them to add lots of new missions and side activties in the same storyline........and iv dlc's came just one year after iv was released simply because they were working in iv dlc's before the release of gta 4 go a head and deny that there were plenty of cameos and mentions in iv story plus iv wasn't hard to make like V..........iv didn't had any stand out missions like an other gta have i only remember Three leaf glover and the ending and that's it.

 

 

You know what (here comes a rant...BUCKLE UP!)

 

TBH...a lot of players don't know what they hell they want! Straight up! I keep hearing all of this sh*t that people want it how it was in IV and the dlc came out at this time in IV...why is it taking so long for it come out in V?

 

If I was either of the Housers brothers my response would be....if you want the old protagonist to come back....THEN GO THE f*ck BACK TO GTA IV!

 

I don't want to see any of those muthaf*cking protagonist, antagonist, side characters, npc, etc... that was in IV in any of the games going forward. When you make a new GTA...it should

be a NEW GTA! Not a blast in the past bullsh*t. We got GTA IV in a rebuilt LC..then TLAD (which was good)...then TBOGT (which was better). THAT'S IT! No more IV!

 

And as far as the DLC my official opinion on it is if it's not dlc 1 featuring a new San Fierro with new characters....then a dlc 2 featuring a new Las Ventrues with new characters and then you can link them all together with the map....then I don't give sh*t about the DLCs!

 

What players really want is the following:

 

* CONTINUE STORYLINE WITH SP....AND I MEAN NOW!!!

* more activities in SP that makes SP more worthwhile to play, instead of it coming to a crashing halt once storyline is completed and feeling like you have to go play online now to keep yourself from dying of boredom.

* a realistic way to spend cash and earn cash in SP...instead of making all this un-necessary money in the stock market and NOTHING to spend it on.

* to stop releasing updates that have bugs in them for the first week!

* more enterable interiors (that might just be me...and a few others.)

* more properties...more cars...and more to the FREAKING MAP!

 

THAT'S IT! That's what majority of player REALLY want.

 

If R* was burying the franchise (which they're not btw...I mean...look at the numbers) they would never evolve and try something new. Which they are doing with creating new charters and this online sh*t (even though I don't like all the attention to it...it is evolving the franchise)

 

Whew....Ok rant over.

[Big Gta fan]

 

 

I'm struggling to understand what the OP is trying to say. The franchise being buried based on the storyline ending up having a protagonist or a main charter dying at the end?

So how would the franchise be buried? Or the matter...what do you mean by "buried"?

 

I mean they can kill all of them and more...and create more with a new GTA. We didn't know about M,F,T before GTA V. They were created and (depending on your personal

choice) they can either be dead or living...but what does that matter? R* will create new ones. That's what you do to create a story for a game like this.

 

The real question you should of asked is "Is R* trying to "bury" the franchise, by focusing so much on Online and negating the story of GTA?"

 

To that answer I would say that they're trying....but us fans of the story of GTA won't let them do it!

 

Well i see a lot of players wants old protagonists to come back in a new game............i think that's what he want ...............and about the DLC story it will come of course shown fonteno said that himself......but to be honest i just want them to add lots of new missions and side activties in the same storyline........and iv dlc's came just one year after iv was released simply because they were working in iv dlc's before the release of gta 4 go a head and deny that there were plenty of cameos and mentions in iv story plus iv wasn't hard to make like V..........iv didn't had any stand out missions like an other gta have i only remember Three leaf glover and the ending and that's it.

 

 

You know what (here comes a rant...BUCKLE UP!)

 

TBH...a lot of players don't know what they hell they want! Straight up! I keep hearing all of this sh*t that people want it how it was in IV and the dlc came out at this time in IV...why is it taking so long for it come out in V?

 

If I was either of the Housers brothers my response would be....if you want the old protagonist to come back....THEN GO THE f*ck BACK TO GTA IV!

