Ambient_ Posted April 11, 2015 Share Posted April 11, 2015 I've always had a special place for RDR, but after thinking recently it is better than V by leaps and bounds, here are a few reasons why: - better distributed map elements (towns etc) - better story - there is more to do - it's more 'dynamic' as in the random events are truly random, and I adore the bounty system! That's excellent! - what does it miss out for a western game? Very, very little! Leave your comments and thought below, do you concur? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NumaYay Posted April 11, 2015 Share Posted April 11, 2015 RDR > your mom. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Coin Posted April 11, 2015 Share Posted April 11, 2015 (edited) No, not really. Edited April 11, 2015 by ¥en Al3x_XXI 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Osho Posted April 11, 2015 Share Posted April 11, 2015 RDR was less boring than V and decent enough of an experience for a game based on the western theme. Map was pretty good. I haven't tried the multiplayer but reading through a lot of good things it sure seems a lot better than ONLINE. So yeah RDR > V. IMO!!! NumaYay 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rebel Posted April 11, 2015 Share Posted April 11, 2015 I'll close this as it really shouldn't be discussed. Both are very different games. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts