GTA Online: Rumors & Speculation

[o TallMarcos o]

BLISTA COMPACT ON PS3

[Starsky83]

BLISTA COMPACT ON PS3

Theres one up near paleto bay too

[HKM87]

BLISTA COMPACT ON PS3

It is a piece of junk. That's how this car is.

[FourFingersOfFun]

I'm watching a stream right now and holy sh*t this game looks absolutely stunning.

 

Hopefully heists come before December

[CrysisAverted]

I'm watching a stream right now and holy sh*t this game looks absolutely stunning.

 

Hopefully heists come before December

Yeah and you can count the amount of cars on screen with 1 hand too!

[FourFingersOfFun]

 

 

I'm watching a stream right now and holy sh*t this game looks absolutely stunning.

 

Hopefully heists come before December

Yeah and you can count the amount of cars on screen with 1 hand too!

Well the guy in watching is in a bad sport lobby with like 5 other people so there's a good amount of cars. Also when you crash pieces of debris and sparks come flying out of your car. Looks pretty awesome

[CrysisAverted]

But is the airport still as lively as it is in singleplayer?

[FourFingersOfFun]

But is the airport still as lively as it is in singleplayer?

I don't think so, watched a guy grab a heli from the airport and it didn't seem as lively as singleplayer.

[OfficialTwiggz]

But is the airport still as lively as it is in singleplayer?

I saw an npc jet, Valor I believe flying above the airport. No idea where he was headed.

 

But sure what you mean by lively though

[tenpennyisplainevil]

 

But is the airport still as lively as it is in singleplayer?

I saw an npc jet, Valor I believe flying above the airport. No idea where he was headed.

 

But sure what you mean by lively though

 

 

 

But is the airport still as lively as it is in singleplayer?

I saw an npc jet, Valor I believe flying above the airport. No idea where he was headed.

 

But sure what you mean by lively though

 

He was headed to Las Venturas! LV and SF DLC confirmed

[luisniko]

I thought you guys wanted Rockstar to push it to the limit, especially in the graphic quality. Now they've done it, but they've got to sacrifice other things.

 

Think as if PS3 was 1 litre bucket, then GTAV was 0.80 litre water. If PS4 was 2 litre bucket, then GTAV was 1.80 litre water. If you fill more water, lift the bucket with that hit-the-limit amount of water inside and walk, of course the water will splash away and eventually lose some, right? Do you want your GTA Online to lag and crash more just because of animal Npc? Hell, it crash and freeze enough even without animals.

 

And anyway, why do you need animal NPC when you already see real animals ruining your play time in GTAO.

[CrysisAverted]

Yeah f*ck gameplay, its all about graphics!

[Richard Power Colt]

 

But is the airport still as lively as it is in singleplayer?

I saw an npc jet, Valor I believe flying above the airport. No idea where he was headed.

 

But sure what you mean by lively though

 

Woah woah woah, you mean a jet as in the Jumbo Jet? IN MULTIPLAYER?!?!?!?

[Starsky83]

I thought you guys wanted Rockstar to push it to the limit, especially in the graphic quality. Now they've done it, but they've got to sacrifice other things.

 

Think as if PS3 was 1 litre bucket, then GTAV was 0.80 litre water. If PS4 was 2 litre bucket, then GTAV was 1.80 litre water. If you fill more water, lift the bucket with that hit-the-limit amount of water inside and walk, of course the water will splash away and eventually lose some, right? Do you want your GTA Online to lag and crash more just because of animal Npc? Hell, it crash and freeze enough even without animals.

 

And anyway, why do you need animal NPC when you already see real animals ruining your play time in GTAO.

