Kampret Posted April 29, 2015 Share Posted April 29, 2015 For [email protected]#K's sake,Can't you bitches stop complaining & just enjoy the game?Get a life Could you stop being such a f*cking fanboy? So a legitimate complaint is not allowed now? Get a life. I think you are the fanboy here,complaining & whining is what you bunch of c*nts do best?I play a game to kill time,to enjoy,not bitch & whine about how the game does'nt go your way,If you guys are so damn good,make a game yourself Keep defending their decisions fanboy. A legitimate complaint about vehicle damage is not allowed? It's called constructive criticism you filthy fanboy. Can't believe that you guys are complaining about the lack of damage physics done to vehicles. I mean if Rockstar actually put in nothing but realism into their games it would become very unpleasant to play due to the fact that you would be doing a lot more dying than surviving. Frustrating your players is the last thing a developer wants. It's not about realism. It's about how it's a step backwards from LG V, IV, or even 3D era GTA. Car damage has been a part of GTA since GTA 1, and IV improved it. LG V went a bit backwards for being so hard to dent them, but CG/PC V is a huge step backwards from not being able to dent the roof and driver side door. Kaito Katsumi 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Xerukal Posted April 29, 2015 Share Posted April 29, 2015 (edited) The inability to dent roofs/driver doors is obviously there due to first person. For better or for worse. Edited April 29, 2015 by Xerukal Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EvilFiend Posted April 29, 2015 Share Posted April 29, 2015 http://i.imgur.com/Ui3JJ7n.jpg That's from ONE bad crash. How can you be honest with yourself and say this damage model 'sucks'? Scharkey its not so much how the damage model is constructed, its the fact its hard to get vehicles to take much damage in comparison. Its like you just expect more damage from certain impacts than you get. I did a quick comparison between IV and V. In both instances the impacted vehicle is parked. In this case I started wayyyyyyyy back down the street and drove the car till it was in its highest gear and climbing speed and this was the result. Now in IV, I didn't actually drive as fast and this was the result. There is a lot more damage to the impacted car and a bit more to the impacting car... Its not "which damage model looks *prettiest*", its which one seems life-like given vehicle weight/speed of impact. Someone said they believe R* tried to increase damage in V during one of the patches tho. I know in the beginning it was almost like brick walls hitting brick walls. It seemed like the most you'd get was a broken light or marks on the paint... But the top image looks a lot more real as these days cars actually have anti crash bars through the framing. Not just a casing that caves into the chassis like 1990.I mean if you think the bottom picture is anything close to realistic which you guys are crying about then im sorry but you must have been dropped on your head as a child or youre not old enough to actually drive a car yet You got it completely backwards. Wrecking in real life like the top picture at 40mph would kill you. If the car doesn't crumple predictably to absorb the shockwave/impact guess where it goes? Through your body/brain, snapping your neck etc. Insta-death. If the car absorbs say 50% of it (guessing) then by the time the wave hits you its not as lethal. So youre telling me you have never been in a car accident then. I was in the back seat of the work car and the boss crashed into a car in front of us at just over 50kmph. Surprise Im still here and my neck didnt snap causing insta death. I did have swelling on my knee from my shins smashing into the struts in the seats though.I know the damage could be increased but theres reasons behind the madness. Remember when GTA4 came out and everyone was in tears because clipping?well you reap what you sow ThunderBanana 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Realblue1 Posted April 29, 2015 Share Posted April 29, 2015 (edited) Ps3 I think this is with all the patches uninstalled, the 1.00 version right? I took this photo 2 years ago with my ps3 on gta online, i dont remember exactly but i think its from 1.01 or 1.02 . Edited April 29, 2015 by Realblue1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bahamut88 Posted April 29, 2015 Share Posted April 29, 2015 If you take a tank or bulldozer and run over cars the deformation is awesome, except of course for roofs, it annoys me that they did that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crimson Flam3s Posted April 29, 2015 Share Posted April 29, 2015 Nobody is complaining about the looks, the detail is better than V. What people are complaining about is that it takes crashing at 120mph to break a headlight. That is retarded, combine that with the arcadeish driving and cars that weight 10 tons and you can't move around in a crash and you end up with a pretty lame and boring driving experience. Nobody is asking for real life sh*t, just like how it was in IV. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bahamut88 Posted April 29, 2015 Share Posted April 29, 2015 Damage is fine for the most part, it's just really inconsistant. It's like they did that on purpose to make the game easier, like being able to turn a car over if you tip it over. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LegendarnyJebaka Posted April 29, 2015 Share Posted April 29, 2015 Damage is sh*t and driving physics is boring and not rewarding compered to IV... It's a big step back and huge minus for gameplay if you think about that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
blues3531 Posted April 30, 2015 Share Posted April 30, 2015 http://i.imgur.com/Ui3JJ7n.jpg That's from ONE bad crash. How can you be honest with yourself and say this damage model 'sucks'? Scharkey its not so much how the damage model is constructed, its the fact its hard to get vehicles to take much damage in comparison. Its like you just expect more damage from certain impacts than you get. I did a quick comparison between IV and V. In both instances the impacted vehicle is parked. In this case I started wayyyyyyyy back down the street and drove the car till it was in its highest gear and climbing speed and this was the result. Now in IV, I didn't actually drive as fast and this was the result. There is a lot more damage to the impacted car and a bit more to the impacting car... Its not "which damage model looks *prettiest*", its which one seems life-like given vehicle weight/speed of impact. Someone said they believe R* tried to increase damage in V during one of the patches tho. I know in the beginning it was almost like brick walls hitting brick walls. It seemed like the most you'd get was a broken light or marks on the paint... But the top image looks a lot more real as these days cars actually have anti crash bars through the framing. Not just a casing that caves into the chassis like 1990. I mean if you think the bottom picture is anything