johnstamosk2873 Posted January 17, 2015 Share Posted January 17, 2015 As we know there is new release date and this only means one thing GTA V Port is going to be so badd. GG GL HF The second delay means that the port is already bad, I'm not going to be surprised if it's going to be worse than GTA 4. First of all; it's not a port. Second; they delayed it to polish it. Third; Recommended req's are a GTX660, that's a 3-4 year old mid-end card, but I guess you wont understand. I have a 2 year old Radeon HD7970 3GB gpu and I'm ready to upgrade, do you think I care about the specs? Don't b*sh*t me about polishing. it doesn't take 4 months to change wheels on a car that I already own. btw what exactly are they polishing if the specs are quite low? port baby, port. Oh FFS. Uncle Sikee Atric 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Uncle Sikee Atric Posted January 17, 2015 Share Posted January 17, 2015 As we know there is new release date and this only means one thing GTA V Port is going to be so badd. GG GL HF The second delay means that the port is already bad, I'm not going to be surprised if it's going to be worse than GTA 4. First of all; it's not a port. Second; they delayed it to polish it. Third; Recommended req's are a GTX660, that's a 3-4 year old mid-end card, but I guess you wont understand. I have a 2 year old Radeon HD7970 3GB gpu and I'm ready to upgrade, do you think I care about the specs? Don't b*sh*t me about polishing. it doesn't take 4 months to change wheels on a car that I already own. btw what exactly are they polishing if the specs are quite low? port baby, port. Oh FFS. Some people do not understand the concept of specs do they? Upgrade a component that is already at the most suitable level, that is the same as a mid life crisis, "ooh yeah, I have a few wrinkles on my face and a perfectly suitable car, but I know, I will attract the girls with a flash car to make my winkie look bigger!" There is no need to upgrade that GPU at all.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheMcSame Posted January 17, 2015 Share Posted January 17, 2015 As we know there is new release date and this only means one thing GTA V Port is going to be so badd. GG GL HF The second delay means that the port is already bad, I'm not going to be surprised if it's going to be worse than GTA 4. Not necessarily. Just be happy that they delayed the game rather than giving us something that may be broken or incomplete. Kampret 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Andreas Posted January 17, 2015 Share Posted January 17, 2015 Were the requirements for GTA IV similar to these? or did they require higher end parts? back in 2008Here are the minimum and recommende specs for GTA IV on PC. Supported Operating Systems: Windows Vista (plus Service Pack 1) Windows XP (plus Service Pack 3, DirectX 9, Microsoft .NET Framework 3.5) Minimum: Processor: Intel Core 2 Duo 1.8Ghz, AMD Athlon X2 64 2.4Ghz Memory: 1.5GB Free Hard Drive Space: 16GB Video Card: 256MB NVidia 7900 / 256MB ATI X1900 DirectX 9 compatible Stereo Sound Card Recommended: Processor: Intel Core 2 Quad 2.4Ghz, AMD Phenom X3 2.1Ghz Memory: 2GB (Windows XP) 2.5GB (Windows Vista) Free Hard Drive Space: 18GB Video Card: 512MB NVIDIA 8600 / 512MB ATI 3870 DirectX 9 compatible Surround Sound Card Keep in mind that meeting the minimum specs did not guarantee that the game actually worked, as it was horribly optimized and had a ton of issues in the first weeks and months after the launch. GTAV's minimum requirements are higher than IV's recommended specs, but there is a high chance that the game will actually run on configurations with similar hardware this time around. BS_BlackScout 1 GTAForums Crew Chat Thread - The Sharks Chat Thread - Leone Family Mafia Chat Thread Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
raburs Posted January 17, 2015 Share Posted January 17, 2015 Were the requirements for GTA IV similar to these? or did they require higher end parts? back in 2008 Here are the minimum and recommende specs for GTA IV on PC. Supported Operating Systems: Windows Vista (plus Service Pack 1) Windows XP (plus Service Pack 3, DirectX 9, Microsoft .NET Framework 3.5) Minimum: Processor: Intel Core 2 Duo 1.8Ghz, AMD Athlon X2 64 2.4Ghz Memory: 1.5GB Free Hard Drive Space: 16GB Video Card: 256MB NVidia 7900 / 256MB ATI X1900 DirectX 9 compatible Stereo Sound Card Recommended: Processor: Intel Core 2 Quad 2.4Ghz, AMD Phenom X3 2.1Ghz Memory: 2GB (Windows XP) 2.5GB (Windows Vista) Free Hard Drive Space: 18GB Video Card: 512MB NVIDIA 8600 / 512MB ATI 3870 DirectX 9 compatible Surround Sound Card Keep in mind that meeting the minimum specs did not guarantee that the game actually worked, as it was horribly optimized and had a ton of issues in the first weeks and months after the launch. GTAV's minimum requirements are higher than IV's recommended specs, but there is a high chance that the game will actually run on configurations with similar hardware this time around. You are implying that GTAV could also be horribly optimized? If yes, then its always a possibility but very highly unlikely at this point, keeping in mind GTAV PC had already been delayed twice. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
