Jump to content
Forum Rules
GTAForums does NOT endorse or allow any kind of GTA Online modding, mod menus, tools or account selling/hacking. Do NOT post them here or advertise them, as per the forum rules.
GTA Online New Bonuses for 24th Apr 2025 - Stick It to the Private Militias with Bonuses on Terrorbyte and Mobile Operations Missions Plus the FIB Priority File, Acid Lab Production Boosts, & More!
Update on the GTAForums Social Club Crew

Would you pay for future heists?

Unpopular Opinions

By Unpopular Opinions
in GTA Online

 Share

Recommended Posts

CrysisAverted

CrysisAverted

Posted
Posted (edited)

 

I would pay for stability.

'Tis not the topic sir.

 

 

It's in regards to your topic, I would not pay for something as unstable as GTAO, though I suppose it not being free would keep online from getting overwhelmed but then matchmaking would be worse with less people.

Edited by CrysisAverted
Unpopular Opinions

Unpopular Opinions

Posted
  • Author
Posted

 

 

I would pay for stability.

 

'Tis not the topic sir.

 

It's in regards to your topic, I would not pay for something as unstable as GTAO, though I suppose it not being free would keep online from getting overwhelmed but then matchmaking would be worse with less people.

Yeah, and I'm sure the price would keep the neck beards complaining on these forums too(:
  • RabCNesbitt
  • Like 1
UKPortista

UKPortista

Posted
Posted (edited)

Yes, but there would need to be some adjustments to the format. Just for starters I would like to see...

 

- An option for remaining players to continue an active mission if someone leaves or gets disconnected.

 

- The ability to kick someone from the Heist (if they're playing up, laggy or just hurting the mission) and still continue as above.

 

- A less time consuming, more reliable launch process.

Edited by UKPortista
Chamber53DV

Chamber53DV

Posted
Posted

No, I won't. I'm an old school gamer, and paying for additional content is something I have only done once (Watch Dogs - A waste, I've only put in about 3 hours of play on that game).

 

I've noticed a big difference between my generation of gamers (I'm 32) and younger ones. The younger players have little to no issue with paying for shark cards and DLC. I guess it's a combo of growing up during the creation of this new avenue of profit and not caring to spend their allowance money/gift cards on something hey enjoy playing.

 

The sad part, as they grow, they are being condition to accept this as the norm. There will be a day that R* will have to start charging for additional content to increase their profit margins, fiscal quarter after fiscal quarter, fiscal year after fiscal year.

Unpopular Opinions

Unpopular Opinions

Posted
  • Author
Posted

No, I won't. I'm an old school gamer, and paying for additional content is something I have only done once (Watch Dogs - A waste, I've only put in about 3 hours of play on that game).

I've noticed a big difference between my generation of gamers (I'm 32) and younger ones. The younger players have little to no issue with paying for shark cards and DLC. I guess it's a combo of growing up during the creation of this new avenue of profit and not caring to spend their allowance money/gift cards on something hey enjoy playing.

The sad part, as they grow, they are being condition to accept this as the norm. There will be a day that R* will have to start charging for additional content to increase their profit margins, fiscal quarter after fiscal quarter, fiscal year after fiscal year.

I got depressed reading that.
  • Antontheman and Heists
  • Like 2
Chamber53DV

Chamber53DV

Posted
Posted

 

No, I won't. I'm an old school gamer, and paying for additional content is something I have only done once (Watch Dogs - A waste, I've only put in about 3 hours of play on that game).

I've noticed a big difference between my generation of gamers (I'm 32) and younger ones. The younger players have little to no issue with paying for shark cards and DLC. I guess it's a combo of growing up during the creation of this new avenue of profit and not caring to spend their allowance money/gift cards on something hey enjoy playing.

The sad part, as they grow, they are being condition to accept this as the norm. There will be a day that R* will have to start charging for additional content to increase their profit margins, fiscal quarter after fiscal quarter, fiscal year after fiscal year.

I got depressed reading that.

Haha, sorry, it wasn't my intent.

CarimboHanky

CarimboHanky

Posted
Posted (edited)

i'd be willing to drop atleast $10 for another heist dlc with many new cars and more garage space.

 

 

evenknow right now the heists are for everyone and one can barely get a crew of randoms to play with, trying to play paid heist would be near impossible!

Edited by CarimboHanky
teagle

teagle

Posted
Posted

 

 

 

I would pay for stability.

 

'Tis not the topic sir.

 

It's in regards to your topic, I would not pay for something as unstable as GTAO, though I suppose it not being free would keep online from getting overwhelmed but then matchmaking would be worse with less people.

Yeah, and I'm sure the price would keep the neck beards complaining on these forums too(:

Is neck beard supposed to be some kind of insult? Like an anti squeaker. I don't understand how facial hair plays any role in anything.

Dest45

Dest45

Posted
Posted

 

 

 

 

I would pay for stability.

 

'Tis not the topic sir.

 

It's in regards to your topic, I would not pay for something as unstable as GTAO, though I suppose it not being free would keep online from getting overwhelmed but then matchmaking would be worse with less people.

