Jump to content

Armored Kuruma has limited range of fire.


Recommended Posts

justinlynch3

In the Kuruma you can only shoot out at certain angles and there are many dead zones where you can't fire outwards.

 

Given this I think R* should put a end once and for all to all Reverse Shooters. I say any car that you cannot shoot into from behind (aka bullerproof back cars like Zentorno, Infurnus, etc), then you should NOT be able to shoot out the back of them.

 

Lets fix this exploit already. No shooting in, then no shooting out either, that's how it should be.

Link to comment
https://gtaforums.com/topic/778716-armored-kuruma-has-limited-range-of-fire/
Share on other sites

In the Kuruma you can only shoot out at certain angles and there are many dead zones where you can't fire outwards.

 

Given this I think R* should put a end once and for all to all Reverse Shooters. I say any car that you cannot shoot into from behind (aka bullerproof back cars like Zentorno, Infurnus, etc), then you should NOT be able to shoot out the back of them.

 

Lets fix this exploit already. No shooting in, then no shooting out either, that's how it should be.

I was under the impression that the driver or passengers fired behind by sticking their arms out the windows, in vehicles like the Zentorno.

 

Passengers can't fire backwards out of the armoured Kuruma, because they can't reach out; the windows are obstructed by the bullet proofing. It's the same reason as to why you can't throw sticky bombs out of an armoured Kuruma.

justinlynch3

I think that's what they actually do is the sticking arm out, but it's still a exploit. They has free range shooting back and we have a near impossible target to hit. They should just implement no backward shooting in these cars at all.

I think that's what they actually do is the sticking arm out, but it's still a exploit. They has free range shooting back and we have a near impossible target to hit. They should just implement no backward shooting in these cars at all.

It's not an exploit. It seems to be working as intended. I'm fine with it.

I have a Zentorno & yet I like this idea because in most cases the only way to not die when dealing with a reverse shooter is blowing up his car & paying the fine. It's just not fair. The driver's ability to shoot backwards is justified & logical because he can take out his arm through the window but having a full range of shooting is not justified or logical. The range should be very limited because the driver "can't" really see what's going on behind him.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • 0 User Currently Viewing
    0 members, 0 Anonymous, 0 Guests

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using GTAForums.com, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.