K0ol-G-R4P Posted January 17, 2015 Share Posted January 17, 2015 (edited) I'm having a lot of trouble believing these requirements. This situation is starting to look a lot like IV all over again. These requirements only make sense if we're getting low res PS3 textures. Open world games are notoriously huge CPU hogs and V looks to be by far the most demanding in terms of map size and content. An Intel Core 2 Quad CPU Q6600 @ 2.40GHz (4 CPUs) can't even run GTAIV at a decent framerate and resolution but it will run V? Even if the RAGE engine has been better optimized (V wouldn't be delayed for "further bug testing" if it was that big of an improvement) the requirements still don't make any sense when you look at any other open world game released in the last 5 years. Edited January 17, 2015 by K0ol-G-R4P Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
arvark Posted January 17, 2015 Share Posted January 17, 2015 I'm having a lot of trouble believing these requirements. This situation is starting to look a lot like IV all over again. These requirements only make sense if we're getting low res PS3 textures. Open world games are notoriously huge CPU hogs and V looks to be by far the most demanding in terms of map size and content. An Intel Core 2 Quad CPU Q6600 @ 2.40GHz (4 CPUs) can't even run GTAIV at a decent framerate and resolution but it will run V? Even if the RAGE engine has been better optimized (V wouldn't be delayed for "further bug testing" if it was that big of an improvement) the requirements still don't make any sense when you look at any other open world game released in the last 5 years. 1st: GTa IV even ran on my intel pentium e2180... 2nd: W_D even runs with a q6600 at high... (with a 660). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
K0ol-G-R4P Posted January 17, 2015 Share Posted January 17, 2015 (edited) I'm having a lot of trouble believing these requirements. This situation is starting to look a lot like IV all over again. These requirements only make sense if we're getting low res PS3 textures. Open world games are notoriously huge CPU hogs and V looks to be by far the most demanding in terms of map size and content. An Intel Core 2 Quad CPU Q6600 @ 2.40GHz (4 CPUs) can't even run GTAIV at a decent framerate and resolution but it will run V? Even if the RAGE engine has been better optimized (V wouldn't be delayed for "further bug testing" if it was that big of an improvement) the requirements still don't make any sense when you look at any other open world game released in the last 5 years. 1st: GTa IV even ran on my intel pentium e2180... 2nd: W_D even runs with a q6600 at high... (with a 660). Just because the game can run on that hardware doesn't mean it plays well. You may enjoy playing your games at 800x600 with 10 fps. Most of us don't. Edited January 17, 2015 by K0ol-G-R4P Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
arvark Posted January 17, 2015 Share Posted January 17, 2015 No, f*ck no. Maybe you didn't patch it... Q6600 can play W_D at 1080p at PS4 (at least) settings with a 660 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jenia Posted January 17, 2015 Share Posted January 17, 2015 As if I didn't expect. Delays everywhere! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BigBadMF Posted January 17, 2015 Share Posted January 17, 2015 I laugh at the two majority types of posts: 1. f*ck ROCKSTAR THEY SUCK, etc. etc. 2. Me has this sh*tty computer running Windoze Me....can it runz teh GTA game? 1. Why bitch? What is two months compared to the rest of your life? Once you have the f*cking game, you will be able to play it for the rest of your life! I am disappointed like all the whiners and crybaby pussies, but I want a game as bug-free as possible. I don't mind the occasional glitch that actually contributes to the fun, like the Swingset Of Doom, but I want them to release a quality product. I would rather wait TWO WHOLE f*ckING MONTHS than get a f*cked up game. 2. Lazy bastards. If you are able to read English, figure it out for yourselves. Not knocking anyone who's native language is not English. That was meant to say if you can read well enough to understand the system specs, you should be able to figure out if your machine can run it. Buy it and install it. If it runs, then yes, your machine will run the game. If it does not, then the answer is NO it will not run the game. My specs: AMD FX-8320 8 GB PC2133 Dual-Channel G-skill RAM AMD Radeon R7-265 2GB Samsung 120GB SSD Boot Drive My CPU is just barely below the recommended FX-8350. Not enough of a difference to worry about. My ram is fine. Video card is just below recommended. Not worried about it. Only thing I really need to do is buy a larger size SSD. Being 120GB, with all the programs I have installed, I only have about 45GB free space right now. I understand 65GB is just a beginning figure, and as time goes on with updates, save games, mods, etc. that figure is going to increase. So this two extra months gives me time to figure out what SSD to buy. See? How difficult it was to figure out I could run the game. I became brain-damaged because I spent weeks with no sleep trying to read their specs and compare them to what I actually had. For all you haters who are sobbing because it got delayed by 2 whole months, which for your silly minds might as well be TEH END UV TIMEZ, you should be glad they released the specs 2 months before the release date so you can get all your hardware sorted out. What made it easy for me to figure out was the fact that I am running GTA IV on this machine right now with maxed out settings and max framerates....and I did not have to tweak the game at all to get it to run this way. The minimum specs being what they are for GTA V, I know I am going to be ok. We now return you to our regularly scheduled programme. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