close to realistic which you guys are crying about then im sorry but you must have been dropped on your head as a child or youre not old enough to actually drive a car yet You got it completely backwards. Wrecking in real life like the top picture at 40mph would kill you. If the car doesn't crumple predictably to absorb the shockwave/impact guess where it goes? Through your body/brain, snapping your neck etc. Insta-death. If the car absorbs say 50% of it (guessing) then by the time the wave hits you its not as lethal. So youre telling me you have never been in a car accident then. I was in the back seat of the work car and the boss crashed into a car in front of us at just over 50kmph. Surprise Im still here and my neck didnt snap causing insta death. I did have swelling on my knee from my shins smashing into the struts in the seats though. I know the damage could be increased but theres reasons behind the madness. Remember when GTA4 came out and everyone was in tears because clipping? well you reap what you sow Yeah. Because you were in a modern car. Not something that absorbs damage like it was from the 1960s like your example picture from V does. You're just proving my point more and again showing you don't know what you're talking about. Although I'll admit I exaggerated on the speed a bit on the low side. A 40mph into a dead stop in a car from the 60s very likely could kill you though. Today any fully developed adult would walk away from that in a modern car. People that make the argument that "cars aren't built like they used to be! look at that damage from a 20mph wreck! what sh*tty build quality!" those are the reasons cars are safer now adays. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EvilFiend Posted April 30, 2015 Share Posted April 30, 2015 what are you talking about? First you say cars these days are death traps at 40 mph then you say they arent and they help save lives... You really need to lay off the crack mate. You cant even hold an opinion Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kaito Katsumi Posted April 30, 2015 Share Posted April 30, 2015 For [email protected]#K's sake,Can't you bitches stop complaining & just enjoy the game?Get a life Could you stop being such a f*cking fanboy? So a legitimate complaint is not allowed now? Get a life. I think you are the fanboy here,complaining & whining is what you bunch of c*nts do best?I play a game to kill time,to enjoy,not bitch & whine about how the game does'nt go your way,If you guys are so damn good,make a game yourselfAs a consumer and customer we have the right to complain. f*ck off, you ain't the boss. Nobody said we were damn good, stop assuming. Kampret 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kampret Posted April 30, 2015 Share Posted April 30, 2015 The inability to dent roofs/driver doors is obviously there due to first person. For better or for worse. I'd take clipping issues over inability to dent a car every day. A5R 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
A5R Posted April 30, 2015 Share Posted April 30, 2015 (edited) The inability to dent roofs/driver doors is obviously there due to first person. For better or for worse. I'd take clipping issues over inability to dent a car every day. This. Clipping through the car is way better than no damage. They could've come up with a better solution such as moving the character's seating position according to damage and also could've made only the steering non deformable but no, they had to lazily remove the whole f*cking damage from that section. Better yet, they could've loaded a separate cockpit for the car which saves damage and clippings for the outside view but doesn't obstruct first person view. Ps3 car damage masterrace lol Edited April 30, 2015 by Shootaholic Kampret 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kaito Katsumi Posted April 30, 2015 Share Posted April 30, 2015 For the first time i have to say. Consoles win in car damage. GG PC loses on ONE point with pride. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Biff73 Posted April 30, 2015 Share Posted April 30, 2015 For [email protected]#K's sake,Can't you bitches stop complaining & just enjoy the game?Get a life Could you stop being such a f*cking fanboy? So a legitimate complaint is not allowed now? Get a life. I think you are the fanboy here,complaining & whining is what you bunch of c*nts do best?I play a game to kill time,to enjoy,not bitch & whine about how the game does'nt go your way,If you guys are so damn good,make a game yourself Keep defending their decisions fanboy. A legitimate complaint about vehicle damage is not allowed? It's called constructive criticism you filthy fanboy. Can't believe that you guys are complaining about the lack of damage physics done to vehicles. I mean if Rockstar actually put in nothing but realism into their games it would become very unpleasant to play due to the fact that you would be doing a lot more dying than surviving. Frustrating your players is the last thing a developer wants. It's not about realism. It's about how it's a step backwards from LG V, IV, or even 3D era GTA. Car damage has been a part of GTA since GTA 1, and IV improved it. LG V went a bit backwards for being so hard to dent them, but CG/PC V is a huge step backwards from not being able to dent the roof and driver side door. Still don't get it?What I posted is directed at people the likes of you,whining bitches Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kaito Katsumi Posted May 1, 2015 Share Posted May 1, 2015 For [email protected]#K's sake,Can't you bitches stop complaining & just enjoy the game?Get a life Could you stop being such a f*cking fanboy? So a legitimate complaint is not allowed now? Get a life. I think you are the fanboy here,complaining & whining is what you bunch of c*nts do best?I play a game to kill time,to enjoy,not bitch & whine about how the game does'nt go your way,If you guys are so damn good,make a game yourself Keep defending their decisions fanboy. A legitimate complaint about vehicle damage is not allowed? It's called constructive criticism you filthy fanboy. Can't believe that you guys are complaining about the lack of damage physics done to vehicles. I mean if Rockstar actually put in nothing but realism into their games it would become very unpleasant to play due to the fact that you would be doing a lot more dying than surviving. Frustrating your players is the last thing a developer wants. It's not about realism. It's about how it's a step backwards from LG V, IV, or even 3D era GTA. Car damage has been a part of GTA since GTA 1, and IV improved it. LG V went a bit backwards for being so hard to dent them, but CG/PC V is a huge step backwards from not being able to dent the roof and driver side door. Still don't get it?What I posted is directed at people the likes of you,whining bitchesYou don't get it. This ain't whining, this is complainig about something downgraded, its what we have the right to do. Now f*ck off our case and stop being such a keyboard warrior. Kampret 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now