Definitive Friendly GTAO Mode Thread (Counter-Arguments DEBUNKED)

[TheKingChivas]

 

 

 

No, they're not...OP and his now 11 likers (wowzers!) can have fun making no sense by themselves. OP didn't want a discussion, he wanted people to agree with him...well, they don't. Sucks for him, but he's too delusional to understand it.

[splorsh]

The saddest thing about this 6 page thread is that all of the people who are against it ONLY want to kill people who don't fight back (because even though they're the ones calling people pussies, they're afraid of lobbies where everyone fights back).

 

Otherwise there's literally not a single reason to oppose this. There would still be millions of PvP lobbies.

[TeammateHelper]

For gizz01's reference:

 

Threads on passive lobbies:

http://gtaforums.com/topic/685860-they-really-need-an-all-passive-mode-only-lobby/

http://gtaforums.com/topic/697498-what-would-an-entire-passive-lobby-look-like/

 

Threads on passive mode:

http://gtaforums.com/topic/643179-how-to-kill-someone-in-passive-mode/

http://gtaforums.com/topic/728965-a-new-and-improved-passive-mode/

 

Thing is, if you ain't shooting, they want you dead even more.

 

EDIT: When Passive Mode got broken by LTS Update 1.17, it's not that big of a deal for people here.

 

http://gtaforums.com/topic/741181-passive-mode-has-a-problem-i-think/

Edited November 9, 2014 by TeammateAssist

[YogurtStorm]

 

 

 

 

 

No, they're not...OP and his now 11 likers (wowzers!) can have fun making no sense by themselves. OP didn't want a discussion, he wanted people to agree with him...well, they don't. Sucks for him, but he's too delusional to understand it.

 

[gizz01]

Why is this not better for both parties?

 

CLASSIC GTA LOBBY'S

 

A large price reduction on all ammo types, bring the price of ammo right down, let players go bonkers, lets see rpgs amd stickies causing chaos, lets see some bullets fly!

 

Drop car insurance payents on both sides (victim/killer) **this needs doing in both lobbys, prices are silly on high end cars and would no longer be need at all under the new system**

 

Do away with bad sports lobbys and passive mode.

 

 

 

FRIENDLY LOBBY'S

 

Once implemented, you start of with a pistol, what ever you buy from then on is saved to that lobby type, high ammo prices in friendly lobbys.

 

Now the important bit, that hopefully makes all this work..

 

Friendly lobbys will be live fire (friendly fire ON), but if you are killed an option pops up allowing you to give the player a strike or not..

 

You strike a player if he kills you for no reason, if its an accident its either easily noticeable or worked out with a simple sorry and the victim accepts it and doesn't strike the player, but griefers get marked, the number of marks a player has is tracked and saved.

 

On starting a friendly lobby the host has the option to choose a max mark count within the last say 48 hours, so if I set it to a max of 2 marks in the last 48 hours anyone having 3 marks in this time frame would be refused conection..

 

So if ive been going into friendly lobbys and griefing/non consensual killing ill get a number of marks meaning I when I search for a friendly lobby I wont be allowed connection to lobbys with a lower mark count than I have..

 

This means that folks can get together in friendly lobby and still have the game working as usual (friendly fire on) so if they liked they could break off into teams or set up a mini event right there and then, but without haing to worry about people griefing..

 

Add a kick function that alerts all on the server to quickly get rid of unwanted players...

 

I think this would be beneficial to both types of player..

[TeammateHelper]

Why is this not better for both parties?

 

CLASSIC GTA LOBBY'S

 

A large price reduction on all ammo types, bring the price of ammo right down, let players go bonkers, lets see rpgs amd stickies causing chaos, lets see some bullets fly!

 

Drop car insurance payents on both sides (victim/killer) **this needs doing in both lobbys, prices are silly on high end cars and would no longer be need at all under the new system**

 

Do away with bad sports lobbys and passive mode.

 

 

 

FRIENDLY LOBBY'S

 

Once implemented, you start of with a pistol, what ever you buy from then on is saved to that lobby type, high ammo prices in friendly lobbys.

 

Now the important bit, that hopefully makes all this work..

 

Friendly lobbys will be live fire (friendly fire ON), but if you are killed an option pops up allowing you to give the player a strike or not..