 

I don't want to see any of those muthaf*cking protagonist, antagonist, side characters, npc, etc... that was in IV in any of the games going forward. When you make a new GTA...it should

be a NEW GTA! Not a blast in the past bullsh*t. We got GTA IV in a rebuilt LC..then TLAD (which was good)...then TBOGT (which was better). THAT'S IT! No more IV!

 

And as far as the DLC my official opinion on it is if it's not dlc 1 featuring a new San Fierro with new characters....then a dlc 2 featuring a new Las Ventrues with new characters and then you can link them all together with the map....then I don't give sh*t about the DLCs!

 

What players really want is the following:

 

* CONTINUE STORYLINE WITH SP....AND I MEAN NOW!!!

* more activities in SP that makes SP more worthwhile to play, instead of it coming to a crashing halt once storyline is completed and feeling like you have to go play online now to keep yourself from dying of boredom.

* a realistic way to spend cash and earn cash in SP...instead of making all this un-necessary money in the stock market and NOTHING to spend it on.

* to stop releasing updates that have bugs in them for the first week!

* more enterable interiors (that might just be me...and a few others.)

* more properties...more cars...and more to the FREAKING MAP!

 

THAT'S IT! That's what majority of player REALLY want.

 

If R* was burying the franchise (which they're not btw...I mean...look at the numbers) they would never evolve and try something new. Which they are doing with creating new charters and this online sh*t (even though I don't like all the attention to it...it is evolving the franchise)

 

Whew....Ok rant over.

 

First i didn't say i want an old protagonists to go back in an other gta i was just explaining to the guy that a lot of gta fans wants that but not me...........second don't you think what you asked for is little too far and too hard to make it i'm sorry but it is......... do you want them recreate all this again maybe will happen in a future gta but not v .........plus v's map is already big i agree with what the people want....will mostly.

Edited April 20, 2015 by Big Gta fan

[CarlitoDorito]

No. If you travel to another dimension in the SP DLC and kill all the other characters and blow up their maps, then V's S.A blows up killing everyone, then there's a message "we don't like all the old characters, new ones or anything about the games, so we decided to kill everyone and start again" followed by a newswire update saying they wanna bury everything that came before then maybe.

Edited April 20, 2015 by CarlitoDorito

[Son of Zeus]

RE: Johnny - I think in part you're right, but I think it was also to illustrate that you can't get too attached to any character (as, potentially, you'll be killing one by the end of the game) and that the death of Johnny was the start of a new era. They wanted to kill off the dark, glum bleakness that TLAD, more than any other GTA game, polluted GTA with. TLAD, for me, is an interesting instalment, but one of the least enjoyable gaming experiences I've ever had. It introduced a few interesting mechanics, but it was bogged down with overwhelmingly depressing themes. Stomping on the head of that instalment was like, to me at least, they were saying 'cheer up muddy funksters, the new guard has arrived'.

I agree that TLaD was really depressing. It's quite possible that they thought along the lines of your view and did it to kill that glum feel, but IMO they should've given Johnny a better death(a shootout, for ex.), if they wanted to kill him that bad. The Johnny in V acted so different to the IV Johnny that it felt like a cheap shock value scene.

 

 

About the johnny's incident.........you do know the motion capture for the game was done in 2010 (steven ogg said that himself) so the beloved johnny and his crew died 5 years ago...........i don't think they made it shortly before the release just to make trevor look badass it's true homie they are gone 5 years ago......

Read my post properly before commenting. I never said they did it shortly before the release. I said that Dan wrote that part of the story in a cheaply exaggerated way make him look like a badass.

 

 

and he is already badass and you probably hate him and think he is a pathetic Gta character despite he will scare the sh*t out of you if you saw him in real life only if you looked in his eyes...........especially his personality is inspired by the movie Bronson and bronson is a real life character and the guy always hit people.......so your point isn't valid...............

I wouldn't call him badass. He's mentally unstable so he can't properly judge what's too dangerous. This makes it look like he doesn't give a sh*t about anything and is a real tough guy, but the fact is that he's not sane and can't help his behaviour.