deadrave Posted January 17, 2015 Share Posted January 17, 2015 I'm having a lot of trouble believing these requirements. This situation is starting to look a lot like IV all over again. These requirements only make sense if we're getting low res PS3 textures. Open world games are notoriously huge CPU hogs and V looks to be by far the most demanding in terms of map size and content. An Intel Core 2 Quad CPU Q6600 @ 2.40GHz (4 CPUs) can't even run GTAIV at a decent framerate and resolution but it will run V? Even if the RAGE engine has been better optimized (V wouldn't be delayed for "further bug testing" if it was that big of an improvement) the requirements still don't make any sense when you look at any other open world game released in the last 5 years. 1st: GTa IV even ran on my intel pentium e2180... 2nd: W_D even runs with a q6600 at high... (with a 660). Just because the game can run on that hardware doesn't mean it plays well. You may enjoy playing your games at 800x600 with 10 fps. Most of us don't. Last 5 years as in? one of the worst open world ports in the last years watch dogs has minimum a core 2 quad and it runs 30+ fps on high, stop lying to your self, not everyone wants 60+ fps, a core 2 quad can play easily 30+ fps any game even at 1080p Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wah007 Posted January 17, 2015 Share Posted January 17, 2015 I laugh at the two majority types of posts: 1. f*ck ROCKSTAR THEY SUCK, etc. etc. 2. Me has this sh*tty computer running Windoze Me....can it runz teh GTA game? 1. Why bitch? What is two months compared to the rest of your life? Once you have the f*cking game, you will be able to play it for the rest of your life! I am disappointed like all the whiners and crybaby pussies, but I want a game as bug-free as possible. I don't mind the occasional glitch that actually contributes to the fun, like the Swingset Of Doom, but I want them to release a quality product. I would rather wait TWO WHOLE f*ckING MONTHS than get a f*cked up game. 2. Lazy bastards. If you are able to read English, figure it out for yourselves. Not knocking anyone who's native language is not English. That was meant to say if you can read well enough to understand the system specs, you should be able to figure out if your machine can run it. Buy it and install it. If it runs, then yes, your machine will run the game. If it does not, then the answer is NO it will not run the game. My specs: AMD FX-8320 8 GB PC2133 Dual-Channel G-skill RAM AMD Radeon R7-265 2GB Samsung 120GB SSD Boot Drive My CPU is just barely below the recommended FX-8350. Not enough of a difference to worry about. My ram is fine. Video card is just below recommended. Not worried about it. Only thing I really need to do is buy a larger size SSD. Being 120GB, with all the programs I have installed, I only have about 45GB free space right now. I understand 65GB is just a beginning figure, and as time goes on with updates, save games, mods, etc. that figure is going to increase. So this two extra months gives me time to figure out what SSD to buy. See? How difficult it was to figure out I could run the game. I became brain-damaged because I spent weeks with no sleep trying to read their specs and compare them to what I actually had. For all you haters who are sobbing because it got delayed by 2 whole months, which for your silly minds might as well be TEH END UV TIMEZ, you should be glad they released the specs 2 months before the release date so you can get all your hardware sorted out. What made it easy for me to figure out was the fact that I am running GTA IV on this machine right now with maxed out settings and max framerates....and I did not have to tweak the game at all to get it to run this way. The minimum specs being what they are for GTA V, I know I am going to be ok. We now return you to our regularly scheduled programme. I don't think that CPU will make a difference as long as your GPU is good, and the 8320 chip can be overclocked to the 8350 levels anyway. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
King Vercetti Posted January 17, 2015 Share Posted January 17, 2015 Its official GTA V most pirated game ever. Within hours... Only a complete dick pirates games. I don't care what you think about the developers themselves, but what about all the hard work that was put into the game over years, like the programmers, artists, musicians, writers, etc? I like free stuff as much as the next guy, but I also don't like taking food out of someone else's mouth. The games two years old, believe me when I tell you everyone who worked on it have been paid appropriately. And comparing the pirating of GTA V to taking food out of someones mouth....lol. I don't swing one way or the other in regards to pirating, but if you are going to voice your holier than thou opinion please leave out the comparisons and elaborations.Stealing is stealing, regardless of how old the game is. I'm not going to argue about this any more, this forum is fully against piracy, so you can forget the holier than thou bull crap. If what I said bothered you that says more about you than it does me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wah007 Posted January 17, 2015 Share Posted January 17, 2015 What I find surprising is that hackers can crack the game within a few hours and put it on the internet. With all the technology in the world today why can't they add security that is extremely hard to crack. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PittDawg Posted January 17, 2015 Share Posted January 17, 2015 Its official GTA V most pirated game ever. Within hours... Only a complete dick pirates games. I don't care what you think about the developers themselves, but what about all the hard work that was put into the game over years, like the programmers, artists, musicians, writers, etc? I like free stuff as much as the next guy, but I also don't like taking food out of someone else's mouth. The games two years old, believe me when I tell you everyone who worked on it have been paid appropriately. And comparing the pirating of GTA V to taking food out of someones mouth....lol. I don't swing one way or the other in regards to pirating, but if you are going to voice your holier than thou opinion please leave out the comparisons and elaborations.Stealing is stealing, regardless of how old the game is. I'm not going to argue about this any more, this forum is fully against piracy, so you can forget the holier than thou bull crap. If what I said bothered you that says more about you than it does me. Not arguing for stealing, just pointing out your flawed cheerleader logic and apparently my reply bothered you enough that you felt the need to continue on your holier than thou tirade. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Totallycasual Posted January 17, 2015 Share Posted January 17, 2015 I've always paid full price for my games and i will continue to do so but with all the crap Rockstar has pulled lately i guess you can say i wont be defending them ever again or berating people for pirating. This last delay that just so happened to sneak up on them when we were 2 weeks from release was the final straw. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PittDawg Posted January 18, 2015 Share Posted January 18, 2015 I've always paid full price for my games and i will continue to do so but with all the crap Rockstar has pulled lately i guess you can say i wont be defending them ever again or berating people for pirating. This last delay that just so happened to sneak up on them when we were 2 weeks from release was the final straw. Agree. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheMcSame Posted January 18, 2015 Share Posted January 18, 2015 So this two extra months gives me time to figure out what SSD to buy. Kind of a no brainier really... Crucial MX100. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BigBadMF Posted January 18, 2015 Share Posted January 18, 2015 I am running a Samsung EVO....it's specs are pretty much the same as the MX100...apples and oranges. Funny....I made the comment I was running GTA IV full on with no mods to fix the crappy optimization, and then I discovered something I had forgotten. When I built this machine last August, I just let the Mobo (ASUS M5A99FX) run the ram at the default speed, which was 1600. So I went into the BIOS this afternoon and bumped my ram up to what it is rated at...2133. Of course, no difference in GTA IV, but just makes it more likely I will be able to run GTA V smoothly. The recommended vid card is 256-bit (the AMD one anyway), and mine is only 128. But all the other stuff I have makes up for the difference so that my machine is just about at the recommended levels. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IcePwrd Posted January 18, 2015 Share Posted January 18, 2015 I'm having a lot of trouble believing these requirements. This situation is starting to look a lot like IV all over again. These requirements only make sense if we're getting low res PS3 textures. Open world games are notoriously huge CPU hogs and V looks to be by far the most demanding in terms of map size and content. An Intel Core 2 Quad CPU Q6600 @ 2.40GHz (4 CPUs) can't even run GTAIV at a decent framerate and resolution but it will run V? Even if the RAGE engine has been better optimized (V wouldn't be delayed for "further bug testing" if it was that big of an improvement) the requirements still don't make any sense when you look at any other open world game released in the last 5 years. 1. Ever heard of graphics settings? there probably will be an option to use PS3 textures 2. Q6600 can run GTA IV just fine (provided the rest of your hardware is up to scratch) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spider-Vice Posted January 18, 2015 Share Posted January 18, 2015 These requirements only make sense if we're getting low res PS3 textures. The recommended graphics card requirement is 2 GB of VRAM. Doesn't sound like low res PS3 textures to me. Of course minimum settings will have those though. Xerukal 1 GTANet | Red Dead Network | 🌲 black lives matter | stop Asian hate | trans lives = human lives the beginning is moments ago, the end is moments away Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