Nice someone who gets it. I love it, R* cant win no matter what they do. People whinge about freezes and lagging yet they wont more detail. People whinge about last gen not get stuff but if R* did add it, it would look crap cos of console limitations (inb4 people whinge about my limitation comment, look at the spec of your smartphone, they are much higher then the last gen consoles) Then people would whinge that it looks crap on last gen. Ffs its a never ending loop of stupid lol

[Richard Power Colt]

 

I thought you guys wanted Rockstar to push it to the limit, especially in the graphic quality. Now they've done it, but they've got to sacrifice other things.

 

Think as if PS3 was 1 litre bucket, then GTAV was 0.80 litre water. If PS4 was 2 litre bucket, then GTAV was 1.80 litre water. If you fill more water, lift the bucket with that hit-the-limit amount of water inside and walk, of course the water will splash away and eventually lose some, right? Do you want your GTA Online to lag and crash more just because of animal Npc? Hell, it crash and freeze enough even without animals.

 

And anyway, why do you need animal NPC when you already see real animals ruining your play time in GTAO.

Nice someone who gets it. I love it, R* cant win no matter what they do. People whinge about freezes and lagging yet they wont more detail. People whinge about last gen not get stuff but if R* did add it, it would look crap cos of console limitations (inb4 people whinge about my limitation comment, look at the spec of your smartphone, they are much higher then the last gen consoles) Then people would whinge that it looks crap on last gen. Ffs its a never ending loop of stupid lol

 

GTA Online has way more potential than what R* can deliver at this point. Fans have too many hopes and dreams for this game that can never come true.

Edited November 16, 2014 by GTAandStuff

[Starsky83]

 

 

 

I thought you guys wanted Rockstar to push it to the limit, especially in the graphic quality. Now they've done it, but they've got to sacrifice other things.

 

Think as if PS3 was 1 litre bucket, then GTAV was 0.80 litre water. If PS4 was 2 litre bucket, then GTAV was 1.80 litre water. If you fill more water, lift the bucket with that hit-the-limit amount of water inside and walk, of course the water will splash away and eventually lose some, right? Do you want your GTA Online to lag and crash more just because of animal Npc? Hell, it crash and freeze enough even without animals.

 

And anyway, why do you need animal NPC when you already see real animals ruining your play time in GTAO.

Nice someone who gets it. I love it, R* cant win no matter what they do. People whinge about freezes and lagging yet they wont more detail. People whinge about last gen not get stuff but if R* did add it, it would look crap cos of console limitations (inb4 people whinge about my limitation comment, look at the spec of your smartphone, they are much higher then the last gen consoles) Then people would whinge that it looks crap on last gen. Ffs its a never ending loop of stupid lol

 

GTA Online has way more potential than what R* can deliver at this point.

Yeah on a PC maybe

[Richard Power Colt]

 

 

 

I thought you guys wanted Rockstar to push it to the limit, especially in the graphic quality. Now they've done it, but they've got to sacrifice other things.

 

Think as if PS3 was 1 litre bucket, then GTAV was 0.80 litre water. If PS4 was 2 litre bucket, then GTAV was 1.80 litre water. If you fill more water, lift the bucket with that hit-the-limit amount of water inside and walk, of course the water will splash away and eventually lose some, right? Do you want your GTA Online to lag and crash more just because of animal Npc? Hell, it crash and freeze enough even without animals.

 

And anyway, why do you need animal NPC when you already see real animals ruining your play time in GTAO.

Nice someone who gets it. I love it, R* cant win no matter what they do. People whinge about freezes and lagging yet they wont more detail. People whinge about last gen not get stuff but if R* did add it, it would look crap cos of console limitations (inb4 people whinge about my limitation comment, look at the spec of your smartphone, they are much higher then the last gen consoles) Then people would whinge that it looks crap on last gen. Ffs its a never ending loop of stupid lol

 

GTA Online has way more potential than what R* can deliver at this point.

Yeah on a PC maybe

 

Well mods will obviously give us almost everything we want lol. I'm happy to own the platform. Though too many mods can make the game a buggy mess as well.