 

Yeah I think he's the most pathetic character on the series.

 

"Despite he'll scare you if he existed, your point isn't valid"

So? A lot of criminals are scary, but that doesn't change the fact that they're pathetic characters.

 

 

And what makes you more sadder he become a drug addict who will die someday by a suicide or the drug itself.............or because he was killed by trevor maybe he died in a horrible way but at least a fast way in a matter of seconds and of course it's not fast like a shot to the head.

Johnny getting killed in a pathetic manner by Trevor made me cringe, not sad. If they wanted T to kill him they could've given him a better death like a shootout.

[walkingsickness]

 

 

 

I'm struggling to understand what the OP is trying to say. The franchise being buried based on the storyline ending up having a protagonist or a main charter dying at the end?

So how would the franchise be buried? Or the matter...what do you mean by "buried"?

 

I mean they can kill all of them and more...and create more with a new GTA. We didn't know about M,F,T before GTA V. They were created and (depending on your personal

choice) they can either be dead or living...but what does that matter? R* will create new ones. That's what you do to create a story for a game like this.

 

The real question you should of asked is "Is R* trying to "bury" the franchise, by focusing so much on Online and negating the story of GTA?"

 

To that answer I would say that they're trying....but us fans of the story of GTA won't let them do it!

 

Well i see a lot of players wants old protagonists to come back in a new game............i think that's what he want ...............and about the DLC story it will come of course shown fonteno said that himself......but to be honest i just want them to add lots of new missions and side activties in the same storyline........and iv dlc's came just one year after iv was released simply because they were working in iv dlc's before the release of gta 4 go a head and deny that there were plenty of cameos and mentions in iv story plus iv wasn't hard to make like V..........iv didn't had any stand out missions like an other gta have i only remember Three leaf glover and the ending and that's it.

 

 

You know what (here comes a rant...BUCKLE UP!)

 

TBH...a lot of players don't know what they hell they want! Straight up! I keep hearing all of this sh*t that people want it how it was in IV and the dlc came out at this time in IV...why is it taking so long for it come out in V?

 

If I was either of the Housers brothers my response would be....if you want the old protagonist to come back....THEN GO THE f*ck BACK TO GTA IV!

 

I don't want to see any of those muthaf*cking protagonist, antagonist, side characters, npc, etc... that was in IV in any of the games going forward. When you make a new GTA...it should

be a NEW GTA! Not a blast in the past bullsh*t. We got GTA IV in a rebuilt LC..then TLAD (which was good)...then TBOGT (which was better). THAT'S IT! No more IV!

 

And as far as the DLC my official opinion on it is if it's not dlc 1 featuring a new San Fierro with new characters....then a dlc 2 featuring a new Las Ventrues with new characters and then you can link them all together with the map....then I don't give sh*t about the DLCs!

 

What players really want is the following:

 

* CONTINUE STORYLINE WITH SP....AND I MEAN NOW!!!

* more activities in SP that makes SP more worthwhile to play, instead of it coming to a crashing halt once storyline is completed and feeling like you have to go play online now to keep yourself from dying of boredom.

* a realistic way to spend cash and earn cash in SP...instead of making all this un-necessary money in the stock market and NOTHING to spend it on.

* to stop releasing updates that have bugs in them for the first week!

* more enterable interiors (that might just be me...and a few others.)

* more properties...more cars...and more to the FREAKING MAP!

 

THAT'S IT! That's what majority of player REALLY want.

 

If R* was burying the franchise (which they're not btw...I mean...look at the numbers) they would never evolve and try something new. Which they are doing with creating new charters and this online sh*t (even though I don't like all the attention to it...it is evolving the franchise)

 

Whew....Ok rant over.

 

First i didn't say i want an old protagonists to go back in an other gta i was just explaining to the guy that a lot of gta fans wants that but not me...........second don't you think what you asked for is little too far and too hard to make it i'm sorry but it is......... do you want them recreate all this again maybe will happen in a future gta but not v .........plus v's map is already big i agree with what the people want....will mostly.

 

 

I wasn't necessary saying you wanted the older charters in the game...just the notion in general. What you mean "a little far and too hard to make"?

 

You know that a gaming company is really an imagination company where there really isn't any boundaries?

 

Another thing I'm going to quickly rant about....When you say "do you want them recreate all this again maybe will happen in a future gta but not v" Are you saying that from a point of fact?

 

How do you know specifically they haven't already done that? That they have't (or planned to) make the dlc like that and they have a way to connect the map? It's so amazing to me

that we play these video games, which is completely imaginative, but when you come up with something more imaginative people be like "nah...can't happen, but maybe in a future GTA".

 

As if imagination just ran out...

Edited April 20, 2015 by walkingsickness

[Otselot]

I voted "I Don't Know" because i really don' want to say yes/no.

 

Lol Rockstar trying to go bankrupt.

The franchise is so brutal, killings are numerous and body counts are high, so notable characters suffer the same fate.

There are no reasons why R* cannot introduce new replacements for them, with new voice actors....

Pointless poll really.

I agree, SP dlc should bring new protagonists.

[Big Gta fan]

Son of zues............yes i know you didn't say this(but a lot of people thought rockstar wanted to make a special introduction to the character before the game was shortly released. but apparently not you So sorry about that) but i never cared for johnny before.....and after what happened to him when he was in V so thank trevor got him out of his life..i mean he became a drug addict

i agree with he is a mentally unstable but not all the time.............i don't think michael will agree on a mentally unstable man all the time during the heists and since he always do the big role in the heists and other missions and so yeah he is a badass can't deny that especially his personality is inspiration by Bronson and that guy is a total badass and based on a real guy ...........and since you say all criminals are scary and pathetic does this include the past gta protagonists (claude-tommy-cj-NB)?

alright maybe you right about this one but Hi ...like i said he is a drug addict man he seemed to be really miserable and his crew is broken do you want to live like that or someone finish the job and kill him..

[Son of Zeus]

i agree with he is a mentally unstable but not all the time.............i don't think michael will agree on a mentally unstable man all the time during the heists and since he always do the big role in the heists and other missions and so yeah he is a badass can't deny that especially his personality is inspiration by Bronson and that guy is a total badass and based on a real guy ...........and since you say all criminals are scary and pathetic does this include the past gta protagonists (claude-tommy-cj-NB)?

It is clear throughout the story that Michael never really thinks of Trevor as a good friend. He tried to get T killed in the 2004 heist. And he wasn't happy when T turns up at his door after 9 years. This was totally unexpected, so Michael had no option but to allow T in the heists. And yeah T isn't completely insane, he has moments of clarity but most of the time he behaves insane.

 

By the criminals, I meant criminals in real life who are crazy like Trevor.

You said that T is not pathetic because he would scare me in real life, so I said that there are a lot of criminals in real life who are scary like T, but they are pathetic characters.

 

 

alright maybe you right about this one but Hi ...like i said he is a drug addict man he seemed to be really miserable and his crew is broken do you want to live like that or someone finish the job and kill him..

Like I said before, what disgusted me was the way Johnny was killed rather than the fact that he was killed. He deserved a better death.

[SCOOBASTEEB]

hahaha so many petty comments.

 

They aren't burying it. Also just because they kill of 'high profile' characters doesn't mean they are trying to bury it either, it just adds for interesting play and shock value. Imagine if none of the main characters ever died... it would be so predictable and boring.

[Big Gta fan]

 

 

 

 

I'm struggling to understand what the OP is trying to say. The franchise being buried based on the storyline ending up having a protagonist or a main charter dying at the end?

So how would the franchise be buried? Or the matter...what do you mean by "buried"?

 

I mean they can kill all of them and more...and create more with a new GTA. We didn't know about M,F,T before GTA V. They were created and (depending on your personal

choice) they can either be dead or living...but what does that matter? R* will create new ones. That's what you do to create a story for a game like this.

