What's your crazy theory that you have no way of proving?

[uncut751]

no, they look alike. if you are able to disprove his idea, please do.

[jatiger13]

no, they look alike. if you are able to disprove his idea, please do.

They look alike. That's were similarities end.

The two are not composed of the same matter. Therefore his theory has been disproved

Edited March 29, 2015 by jatiger13

[uncut751]

yes, they look alike, thats what the article said, and nothing else.

if you look at nature, you see the same kind of similarities and patterns in pretty much every structure, from biggest to smallest.

and they are not composed of the same matter? how can you differentiate matter if everything is made out of protons, electrons and neutrons anyway?

my body is made out of the same matter as the earth, but i somehow i am a conscious, living creature.

Edited March 29, 2015 by uncut751

[Richard Power Colt]

 

no, they look alike. if you are able to disprove his idea, please do.

They look alike. That's were similarities end.

The two are not composed of the same matter. Therefore his theory has been disproved

 

What if science is just a reflection of the mother brain's persona?

[sivispacem]

They look similar almost solely because they're rendered in the same colour spectrum. They're vaguely similar shapes, but they're really not that alike. Let's see another image of neurons, this time without the colouration:

 

 

Also, the simulated image of the universe is predictive; one of several hypothetical structures based on our know observation

[uncut751]

im not sure what your big problem with the color is.

[sivispacem]

Interesting example given they're both vascular systems and are therefore actually two images of the same thing. Doesn't mitigate neurons not really being similar to one hypothetical extrapolation of what the universe might look like.

[drifter.]

dude, lost socks just teleport into other dimensions.

also, the marijuana strain that was found in Australia but turned out to be fake. It was totally real, I think the guys got stoned and accidentally smoked it all up.

[uncut751]

i was just thinking that the gravitational effects between galaxies and stars could pose a similarity to neurons processing and transmitting information through electrical and chemical signals in, of course, a smaller and probably less complex system.

 

but i must admit i dont know sh*t.

Edited March 29, 2015 by uncut751

[drifter.]

interesting thought I sometimes think similarly.

 

but yea the only cold hard fact I think is 100% true is that I don't know jack sh*t about the universe and no one probably will.

[uncut751]

yes, we probably are actually pretty clueless about everything. if i was intelligent, conscious bacteria in a persons stomach, maybe after many many years of evolution i would come to the conclusion that the intestine itself would be my observable universe. i would never know about body parts like hands, brain, eyes, genitals, let alone imagine having the ability to process such sensory input. my "big bang" would be the time when the persons fetus started beginning to evolve. i could never bend my mind around the possibility of other people, parallel universes, living for thousands of years, even before "my" person was born, let alone animals or insects.

Edited March 29, 2015 by uncut751

[Webster.]

I have a very paranoid theory - anybody want to hear it?

[Mr_Leone]

Okay I'm stoned so forgive me:

 

Is it possible that a Big Foot kinda thing could have happened? Like maybe when we were closer to our cousins we could have mated with them and they are like hybrid animals lol.

[Abel.]

To the people who say we're clueless about everything, we really aren't. Scientists have expended a great deal of mental effort in unravelling the laws that underpin our universe so I'd prefer it if you didn't undermine their work by saying that we're "clueless".

[PhillBellic]

Okay I'm stoned so forgive me:

 

Is it possible that a Big Foot kinda thing could have happened? Like maybe when we were closer to our cousins we could have mated with them and they are like hybrid animals lol.

You certainly are stoned. It could have happened at one stage in the past, or it is a very convincing hoax.

[GrandMaster Smith]

To the people who say we're clueless about everything, we really aren't. Scientists have expended a great deal of mental effort in unravelling the laws that underpin our universe so I'd prefer it if you didn't undermine their work by saying that we're "clueless".

 

Only a fool knows everything, a wise man knows how little he actually knows..

[Ai®a©ob®a]

 

Stephen hawking has been in a vegetative state for the last twenty odd years. That robotic voice computer thing he uses to speak is actually operated remotely by an unknown group of scientists who use him a way of broadcasting their theories anonymously.

It makes sense if you think about it, how can one person be so smart? It's gotta be the work of some shadowy organisation.

Even better, the computer he uses to communicate is in fact the first successful AI ever created and it (he) uses his body as disguise to help science and interact with other people.

I have spent so much time thinking that kind of stuff whenever i see him on TV or there is an article about him.

 

I wish I could see an UFO so that I can prove that aliens exist.

But you already have seen an Alien it goes by the name Fran Drescher

[Jehannum]

Deja vu is a "checkpoint" in your life. Time re-starts from that point in order to correct something in the universe - and you get that vague sense of recall.*

 

*Note: I don't actually believe this; it's just a hypothesis I came up with as a child. What the universe is actually "correcting" is an interesting question.

I have a very paranoid theory - anybody want to hear it?

 

We already know what it is. We can read your thoughts.

[sivispacem]

 

 

To the people who say we're clueless about everything, we really aren't. Scientists have expended a great deal of mental effort in unravelling the laws that underpin our universe so I'd prefer it if you didn't undermine their work by saying that we're "clueless".

Only a fool knows everything, a wise man knows how little he actually knows..

