Quantcast
Jump to content
Search In
  • More options...
Find results that contain...
Find results in...
    1. Welcome to GTAForums!

    1. Red Dead Redemption 2

      1. PC
      2. Gameplay
      3. Missions
      4. Help & Support
    2. Red Dead Online

      1. Gameplay
      2. Find Lobbies & Outlaws
      3. Help & Support
      4. Frontier Pursuits
    1. Crews & Posses

      1. Recruitment
    2. Events

    1. GTA Online

      1. Diamond Casino & Resort
      2. DLC
      3. Find Lobbies & Players
      4. Guides & Strategies
      5. Vehicles
      6. Content Creator
      7. Help & Support
    2. Grand Theft Auto Series

    3. GTA 6

    4. GTA V

      1. PC
      2. Guides & Strategies
      3. Help & Support
    5. GTA IV

      1. Episodes from Liberty City
      2. Multiplayer
      3. Guides & Strategies
      4. Help & Support
      5. GTA IV Mods
    6. GTA Chinatown Wars

    7. GTA Vice City Stories

    8. GTA Liberty City Stories

    9. GTA San Andreas

      1. Guides & Strategies
      2. Help & Support
      3. GTA SA Mods
    10. GTA Vice City

      1. Guides & Strategies
      2. Help & Support
      3. GTA VC Mods
    11. GTA III

      1. Guides & Strategies
      2. Help & Support
      3. GTA III Mods
    12. Top Down Games

      1. GTA Advance
      2. GTA 2
      3. GTA
    13. Wiki

      1. Merchandising
    1. GTA Modding

      1. GTA V
      2. GTA IV
      3. GTA III, VC & SA
      4. Tutorials
    2. Mod Showroom

      1. Scripts & Plugins
      2. Maps
      3. Total Conversions
      4. Vehicles
      5. Textures
      6. Characters
      7. Tools
      8. Other
      9. Workshop
    3. Featured Mods

      1. DYOM
      2. OpenIV
      3. GTA: Underground
      4. GTA: Liberty City
      5. GTA: State of Liberty
    1. Red Dead Redemption

    2. Rockstar Games

    1. Off-Topic

      1. General Chat
      2. Gaming
      3. Technology
      4. Programming
      5. Movies & TV
      6. Music
      7. Sports
      8. Vehicles
    2. Expression

      1. Graphics / Visual Arts
      2. GFX Requests & Tutorials
      3. Writers' Discussion
      4. Debates & Discussion
    1. News

    2. Forum Support

    3. Site Suggestions

Sign in to follow this  
X S

#GamerGate, or Wrath of the Slopebrowed Weaseldicks

Recommended Posts

The-King

f*ck Anita Sarkeesian for profiting off kicking a nest of hornets every single day (that bitch is making f*cking bank on this), f*ck Zoe Quinn for turning a genuine issue into a 'poor me' story, f*ck anyone who errs to the side of Social Justice and uses ad-hominem attacks to justify their points (that's literally all I've seen, not once has an SJW engaged in an argument that didn't end in an attack and subsequent block) and f*ck people who assume this mockery of real feminism is a representation of what feminism is all about. If your reaction to an opposing argument is to pull a fire alarm, plug your fingers in your ears, scream 'mysogeny' at everything and call anyone who disagrees with you a libertarian neckbeard, maybe you need to look inward and realize you're the one creating an issue where there is f*cking none.

 

I'm an avowed liberal, I support moderate socialism (single-payer healthcare, basic income/higher minimum-wage etc), I think Ayn Rand was a stuck up c*nt and Social Justice bullsh*ttery still pisses me off more than just about anything else in the world (outside of willfully ignorant right wing nut-f*cks). Don't f*cking assume my political leanings because I refuse to put up with people who assume everything is a form of oppression and lash out at anyone who disagrees with them.

 

And no, the irony of my post isn't lost on me, so if you're going to use that to attack me try something else.

