15 year old Cliffton Colorado resident kills another 15 year old at a

[Crazyeighties]

Landon Sardi ( 15 ) killed Brandon Crawford also 15 with a revolver he claimed was for protection http://blogs.westword.com/latestword/2014/11/brandon_crawford_killed_clifton_gun_protection.php

incidents like this beg the question do you think parents are relying too much on schools to raise kids.

 

Also do you think it's okay for parents to go through their kids belongings to make sure they are not into things that are bad for the kid. (I.E.) drugs, guns, gang activity

Edited November 25, 2014 by Crazyeighties

[RedBull FM]

Source?

[Crazyeighties]

Source?

Sorry I forgot to post a link the link has been added its a pretty sad story.

 

Sardi's parents do not seem to be in the picture I have not found any news reports that talk about his parents.

Edited November 25, 2014 by Crazyeighties

[AlienTwo]

I love our gun-nut culture here in the 'rado. School shootings, movie theater shootings.... who cares, let's arm up.

[Dottie]

I love our gun-nut culture here in the 'rado. School shootings, movie theater shootings.... who cares, let's arm up.

already ahead of you

 

back on topic.

Fairly certain that that 15 year old shouldn't be needing to carry a weapon

[Crazyeighties]

About the only think I can think of is maybe he stole the gun and his parent(s) are to busy working to parent their child or they have a serious substance abuse problem and are too high to be able to parent their child and go through their stuff to be sure they are not into things they shouldn't be.

[I cucked Alex Jones]

If parents leave their gun unlocked and their child commits a murder with their gun, the parents should be help partly responsible for the murder.

[AlienTwo]

If parents leave their gun unlocked and their child commits a murder with their gun, the parents should be help partly responsible for the murder.

Partly? I would say fully.

[Gay Tony]

 

If parents leave their gun unlocked and their child commits a murder with their gun, the parents should be help partly responsible for the murder.

Partly? I would say fully.

 

That's taking it too far. I'd say if anything it's more involuntary manslaughter.

Edited November 25, 2014 by mr toasterbutt

[AlienTwo]

 

 

If parents leave their gun unlocked and their child commits a murder with their gun, the parents should be help partly responsible for the murder.

Partly? I would say fully.

 

That's taking it too far. I'd say if anything it's more involuntary manslaughter.

 

I suppose. I didn't mean "murder" charges, I responded to the word "murder" is in simply "death".

[Frank Brown]

 

If parents leave their gun unlocked and their child commits a murder with their gun, the parents should be help partly responsible for the murder.

Partly? I would say fully.

 

 

Not if the child is 15. You should know by that age that that isn't acceptable. Unless he had some crippling mental disability, there's no excuse.

[AlienTwo]

 

 

If parents leave their gun unlocked and their child commits a murder with their gun, the parents should be help partly responsible for the murder.

Partly? I would say fully.

 

 

Not if the child is 15. You should know by that age that that isn't acceptable. Unless he had some crippling mental disability, there's no excuse.

 

Are you arguing that 15 is old enough to be held responsible for you actions or the opposite, that 15 is far too young to place this kind of blame?

[Frank Brown]

 

 

 

If parents leave their gun unlocked and their child commits a murder with their gun, the parents should be help partly responsible for the murder.

Partly? I would say fully.

 

 

Not if the child is 15. You should know by that age that that isn't acceptable. Unless he had some crippling mental disability, there's no excuse.

 

Are you arguing that 15 is old enough to be held responsible for you actions or the opposite, that 15 is far too young to place this kind of blame?

 

 

Sorry, I should have clarified.

 

15 is old enough to be held responsible for this, in my opinion. They're much more developed by that age than say, 8 years old, and most likely know what the function of a firearm is.

[dudclub55]

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

If parents leave their gun unlocked and their child commits a murder with their gun, the parents should be help partly responsible for the murder.

Partly? I would say fully.

 

Not if the child is 15. You should know by that age that that isn't acceptable. Unless he had some crippling mental disability, there's no excuse.

 

Are you arguing that 15 is old enough to be held responsible for you actions or the opposite, that 15 is far too young to place this kind of blame?

 

Sorry, I should have clarified.

 

15 is old enough to be held responsible for this, in my opinion. They're much more developed by that age than say, 8 years old, and most likely know what the function of a firearm is.

Probably, yes.. but teenagers are still barely any better at making decisions.

[TheGodDamnMaster]

This is why couples with children need to buy a safe or other secure devices to hide their weapons in instead of tucking them away in a shoebox or sock drawer.

[Crazyeighties]

This is why couples with children need to buy a safe or other secure devices to hide their weapons in instead of tucking them away in a shoebox or sock drawer.

A quality safe at that, like the ones that bolt to the floor, I'm buying a safe because I am on medications that are very strong pain killers (more so then morphine) so I am doing the responsible thing and getting a strong safe, that I can bolt to the cement floor in the basement.

[Clem Fandango]

15 is old enough to be held responsible for this, in my opinion. They're much more developed by that age than say, 8 years old, and most likely know what the function of a firearm is.

 

Granted, but fifteen year olds shouldn't have access to guns regardless.

[Frank Brown]

 

15 is old enough to be held responsible for this, in my opinion. They're much more developed by that age than say, 8 years old, and most likely know what the function of a firearm is.

 

Granted, but fifteen year olds shouldn't have access to guns regardless.

 

 

I don't see a problem allowing them to use them safely, like at a range with adult supervision, but they really should be locked up.