 

You strike a player if he kills you for no reason, if its an accident its either easily noticeable or worked out with a simple sorry and the victim accepts it and doesn't strike the player, but griefers get marked, the number of marks a player has is tracked and saved.

 

On starting a friendly lobby the host has the option to choose a max mark count within the last say 48 hours, so if I set it to a max of 2 marks in the last 48 hours anyone having 3 marks in this time frame would be refused conection..

 

So if ive been going into friendly lobbys and griefing/non consensual killing ill get a number of marks meaning I when I search for a friendly lobby I wont be allowed connection to lobbys with a lower mark count than I have..

 

This means that folks can get together in friendly lobby and still have the game working as usual (friendly fire on) so if they liked they could break off into teams or set up a mini event right there and then, but without haing to worry about people griefing..

 

Add a kick function that alerts all on the server to quickly get rid of unwanted players...

 

I think this would be beneficial to both types of player..

 

Couple of points to consider:

 

- setting someone's car on fire with gasoline and car exhaust isn't fixed, still. It's fun, and you get good sport. Cool huh?

- in RDR, you can cause griefing even in the friendly lobbies. Shooting their horse while riding, knocking them out in that lake where you can walk around, etc etc. In this suggested mode, you can repeatedly run towards someone's bullets, making them kill you not on purpose, and you can even mark them. Trust me on this, I've done this on Uncharted 3 a lot.

 

EDIT: Don't tell anyone on Uncharted 3 about this. The best kind of asshole is when you're so nice when you actually do something, you have zero suspicions.

Edited November 9, 2014 by TeammateAssist

[gizz01]

For gizz01's reference:

 

Threads on passive lobbies:

http://gtaforums.com/topic/685860-they-really-need-an-all-passive-mode-only-lobby/

http://gtaforums.com/topic/697498-what-would-an-entire-passive-lobby-look-like/

 

Threads on passive mode:

http://gtaforums.com/topic/643179-how-to-kill-someone-in-passive-mode/

http://gtaforums.com/topic/728965-a-new-and-improved-passive-mode/

 

Thing is, if you ain't shooting, they want you dead even more.

 

EDIT: When Passive Mode got broken by LTS Update 1.17, it's not that big of a deal for people here.

 

http://gtaforums.com/topic/741181-passive-mode-has-a-problem-i-think/

Lol chears some funny reads there lol

[YogurtStorm]

God I love memes

 

[§†range]

This is why people kill passive players. Everything is Dom's fault.

[gizz01]

 

Couple of points to consider:

 

- setting someone's car on fire with gasoline and car exhaust isn't fixed, still. It's fun, and you get good sport. Cool huh?

- in RDR, you can cause griefing even in the friendly lobbies. Shooting their horse while riding, knocking them out in that lake where you can walk around, etc etc. In this suggested mode, you can repeatedly run towards someone's bullets, making them kill you not on purpose, and you can even mark them. Trust me on this, I've done this on Uncharted 3 a lot.

 

EDIT: Don't tell anyone on Uncharted 3 about this. The best kind of asshole is when you're so nice when you actually do something, you have zero suspicions.

Good post..

 

Although what you are saying here is for the..... shall we say the more "advanced griefer", most are mimdless idiots, and with the above system they would be weeded out in a short amount of time, plus you will have lobbys filled with non greifers so vote kicking will be fast and swift..

 

Good points tho, I just wish parents would bring there kids up properly, we wouldn't have half as much trouble with greifing idiots.

[CarnageRacing00]

I don't see how having the option to join a no-kill lobby should bother anybody. Don't want it? Don't join one. How does its existence bother you? If I want to try a GTA session where I'll automatically be matched with like-minded players to just stunt and explore without the possibility of it devolving into a shoot out, why can't there be an option? Because some douchebags don't want one, because ____ reason?

[splorsh]

I don't see how having the option to join a no-kill lobby should bother anybody. Don't want it? Don't join one. How does its existence bother you? If I want to try a GTA session where I'll automatically be matched with like-minded players to just stunt and explore without the possibility of it devolving into a shoot out, why can't there be an option? Because some douchebags don't want one, because ____ reason?

 

Exactly, none of these people will articulate why they're against it.

 

Truthfully, they probably just get off to the thought of ruining the fun for people who are more chilled and creative than them. We'll never get them to admit that though.

[§†range]

I get laughed at by one poster because i like to photograph. On my other profile I would fight till im broke. The option should exist, it's an option.