 

The real question you should of asked is "Is R* trying to "bury" the franchise, by focusing so much on Online and negating the story of GTA?"

 

To that answer I would say that they're trying....but us fans of the story of GTA won't let them do it!

 

Well i see a lot of players wants old protagonists to come back in a new game............i think that's what he want ...............and about the DLC story it will come of course shown fonteno said that himself......but to be honest i just want them to add lots of new missions and side activties in the same storyline........and iv dlc's came just one year after iv was released simply because they were working in iv dlc's before the release of gta 4 go a head and deny that there were plenty of cameos and mentions in iv story plus iv wasn't hard to make like V..........iv didn't had any stand out missions like an other gta have i only remember Three leaf glover and the ending and that's it.

 

 

You know what (here comes a rant...BUCKLE UP!)

 

TBH...a lot of players don't know what they hell they want! Straight up! I keep hearing all of this sh*t that people want it how it was in IV and the dlc came out at this time in IV...why is it taking so long for it come out in V?

 

If I was either of the Housers brothers my response would be....if you want the old protagonist to come back....THEN GO THE f*ck BACK TO GTA IV!

 

I don't want to see any of those muthaf*cking protagonist, antagonist, side characters, npc, etc... that was in IV in any of the games going forward. When you make a new GTA...it should

be a NEW GTA! Not a blast in the past bullsh*t. We got GTA IV in a rebuilt LC..then TLAD (which was good)...then TBOGT (which was better). THAT'S IT! No more IV!

 

And as far as the DLC my official opinion on it is if it's not dlc 1 featuring a new San Fierro with new characters....then a dlc 2 featuring a new Las Ventrues with new characters and then you can link them all together with the map....then I don't give sh*t about the DLCs!

 

What players really want is the following:

 

* CONTINUE STORYLINE WITH SP....AND I MEAN NOW!!!

* more activities in SP that makes SP more worthwhile to play, instead of it coming to a crashing halt once storyline is completed and feeling like you have to go play online now to keep yourself from dying of boredom.

* a realistic way to spend cash and earn cash in SP...instead of making all this un-necessary money in the stock market and NOTHING to spend it on.

* to stop releasing updates that have bugs in them for the first week!

* more enterable interiors (that might just be me...and a few others.)

* more properties...more cars...and more to the FREAKING MAP!

 

THAT'S IT! That's what majority of player REALLY want.

 

If R* was burying the franchise (which they're not btw...I mean...look at the numbers) they would never evolve and try something new. Which they are doing with creating new charters and this online sh*t (even though I don't like all the attention to it...it is evolving the franchise)

 

Whew....Ok rant over.

 

First i didn't say i want an old protagonists to go back in an other gta i was just explaining to the guy that a lot of gta fans wants that but not me...........second don't you think what you asked for is little too far and too hard to make it i'm sorry but it is......... do you want them recreate all this again maybe will happen in a future gta but not v .........plus v's map is already big i agree with what the people want....will mostly.

 

 

I wasn't necessary saying you wanted the older charters in the game...just the notion in general. What you mean "a little far and too hard to make"?

 

You know that a gaming company is really an imagination company where there really isn't any boundaries?

 

Another thing I'm going to quickly rant about....When you say "do you want them recreate all this again maybe will happen in a future gta but not v" Are you saying that from a point of fact?

 

How do you know specifically they haven't already done that? That they have't (or planned to) make the dlc like that and they have a way to connect the map? It's so amazing to me

that we play these video games, which is completely imaginative, but when you come up with something more imaginative people be like "nah...can't happen, but maybe in a future GTA".

 

As if imagination just ran out...

 

You want them to create san fiarro or l.V in v When everybody complaining about there isn't much to do in the state of V make sense right (i mean there still things to do in the state of v) ? i highly doubt they will do that......