Yeah, and I'm sure the price would keep the neck beards complaining on these forums too(:Is neck beard supposed to be some kind of insult? Like an anti squeaker. I don't understand how facial hair plays any role in anything.

http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=neckbeard

 

Its all true

teagle

teagle

Posted
Posted (edited)

 

 

 

 

 

I would pay for stability.

 

'Tis not the topic sir.

 

It's in regards to your topic, I would not pay for something as unstable as GTAO, though I suppose it not being free would keep online from getting overwhelmed but then matchmaking would be worse with less people.

Yeah, and I'm sure the price would keep the neck beards complaining on these forums too(:Is neck beard supposed to be some kind of insult? Like an anti squeaker. I don't understand how facial hair plays any role in anything.http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=neckbeard

 

Its all true

edit: http://www.cisurfboards.com/surfboards/neck-beard-by-dane-reynolds/ Edited by teagle
Relative007

Relative007

Posted
Posted (edited)

No.

 

This Update has seen the return of the dreaded Unknown Connection Error for me on PS4 (had 5 times today already) and Connecting to/from Heists is being problematic...Then do not get me started on actually trying to get Heists done with this nonsense all 4 Players need to be alive when in reality it is rarely required.

Edited by Relative007
DJ_Dribbles

DJ_Dribbles

Posted
Posted

I would pay no more than $10 on nothing short of a prodigious heist update, or update in general. Would I pay for this Heist update or any other DLCs before it? There wouldn't have been enough interest for me to spend more money on a game I already paid for.

 

But if the return is awesome where they give us ten heists, I'm even good with just another five as long as they are actual heists, long, long, elaborately planned heists and not these heists that are just a bunch of contact missions pieces together (although they are still fun).

 

I would also want a slew of new guns (anyone else disappointed there was only one new weapon? And it was a flare gun). I want melees, assaults, a heavy sniper you can walk with while scoping, everything! Just no more pistols...FOR THE LOVE OF EVERYTHING, NO MORE FRIGGEN PISTOLS!!!

 

A bombardment of new cars. Three in every class. 3 new supers, 3 muscles, 3 compacts, etc each with a ton of upgrades....and I want to be able to buy, upgrade and race semi trucks.

 

If they give us a myriad of weapons, cars, clothes, tats, hair, paint and all that fun stuff as well as extremely long well thought out heists, I will. But no more than $10. Call of Duty's $15 DLC maps make my balls itch.

 

Also, they would need to fix glitches and make improvements and give us MANSIONS!!!!!

 

Then they can have my money.

CaliMeatWagon

CaliMeatWagon

Posted
Posted

Not single-player heists but rather online.

 

No. Rockstar has good thing going here with all the DLC being free. It keeps the player base from being separated. It keeps friends playing with each other. Let them keep selling Cash Cards as it is a good way for them to make extra money without it drastically changing gameplay.*

 

 

 

*If this can't be seen as the truth, it is not my fault. I will not get into a Cash Card debate.

I would pay no more than $10 on nothing short of a prodigious heist update, or update in general. Would I pay for this Heist update or any other DLCs before it? There wouldn't have been enough interest for me to spend more money on a game I already paid for.

 

But if the return is awesome where they give us ten heists, I'm even good with just another five as long as they are actual heists, long, long, elaborately planned heists and not these heists that are just a bunch of contact missions pieces together (although they are still fun).

 

I would also want a slew of new guns (anyone else disappointed there was only one new weapon? And it was a flare gun). I want melees, assaults, a heavy sniper you can walk with while scoping, everything! Just no more pistols...FOR THE LOVE OF EVERYTHING, NO MORE FRIGGEN PISTOLS!!!

 

A bombardment of new cars. Three in every class. 3 new supers, 3 muscles, 3 compacts, etc each with a ton of upgrades....and I want to be able to buy, upgrade and race semi trucks.

 

If they give us a myriad of weapons, cars, clothes, tats, hair, paint and all that fun stuff as well as extremely long well thought out heists, I will. But no more than $10. Call of Duty's $15 DLC maps make my balls itch.

 

Also, they would need to fix glitches and make improvements and give us MANSIONS!!!!!

 

Then they can have my money.

 

You already can. They added the ability in this update. Press Start>Options>Controls then on the bottom of the list is an option that reads something like "Move While Zoomed". Toggle this on and you can walk around while zoomed in on any scoped rifle. Up and Down on the D-Pad is now how you zoom in (not sure what it is on PS3).

gengas

gengas

Posted
Posted

id only pay for any DLC if you could only use it once your past a certain level lol

 

i know that seems weird, but thats just me

 

i didnt really like the way many people built themselves up to higher levels for R* to just give lots of artillery to level 1 noobs, i.e homing launcher/RPG

 

so yeh, id only pay for it if i knew that there were people out there miserable because they cant just pay for it and join the fun all willy nilly

 

dont judge, or do, i dnt rly care lol

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • 0 User Currently Viewing
    0 members, 0 Anonymous, 0 Guests

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using GTAForums.com, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.

  I accept