Edited November 16, 2014 by GTAandStuff

[Starsky83]

 

 

 

 

 

I thought you guys wanted Rockstar to push it to the limit, especially in the graphic quality. Now they've done it, but they've got to sacrifice other things.

 

Think as if PS3 was 1 litre bucket, then GTAV was 0.80 litre water. If PS4 was 2 litre bucket, then GTAV was 1.80 litre water. If you fill more water, lift the bucket with that hit-the-limit amount of water inside and walk, of course the water will splash away and eventually lose some, right? Do you want your GTA Online to lag and crash more just because of animal Npc? Hell, it crash and freeze enough even without animals.

 

And anyway, why do you need animal NPC when you already see real animals ruining your play time in GTAO.

Nice someone who gets it. I love it, R* cant win no matter what they do. People whinge about freezes and lagging yet they wont more detail. People whinge about last gen not get stuff but if R* did add it, it would look crap cos of console limitations (inb4 people whinge about my limitation comment, look at the spec of your smartphone, they are much higher then the last gen consoles) Then people would whinge that it looks crap on last gen. Ffs its a never ending loop of stupid lol

 

GTA Online has way more potential than what R* can deliver at this point.

Yeah on a PC maybe

 

Well mods will obviously give us almost everything we want lol. I'm happy to own the platform. Though too many mods can make the game a buggy mess as well.

Yeah Im a console gamer, but do understand that PC just has way more potential. Though as you say the number of PC gamers Ive seen that have all the setting cranked up but the framerate is like 15fps is just a joke lol.

[CrysisAverted]

 

 

 

 

 

I thought you guys wanted Rockstar to push it to the limit, especially in the graphic quality. Now they've done it, but they've got to sacrifice other things.

 

Think as if PS3 was 1 litre bucket, then GTAV was 0.80 litre water. If PS4 was 2 litre bucket, then GTAV was 1.80 litre water. If you fill more water, lift the bucket with that hit-the-limit amount of water inside and walk, of course the water will splash away and eventually lose some, right? Do you want your GTA Online to lag and crash more just because of animal Npc? Hell, it crash and freeze enough even without animals.

 

And anyway, why do you need animal NPC when you already see real animals ruining your play time in GTAO.

Nice someone who gets it. I love it, R* cant win no matter what they do. People whinge about freezes and lagging yet they wont more detail. People whinge about last gen not get stuff but if R* did add it, it would look crap cos of console limitations (inb4 people whinge about my limitation comment, look at the spec of your smartphone, they are much higher then the last gen consoles) Then people would whinge that it looks crap on last gen. Ffs its a never ending loop of stupid lol

 

GTA Online has way more potential than what R* can deliver at this point.

Yeah on a PC maybe

 

Well mods will obviously give us almost everything we want lol. I'm happy to own the platform. Though too many mods can make the game a buggy mess as well.

Yeah Im a console gamer, but do understand that PC just has way more potential. Though as you say the number of PC gamers Ive seen that have all the setting cranked up but the framerate is like 15fps is just a joke lol.

 

Well of course, not everyone is capable of running 4k betwen a triple monitor setup

[OfficialTwiggz]

 

 

 

But is the airport still as lively as it is in singleplayer?

I saw an npc jet, Valor I believe flying above the airport. No idea where he was headed.

 

But sure what you mean by lively though

 

Woah woah woah, you mean a jet as in the Jumbo Jet? IN MULTIPLAYER?!?!?!?

Noooo, a black private jet. It was an npc though, not a player. He was just flying low, about to land or just taking off.

[Richard Power Colt]

 

 

 

But is the airport still as lively as it is in singleplayer?

I saw an npc jet, Valor I believe flying above the airport. No idea where he was headed.

 

But sure what you mean by lively though

 

Woah woah woah, you mean a jet as in the Jumbo Jet? IN MULTIPLAYER?!?!?!?

Noooo, a black private jet. It was an npc though, not a player. He was just flying low, about to land or just taking off.