 

and Second:no i don't say this as a fact i'm just saying i think it's hard to do this

 

 

 

and how do i know specifically that they haven't already done that or planned to?.... let me ask you this.....How do you know that they are already done that or planned it to what makes you so sure?

[Big Gta fan]

 

i agree with he is a mentally unstable but not all the time.............i don't think michael will agree on a mentally unstable man all the time during the heists and since he always do the big role in the heists and other missions and so yeah he is a badass can't deny that especially his personality is inspiration by Bronson and that guy is a total badass and based on a real guy ...........and since you say all criminals are scary and pathetic does this include the past gta protagonists (claude-tommy-cj-NB)?

It is clear throughout the story that Michael never really thinks of Trevor as a good friend. He tried to get T killed in the 2004 heist. And he wasn't happy when T turns up at his door after 9 years. This was totally unexpected, so Michael had no option but to allow T in the heists. And yeah T isn't completely insane, he has moments of clarity but most of the time he behaves insane.

 

By the criminals, I meant criminals in real life who are crazy like Trevor.

You said that T is not pathetic because he would scare me in real life, so I said that there are a lot of criminals in real life who are scary like T, but they are pathetic characters.

 

 

alright maybe you right about this one but Hi ...like i said he is a drug addict man he seemed to be really miserable and his crew is broken do you want to live like that or someone finish the job and kill him..

Like I said before, what disgusted me was the way Johnny was killed rather than the fact that he was killed. He deserved a better death.

 

No.actually they had their moments during the story and michael seemed to like trevor with him it's implied more then once but in the sametime he was scared of him too (you know the Brad situation)

 

And yes maybe trevor is sometimes pathetic but you have to understand he had a tough childhood he was rejected by everyone only brad and michael he thought their were the true friends of him .........and come on he is almost a copy paste of Bronson like i said before you know (hitting people with no reason or even killing them if they gone too far with him) he was heaveily inspired by him to be honest.

 

And i think it's a matter of an opinion of how it disgusts people with johnny's death example me i never liked him but it was still a shock to see a protagonist die but it didn't disgust me like how disgust TLAD fans so i understand your feelings......................(This remind of how vito and joe from mafia 2 killed the protagonist of mafia 1 by putting a big hole into his stomeach using a shotgun) i was kinda upset but it's ok now.

[wiizardii]

This thread is beyond stupid and needs to get locked. I mean for one that was only an easter egg about CJ when they where talking about a dude who ran the families in Grove street way back, and that is because the HD universe has nothing to do with f*cking 3D universe. So, OP and all SA fanboys, get that through your thick skull. Same thing goes to anyone who denies the universes being seperate, because R* confirmed this themselfs.

 

Second, the fact that Packie says Niko is dead is something that will leave in speculation, he may not be dead at all because in game Packie was only guessing, he wasn't saying ''UGGGHHH YEAH MY OLD EASTERN EUROPEAN BUDDY DIED, TOO BAD TOO BADDDD :('' so, get that through your thick skull OP.

 

And Johnny getting killed........ Do I even have to get into this, or is the OP another one of does babies crying and hating Trevor?

Edited April 20, 2015 by Phoenix_Poop

[Big Gta fan]

This thread is beyond stupid and needs to get locked. I mean for one that was only an easter egg about CJ when they where talking about a dude who ran the families in Grove street way back, and that is because the HD universe has nothing to do with f*cking 3D universe. So, OP and all SA fanboys, get that through your thick skull. Same thing goes to anyone who denies the universes being seperate, because R* confirmed this themselfs.

 

Second, the fact that Packie says Niko is dead is something that will leave in speculation, he may not be dead at all because in game Packie was only guessing, he wasn't saying ''UGGGHHH YEAH MY OLD EASTERN EUROPEAN BUDDY DIED, TOO BAD TOO BADDDD :('' so, get that through your thick skull OP.

 

And Johnny getting killed........ Do I even have to get into this, or is the OP another one of does babies crying and hating Trevor?

This how it is homie........