Edited by The-King

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
X S

f*ck Anita Sarkeesian for profiting off kicking a nest of hornets every single day (that bitch is making f*cking bank on this), f*ck Zoe Quinn for turning a genuine issue into a 'poor me' story, f*ck anyone who errs to the side of Social Justice and uses ad-hominem attacks to justify their points (that's literally all I've seen, not once has an SJW engaged in an argument that didn't end in an attack and subsequent block) and f*ck people who assume this mockery of real feminism is a representation of what feminism is all about. If your reaction to an opposing argument is to pull a fire alarm, plug your fingers in your ears, scream 'mysogeny' at everything and call anyone who disagrees with you a libertarian neckbeard, maybe you need to look inward and realize you're the one creating an issue where there is f*cking none.

 

I'm an avowed liberal, I support moderate socialism (single-payer healthcare, basic income/higher minimum-wage etc), I think Ayn Rand was a stuck up c*nt and Social Justice bullsh*ttery still pisses me off more than just about anything else in the world (outside of willfully ignorant right wing nut-f*cks). Don't f*cking assume my political leanings because I refuse to put up with people who assume everything is a form of oppression and lash out at anyone who disagrees with them.

 

And no, the irony of my post isn't lost on me, so if you're going to use that to attack me try something else.

 

I award you one George Orwell and 10 internetz :lol:

 

1233928590_citizen%20kane%20clapping.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
DeafMetal

Anyone heard of the whole Gawker thing? They seem to be losing partners left and right.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Mr. House

f*ck Zoe Quinn for turning a genuine issue into a 'poor me' story,

Lol this thing LITERALLY started out from an ex boyfriend making false claims of infidelity for reviews, genius.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
The-King

 

f*ck Zoe Quinn for turning a genuine issue into a 'poor me' story,

Lol this thing LITERALLY started out from an ex boyfriend making false claims of infidelity for reviews, genius.

 

And? She still played the sympathy card and turned it into an us vs. them social issue instead of hashing it out like a god damned adult behind closed doors. She made it all about her and blaming society and anyone who disagreed with her for her ills and f*ck anything that comes before her acting like a martyr. If she were an adult who could handle stress and issues like an adult she'd have simply made a statement and then kept quiet, instead she lashed out at everyone that wasn't 100% for her and tried to become some sort of hero for feminism.

 

Also last I checked there's no verification over whether the claims were false or not, nor does their legitimacy factor into the gross overreactions she took following the initial backlash. I'd say the lady doth protest too much but in the end I don't care as the whole issue opened the valve for a bigger problem to come to light in that the current group in charge of a large portion of mainstream gaming 'journalism' are massively corrupt (morally and ethically) and terrified of any negative press coming out about them to the point of engaging in censorship on a massive scale and running smear campaigns against anyone who disagrees with them.

 

Let's also not forget to mention that she attacked anyone who criticized her game and demanded negative reviews be deleted despite every critique of the game I've read saying it's mediocre, preachy and tries too hard to be edgy. If you're not mature enough to take criticism for your product and actions and use it to better yourself (I'm looking at you Phil Fish) than you deserve neither respect nor admiration.

Edited by The-King

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Tchuck

I wish games were considered art, then developers would be free to create whatever they want.

 

I despise Sarkeesian, not because she's a "feminist", not because she's a "critic", but because she twists all of her "criticism" to fit her agenda and her own views of the world. Developers should be free to make the games and tell the stories they want to. If I want to make a story-based game about 5 dudes and their tribulations, then it's supposed to be a story-based game about 5 dudes and their tribulations, not an attack on how women are weak, or how they don't fit in the mainstream view, or whether or not my game would be better off if one of the dudes was a chick, if it would be more balanced, it might well be, but then it wouldn't be a story-based game about 5 dudes, it would be a story-based game about 4 dudes and a chick.

 

We get it, women are portrayed as weak, portrayed as defenseless, portrayed as a piece of scenery. And more often than not, they fit in the story in that way. Not every women character has to be an accurate representation of reality or a super powerful strong woman, just like not every male character is an accurate representation of reality or a super powerful strong man. If she were to properly analyze games, and explain why the story/game of, I don't know, Mario would have been better if Peach was not just a piece of cake for Mario, and give it as her opinion, and not as an absolute truth, then I'd welcome her speeches. But it's not. It's all to make herself feel powerful and proud and sh*t.

 

Heck, when I play games I'm not looking for some commentary on society or morals to adapt to my lives; I'm simply playing a game and enjoying the experience. I'm not thinking "Oh man, look at that woman character, she's so weak! haha women are so useless and only for sex!", I'm simply following the story and seeing what happens.