Only a fool claims to know everything. But since scientists don't claim to know everything, this is largely irrelevant. Clueless people tend to dramatically overstate their knowledge on a subject; intelligent individuals often dramatically understate it. See also: illusory superiority, the Dunning-Kruger effect, et cetera.

 

Of course, a highly knowledgeable individual with a realistic or slightly pessimistic evaluation of their knowledge may appear only as knowledgeable as an idiot with a delusional view of their own understanding until the actual statements they make are evaluated...

[sammystarock]

I believe that sometimes in life we die from accidents but our lives branch off to a parallel universe where we see our selves as having survived and meanwhile, in the original universe, people see us as dead. We can have many branches of this.

 

That is crazy. I've had the exact same idea for a long time but in a more extreme way. Like we are dying every second or millisecond without knowing it. Funny thought.

[Algonquin Assassin]

I have a theory that Universetwisters doesn't really have long hair and doesnt like trains.

 

I believe he's a shaven headed ginger and likes to mock those that do like trains.

[reiniat]

i was just thinking that the gravitational effects between galaxies and stars could pose a similarity to neurons processing and transmitting information through electrical and chemical signals in, of course, a smaller and probably less complex system.

 

but i must admit i dont know sh*t.

The problem here is that theres no way to pass information faster than light speed. And those supercluster threads are really REALLY REALLY BIG. So it must be a really slow brain.

Or maybe it uses quantum physics but in that case its structure is irrelevant.

[GrandMaster Smith]

 

 

To the people who say we're clueless about everything, we really aren't. Scientists have expended a great deal of mental effort in unravelling the laws that underpin our universe so I'd prefer it if you didn't undermine their work by saying that we're "clueless".

Only a fool knows everything, a wise man knows how little he actually knows..

Only a fool claims to know everything. But since scientists don't claim to know everything, this is largely irrelevant. Clueless people tend to dramatically overstate their knowledge on a subject; intelligent individuals often dramatically understate it. See also: illusory superiority, the Dunning-Kruger effect, et cetera.

 

Of course, a highly knowledgeable individual with a realistic or slightly pessimistic evaluation of their knowledge may appear only as knowledgeable as an idiot with a delusional view of their own understanding until the actual statements they make are evaluated...

 

 

A lot of people have the idea that scientists know everything though and that everything in modern science is practically set in stone. We could discover something new tomorrow that would turn our entire understanding of the universe upside down but many people seem to be really closed off to that idea.. I like to try and take everything with a grain of salt, all throughout history things that have been taught as common knowledge and as being well-established have turned out to be completely wrong.

[Mr_Leone]

I have a theory that Universetwisters doesn't really have long hair and doesnt like trains.

 

I believe he's a shaven headed ginger and likes to mock those that do like trains.

[sivispacem]

A lot of people have the idea that scientists know everything though and that everything in modern science is practically set in stone.

Popular misconceptions regarding science ≠ actual scientific understanding.

 

 

We could discover something new tomorrow that would turn our entire understanding of the universe upside down but many people seem to be really closed off to that idea.

That's because discarding accepted understanding in the hope that a new theory might appear is patently ridiculous. You work with the most viable and best supported theory until such a time as it is no longer the most viable or best supported.

 

 

I like to try and take everything with a grain of salt, all throughout history things that have been taught as common knowledge and as being well-established have turned out to be completely wrong.

Most incorrect things treated as common knowledge were simply assumed rather than actually being supported by evidence, though it does raise a good point about assuming that evidence can only tell one story. Many of the scientific conclusions which have been reached and later determined to be wrong are still rational conclusions given the evidence available at the time, and you can't really work with evidence that doesn't exist at the time.

[Moth]

 

I believe that sometimes in life we die from accidents but our lives branch off to a parallel universe where we see our selves as having survived and meanwhile, in the original universe, people see us as dead. We can have many branches of this.

 

That is crazy. I've had the exact same idea for a long time but in a more extreme way. Like we are dying every second or millisecond without knowing it. Funny thought.

 

I kinda have the same thinking. Just instead of dying, every choice you make creates another branch or branches. Like how in this universe I'm a guy, but in another one, I could be a girl. Or how in this universe I thought off thoughts of suicide, but in another I could have went through with it. And how in this universe sivispacem is sane and Grandmaster Smith isn't, but what if in another their roles would be reversed? 0_0

 

There is absolutely no proof to support this, but it's an idea that keeps on bouncing around in my head. Though it also kinda makes us humans, gods. We are the ones that are creating life and other things.

Edited April 1, 2015 by Moth

[JetsRLove]

That humans are to damn complex to be just randomly made by a big bang. Like all the processes are bodies go through looks like it was built by something and the world has all these cycles that also go through it all the time.

[sivispacem]

Science fail.

[Jolly Swagman]

Science fail.

Isn't that the whole premise of a crazy theory that you can't prove though?

If it wasn't a science fail it wouldn't be that crazy or unprovable.

Edited April 2, 2015 by Jolly Swagman

[sivispacem]

My comment was more related to the notion there's any direct causal link between the big bang and evolution of humans. The latter could not gave happened without the former, but the big bang did not create humans.