King Vercetti Posted January 19, 2015 Share Posted January 19, 2015 Its official GTA V most pirated game ever. Within hours... Only a complete dick pirates games. I don't care what you think about the developers themselves, but what about all the hard work that was put into the game over years, like the programmers, artists, musicians, writers, etc? I like free stuff as much as the next guy, but I also don't like taking food out of someone else's mouth. The games two years old, believe me when I tell you everyone who worked on it have been paid appropriately. And comparing the pirating of GTA V to taking food out of someones mouth....lol. I don't swing one way or the other in regards to pirating, but if you are going to voice your holier than thou opinion please leave out the comparisons and elaborations.Stealing is stealing, regardless of how old the game is. I'm not going to argue about this any more, this forum is fully against piracy, so you can forget the holier than thou bull crap. If what I said bothered you that says more about you than it does me. Not arguing for stealing, just pointing out your flawed cheerleader logic and apparently my reply bothered you enough that you felt the need to continue on your holier than thou tirade.The only one bothered appears to be you. I'm not wasting any more time on this useless thread or argument. I'll keep voting with my wallet like I always have. Pirate the game if you want, I dont care. Your choice, but it's wrong no matter how you spin it. There's just no defending that. I'm not coming back to this thread because i don't want to derail it any more than it already has been. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
utack Posted January 19, 2015 Share Posted January 19, 2015 What I find surprising is that hackers can crack the game within a few hours and put it on the internet. With all the technology in the world today why can't they add security that is extremely hard to crack. Denuovo tried it. I guess the DRM is mostly to make it illegal to copy the game in many countries, so they can sue if they want? Not for real protection. Just a guess. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wah007 Posted January 19, 2015 Share Posted January 19, 2015 What I find surprising is that hackers can crack the game within a few hours and put it on the internet. With all the technology in the world today why can't they add security that is extremely hard to crack. Denuovo tried it.I guess the DRM is mostly to make it illegal to copy the game in many countries, so they can sue if they want? Not for real protection. Just a guess.Yeah they can sue. Still not much good for the PC community though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kampret Posted January 19, 2015 Share Posted January 19, 2015 What I find surprising is that hackers can crack the game within a few hours and put it on the internet. With all the technology in the world today why can't they add security that is extremely hard to crack. Reasons why there's no uncrackable DRM this time around, purely based on my thoughts: 1. Hardware limitations. Even a 5960X will be bogged down when running an overly complex DRM, combined with a heavy tasking game. 2. Budget. Self explanatory. The amount of pirated copies probably minuscule compared to legit copies, that dev's wouldn't mind losing a tiny fraction of revenue. 3. Coding limitations. 4. Unoptimized software that is already tasking by itself. wah007 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wah007 Posted January 19, 2015 Share Posted January 19, 2015 What I find surprising is that hackers can crack the game within a few hours and put it on the internet. With all the technology in the world today why can't they add security that is extremely hard to crack. Reasons why there's no uncrackable DRM this time around, purely based on my thoughts: 1. Hardware limitations. Even a 5960X will be bogged down when running an overly complex DRM, combined with a heavy tasking game. 2. Budget. Self explanatory. The amount of pirated copies probably minuscule compared to legit copies, that dev's wouldn't mind losing a tiny fraction of revenue. 3. Coding limitations. 4. Unoptimized software that is already tasking by itself.Ah, fair enough. If it's going to drag the hardware down it won't be worth it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
r3h4n786 Posted January 20, 2015 Share Posted January 20, 2015 I wonder what "requirements subject to change mean"? "Over time, downloadable content and programming changes will change the system requirements for this game" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Froxie24 Posted January 20, 2015 Share Posted January 20, 2015 Do you think we will @ last week before release get 4K trailer on you tube? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LS.Franklin Posted January 23, 2015 Share Posted January 23, 2015 Hello ,, can my pc run this game plz ?? this is my system requirements: AMD Radion HD 7600M Series Intel® HD Graphics 4000 Intel® Core I5 CPU:1.80 GHz Ram: 4GB Video Ram : 1GB Pixel Shader: 5.0 thx. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now