Chris S Posted November 12, 2014 Share Posted November 12, 2014 (edited) figured i would do this 4k ultra hd video in gta 4 to show the relatively small difference in quality of patch 4 to patch 7 plus you get the online mode. I made this video to provide people with the ease of deciding which patch to go with as new user to gta series and naturally the user would download 1 enb and install it but not worry if patch 4 or patch 7 is better still to this day in 2014. this helps you decide what you want. Edited December 16, 2014 by DrGta buzzbass, Frozenflake and Vulgadrop 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Frozenflake Posted November 13, 2014 Share Posted November 13, 2014 Congratulations, nice comparations. The image on the left side of the gameplay is more clean. This means que Patch 1.0.7.0 has better quality at 4K.Any chance to test my mods in 4K? My page: https://www.facebook.com/frozenflakeModding Vulgadrop 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chris S Posted December 15, 2014 Author Share Posted December 15, 2014 Congratulations, nice comparations. The image on the left side of the gameplay is more clean. This means que Patch 1.0.7.0 has better quality at 4K. Any chance to test my mods in 4K? My page: https://www.facebook.com/frozenflakeModding hi sorry for lat response. yes you can email here for inquires :[email protected] or just msg me on the forums best, Frozenflake 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
henry_™ Posted December 15, 2014 Share Posted December 15, 2014 What's your Specs and how many FPS do you get with these Settings? Frozenflake 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PacketOverload_x64bit Posted December 15, 2014 Share Posted December 15, 2014 Seeing as your headlining comment relates to patches first, and ENB / iCEnhancer differences secondly, I can say that I don't think icenhancer3.0 specifically, is a reasonable test subject to compare versions graphically. Maybe ice1.25. You need to compare in a different manner the different aspects of ENB between patches, not just CryENB or iCE3.0 to itself. Anything that looks very similiar on 1070 is not taking full usage of skylighting on 1040. I can't put my finger on it but- skylighting itself (despite trying this weekend CryENB / iCE3.0 / my own settings on 1070) is still an awe-inspiring feature. This is why even iCeLaGlace plays on 1040 almost exclusively (except to port the settings for 1070 users). Both are good, and of course, I hope everyone has fun with whichever version they "WANT" to play. buzzbass and Frozenflake 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vulgadrop Posted December 16, 2014 Share Posted December 16, 2014 Interesting... this shows 1070 have clearly better quality than 1040. @PacketOVerload_x64Bit so you just play 1040 because ICElaGLACE does too? skylighting is just a multiplier for timecyc ambs colours... but what can I say, this video speak by itself Frozenflake 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chris S Posted December 16, 2014 Author Share Posted December 16, 2014 on a side note i was using single player and using an 8 core. i saw more cpu usage on the patch 4o than patch 7. patch 7 gained more fps. and was more clear. but patch 4 has more atmospheric depth, reflection, and aa sharpness. plus the trees are slightly better What's your Specs and how many FPS do you get with these Settings? Frozenflake 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
buzzbass Posted December 16, 2014 Share Posted December 16, 2014 (edited) patch 4 has more atmospheric depth,You probably mean fog effect, Icenhancer don't support 1.0.7.0 (and never supported) and he removed all fog, you can check skytop is just all black. And other sky settings are f*ck up too, so I would recommend you to use his 1.0.4.0 timecyc and make the port to 1.0.7.0 by yourself... plus the trees are slightly betterProblem are not trees but DAX1 shader wich have faulty shadows causing weird shadows on trees. Actually 1.0.4.0 have a huge bug in trees sometimes they are invisible and R* fixed with 1.0.7.0. About skylighting half working, again, is Dax1 shader fault. This is the endless discussion... both patches are fine, problem is certain mods support one or other patch and users must choose. Edited December 16, 2014 by buzzbass Chris S, Vulgadrop, Frozenflake and 1 other 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Frozenflake Posted December 17, 2014 Share Posted December 17, 2014 patch 4 has more atmospheric depth, You probably mean fog effect, Icenhancer don't support 1.0.7.0 (and never supported) and he removed all fog, you can check skytop is just all black. And other sky settings are f*ck up too, so I would recommend you to use his 1.0.4.0 timecyc and make the port to 1.0.7.0 by yourself... plus the trees are slightly better Problem are not trees but DAX1 shader wich have faulty shadows causing weird shadows on trees. Actually 1.0.4.0 have a huge bug in trees sometimes they are invisible and R* fixed with 1.0.7.0. About skylighting half working, again, is Dax1 shader fault. This is the endless discussion... both patches are fine, problem is certain mods support one or other patch and users must choose. He removed all fog effect from 1.0.7.0 shaders & timecyc or only from timecyc? This leads me to think that iCEnhancer is not designed (and will never be) to 1.0.7.0 instead of CryENB that works better and have fog effect on 1.0.7.0. I mean: icelaglace should do iCEnhancer only for 1.0.4.0. Fabriciuz should do CryENB only for 1.0.7.0. @icelaglace I do not hate you, and I am not attacking anyone. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now