[DopeFresh]

We should all have choices of how we play the game. For me, the most fun is dicking around in free mode with total random strangers who aren't your friends. If we had a friendly free mode then we would have a better game. end of story.

[Two gun]

 

 

I don't see how having the option to join a no-kill lobby should bother anybody. Don't want it? Don't join one. How does its existence bother you? If I want to try a GTA session where I'll automatically be matched with like-minded players to just stunt and explore without the possibility of it devolving into a shoot out, why can't there be an option? Because some douchebags don't want one, because ____ reason?

Exactly, none of these people will articulate why they're against it.

 

Truthfully, they probably just get off to the thought of ruining the fun for people who are more chilled and creative than them. We'll never get them to admit that though.

I don't have to tell you why I think the way I do. Just know your idea is sh*t and you're a puss too afraid to play in a freeroam lobby out of fear of being raped repeatedly . Grow a pair or go play animal crossings.

[splorsh]

 

 

I don't see how having the option to join a no-kill lobby should bother anybody. Don't want it? Don't join one. How does its existence bother you? If I want to try a GTA session where I'll automatically be matched with like-minded players to just stunt and explore without the possibility of it devolving into a shoot out, why can't there be an option? Because some douchebags don't want one, because ____ reason?

Exactly, none of these people will articulate why they're against it.

 

Truthfully, they probably just get off to the thought of ruining the fun for people who are more chilled and creative than them. We'll never get them to admit that though.

I don't have to tell you why I think the way I do. Just know your idea is sh*t and you're a puss too afraid to play in a freeroam lobby out of fear of being raped repeatedly . Grow a pair or go play animal crossings.

 

 

Still posting sh*t I already destroyed in the OP.

 

Average literacy of anti-friendly lobby people is rapidly approaching 0.

[YogurtStorm]

 

 

I don't see how having the option to join a no-kill lobby should bother anybody. Don't want it? Don't join one. How does its existence bother you? If I want to try a GTA session where I'll automatically be matched with like-minded players to just stunt and explore without the possibility of it devolving into a shoot out, why can't there be an option? Because some douchebags don't want one, because ____ reason?

Exactly, none of these people will articulate why they're against it.

 

Truthfully, they probably just get off to the thought of ruining the fun for people who are more chilled and creative than them. We'll never get them to admit that though.

I don't have to tell you why I think the way I do.

 

Well, typically, when you bring forth an argument to a debate (this thread has turned into a debate, yes) you better damn well explain why your argument should be valid. That's the point of a debate; can you prove to us that your train of thought is right and the others are wrong?

 

Imagine a political debate and one guy says: I think we shouldn't cut down all the trees! I don't have to explain sh*t to any of you, but don't cut any trees, ok? Pretty sure we'd lose every tree on the planet.

 

In layman's terms:

 

Edited November 9, 2014 by YogurtStorm

[splorsh]

Thousands of years ago these dudes would have been clubbing/stoning the dude who was peacefully painting animals on cave walls.

[chainsoar]

http://gtaforums.com/topic/746028-people-still-kill-on-sight/?p=1066436147

 

"Well a sandbox game is whatever you want it to be".

 

You could try quoting the whole post, wherein he reiterates the point he made here. Or, you know, you could just not go desperately rummaging through someone's post history for some sh*t to throw instead of expressing some worthwhile input of your own.

[Headdogg81]

16 likes now OP. R* are surely paying attention now.

[splorsh]

16 likes now OP. R* are surely paying attention now.

 

16 likes on a post that required a considerable amount of reading.

 

That's roughly equal to getting 160 likes on any of the sh*t you've posted in this thread so far (which is basically a lot of sh*t-talking without attempting to even make an argument yet).

Edited November 9, 2014 by splorsh

[Headdogg81]

Don't get your panties in a twist now OP. There is no need to be mean. By the way had you actually read my comments you would realise I'm not against the very original and thread worthy idea of a friendly fire off lobby.

[splorsh]

Don't get your panties in a twist now OP. There is no need to be mean. By the way had you actually read my comments you would realise I'm not against the very original and thread worthy idea of a friendly fire off lobby.

 

Then why did you spend half of the thread pretending like "that's an opinion" and "petulant" were valid arguments against it.

[slohbur]

This is going nowhere.

 

Topic closed.