 

And again they generalize that every women is being treated unfairly in the industry, when not all of them are. I worked at EA alongside several women, and they all enjoyed their work and the industry and the environment very much. Of course, anecdotal evidence and all, there are plenty of women being treated unfairly, and it sucks and it should not happen; screaming about it in videos alongside your "criticism" of video games will not help accomplish that.

 

If you wanna do video game criticism, you can do video game criticism. Say why the story sucks, say why the plot is terrible, say why the characters are flat, but don't say that everything would be better if the characters were all strong confident women just because that's the way you like it. GTA wouldn't have been a "better game" if one of the main protagonists was a girl; it would have been a completely different game and that's it. Better or worse is subjective, and when it comes to video games as art, even more so. Just keep the politics and social correctness out of my games, most of the devs aren't actively out trying to undermine women in their games, they're just writing their stories.

 

Now, her aside, journalism in games is laughable. We all know it's a pay to win game, where the devs will pay for good reviews and that's it. Or sometimes you'll have things like Alien Isolation, where IGN gave it a 5.9, because the reviewer found the game too hard on the hard difficulty setting, and that a game about isolation and hiding made you spend too much time... in isolation and hiding. Oh and that it was too long. Aside from that, the game was superb, with the visuals were nailed spot on and the environment feeling great, and accomplished all those good things. And still earned a 5.9. Ridiculous.

 

And it's not just in big genres; in niche areas it happens the same way, as exemplified by this story. In the end, it's all bullsh*t.

 

TL;DR:

 

I wish games were considered art, so that game developers could make the games and tell the stories they wanted, and get fair criticism that would help make the games themselves better, and not to fit a particular stereotype or world view.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
El Dildo

 

f*ck Zoe Quinn for turning a genuine issue into a 'poor me' story,

this thing LITERALLY started out from an ex boyfriend making false claims of infidelity for reviews, genius.

 

I'm pretty sure there's been no verification of those claims.

one way or another.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Daz

-

It is a shame I can't like a post more than once.

 

Pretty much all the points I have been making against her since the start.

 

Besides, mainstream videogames really aren't the place to look for a good story anyway. You far more often find complete trash than something worthwhile.

 

Some sh*t sells, and some sh*t doesn't, they will only just go with what sells easily to the masses. And if that means jiggly tit physics then that is what they will do.

 

I happen to want a really decent and realistic Vietnam game, but there is literally no motherf*cking chance of that ever happening. It was rare to even get a straight up re-inactment of that war without some sort of weird element or sidetracked story to it.

 

There are games that we want made, and there are games that are going to be made regardless.

 

Besides, as I said before, judge each game separately as a whole off it's merits, don't pick and choose choice parts out of each to justify your own agenda.

 

Attacking the Hitman series for it's 'bad' portrayal of women is f*cking moronic, when we all know if she f*cking played the game she would know it has one of the strongest female characters out of any game, Diana, who has been there throughout.

 

Also what was quite humorous was taking jabs at Duke Nukem and throwing money at strippers. I mean for f*ck sake how pointless is that? What does she want? one overweight male giving a lapdance for every female poledancer? Because that sure makes a lot of sense. The whole thing is f*cking satire anyway. Only someone who isn't a gamer would come up with that sh*t.

 

Being offended doesn't make you in the right. There are people out there with a phobia of bananas, anyone will take offense to anything. I think the only reason people listened to her is they mistook it for someone standing up for something for a positive outcome, but it really had no merits.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Otter

Hashtags are the absolute worst.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
W1ddL3

Anyone heard of the whole Gawker thing? They seem to be losing partners left and right.

 

Yep. Seems Adobe has "distanced" themselves from Gawker.

 

Here's a couple of fairly neutral articles on the subject, although there are plenty of "Adobe are dicks for supporting the sexist neckbeards" articles out there if you'd rather read those.