 

DAMN! I feel like the jumbo jet is something they absolutely should have put in for Online. Though we still have a huge patch coming tomorrow and I'm personally buying it on PC anyways so mods.

[OfficialTwiggz]

My pc is sh*t, and used to edit videos and for my roommate to play WoW. That's mainly it lol. Otherwise I'd definitely upgrade to pc and take full advantage of the mods that will be offered. I wanna play lspdfr.

[Privatebush86]

I've got a core i5 machine that's had onboard graphics until I bought an R7 260X a few weeks ago. A graphics card that's comparable to the gfx in the Xbox One (there's no direct comparison as each chipset has its pros and cons) but its on the level with, if not better than the Xbox One's graphics. It cost me £79.99.

 

Looking forward to January for those "Next Gen" GTA graphics for under £100!!

 

http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/digitalfoundry-2014-r7-260x-vs-next-gen-console

Edited November 16, 2014 by Privatebush86

[D.A.]

Meanwhile all the people playing and having fun with GTAV regardless of how it looks.

[Privatebush86]

^this.

 

Don't get me wrong, 360 >*

[D.A.]

^this.

 

Don't get me wrong, 360 >*

Well PC is gonna look absolutelly amazing,can't wait for all the high res screenshots,but there's NO way I would wait for this game till January just to have it...prettier.

[CaptainMarvel]

I thought you guys wanted Rockstar to push it to the limit, especially in the graphic quality. Now they've done it, but they've got to sacrifice other things.

Think as if PS3 was 1 litre bucket, then GTAV was 0.80 litre water. If PS4 was 2 litre bucket, then GTAV was 1.80 litre water. If you fill more water, lift the bucket with that hit-the-limit amount of water inside and walk, of course the water will splash away and eventually lose some, right? Do you want your GTA Online to lag and crash more just because of animal Npc? Hell, it crash and freeze enough even without animals.

And anyway, why do you need animal NPC when you already see real animals ruining your play time in GTAO.

Yeah f*ck gameplay, its all about graphics!

 

You two are the cutest couple. Congratulations on finding love on the Internet.

[Andropov]

I thought you guys wanted Rockstar to push it to the limit, especially in the graphic quality. Now they've done it, but they've got to sacrifice other things.

 

Think as if PS3 was 1 litre bucket, then GTAV was 0.80 litre water. If PS4 was 2 litre bucket, then GTAV was 1.80 litre water. If you fill more water, lift the bucket with that hit-the-limit amount of water inside and walk, of course the water will splash away and eventually lose some, right? Do you want your GTA Online to lag and crash more just because of animal Npc? Hell, it crash and freeze enough even without animals.

 

And anyway, why do you need animal NPC when you already see real animals ruining your play time in GTAO.

 

Why do you think animal-NPCs are more resource-intensive than any other NPCs? I can't think of a reason.

[Jaggs]

 

I thought you guys wanted Rockstar to push it to the limit, especially in the graphic quality. Now they've done it, but they've got to sacrifice other things.

 

Think as if PS3 was 1 litre bucket, then GTAV was 0.80 litre water. If PS4 was 2 litre bucket, then GTAV was 1.80 litre water. If you fill more water, lift the bucket with that hit-the-limit amount of water inside and walk, of course the water will splash away and eventually lose some, right? Do you want your GTA Online to lag and crash more just because of animal Npc? Hell, it crash and freeze enough even without animals.

 

And anyway, why do you need animal NPC when you already see real animals ruining your play time in GTAO.

 

Why do you think animal-NPCs are more resource-intensive than any other NPCs? I can't think of a reason.

 

 

My guess would be model memory and loading other animation sets, but I actually think because it's next gen it should not be that big a deal. In most forest areas your console isn't loading pedestrians anyway so loading a deer or two should be that problematic. I think it's a real bummer and that the animals will roam Online one day.

[sweetbrother]

I was just thinking... do you think Rockstar is watching these forums for feedback on the leaks right now?