 

http://www.businessinsider.com/adobe-pulls-gawker-sponsorship-2014-10

http://recode.net/2014/10/22/adobe-distances-self-from-gawker-after-writers-gamergate-tweet/

 

This comes after Intel pulled their advertising from Gamasutra earlier this month. Afterwards, Intel of course attempted to distance themselves from Gamergate but I don't think they're fooling anyone, especially as happened in the wake of Leigh Alexander's infamous "'Gamers' are over" piece.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
DeafMetal

 

-

-

I would be okay with the whole Anita-type thing if, instead of trying to change existing games, she used the donation money to create her own. Make the game she wants to make and let the free market decide if there's interest inn those types of games. She doesn't even have to market it ffs, she's friends with every gaming news outlet. If some hipster showed up on the Oprah show demanding that it have more guns and explosions to appeal to men because the tone of it offends him, he'd be laughed out by the media.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
W1ddL3

That would be fair enough, but I don't believe Sarkeesian gives a sh*t about games at all. She's just a narcissistic troll, and an annoyingly successful one at that.

Edited by Waldie

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
X S

Just look at GTA. It's considered one of the worst offenders of sexism, violence and stereotypes, yet close to two-thirds of it's online demographic of men choose to play as women! Not only is there an interest in playing with female characters, but there's plenty of games that provide the experience.

 

But what's beginning to bother me is the blatant censorship and opinionated responses stemming from both social websites and news outlets. Personally, I'm sick and tired of 4chan, which for many reasons has been considered the last bastion of free speech on the web. Rather than target threads related to "personal raids" and related crimes, 4chan's moderators have chosen to completely blanket the issue of Gamergate and delete every thread related to the subject. They are deliberately sweeping it under the carpet! Chris Poole, 4chan's founder, provided a response to the moderation, claiming that all threads were in violation of related crimes. Yet, he's attempting to police this policy with no regard for the actual content of the threads themselves.

 

He's been guilty of this before, when he removed the "News" aka /new/ board from 4chan a few years ago. The board was becoming a proliferation of stormfront and white-power threads, and although most of it was spam, a decent portion of the topics were actually worth discussing. Instead of ignoring controversial issues, many of us chose to engage in heated debates on the facts and claims of controversial issues you wouldn't normally discuss in public. So instead of moderating /new/, Chris Poole decided to shut it down, only then to re-open the board as "Politically Incorrect" aka /pol/ a few years later. Did he learn anything from that? Obviously not. You can't silence an opposition by pretending it doesn't exist. Not only does that not work, but it encourages the opposition to speak even louder. As a result, 4chan users have sought refuge in mirror sites like 2chan and 8chan.

 

Then you have the media, and their childish articles, attempting to marginalize 4chan users. The author uses insults such as "nerds, virgins, neckbeards, misogynists, homophobes". Is that mature journalism? Why are these people even allowed to write? It's quite a pathetic read:

 

http://gawker.com/these-are-the-creepy-4chan-successors-behind-gamergates-1648966614/+kcampbelldollaghan

 

Then you have Reddit, which isn't exactly the place to voice an opinion, but that's because of the systemic circle-jerk it encourages in voting up or down. With that said, it didn't surprise me that Reddit, too, joined the fight to silence discussion on Gamergate. On Sept. 15, Julian Assange of Wikileaks held an AMA on Reddit, and was asked a question on Gamergate. He was then later banned. You can see below:

 

c22.jpg

 

003.jpg

 

This is what's beginning to bother me. Not the generalizing committed by feminists or the "liberal media", but the apparent lack of responsibility on the part either 4chan, Reddit, or any other related site, to recognize that censorship is not an option. If 4chan or Reddit can't police threads directly related to personal attacks, raids or related crimes, then it's not their fault. Who are they to think they could possibly police that? No website could.

 

What if the issues at stake were much more meaningful and important? What then would these sites do? Why has this issue become so much more than just a back-page news article? To me, it's unnerving.

Edited by Crossed Sabres

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
make total destroy

A Summary Of The Gamergate Movement That We Will Immediately Change If Any Of Its Members Find Any Details Objectionable

 

Even if you’re only a casual internet user, chances are that by now you’ve probably heard something about the movement known as Gamergate. If you’re unfamiliar with what Gamergate is, we’ve taken the liberty of writing up a brief summary of the movement and its goals, which we will immediately change if anything in it offends anyone who associates with Gamergate.

What is Gamergate?

Gamergate is a movement of video game fans who are fighting to achieve something involving ethics in gaming journalism using reasonable, measured debate. Note, though, that should a single word of that description make members of the Gamergate movement angry or uncomfortable, we are perfectly willing to rewrite it. Please just let us know!

What do members of Gamergate want?

One need only spend three or four hours perusing Gamergate message boards to know that the main thing members of the movement want is ethics in gaming journalism—there aren’t enough ethics, and so, one way or another, there will have to be more ethics. They might want other things too, but we had a hard time figuring out what they were. Again, if you’re a member of Gamergate who feels like we didn’t get this part exactly right, please just tell us what you want added or removed, and you can consider it done. We don’t want any trouble.

What’s “wrong” with Gamergate?

Coverage of Gamergate by certain media outlets ***that we do not necessarily agree with*** has focused on a long series of female game designers and critics who have been forced to flee their homes after individuals identifying with the Gamergate movement bombarded them with a significant amount of online harassment, followed by explicit threats to rape and murder them. This has led many to decry Gamergate as somehow misogynistic or violent, and is an aspect of this whole issue we’d readily omit here if members of the movement told us to.

Because it’s only one side of the story! The rape threats and hate speech are coming from only one, extremely vocal, extremely visible faction within Gamergate. These radical individuals distract from the main message of Gamergate. It is important to remember that the members of Gamergate, only some of whom threaten to rape and murder women, are simply fighting for ethics in gaming journalism.

How is Gamergate answering its critics?

In order to clarify their message, members of Gamergate have seen to it that any individual who unfairly singles out the violent and bigoted aspects of the movement for criticism immediately becomes the target of sustained online harassment. Needless to say, we don’t mean for that last sentence to sound like a criticism of Gamergate. We’d even go so far as to say that anybody critical of Gamergate probably had it coming, if that is better.

Listen: If you’re thinking about targeting the authors of this article, or mounting a campaign to get funding for this website pulled, please reconsider, and instead, just tell us how to make this thing look the way you want it to look.

Is Gamergate a vast, complex, and diverse community?

Yes! It is not composed, as the mainstream media would lead you to believe, solely of white male trolls. It also has female trolls. It has African-American trolls and Asian trolls, gay trolls and straight trolls. In fact, Gamergate is all about the inclusion of anyone—regardless of gender, race, or sexual orientation—whose views on video games and how we should think about them conform exactly to those of the movement at large.

———

Is that right? If you are a member of Gamergate, let us know if that is not right, or if any of that made you angry. We’ll change it right away. We want to accurately reflect your dedication to something involving ethics in journalism. We want to tell the world about what you are trying to build. Or destroy. We don’t know. It’s been a bit tricky to piece together what it is you’re trying to do and how you’re trying to do it.

We would hasten to add, before our Twitter feed is turned into a hellish garbage dump for the worst discussion ever conducted on the internet, that these women driven from their homes, these journalists targeted by hate campaigns, and these websites financially punished for their dissent are all unfortunate victims of a few fringe individuals within Gamergate. That these are the movement’s only tangible achievements so far does not change the fact that this is, at its core, a concerned community dedicated to having a reasonable discussion about ethics in journalism.

And that’s the best part of the whole thing, right? That Gamergate, as a legitimate movement arguing in good faith, can accept criticism and dissent without resorting to vitriolic censorship or threats of violence.

Unless you guys aren’t into that. If not, then that’s totally fine. Just look this whole thing over and tell us if there’s anything we should change. Email all of your demands to [email protected]. We’ll get on it right away.

Like you, we value ethics in journalism, and will alter our content in whatever way you feel best supports those values.

Please don’t hurt us.

Edited by make total destroy

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I cucked Alex Jones

 

f*ck Anita Sarkeesian for profiting off kicking a nest of hornets every single day (that bitch is making f*cking bank on this), f*ck Zoe Quinn for turning a genuine issue into a 'poor me' story, f*ck anyone who errs to the side of Social Justice and uses ad-hominem attacks to justify their points (that's literally all I've seen, not once has an SJW engaged in an argument that didn't end in an attack and subsequent block) and f*ck people who assume this mockery of real feminism is a representation of what feminism is all about. If your reaction to an opposing argument is to pull a fire alarm, plug your fingers in your ears, scream 'mysogeny' at everything and call anyone who disagrees with you a libertarian neckbeard, maybe you need to look inward and realize you're the one creating an issue where there is f*cking none.

 

I'm an avowed liberal, I support moderate socialism (single-payer healthcare, basic income/higher minimum-wage etc), I think Ayn Rand was a stuck up c*nt and Social Justice bullsh*ttery still pisses me off more than just about anything else in the world (outside of willfully ignorant right wing nut-f*cks). Don't f*cking assume my political leanings because I refuse to put up with people who assume everything is a form of oppression and lash out at anyone who disagrees with them.

 

And no, the irony of my post isn't lost on me, so if you're going to use that to attack me try something else.

 

I award you one George Orwell and 10 internetz :lol:

 

1233928590_citizen%20kane%20clapping.gif

 

Mistaking George Orwell for Orson Welles is the most offensive thing in this topic.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
make total destroy

dyslexia ftw

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
X S

I wanted to add this to my previous post about several media outlets continuing to pretend that these issues are irrelevant. This video also points out that the articles attempting to address it have been completely unprofessional.

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Km3DZQp0StE

 

Who is H.G. Wells?

 

I'll take "Trolled Softly" for 500, please. :catloaf:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Otter

Anyone who throws around "SJW" while complaining about ad hominem in the same breath is a f*cking hypocrite.

 

Regardless, this entire - movement? Statement? Gang? - thing has inflated beyond repair: #gamergate has no leadership, no focus, no f*cking point.

 

This is the sort of sh*t happening because of this idiotic 'movement':

 

http://www.theguardian.com/technology/2014/oct/23/felicia-days-public-details-online-gamergate

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Dumb guy

WOW!!!

People should just go back to playing video games.

I think I will after reading these two pages of.....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Moonshield

 

 

The former NFL star Chris Kluwe, whose own post against Gamergate went viral after he called members of the group “slackjawed pickletits”, “slopebrowed weaseldicks” and a “basement-dwelling, cheetos-huffing, poopsock-sniffing douchepistol”, made the point himself.

 

lol

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Coin

Stopped reading after the first sentence of his 'answer'. 'lol' indeed.

Edited by Insert-Coin-To-Continue

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Otter

Indeed! The scandal!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
DeafMetal

Guardian link. Felicia Day.

 

If someone were to mention something like Adam Baldwin interviewing with Fox News as noteworthy enough to blanket-label an entire group of people, everyone would scream fire.

 

Edit: link related: http://www.reddit.com/r/KotakuInAction/comments/2jguxg/the_guardian_accidentally_sent_out_an_internal/ (the Ralph Retort site is not something I really like since they dwell too much in personal attacks, but they do get to the point)

 

pic for the link-loathers:

GUARDIANEMAIL1.png

Edited by DeafMetal

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Otter

Speak english, please, guv.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
DeafMetal

Speak english, please, guv.

I'm saying that the source of the link is questionable. i.e., it's a liberally-minded news outlet interviewing a TV actress. I am making the point that if someone were to use a Fox News, a conservative news outlet, interview with Adam Baldwin, a TV actor, people would think the source is questionable. I think it's pretty short-sighted to use an interview from that type of source as a base to say that X peoples are idiots.

 

Also: see above pic. A leaked Guardian email to internal Guardian staff. Note the subject line and the content of the email. You can't expect a fair report from a site that has an agenda with this subject.

 

Canadian edit: eh

Edited by DeafMetal

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Otter

Hmm. You seem to have misread my post. I called the 'movement' idiotic, because, well, it lacks everything a movement requires. As for my source, well, I'd link a fox news report starring adam baldwin stroking off glen beck if it was a report about a public statement that ANYONE can find.

 

The joy of #gamergate, I suppose, is seeing the very worst aspects of internet 'debate' all lumped together in one steaming pile of self righteous dogsh*t. Good times.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
DeafMetal

What are the prerequisites for something to be a movement, if I may ask?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
make total destroy

this movement is making me have a bowel movement

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Otter

To what end would you have me lead you down that path, Deaf? #Gamergate is nay but a fart in the wind.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
X S

>patiently waits for South Park to do an episode on GamerGate

 

:jackthompson:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Sign in to follow this  

  • 1 User Currently Viewing
    0 members, 0 Anonymous, 1 Guest

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using GTAForums.com, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.